[bestbits] A disaggregated internet governance taxonomy

[parminder]

The focus here is of one clear set of functions - public policy making, 
that also, specifically decision making vis a vis public polices...

If we need closures somewhere. Power does not disappear in absence of 
legitimate governance. The Internet is right now being shaped by the 
powerful for their benefit.

At one point we need to agree on should be taking decisions for public 
policies.

And to reach that point faster than slower is more in the interest to 
those most excluded in current power configurations..

parminder

On Tuesday 15 April 2014 08:51 PM, Mike Godwin (mgodwin at INTERNEWS.ORG) 
wrote:
>
> Following a suggestion made by Carolina Rossini at a New America 
> Foundation panel she moderated, I mined Laura DeNardis’s and Mark 
> Raymond’s paper (“Thinking Clearly about Multistakeholder Governance”) 
> for its big chart of “disaggregated internet governance” functions.
>
> I find it’s useful to look at this chart (somewhat clumsily assembled 
> by me and attached here as a PDF) and ask which of these functions are 
> best administered by multi-stakeholder process, which are best 
> administered by expert bodies (including self-selected experts), which 
> are best administered by governments or intergovernmental entities, 
> and so forth.
>
> Here’s a link to DeNardis’s talk about her new internet-governance book:
> The Global War for Internet Governance with Dr. Laura DeNardis:
> http://youtu.be/i_bZw-O7cC0
>  via @YouTube
>
> Unsurprisingly, DeNardis says there’s no one-size-fits-all solution 
> for administering every aspect of internet governance.
>
>
> —Mike
>
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20140415/21905d9a/attachment.htm>