[bestbits] [governance] Re: Call for making the IGF permanent

[Walid AL-SAQAF]

Absolutely a +1.

Sincerely,

Walid
On Sep 3, 2014 5:07 PM, "Milton L Mueller" <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > I will have to be the one to provide that "almost" to that unanimity.
> > Speaking for myself, I do not support making the IGF a permanent body.
> >
> > The IGF has to be relevant and has to deliver results, and we should
> push for
> > accountability of the IGF.  Making it permanent isn't really going to
> help
> > accountability of the IGF (just as having the IANA contract be renewable
> has
> > helped keep ICANN more accountable so far, though the analogy is not
> perfect).
> > I would support making the evaluation process (for renewal of the IGF's
> term)
> > more participative and transparent and, yes, more "multistakeholder".
>
> Agree with Pranash
> --MM
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20140903/ce2dde9a/attachment.htm>