[bestbits] Important: letter to Brazil government on CS representation

[Anja Kovacs]

Dear all,

Since there have been no further comments, I presume we can say that the
letter has been accepted as is and Best Bits can formally be added to the
signatories.

Mawaki, I did propose your changes to the larger group involved in the
drafting, but possibly since the initial drafting was such a long-drawn out
process, people prefered that we leave it as is. Thanks for your feedback
though.

And many thanks to all who responded to this thread for your vocal support.

Best regards,
Anja


On 23 November 2013 13:51, Anja Kovacs <anja at internetdemocracy.in> wrote:

> Dear Mawaki, Daniel, and all,
>
> On 23 November 2013 01:03, Mawaki Chango <kichango at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Not to speak for Daniel but (since you may be pressed by time) from the
>> way I read that part, it is a suggestion that you might want to specify for
>> each one of the Liaisons which of the 3 signatory networks they are part
>> of.
>>
>
> Thanks for the feedback, Mawaki. I think the whole idea is precisely to
> present the liaisons as liaisons of all three networks, irrespective of
> their exact memberships. This kind of approach allows us to present a
> unified front and, I would argue, also to strengthen collaboration and come
> to greater unity amongst ourselves in practice in the longer term.
>
> Daniel, I therefore suggest that we simply sign with the names of the
> three networks. If you strongly disagree with this approach, please do let
> us know within the next two hours or so.
>
> Many thanks,
> Anja
>
>
>>
>> I'm just serving as an interpret here, and have no position on that.
>> .... You're welcome Anja. Thank you for your stewardship.
>> Best,
>>
>> Mawaki
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Anja Kovacs <anja at internetdemocracy.in>wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Daniel,
>>>
>>> I think Marianne has already answered most of your questions, but I
>>> wanted to get a clarification on this one:
>>>
>>> On 22 November 2013 18:37, Daniel Pimienta <pimienta at funredes.org>wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Also, dont you think the belonging to the respective(s) 3 network(s)
>>>> of the list of representative names should be explicitely mentionned?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Could you please explain in more detail what you mean exactly?
>>>
>>> Many thanks,
>>> Anja
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and
>>>> is
>>>> believed to be clean.
>>>>
>>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>>>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>>>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dr. Anja Kovacs
>>> The Internet Democracy Project
>>>
>>> +91 9899028053 | @anjakovacs
>>> www.internetdemocracy.in
>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Anja Kovacs
> The Internet Democracy Project
>
> +91 9899028053 | @anjakovacs
> www.internetdemocracy.in
>



-- 
Dr. Anja Kovacs
The Internet Democracy Project

+91 9899028053 | @anjakovacs
www.internetdemocracy.in
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20131124/21709855/attachment.htm>