[governance] Food for thought & next steps..

[ian.peter at ianpeter.com]

Rober I agree with your approach - lets isolate the key components in 
forum and
detailed governance proposals and food for thought document and compare 
and see
where we have a common position we can support or caution against.

In parallel, we can comment on any proposed wording changes to the draft
document under the separate topic.

Can someone prepare a draft of key points we should comment on or consider?



Ian Peter
Senior Partner
Ian Peter and Associates Pty Ltd
PO Box 10670 Adelaide St
Brisbane 4000
Australia
Tel +617 3870 1181
Fax +617 3105 7404
Mob +614 1966 7772
www.ianpeter.com
www.internetmark2.org (Creating Tomorrow's Internet)
www.nethistory.info (Winner, PC Mag Top 100 Sites Award Spring 2005)


Quoting Robert Guerra <rguerra at lists.privaterra.org>:

> As for documents for CS to comment on - well, there sees to be a pool
> of documents:
>
> - The latest version of the chair's document
> - Food for Thought paper - a document, that many countries didn't
> even want to see tabled (US, Ghana, Canada, and others)...will they
> even care to use it, or ignore it all together...?
> - Proposals: EU, Brazil, Argentinean, and others
>
> The Argentinean proposal, didn't manage to get the discussion it
> could have as right after it was tabled Pakistan asked the chair
> (also from Pakistan) to come up with a food for thought paper... I'm
> not sure how all of you read the situation...
>
> That being said, the fact is that there are some key proposals on the
> table. An idea - can we analyse the different proposals,  and come up
> with a CS response...How to do that -  we compare the elements found
> in each of the proposals. Let's see what is common, what's
> different , and what's missing all together.
>
> If anything, the caucus would have something to say to each of the
> proponents. By adding our own elements - well, we'd have something
> positive to contribute.
>
> well, that's my suggestion. Comments anyone?
>
>
> regards,
>
> Robert
>
> --
> Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.org>
> Managing Director, Privaterra <http://www.privaterra.org>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 17-Oct-05, at 10:02 PM, ian.peter at ianpeter.com wrote:
>
>>
>> I'll have a look, Adam.
>>
>> One thing though - are there changes that we are aware governments are
>> going to
>> want in the sections that are still not agreed? One of the
>> difficulties is its
>> easy to comment on the draft, but not so easy to prepare in advance
>> positions
>> on issues that are like to be raised...
>>
>> I guess this particularly applies to 76 on. In this respect is the
>> chairs Food
>> for Thought at
>> http://www.itu.int/wsis/documents/doc_multi.asp?lang=en&id=2125|0
>> at all relevant to your needs at present? It covers forum etc to a
>> larger degree
>> - do we need to comment on it as well at this stage?
> _______________________________________________
> governance mailing list
> governance at lists.cpsr.org
> https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance
>



_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance