[bestbits] [Internet Policy] IGF 2014 Consultation - ISOC Submission

Jeremy Malcolm jeremy at ciroap.org
Tue Feb 11 11:05:21 EST 2014


On 11 Feb 2014, at 8:07 pm, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:

> On Tuesday 11 February 2014 03:29 PM, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:
>> This is a BIG step for ISOC.  Finally they are suggesting the IGF
>> produce policy outcome documents open for voluntary adoption, based on
>> the IETF process... something they had been fiercely resisting for years!
> 
> Public policies are not technical standards to be voluntarily adopted... (even technical standards have often to be mandatory - as you know Microsoft for instance will never  - and did not - voluntarily adopt inter operability standards for document software) ... This is an entirely new kind of political-ese to talk of voluntary adoption of public policies, which is post-democratic in essence. These are frameworks for working outside democratic politics. Voluntary adoption of public policies is similar to 'coalition of the willing' for political action and I am sure you know what it means and implies.. Th powerful shall inherit the world....
> 
> Everyone can see what slope we are slipping on..

Baby steps, this is still a paradigm shift for ISOC.  What begins with voluntarily-adopted soft law can harden into national and international law where necessary... at least now, finally, we are on a path that could lead somewhere.  I'm not going to criticise them for taking this step.

-- 
Dr Jeremy Malcolm
Senior Policy Officer
Consumers International | the global campaigning voice for consumers
Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Tel: +60 3 7726 1599

WCRD 2014 - Fix Our Phone Rights! | http://consint.info/fix-our-phone-rights

@Consumers_Int | www.consumersinternational.org | www.facebook.com/consumersinternational

Read our email confidentiality notice. Don't print this email unless necessary.

WARNING: This email has not been encrypted. You are strongly recommended to enable PGP or S/MIME encryption at your end. For instructions, see http://jere.my/l/8m.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 204 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20140212/08266429/attachment.sig>


More information about the Bestbits mailing list