[bestbits] Civil society response to NETmundial 2014 outcome text open for endorsement

[Niels ten Oever]

Hi Adam,

This statement was developed with roughly 50-60 people from civil
society after the final drafting session.

I made it clear that I did not represent the whole of civil society, but
a group of civil society organizations, so I do not think there are any
representation issues. Let me know if you think there are.

On the process: I looked for consensus via this lists and talking to
people in person. The initial drafting session was with around 30
people, and then there were two more group meetings with 10-15 different
people. Jointly we made text edits.

The opportunity to speak was arranged by a group of organizations from
Latin America.

Let me know if you have any more questions.

Best,

Niels

On 04/30/2014 01:31 PM, Adam Peake wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Apr 25, 2014, at 7:24 PM, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:
> 
>> I haven't endorsed it either for the same reason.
>>
> 
> 
> Would have been nice to know who Niels was speaking for -- gave the impression of civil society broadly.  Who asked for the opportunity to speak and who did they say they represented?    
> 
> Adam
> 
> 
> 
>> -- 
>> Jeremy Malcolm PhD LLB (Hons) B Com
>> Internet lawyer, ICT policy advocate, geek 
>> host -t NAPTR 5.9.8.5.2.8.2.2.1.0.6.e164.org|awk -F! '{print $3}'
>> WARNING: This email has not been encrypted. You are strongly recommended to enable encryption at your end. For instructions, see http://jere.my/l/pgp.
>>
>>
>> On 25 Apr 2014, at 7:20 am, Andrew Puddephatt <Andrew at gp-digital.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I think this is much too negative and fails to reflect the amount of positive agenda and genuinely good things that came out of the whole process.  I can’t support this statement 
>>>
>>> Andrew Puddephatt
>>> Global Partners Digital
>>> Andrew at gp-digital.org
>>> Tel mobile +44 (0)771 339 9597 
>>> Tel office   +44 (0)207 549 0350
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Jeremy Malcolm <Jeremy at Malcolm.id.au>
>>> Reply-To: Jeremy Malcolm <Jeremy at Malcolm.id.au>
>>> Date: Friday, 25 April 2014 01:44
>>> To: "<bestbits at lists. net>" <bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>
>>> Subject: [bestbits] Civil society response to NETmundial 2014 outcome text open for endorsement
>>>
>>> The following initial response to the NETmundial 2014 outcome text was agreed in the room at NETmundial by about 25 civil society representatives and was read out in the session by Niels ten Oever from Article 19.  If you are in agreement, please endorse and share:
>>>
>>> http://bestbits.net/netmundial-response
>>>
>>> This need not prevent the development of a more substantive civil society response later.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Jeremy Malcolm PhD LLB (Hons) B Com
>>> Internet lawyer, ICT policy advocate, geek
>>> host -t NAPTR 5.9.8.5.2.8.2.2.1.0.6.e164.org|awk -F! '{print $3}'
>>>
>>> WARNING: This email has not been encrypted. You are strongly recommended to enable encryption at your end. For instructions, see http://jere.my/l/pgp.
>>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>     bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>     http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
> 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 551 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20140501/04b3c142/attachment.sig>