[bestbits] [governance] Remarks at UNESCO Closing Ceremony of "Connecting the Dots Conference"

[parminder]

On Wednesday 04 March 2015 09:52 PM, Michael Gurstein wrote:
>
> However, the Just Net Coalition does represent a rather significant 
> component of civil society and arguably a numerically rather larger 
> component than do certain other components such as those gathered 
> around Best Bits.
>
> BTW, since when did Civil Society not support democracy as a 
> fundamental anchor for any governance process.  I would suggest in 
> fact that it is again arguable that any group which did not endorse 
> democracy as a fundamental principle would find itself ostracized and 
> shunned within any conventional civil society grouping.
>

Like for instance in a women's rights group there are some red-lines, 
some things cannot be said, and some cannot be spoken against. Every 
political group has some red lines, and civil society involved with 
Internet governance must also have some. To me resisting mention of 
'democratic' in an IG document with the claim that the term carries 
'baggage' certainly qualifies as such a redline.The fact that some  
'civil society' persons sided with US and its allies (who as the key 
power-holders in the global IG realm have their obvious reasons) to do 
so indeed makes it a sad day for public interest advocacy.... parminder
>
> M
>
> *From:*bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net 
> [mailto:bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net] *On Behalf Of *Jeremy Malcolm
> *Sent:* March 4, 2015 7:42 AM
> *To:* Jeremy Malcolm
> *Cc:* Civil Society Internet Governance Caucus - IGC; Nnenna Nwakanma; 
> <bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>
> *Subject:* Re: [bestbits] [governance] Remarks at UNESCO Closing 
> Ceremony of "Connecting the Dots Conference"
>
> On Mar 4, 2015, at 4:33 PM, Jeremy Malcolm <jmalcolm at eff.org 
> <mailto:jmalcolm at eff.org>> wrote:
>
>     You’re right, but you can nevertheless thank UNESCO for the
>     opportunity to participate on a multi-stakeholder basis and
>     acknowledge that the outcome document is a lot richer than it
>     would otherwise have been because of this.
>
> Also, please clarify that the Just Net Coalition does NOT represent 
> all of civil society.  This given that Richard Hill on behalf of the 
> coalition has just disrupted the meeting with a formal objection to 
> the document due to its omission to qualify references to 
> multi-stakeholderism with “democratic” (which he incorrectly stated 
> was not objected to during the last drafting session), and its 
> omission to include a reference to the International Covenant on 
> Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.  Other than his objection, the 
> document was adopted by the meeting by consensus.
>
> -- 
>
> Jeremy Malcolm
>
> Senior Global Policy Analyst
>
> Electronic Frontier Foundation
>
> https://eff.org
> jmalcolm at eff.org <mailto:jmalcolm at eff.org>
>
> Tel: 415.436.9333 ext 161
>
> :: Defending Your Rights in the Digital World ::
>
> Public key: https://www.eff.org/files/2014/10/09/key_jmalcolm.txt
>
> PGP fingerprint: FF13 C2E9 F9C3 DF54 7C4F EAC1 F675 AAE2 D2AB 2220
>
> OTR fingerprint: 26EE FD85 3740 8228 9460 49A8 536F BCD2 536F A5BD
>
> Learn how to encrypt your email with the Email Self Defense guide:
>
> https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/en
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>       bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>       http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20150304/2a6ad5cf/attachment.htm>