[governance] : oversight

[Laina Raveendran Greene]

Thanks for that correction Robert. Glad to see you are very well on top of
people and things.:>

Meanwhile, I would also appreciate some comments on the other points. Nice
to finally get some reaction to my comments though it would be nice if it
was not just to correct my mistakes. :; 

Laina 

-----Original Message-----
From: governance-bounces at lists.cpsr.org
[mailto:governance-bounces at lists.cpsr.org] On Behalf Of Robert Guerra
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2005 11:05 PM
To: Laina Raveendran Greene
Cc: governance at lists.cpsr.org
Subject: Re: [governance] oversight



On 16-Oct-05, at 4:13 PM, Laina Raveendran Greene wrote:

>
>
> Bottom line, for sure, a California 501 (c) corporation, which ICANN 
> is now alone is not acceptable (from what I understand,one of the main 
> form of recourse if one is dissatisfied with ICANN, is to make 
> complaints to the US attorney general, who then decides whether to 
> take up the case).
>
It's not the US attorney general, but the one in California...Bill Lockyer
to be exact..
http://caag.state.ca.us/

regards

Robert

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance