[governance] [bestbits] [letter to Dilma Rousseff] merging threads from IGC and BB

[Anja Kovacs]

Dear all,

I was very happy with the compromise initially found for point number 4 but
will not be able to support the letter if this is replaced by the shorter
version as this refers to multistakeholderism only in the Brazilian context
and thus does  not in any way assuage the concerns I have expressed
earlier, esp since the intro of the statement contains blanket support for
Dilma's speech. I would therefore really appreciate if we can go back to
the earlier text. If not, I will be extremely sad not to be able to support
this important and valuable statement. Really deeply sorry about that.

Thanks for your understanding.

Best,
Anja
On Sep 26, 2013 5:07 PM, "Jeremy Malcolm" <jeremy at ciroap.org> wrote:

> On 26/09/2013, at 7:31 AM, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:
>
> Joana's deadline for proposing amendments to the statement is not over
> yet, and the statement is changing right now..
>
> Putting up an earlier version for sign on causes a great amount of
> confusion to the process...
>
>
> Sorry, I was acting on instructions to put it up early because consensus
> had already been reached, but then the thread suddenly reactivated and
> point 4 changed... anyway point 4 is now "Reinforce our support for the
> Brazilian multistakeholder model for Internet governance lead by CGI.br<http://cgi.br/>",
> is that correct?
>
> --
>
> *Dr Jeremy Malcolm
> Senior Policy Officer
> Consumers International | the global campaigning voice for consumers*
> Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
> Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur,
> Malaysia
> Tel: +60 3 7726 1599
>
> Explore our new Resource Zone - the global consumer movement knowledge hub
> |http://www.consumersinternational.org/news-and-media/resource-zone
>
> @Consumers_Int | www.consumersinternational.org |
> www.facebook.com/consumersinternational
>
> Read our email confidentiality notice<http://www.consumersinternational.org/email-confidentiality>.
> Don't print this email unless necessary.
>
> *WARNING*: This email has not been encrypted. You are strongly
> recommended to enable PGP or S/MIME encryption at your end. For
> instructions, see http://jere.my/l/8m.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20130926/8b42045e/attachment.htm>