<html><head></head><body>Hi,<br>
<br>
Please put me down for thread 2.<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
<br>
Avri<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Bertrand de La Chapelle <bdelachapelle@gmail.com> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail">Hi Andrew, nice initiative. Please put me in for Stream 3.<br /><br />Best<br /><br />Bertrand<br /><br /><br /><br />On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Andrew Puddephatt <Andrew@gp-digital.org>wrote:<br /><br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">Latest expressions of interest<br /><br /><br /><br />Just to remind everyone – I’m not putting anything together for Stream 1,<br />my only interest is in stream 3 and one aspect of stream 2 – free<br />expression and privacy<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />*Stream 1*<br /><br />*Stream 2*<br /><br />*Stream 3*<br /><br /><br /><br />*Recommendation on process issues for the conference (remote<br />participation, stakeholder representation and selection)*<br /><br />*Substantive input on universal Internet principles (based on Marco Civil<br />and/or other existing principles documents).*<br />!
<br
/>*Substantive input on an institutional framework for multistakeholder<br />Internet governance including: 1. Internationalisation of ICANN (based on<br />existing work done by Internet Governance Project and/or others). 2. Orphan<br />issues (based on existing proposals put before the WGEC and the<br />recommendations of the Correspondence Group).*<br /><br />Andrew<br /><br /><br /><br />Submission on the first high level principle dealing with free expression,<br />privacy etc. > asserting ICCPR standards on free expression.<br /><br />Submission on reforming internet governance that keep the dispersed<br />structure and multi-stakeholder participation (which is likely to include<br />ideas on internationalising ICANN and strengthening the IGF)<br /><br />Matthew<br /><br /><br /><br />x<br /><br />x<br /><br />Nnenna<br /><br />x<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Claudio<br /><br /><br /><br />x - contribute, not lead<br /><br /><br /><br />Valeria/ APC<br /><br /><!
br /><br
/>x - contribute<br /><br />x - contribute<br /><br />Marianne/ IRP<br /><br /><br /><br />x<br /><br /><br /><br />Jeanette<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />x - listen and comment<br /><br />Anriette APC<br /><br />x<br /><br />x<br /><br />x<br /><br />Anja<br /><br />x<br /><br /><br /><br />x<br /><br />Joana<br /><br />x<br /><br />x<br /><br />x<br /><br />M. Gurstein<br /><br /><br /><br />x<br /><br />x<br /><br />Marilia/ Joana<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />3.1/3.2<br /><br />Pranesh<br /><br /><br /><br />x<br /><br />x<br /><br />Carolina<br /><br />x<br /><br />x<br /><br />x<br /><br />Misha<br /><br /><br /><br />x<br /><br /><br /><br />Parminder<br /><br />x<br /><br />x<br /><br />x<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />*Andrew Puddephatt* | *GLOBAL PARTNERS* DIGITAL<br /><br />Executive Director<br /><br />Development House, 56–64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT<br /><br />T: +44 (0)20 7549 0336 | M: +44 (0)771 339 9597 | Skype:
andrewpuddephatt<br />*<a href="http://gp-digital.org">gp-digital.org</a> <<a href="http://gp-digital.org">http://gp-digital.org</a>>*<br /><br /><br /><br />*From:* bestbits-request@lists.bestbits.net [mailto:<br />bestbits-request@lists.bestbits.net] *On Behalf Of *Andrew Puddephatt<br />*Sent:* 27 November 2013 11:26<br />*To:* matthew shears; <bestbits@lists. net> (bestbits@lists.bestbits.net)<br />*Subject:* RE: [bestbits] FW: BB/ Brazil summit input - expression of<br />interest<br /><br /><br /><br />Great – I’ve sent round a survey monkey to start us off<br /><br /><br /><br />*Andrew Puddephatt* | *GLOBAL PARTNERS* DIGITAL<br /><br />Executive Director<br /><br />Development House, 56–64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT<br /><br />T: +44 (0)20 7549 0336 | M: +44 (0)771 339 9597 | Skype: andrewpuddephatt<br />*<a href="http://gp-digital.org">gp-digital.org</a> <<a href="http://gp-digital.org">http://gp-digital.org</a>>*<br /><br /><br /><br />*!
From:*
matthew shears [mailto:mshears@cdt.org <mshears@cdt.org>]<br />*Sent:* 27 November 2013 10:42<br />*To:* Andrew Puddephatt; <bestbits@lists. net> (<br />bestbits@lists.bestbits.net)<br />*Subject:* Re: [bestbits] FW: BB/ Brazil summit input - expression of<br />interest<br /><br /><br /><br />Hi Andrew - I am also interested in item 3.<br /><br />On 26/11/2013 17:53, Andrew Puddephatt wrote:<br /><br />Following up on my e-mail re inputs to Brazil conference.<br /><br /><br /><br />To remind everyone: Although the details are not clear, it looks like<br />there are three broad areas within which it would be useful for CS groups<br />(and others) to make pro-active submissions to the Brazil meeting. These<br />are:<br /><br />AREA 1 - Recommendations on process issues for the conference (remote<br />participation, stakeholder representation and selection)<br /><br />AREA 2 - Substantive input into their work to develop universal Internet<br />principles (likely t!
o cover
the areas sketched out by President Rousseff in<br />her speech to the UNGA).<br /><br />AREA 3 - Substantive input on an institutional framework for<br />multistakeholder Internet governance including:<br /><br />1. Internationalisation of ICANN (based on existing work done by<br />Internet Governance Project and/or others).<br /><br />2. Orphan issues (based on existing proposals put before the WGEC<br />and the recommendations of the Correspondence Group).<br /><br />We have produced a chart mapping those who have expressed an interest in<br />each of the areas below. There could feasibly be a number of different<br />civil society submissions on each of these areas.<br /><br />Given the short timeframes, and the fact that there does not seem to be<br />consensus among all of us on a number of these issues, I think the best way<br />forward is for anyone who wants to lead on a particular submission to let<br />the list know, gather together people who also want !
to work
on that<br />submission, develop something as a smaller group and then share it back<br />with the platform. Obviously, ideally submissions would be able to gather<br />broad agreement among BB participants, but consensus may be too high a bar<br />at this stage.<br /><br />For my part, I am interested in two specific inputs:<br /><br />A submission on reforming internet governance that keep the dispersed<br />structure and multi-stakeholder participation (elements of which are likely<br />to include ideas on internationalising ICANN and strengthening the IGF)<br /><br />A submission on the first high level principle dealing with free<br />expression, privacy etc. Note that I’m concerned that privacy protections,<br />if badly expressed, could restrict freedom of expression unduly so I’ll be<br />looking to assert ICCPR standards on free expression.<br /><br />Not everyone will agree with that take on things and I assume there are<br />many other issues to focus on so a!
t this
stage I’d like to know who would<br />want to work with me on these two specific topics.<br /><br />I would encourage others to set out their own area of interest and seek<br />collaborators. As we will probably need to submit our views to Brazil<br />and/or other organisers by March 1, 2014 I’d suggest we should aim to<br />produce documents for endorsement/support by other groups on the BB<br />platform by mid-February<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />*Stream 1*<br /><br />*Stream 2*<br /><br />*Stream 3*<br /><br /><br /><br />*Recommendation on process issues for the conference (remote<br />participation, stakeholder representation and selection)*<br /><br />*Substantive input on universal Internet principles (based on Marco Civil<br />and/or other existing principles documents).*<br /><br />*Substantive input on an institutional framework for multistakeholder<br />Internet governance including: 1. Internationalisation of ICANN (based on<br />existing work done by
Internet Governance Project and/or others). 2. Orphan<br />issues (based on existing proposals put before the WGEC and the<br />recommendations of the Correspondence Group).*<br /><br />Andrew<br /><br /><br /><br />Submission on the first high level principle dealing with free expression,<br />privacy etc. > asserting ICCPR standards on free expression.<br /><br />Submission on reforming internet governance that keep the dispersed<br />structure and multi-stakeholder participation (which is likely to include<br />ideas on internationalising ICANN and strengthening the IGF)<br /><br />Matthew<br /><br /><br /><br />x<br /><br /><br /><br />Nnenna<br /><br />x<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Claudio<br /><br /><br /><br />x - contribute, not lead<br /><br /><br /><br />Valeria/ APC<br /><br /><br /><br />x - contribute<br /><br />x - contribute<br /><br />Marianne/ IRP<br /><br /><br /><br />x<br /><br /><br /><br />Jeanette<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />x - listen!
and
comment<br /><br />M. Gurstein<br /><br /><br /><br />x<br /><br />x<br /><br />Marilia/ Joana<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />3.1/3.2<br /><br />Pranesh<br /><br /><br /><br />x<br /><br />x<br /><br />Parminder<br /><br />x<br /><br />x<br /><br />x</blockquote><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /></pre></blockquote></div><br>
Avri Doria</body></html>