Secret vs CS list (was Re: process Re: [bestbits] [Meeting Report]: friday meeting with fadi et all)

[Tapani Tarvainen]

On Oct 31 08:34, Daniel Pimienta (pimienta at funredes.org) wrote:

> What is at stake is the non interference in the CS debate of those
> intruders not the fact that they can listen to our debates.

In that case I have misunderstood, but as I already stated:

> > I would have no problem with a closed-but-public list,
> > i.e., one with restricted subscription but publicly
> > visible archives

If by interference you mean outsiders' unwanted participation in our
internal discussions, such a list would suffice to keep them out
without compromising our commitment to transparency.

-- 
Tapani Tarvainen