[bestbits] Shortlists for Brazil for further consideration

[Burcu Kilic]

I second that. Carol is a strong advocate for developing countries, particularly Latin America.
She is a proud Brazilian when it comes to work.


From: bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net [mailto:bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net] On Behalf Of Carolina
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 5:28 PM
To: Ian Peter
Cc: Ian Peter; <bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>
Subject: Re: [bestbits] Shortlists for Brazil for further consideration

Btw... I am Brazilian and even leaving in US, I have TONS of work in developing world, my day by day work is focused on developing work, and just moved to the US because my husband is american. I do TONS of pro bono work on A2K, education, and ICTs in Brazil and other Latin American and South Asia countries. So it is NOT true I would not represent a developing country view.
I am very honored by the votes and the trust.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 8, 2014, at 4:02 PM, "Ian Peter" <ian.peter at ianpeter.com<mailto:ian.peter at ianpeter.com>> wrote:
OMG... clearly not meant for this list and my sincere apologies to everyone.

this was an awful mistake on my part...



From: Ian Peter<mailto:ian.peter at ianpeter.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 7:43 AM
To: bestbits at lists.bestbits.net<mailto:bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>
Subject: [bestbits] Shortlists for Brazil for further consideration

Thanks everyone for prompt replies – below is a summary of your responses and the candidates still under consideration (although there is nothing to stop us bringing forward other names later on if we want to)

HLC

Carolina Rossini – 3.5 votes
Jovan K – 3 votes
Mark Rotenberg – 3 votes
Joana Varon 2.5 votes
Milton Mueller 2 votes
Parminder Singh 2 votes
Stephanie Perrin 1 vote
Louis Pouzin 1 vote
Marilia Maciel 1 vote

SOME COMMENTS AND ISSUES

The brief here is “This committee will set the high ­level political tone and objectives of the
conference.  Committee members will engage on a global level with stakeholders to
encourage participation in the conference and maximize its chances of success”

Bear in mind also that (my paraphrasing) the aim of the meeting seems to be to develop a set of high level principles for Internet Governance.

We dont know yet whether we need 3 or 4 candidates, and probably wont know till Saturday. I think our aim between now and then should be to try and narrow down our field a bit and eliminate some names if possible. But in doing so:

Carolina Rossini, Jovan K and Marc Rotenberg got the most support initially – not that we need to be bound by this. They are all impressive candidates.

If Marc was in, we probably couldn’t include Milton – 2 US males would not be a good decision politically. Milton also probably fits as an academic – but as he is likely to be running the process to select academic candidates, he may not be able to include himself. Maybe we should seek clarification here?

If Carolina was in, we probably wouldn’t include Joana or Marilia

None of our first 3 would be considered to be a strong advocate for third world issues. If we thought it was important to include someone with this perspective, the choices would be Louis Pouzin or Parminder Singh. Parminder has indicated he would step down in favour of Louis Pouzin, and we may need to consider that Parminder is a member of the CI (Community Informatics) Nomcom also considering candidates for these very same positions (but with about 6 candidates and very little chance of their nominees being accepted) . That may be perceived as a conflict of interest, or we could ignore it. But some people have already suggested to me informally that Parminder has a conflict of interest here.

Also to just note re Stephanie Perrin – if Marc Rotenberg was in we might consider we have privacy issues well covered; but if in our final slate we wanted to include Milton and leave Marc out to not have too many male US citizens Stephanie is an option to cover privacy.

So lots of issues.Let’s discuss and see if we can narrow down a little while we await info as to whether we need 3 or 4 names.


EC
Marilia Maciel 3.5 votes
Adam Peake 3 votes
Joana Varon 2 votes
Nadira Alaraj 1.5 votes
Carolina Rossini 1.5 votes
Stephanie Perrin 1 vote
Norbert Bollow 1 vote
Birgitta Jonsdottr .5
Parminder Singh .5

SOME COMMENTS AND ISSUES

The brief here is “This committee owns the full responsibility of organizing the event, including: defining conference purpose/agenda, managing invitations, organizing input received into a coherent set of proposals for the conferees to address, managing conference proceedings and process, and directing all communications activities pre/­during/­post conference.  This committee will include 2 civil society representatives”.

I think we need to determine HLC before finalising here. However Marilia and Adam have the strongest support at this stage. We again face the issue here of having a strong advocate for third world issues as a factor in deciding our final 2.

Over to you all for comments, suggestions, and attempts to narrow this down further!

Ian Peter



________________________________
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     bestbits at lists.bestbits.net<mailto:bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>.
To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
     http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
    bestbits at lists.bestbits.net<mailto:bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>.
To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
    http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20140108/18dd0b60/attachment.htm>