[governance] oversight

[McTim]

Hello, Laina,

On 10/17/05, Laina Raveendran Greene <laina at getit.org> wrote:
> at whether there
> are other countries that may make it easier to do this e.g. in Switzerland,
> and suggest a timeframe to get ICANN moved over- recognising this is a
> process which will take time- i.e keeping status quo until details are
> worked out.

Do you honestly think ICANN would go for this?

I believe this is a non-starter.  I think talking about this would be
a waste of cycles.

> I think this is an important factor to keep inmind instead of just saying
> let's have a host country agreement.
>

This is probably not something the US would agree to either.  I might
be wrong, but in the current polarised environment, I don't think so.

> Alternatively, as I suggested before, we can agree to principles first and
> set deadlines time wise to ensure things happen and agree on the process on
> input to make this happen. This is where we can then make a concrete "text"
> as Jeanette and Adam are pushing us to do.

and we'd be wasting our time IMO.

--
Cheers,

McTim
nic-hdl:      TMCG

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance