[bestbits] Debunking eight myths about multi-stakeholderism

[Jeremy Malcolm]

On 24/04/2015 5:56 pm, Barry Shein wrote:
> On April 24, 2015 at 15:45 jmalcolm at eff.org (Jeremy Malcolm) wrote:
>  > http://igfwatch.org/discussion-board/debunking-eight-myths-about-multi-stakeholderism
>
> That's all well and good and a nice easy read.
>
> However it doesn't address what I think are the biggest concerns with
> multistakeholderism which are:

You're right, it doesn't address these sort of detailed questions
because it expressly didn't set out to do so.  It wasn't intended as a
recipe for how multi-stakeholderism should be done, partly because
indeed there is no single recipe; there are many variables and the
answers to your questions will differ from one instance to another. 
Ironically someone on another list I believe has purported to rearrange
my 8 points into a positive description of multi-stakeholderism, which I
don't endorse at all.  As indeed I noted in the concluding lines of the
post, that is a separate effort altogether.

-- 
Jeremy Malcolm
Senior Global Policy Analyst
Electronic Frontier Foundation
https://eff.org
jmalcolm at eff.org

Tel: 415.436.9333 ext 161

:: Defending Your Rights in the Digital World ::

Public key: https://www.eff.org/files/2014/10/09/key_jmalcolm.txt
PGP fingerprint: FF13 C2E9 F9C3 DF54 7C4F EAC1 F675 AAE2 D2AB 2220
OTR fingerprint: 26EE FD85 3740 8228 9460 49A8 536F BCD2 536F A5BD

Learn how to encrypt your email with the Email Self Defense guide:
https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/en


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 244 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20150427/00957fb9/attachment.sig>