[bestbits] [governance] Call for Participation: Global Congress on Intellectual Property and the Public Interest, 2015

[David Cake]

I am in full agreement with Anriette and Nick.

We have a huge amount of work to do, and some huge threats and opportunities currently in the IP area.

Spending our energy on definitions and interrogation of potential commercial allies seems a very unhelpful approach.

We need any allies against the TPP we can find. If there are large US based commercial organisations that are willing to stand against TPP, and for positive copyright reform, I’ll happily work with them whether or not this makes me, in the opinion of others, a tool of empire.

Regards

	David

> On 19 May 2015, at 8:13 pm, Anriette Esterhuysen <anriette at apc.org> wrote:
> 
> Dear all
> 
> I am writing against my better judgement, but here goes anyway.
> 
> The Global Congress on IP has been one of the most important spaces were
> radical civil society has mobilised and strategised against some of the
> most problematic US-government lead initiatives with regard to impact on
> access to knowledge in recent years - ACTA and TPP.
> 
> I have only ever been an observer at the Global Congress (when it was in
> Cape Town in 2013) but have always learnt a lot, and I really value the
> work that this community does in WIPO among other spaces. In Africa the
> Global Congress has collaborated with projects such as the African
> Access to Knowledge project.. people that we have done really important
> work with, and who have influenced intellectual property legislation
> positively. They work with groups such as councils for the blind and
> visually impaired, and the library community. People that we need in
> internet governance spaces if we want to build movement for social
> justice in internet governance.
> 
> I find it extremely disappointing and distressing that the debate in
> this thread is not about substantial issues that the Global Congress
> will address, but about whether it is 'multistakeholder' or not -
> evolving into yet another set of assertions that everyone who supports
> the notion of multistakeholder in ANY sense at all is by definition
> coopted by empire.
> 
> Why not write about substantive issues, and about how to pursue a social
> justice agenda around the issues that are internet-related that the
> Global Congress will address?
> 
> Anriette
> 
> 
> 
> On 19/05/2015 18:51, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:
>> On 19/05/2015 5:50 am, parminder wrote:
>>> Coming to the context of the series of congresses on 'Intellectual
>>> property and public interest', here is the list of participants
>>> <http://infojustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Participants-Handout1.pdf>of
>>> the 2011 Congress . Just one big business participant - Google among
>>> scores and scores others. And none in program committee, or among the
>>> hosing group or funders (except one, again Google, which is certainly
>>> an oddity, perhaps explainable but wont go there right now) . No way
>>> to me this looks like a multistakeholder or MS conference, as we have
>>> come to understand the term in the Internet governance space.
>> 
>> Apples and oranges; the Global Congress on IP and the Public Interest
>> never purported to be a multi-stakeholder event; it is closer to a Best
>> Bits meeting or your Internet Social Forum, both of which are civil
>> society only, than it is to something like the IGF.
>> 
>> --
>> Jeremy Malcolm
>> Senior Global Policy Analyst
>> Electronic Frontier Foundation
>> https://eff.org
>> jmalcolm at eff.org
>> 
>> Tel: 415.436.9333 ext 161
>> 
>> :: Defending Your Rights in the Digital World ::
>> 
>> Public key: https://www.eff.org/files/2014/10/09/key_jmalcolm.txt
>> PGP fingerprint: FF13 C2E9 F9C3 DF54 7C4F EAC1 F675 AAE2 D2AB 2220
>> OTR fingerprint: 26EE FD85 3740 8228 9460 49A8 536F BCD2 536F A5BD
>> 
>> Learn how to encrypt your email with the Email Self Defense guide:
>> https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/en
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>     bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>     http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>     http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20150520/a60cfc1f/attachment.sig>