[governance] preparations for prepcom 3 in tunis
Vittorio Bertola
vb at bertola.eu.org
Mon Oct 17 08:13:04 EDT 2005
Il giorno ven, 14-10-2005 alle 22:51 +0900, Adam Peake ha scritto:
> Hi,
To cut it short, I agree with your plan, and I am available to
contribute text. I think that in any case civil society should be ready
with an alternate formulation of section 5, and perhaps of the entire
chapter 3, and I would be more than happy to contribute (even if we have
only three weeks for that... is that really feasible?).
In any case, I had written an expanded version (attached) of my Forum
proposal, which I tried to submit by August 15 - unfortunately, it was
rejected as I submitted it as an individual. I know that not everyone
agrees with my specific ideas for the Forum, but perhaps we can use this
document as a starting point to prepare a detailed Forum proposal by
civil society.
I am wondering whether we should spawn three very small (3-4 people)
online working groups to draft each of the three parts you were
suggesting for the statement (forum, oversight, development). Does this
sound like a good idea?
--
vb. [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<-----
http://bertola.eu.org/ <- Prima o poi...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: WGIG Report Comments - Internet Policy Task Force.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 20901 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20051017/a40cc17c/attachment.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list