[bestbits] Best Bits working group on Broadcasting Treaty?

[AHM Bazlur Rahman]

*Dear Jeremy Malcolm,*

Please accept our best compliments on behalf of the Bangladesh NGOs Network
for Radio and Communication (BNNRC) Secretariat.



BNNRC actively works to improve recognition of the community electronic
media sector [Community Radio | Community TV | Community Film] & its work
in and involvement with the communities it seeks to serve. BNNRC represent
the community electronic media sector to Government, Industry, Regulatory
Bodies, Media, Academia and Development Partners from 2000. The BNNRC
provides leadership and support for rural initiators to facilitate
independent electronic community broadcasting services and to build and
strengthen rural communities.



BNNRC is in Special Consultative Status with the Economic and Social
Council of the United Nations & accredited with UN World Summit on the
Information Society. The BNNRC regularly organizes high profile national
events which showcase new developments in the electronic community media
sector and brings together a diverse audience from the Community,
Voluntary, Public and Private sectors.

In this backdrop, I would like to join the
WIPO Broadcasting Treaty matter.
Than you very much for your nice posting about
WIPO Broadcasting Treaty.

With Solidarity,


*Bazlu*
________________________
AHM. Bazlur Rahman-S21BR *| *Chief Executive Officer *|*
Bangladesh NGOs Network for Radio and Communication (BNNRC)
[In Special Consultative Status with the Economic and Social Council of the
United Nations]

House: 13/3, Road: 2, Shaymoli, Dhaka-1207*|*  Bangladesh*|*
Phone: +88-02-9130750| 9101479 | Cell: +88 01711881647
Fax: 88-02-9138501 *|* E-mail: ceo at bnnrc.net* |* bnnr <bnnrc at bd.drik.net>
cbd at gmail.com *|*
www.bnnrc.net




On 2 March 2015 at 16:59, Jeremy Malcolm <jmalcolm at eff.org> wrote:

> At a Best Bits steering committee meeting on 1 March it was suggested we
> could start a new fluid working group to coordinate a civil society
> response the proposed
> WIPO Broadcasting Treaty, because of the potential impacts of the treaty
> on Internet video streaming services. Were we to take this on this could
> overlap a bit with other networks on IP, but I'm not aware that there is
> any other real coordination of civil society against the Broadcasting
> Treaty.  So I'm putting it to the group to gauge how much interest there
> may be from Best Bits participants in working together on this.  If you are
> interested, please reply and we can take it further.
>
> Here is some background:
>
>
> https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/12/danger-post-fixation-rights-wipo-broadcasting-treaty
>
> I'm also happy to answer any questions about why the potential impacts of
> the Broadcasting Treaty.
>
> --
> Jeremy Malcolm
> Senior Global Policy Analyst
> Electronic Frontier Foundation
> https://eff.org
> jmalcolm at eff.org
>
> Tel: 415.436.9333 ext 161
>
> :: Defending Your Rights in the Digital World ::
>
> Public key: https://www.eff.org/files/2014/10/09/key_jmalcolm.txt
>
> PGP fingerprint: FF13 C2E9 F9C3 DF54 7C4F EAC1 F675 AAE2 D2AB 2220
> OTR fingerprint: 26EE FD85 3740 8228 9460 49A8 536F BCD2 536F A5BD
>
> Learn how to encrypt your email with the Email Self Defense guide:
> https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/en
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20150302/11ec9073/attachment.htm>