[governance] Caucus process comment

[Jacqueline Morris]

Very useful links, but i have one concern:
Will this process include responses and so forth at the Prepcom and
other negotiating bodies? Cause if so, then the period of comment to
the list may have to be something like 4 hours rather than 4 weeks.
Unless a different mechanism is proposed for these situations - like a
general agreement on issues and then give a mandate to the team onsite
and online to simply make statements on behalf of the Caucus without
the full consultation, as the timeframe for these comments is very
short - just like the last consultation with the WGIG report (4 days)
in Prepcom it is sometimes less than 4 hours to develop a
comment/response.
Jacqueline

On 7/27/05, McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com> wrote:
> All, 
>   
> I have to agree with Ronda's comments. 
>   
> I think the process of developing statements/postions on how IG should be
> done should be as inclusive/transparent, etc as the current way IG is done.
> For some BCPs, I suggest visiting some of the RIR Policy Development pages: 
> 
> http://ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/pdp.html 
>   
> http://www.afrinic.net/pdp.htm 
>   
> http://www.apnic.net/docs/policy/dev/process.html 
>   
> http://www.arin.net/policy/irpep.html 
>   
> I think some of these links might be helpful in coming up with a suitable
> process. 
>   
> I have been offline for most of July, so have not been able to participate
> at all.  I would rather have waited and not rushed a response in a few days.
>   
> Regards, 
>   
>   
> McTim
>   
> _______________________________________________
> governance mailing list
> governance at lists.cpsr.org
> https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance
> 
> 
> 


-- 
______________________
Jacqueline Morris
www.carnivalondenet.com
T&T Music and videos online

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance