[bestbits] [governance] US Support for Multistakeholder Governance is Conditional on US Remaining in Control

[Padmini]

Oh no,  Mr. Mueller. My question was two parts. Will US support a change in
jurisdiction and will there be support for the multistakeholder in the
event that jurisdiction changes?
He said very eloquently -  no.
On 20 Oct 2015 17:04, "Mueller, Milton L" <
milton.mueller at pubpolicy.gatech.edu> wrote:

> No quite accurate.
> He was asked whether the US Congress would support changing the
> jurisdiction of ICANN.
> He said no.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org [mailto:governance-
> > request at lists.igcaucus.org] On Behalf Of Pranesh Prakash
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 7:11 AM
> > To: BestBits <bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>;
> governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> > Subject: [governance] US Support for Multistakeholder Governance is
> > Conditional on US Remaining in Control
> >
> > At a meeting with civil society actors, Larry Strickling of the US NTIA
> was
> > asked by my colleague Padmini whether the US Congress would support the
> > multistakeholder model if ICANN's jurisdiction were to shift.
> >
> > He said that it wouldn't.
> >
> > https://twitter.com/pranesh/status/656422297876561921
> >
> > --
> > Pranesh Prakash
> > Policy Director, Centre for Internet and Society http://cis-india.org |
> tel:+91
> > 80 40926283 sip:pranesh at ostel.co | xmpp:pranesh at cis-india.org
> > https://twitter.com/pranesh
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20151020/e749387e/attachment.htm>