[governance] latest canadian proposal on the forum

[Izumi AIZU]

Isn't it time for us, CS IG Caucus, and CS at large, how to
get involved with the formation process of the Forum,
in a relatively organized manner, say, seriously that the
formation process itself should be of multistakeholder
approach and we are ready to be part of the small
lean bureau, meaning we are also professional and
technical in a broad sense when it comes to Internet
governance.

izumi

At 20:47 05/11/14 +0100, Jeanette Hofmann wrote:
>I'd find it unfortunate if the question of hosting the forum becomes
>reduced to the UN versus private sector cleavage. While I don't mind at
>all for the UN SG to initiate the forum, I would hope for more creative
>solutions wrt the long term hosting. I've been told that the EU is
>considering a proposal.
>
>Whoever hosts the forum, I would hope for an organization that shows
>some sympathy to the idea of a new forum.
>
>jeanette
>
>Vittorio Bertola wrote:
> > Milton Mueller ha scritto:
> >
> >>The idea that ISOC should organize and manage the forum is a
> >>non-starter. Forget about it. That's basically the same as saying that
> >>ICANN and the U.S. private sector should organize and manage it.
> >
> >
> > News from that room now say that the idea has already been killed, and
> > current text says that "The UN Secretary General, in an open and
> > inclusive manner, should set up..."
>_______________________________________________
>governance mailing list
>governance at lists.cpsr.org
>https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance