[governance] and more Re: Ideas that this mailing list has agreed to
Jacqueline Morris
jam at jacquelinemorris.com
Wed Nov 9 14:39:18 EST 2005
But that is exactly what I said -
re ownership is -
NOT the Government , but the NATION or COUNTRY- which is the people,
which is sometimes/often PARTICULARLY NOT the Government.
Jacqueline
On 11/9/05, Avri Doria <avri at psg.com> wrote:
> Actually that is exactly what I do not agree to.
>
> I do not think .uk belongs to the British government, but rather
> pertains to the British people. I think that finding the correct
> stewart for that is not necessarily as simple as saying that it
> belongs to the government. It may be the case that the government is
> the right stewart but i don't think is an a priori given, or that we
> should be the ones making that declaration.
>
> a.
>
> >
> On 9 nov 2005, at 10.50, Jacqueline Morris wrote:
>
> > Agree
> > How about something like:
> > We agree that the ccTLDs are the sovereign property of the countries,
> > and believe that there is therefore a requirement for more active
> > participation of Governments in the Internet Governance process,
> > particularly, to take the lead in managing their ccTLDs, and agree to
> > do so with the full involvement and participation of the local
> > Internet community and civil society through a bottom-up
> > multi-stakeholder process. -
> >
> > Cause I don't think that there is need for dialogue on whether .uk
> > belongs to the UK - who else COULD it belong to? Now as to the
> > question as to why the difference between country property and
> > government property - that is again a cultural thing - I KNOW that
> > there is a difference here. In most other places, there isn't.
> >
> > Jacqueline
> >
> > On 11/9/05, Avri Doria <avri at psg.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 9 nov 2005, at 08.59, Adam Peake (ajp at glocom.ac.jp) wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> 52. We also agree with the US government that governments have
> >>> legitimate public policy and sovereignty concerns with respect to
> >>> the
> >>> management of their ccTLD,
> >>>
> >>
> >> i don't agree with this as I do beleive that the ccTLDs should be
> >> automatically acknowledged as sovereign property.
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> a) in keeping with the US government's recognition that governments
> >>> have legitimate public policy and sovereignty concerns with
> >>> respect to
> >>> the management of their ccTLD, and has welcomed the further
> >>> opportunity for dialogue on these issues and seems committed to
> >>> ensuring progress,
> >>>
> >>
> >> i would prefer that this acknowledgment not be included.
> >>
> >>
> >> a.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> governance mailing list
> >> governance at lists.cpsr.org
> >> https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jacqueline Morris
> > www.carnivalondenet.com
> > T&T Music and videos online
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > governance mailing list
> > governance at lists.cpsr.org
> > https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance
> >
> >
>
>
--
Jacqueline Morris
www.carnivalondenet.com
T&T Music and videos online
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list