[bestbits] BestBits statement

[Niels ten Oever]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

We will support this. Even though I would prefer to make point 6 point
1. Is there opposition against that?

Could we also make this a Best Bits statement instead of a sign-on
statement? (Sorry for now being more acquainted with the process.)

Best,

Niels

On 09/04/2014 02:03 PM, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:
> On Sep 4, 2014, at 12:16 PM, Anne Jellema <anne at webfoundation.org>
>  wrote:
> 
>> +1. It is really important to be able to present it tomorrow, 
>> particularly the statement re Turkey. WF is happy with the draft
>>  as it stands (although the word order of point no 1 could be 
>> improved so that it's clear it's the IGF that needs strengthening
>> and improving, not the mandate).
> 
> I apologise for the delay.  There was some time needed to tie up 
> loose ends of wording and to check with the steering committee that
> we are indeed ready to post it.  So here it is now for 
> endorsement:
> 
> http://bestbits.net/igf-statement-2014/
> 
> If I have made any errors please advise me.
> 
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________ You 
> received this message as a subscriber on the list: 
> bestbits at lists.bestbits.net. To unsubscribe or change your 
> settings, visit: http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
> 

- -- 
Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital

Article 19
www.article19.org

PGP fingerprint = 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUCFlOAAoJEAi1oPJjbWjpdwgH/3V0FckVB55DfsBM+Hx8KjW2
/6Kk+fhOFioYeppGqCY9TaXHMkr3BkRy/X6yqofBBGhowfDSKPAk5gpIdmDJ0VQN
9vAMGrzsRbkUZX0MOno2V5XdtljmoFgShwzPrs3jk+ZLXQupc3K8ttqpKGzTnFed
PWdMv/07jqhO1GTLpnzSIY3XSozEuUMiPLolL7eunP+s/KRGdwXl+NwmWkPAQ/g9
dCOGlh48LqdIzIdBvc37ICc/pctSstRiWUX7Gv6Zgw6ulK6NEPNAMbwSMyXjTyow
7IYH+C1si9mn1WtE7eRCDgaQ3ocVJqRQTgPFv8vVxrh7RCfxO/XFpIHW7EGrIKE=
=mapD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----