[bestbits] FW: BB/ Brazil summit input - expression of interest

Avri Doria avri at acm.org
Thu Nov 28 12:49:40 EST 2013


Hi,

Please put me down for thread 2.

Thanks

Avri

Bertrand de La Chapelle <bdelachapelle at gmail.com> wrote:
>Hi Andrew, nice initiative. Please put me in for Stream 3.
>
>Best
>
>Bertrand
>
>
>
>On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Andrew Puddephatt
><Andrew at gp-digital.org>wrote:
>
>> Latest expressions of interest
>>
>>
>>
>> Just to remind everyone – I’m not putting anything together for
>Stream 1,
>> my only interest is in stream 3 and one aspect of stream 2 – free
>> expression and privacy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Stream 1*
>>
>> *Stream 2*
>>
>> *Stream 3*
>>
>>
>>
>> *Recommendation on process issues for the conference (remote
>> participation, stakeholder representation and selection)*
>>
>> *Substantive input on universal Internet principles (based on Marco
>Civil
>> and/or other existing principles documents).*
>>
>> *Substantive input on an institutional framework for multistakeholder
>> Internet governance including: 1. Internationalisation of ICANN
>(based on
>> existing work done by Internet Governance Project and/or others). 2.
>Orphan
>> issues (based on existing proposals put before the WGEC and the
>> recommendations of the Correspondence Group).*
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>>
>>
>> Submission on the first high level principle dealing with free
>expression,
>> privacy etc. > asserting ICCPR standards on free expression.
>>
>> Submission on reforming internet governance that keep the dispersed
>> structure and multi-stakeholder participation (which is likely to
>include
>> ideas on internationalising ICANN and strengthening the IGF)
>>
>> Matthew
>>
>>
>>
>> x
>>
>>  x
>>
>> Nnenna
>>
>> x
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Claudio
>>
>>
>>
>> x - contribute, not lead
>>
>>
>>
>> Valeria/ APC
>>
>>
>>
>> x - contribute
>>
>> x - contribute
>>
>> Marianne/ IRP
>>
>>
>>
>> x
>>
>>
>>
>> Jeanette
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> x - listen and comment
>>
>> Anriette APC
>>
>> x
>>
>> x
>>
>> x
>>
>> Anja
>>
>> x
>>
>>
>>
>> x
>>
>> Joana
>>
>> x
>>
>> x
>>
>> x
>>
>> M. Gurstein
>>
>>
>>
>> x
>>
>> x
>>
>> Marilia/ Joana
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 3.1/3.2
>>
>> Pranesh
>>
>>
>>
>> x
>>
>> x
>>
>> Carolina
>>
>> x
>>
>> x
>>
>> x
>>
>> Misha
>>
>>
>>
>> x
>>
>>
>>
>> Parminder
>>
>> x
>>
>> x
>>
>> x
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Andrew Puddephatt* | *GLOBAL PARTNERS* DIGITAL
>>
>> Executive Director
>>
>> Development House, 56–64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT
>>
>> T: +44 (0)20 7549 0336 | M: +44 (0)771 339 9597 | Skype:
>andrewpuddephatt
>> *gp-digital.org <http://gp-digital.org>*
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net [mailto:
>> bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net] *On Behalf Of *Andrew Puddephatt
>> *Sent:* 27 November 2013 11:26
>> *To:* matthew shears; <bestbits at lists. net>
>(bestbits at lists.bestbits.net)
>> *Subject:* RE: [bestbits] FW: BB/ Brazil summit input - expression of
>> interest
>>
>>
>>
>> Great – I’ve sent round a survey monkey to start us off
>>
>>
>>
>> *Andrew Puddephatt* | *GLOBAL PARTNERS* DIGITAL
>>
>> Executive Director
>>
>> Development House, 56–64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT
>>
>> T: +44 (0)20 7549 0336 | M: +44 (0)771 339 9597 | Skype:
>andrewpuddephatt
>> *gp-digital.org <http://gp-digital.org>*
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* matthew shears [mailto:mshears at cdt.org <mshears at cdt.org>]
>> *Sent:* 27 November 2013 10:42
>> *To:* Andrew Puddephatt; <bestbits at lists. net> (
>> bestbits at lists.bestbits.net)
>> *Subject:* Re: [bestbits] FW: BB/ Brazil summit input - expression of
>> interest
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Andrew - I am also interested in item 3.
>>
>> On 26/11/2013 17:53, Andrew Puddephatt wrote:
>>
>> Following up on my e-mail re inputs to Brazil conference.
>>
>>
>>
>> To remind everyone: Although the details are not clear, it looks like
>> there are three broad areas within which it would be useful for CS
>groups
>> (and others)  to make pro-active submissions to the Brazil meeting.
>These
>> are:
>>
>> AREA 1 - Recommendations on process issues for the conference (remote
>> participation, stakeholder representation and selection)
>>
>> AREA 2 - Substantive input into their work to develop universal
>Internet
>> principles (likely to cover the areas sketched out by President
>Rousseff in
>> her speech to the UNGA).
>>
>> AREA 3 - Substantive input on an institutional framework for
>> multistakeholder Internet governance including:
>>
>> 1.      Internationalisation of ICANN (based on existing work done by
>> Internet Governance Project and/or others).
>>
>> 2.      Orphan issues (based on existing proposals put before the
>WGEC
>> and the recommendations of the Correspondence Group).
>>
>> We have produced a chart mapping those who have expressed an interest
>in
>> each of the areas below. There could feasibly be a number of
>different
>> civil society submissions on each of these areas.
>>
>> Given the short timeframes, and the fact that there does not seem to
>be
>> consensus among all of us on a number of these issues, I think the
>best way
>> forward is for anyone who wants to lead on a particular submission to
>let
>> the list know, gather together people who also want to work on that
>> submission, develop something as a smaller group and then share it
>back
>> with the platform. Obviously, ideally submissions would be able to
>gather
>> broad agreement among BB participants, but consensus may be too high
>a bar
>> at this stage.
>>
>> For my part, I am interested in two specific inputs:
>>
>> A submission on reforming internet governance that keep the dispersed
>> structure and multi-stakeholder participation (elements of which are
>likely
>> to include ideas on internationalising ICANN and strengthening the
>IGF)
>>
>> A submission on the first high level principle dealing with free
>> expression, privacy etc.  Note that I’m concerned that privacy
>protections,
>> if badly expressed, could restrict freedom of expression unduly so
>I’ll be
>> looking to assert ICCPR standards on free expression.
>>
>> Not everyone will agree with that take on things and I assume there
>are
>> many other issues to focus on so at this stage I’d like to know who
>would
>> want to work with me on these two specific topics.
>>
>> I would encourage others to set out their own area of interest and
>seek
>> collaborators.  As we will probably need to submit our views to
>Brazil
>> and/or other organisers by March 1, 2014 I’d suggest we should aim to
>> produce documents for endorsement/support by other groups on the BB
>> platform by mid-February
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Stream 1*
>>
>> *Stream 2*
>>
>> *Stream 3*
>>
>>
>>
>> *Recommendation on process issues for the conference (remote
>> participation, stakeholder representation and selection)*
>>
>> *Substantive input on universal Internet principles (based on Marco
>Civil
>> and/or other existing principles documents).*
>>
>> *Substantive input on an institutional framework for multistakeholder
>> Internet governance including: 1. Internationalisation of ICANN
>(based on
>> existing work done by Internet Governance Project and/or others). 2.
>Orphan
>> issues (based on existing proposals put before the WGEC and the
>> recommendations of the Correspondence Group).*
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>>
>>
>> Submission on the first high level principle dealing with free
>expression,
>> privacy etc. > asserting ICCPR standards on free expression.
>>
>> Submission on reforming internet governance that keep the dispersed
>> structure and multi-stakeholder participation (which is likely to
>include
>> ideas on internationalising ICANN and strengthening the IGF)
>>
>> Matthew
>>
>>
>>
>> x
>>
>>
>>
>> Nnenna
>>
>> x
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Claudio
>>
>>
>>
>> x - contribute, not lead
>>
>>
>>
>> Valeria/ APC
>>
>>
>>
>> x - contribute
>>
>> x - contribute
>>
>> Marianne/ IRP
>>
>>
>>
>> x
>>
>>
>>
>> Jeanette
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> x - listen and comment
>>
>> M. Gurstein
>>
>>
>>
>> x
>>
>> x
>>
>> Marilia/ Joana
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 3.1/3.2
>>
>> Pranesh
>>
>>
>>
>> x
>>
>> x
>>
>> Parminder
>>
>> x
>>
>> x
>>
>> x
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

Avri Doria
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20131128/7ac2e0b4/attachment.htm>


More information about the Bestbits mailing list