[bestbits] IMPORTANT: World Economic Forum and The-Initiative-Formerly-Known-As-NETmundial

[Deborah Brown]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi Jeremy,

The timeline on making a decision on this was not clear to me from
your email. You wrote:

The timetable CSCG is discussing would see us begin a call for
nominations no earlier than Friday – the last day of IGF – to allow
discussion and further clarification before we commence any such process.

I agree that there has not been enough discussion of this (nor time to
do so) but a concrete deadline might encourage this ;)

Best,
Deborah

On 9/4/14 9:52 AM, Ian Peter wrote:
> just to be clear on this – the statement below would only be
> when/if we formally announce our nominees – not every time they
> speak!
> 
> Ian
> 
> From: Jeremy Malcolm Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 4:38 PM To:
> Carlos A. Afonso Cc: Ian Peter ; mailto:bestbits at lists.bestbits.net
>  Subject: Re: [bestbits] IMPORTANT: World Economic Forum and
> The-Initiative-Formerly-Known-As-NETmundial
> 
> On Sep 2, 2014, at 3:53 PM, Carlos A. Afonso <ca at cafonso.ca>
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> "The WEF representatives seem to be listening and adapting at IGF –
> so I think this is still quite fluid." You mean, like the Borg? :)
> 
> 
> I don't feel that we have yet received a good sense from this group
> yet about whether we should patronise the WEF initiative or not.
> You have, by now, seen that the Just Net Coalition people are
> refusing to support the initiative.  If the Coordination Group goes
> forward with nominating candidates at all, it would therefore have
> to be on the basis that any public statement of our nominees would
> include that "although JNC is a member of CSCG, JNC has opted out
> from participation in this particular selection process".
> 
> Are we happy with that?  Or do we agree with JNC and want to wash
> our hands of this process?  I have heard view both ways, and I
> don't have a good sense of where the balance of opinion lies.
> Would be grateful for some more people to express their views
> here.
> 
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________ You
> received this message as a subscriber on the list: 
> bestbits at lists.bestbits.net. To unsubscribe or change your
> settings, visit: http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
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=rfXg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----