[NCUC-DISCUSS] [bestbits] Re: [governance] list of important questions to be delivered to LOC before 27th meeting

[Joana Varon]

Please read "Transmitted on behalf of 1net steering"
On 26 Jan 2014 16:08, "Joana Varon" <joana at varonferraz.com> wrote:

> Very good point,  Nnenna.
>
> Dear all, for the record, in the sense of using all the paths we have,
> Adiel has just transmitted to the co-chairs of the EMC, Demi and Raul, the
> sets of questions we have compiled. So Marilia and Adam can have more
> support to push them as urgent matters as well.
>
> For the very tricky ones, I would suggest to bring a set of options to
> consult with the stakeholders.
>
> All the best and I wish you both, Adam and Marilia, a very inspired meeting
>
> Best
>
> Joana
> On 26 Jan 2014 14:24, "Nnenna Nwakanma" <nnenna75 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I will tend to lean on a committee using an agreed set of criteria, one
>> being contribution during the prep process.
>> However, there is one thing that needs to be checked
>> ** the size of government delegations***
>>
>> How many people can be in an official delegation?
>>
>> Over the years, the IGF has been encouraging governments to add CS folks
>> to their delegations, and not  many countries have been doing that. So the
>> question here will be : "What will be the maximum size of an official
>> delegation?"
>>
>> N
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for that Norbert. And if anyone feels that there were older
>>> threads in our lists that were important to this present discussion, please
>>> link them here, or resend them. I am trying to map, but any help would be
>>> useful.
>>> Best
>>> Marília
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Next step would be the question of selection. So far I have informally
>>>> > tried to reach out to people and ask opinions. What I have collected
>>>> > so far comes down to three options. But there may be more, so please
>>>> > propose new ideas or comment on the ones below:
>>>> >
>>>> > - Bottom up self-selection process. Pro: more legitimacy. Con: some
>>>> > fear the burden would be too heavy for a nom-com.
>>>> > - First come first served. People who register would be accepted
>>>> > until the number of participants is reached. Pro: easier to handle.
>>>> > Con: some fear it could create distortions and lack of balance
>>>> > - Selection by a committee (not clear by which one), based on
>>>> > previously agreed criteria such as: balance between developind and
>>>> > developed regions, presenting contributions to the public
>>>> > consultation as pre-condition for on site participation, have
>>>> > attended at least 3 IGFs, etc. Pro: Middle-terms solution if criteria
>>>> > is agreed beforehand. Con: Not mentioned.
>>>> >
>>>> > Please, let me know if you have feelings or preferences about the
>>>> > above.
>>>>
>>>> APC has proposed that the selection of participants should be on the
>>>> basis of contributing substantively during the preparatory process.
>>>>
>>>> I support that proposal.
>>>>
>>>> Greetings,
>>>> Norbert
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Marília Maciel*
>>> Pesquisadora Gestora
>>> Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio
>>>
>>> Researcher and Coordinator
>>> Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School
>>> http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
>>>
>>> DiploFoundation associate
>>> www.diplomacy.edu
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20140126/be40fc88/attachment.htm>