[bestbits] US Support for Multistakeholder Governance is Conditional on US Remaining in Control

[Padmini]

Pranesh: would the splitting up of IANA functions like you were proposing
find more acceptance as a starting point of shifting jurisdiction?
On 20 Oct 2015 17:15, "Seth Johnson" <seth.p.johnson at gmail.com> wrote:

> Pleased to hear that the topic of jurisdiction shifting came up again.
>
> I specifically criticized the misframing of the jurisdiction issue in
> the CCWG-Accountability group's Paris meeting a few weeks back.
>
>
> Seth
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Pranesh Prakash <pranesh at cis-india.org>
> wrote:
> > At a meeting with civil society actors, Larry Strickling of the US NTIA
> was
> > asked by my colleague Padmini whether the US Congress would support the
> > multistakeholder model if ICANN's jurisdiction were to shift.
> >
> > He said that it wouldn't.
> >
> > https://twitter.com/pranesh/status/656422297876561921
> >
> > --
> > Pranesh Prakash
> > Policy Director, Centre for Internet and Society
> > http://cis-india.org | tel:+91 80 40926283
> > sip:pranesh at ostel.co | xmpp:pranesh at cis-india.org
> > https://twitter.com/pranesh
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> >      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
> > To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
> >      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20151020/5885d3fa/attachment.htm>