[governance] Comments on latest version of chairs paper

[Adam Peake]

>
>Please also however help clarify whether one of your last interventions
>asking us to advise on 3 Options still apply.


See my email 
<https://ssl.cpsr.org/pipermail/governance/2005-October/004147.html>

I made suggestions about the tasks we might want to take on.  They were:

(1) making our case for full participation in the resumed session of prepcom 3.
(2) responding to the chair's draft of chapter 3, noting that we 
should first look again at the statements read by civil society 
during the Geneva prepcom.
(3) writing our own statement, with the suggestion that it cover 
forum, oversight, development.

Responding to the chair's paper and writing our own statement could 
be done in parallel (if people are willing to do it.)

Looking again at the Geneva statements would be a good starting 
point, this is text we already have to hand, was drafted on the basis 
of earlier statements and discussions on the list. I sent copies of 
the statements I thought most relevant (see mail archive as above) 
and all statements should be online <http://www.net-gov.org/docs.php> 
The oversight statement I sent yesterday (inc. host country 
agreement) was an attempt to get a few comments on specific text and 
issues.


>Option 3 included writing up
>our own statement, which you then referred to a list of issues which
>included the "host country agreement" section. Are you now saying that only
>the comments mentioned below is now the new strategy.


No!

Thanks,

Adam



>Just thought I would
>ask as I too was getting confused about what we were trying to do and
>comment on.
>
>Thanks,
>Laina
>
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance