[governance] new TLDs? Lee in Wonderland

[Milton Mueller]

Brilliant contribution, Lee. And speakling of Prepcom 3, I would like to
see some discussion of the MS Forum proposed by WGIG. 

>>> "Lee McKnight" <LMcKnigh at syr.edu> 08/30/05 10:50 AM >>>
I must have missed something, because if I am following the 
gist of the TLD thread properly:

1) we object to US unilateral control of the net, except when 
that control is used to regulate content we may or may not 
personally object to 

1)a (and since the line drawn here is perfectly clear, there is no
need to be alarmist about this, just relax, this is a special case)

2) the root zone file is really really small, so we should not make
it bigger, except of course we must make it bigger because of 
DNSSec, but not to worry, we know bigger is no problem - but 
we must make it no bigger than that, except when we do 
(eventually add multilingual gTLDs)
    
3) and of course we know permitting many more gTLDs would 
reduce their scarcity value and make it less likely we would 
argue about them, but we prefer arguing about them, except 
in this case, where three x's in a row are really offensive and 
just dumb, except to the rest of the world which wishes more 
attention would be paid to making it easier to add
other scripts and many multilingual domains and - dare I say 
it? gTLDs...
    
As we now appear to have reached a rough consensus on 
points 1-3, perhaps we can move on the list to thinking about 
matters such as PrepCom 3, and the forum, and...
   
    Lee
    

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance