[bestbits] Call for making the IGF permanent

[Jeremy Malcolm]

On Sep 1, 2014, at 2:18 PM, Jeanette Hofmann <jeanette at wzb.eu> wrote:

> when I suggested yesterday that we should ask for the IGF to become permanent I referred to the specific discussion we had about the number of years.
> 
> However, I don't see any problems with asking for also strengthening the IGF. We have by now several more or less consensual ms documents that support such a position, not least the NetMundial statement.

Please jump on the pad if you can improve the current text which presently reads:

"We call for the establishment of the IGF as a permanent multistakeholder forum within the framework of the UN, that should be reformed and strengthened."

https://etherpad.mozilla.org/NnbQgXIv8Y (at line 326)

-- 
Jeremy Malcolm
Senior Global Policy Analyst
Electronic Frontier Foundation
https://eff.org
jmalcolm at eff.org

Tel: 415.436.9333 ext 161

:: Defending Your Rights in the Digital World ::

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 204 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20140901/7ed30d33/attachment.sig>