[bestbits] Proposed constructive contribution towards enhanced cooperation post-WTPF

[Jeremy Malcolm]

OK, here is the draft text in an etherpad:

http://igcaucus.org:9001/p/igf-opinions

A proposed schedule:

Comments and edits close at 09:00 GMT on 20 May 2012, final text to be moved to the Best Bits website.  Please discuss in this thread if your comments are too long to be made directly in the pad.
Endorsements collected from 10:00 GMT on 20 May 2012 via the Best Bits website similar to the WTPF statement.
Proposal delivered at IGF open consultation meeting on 21 May 2012 with endorsements as existing at that time.

Please have at it!

On 17/05/2013, at 10:41 AM, Jeremy Malcolm <jeremy at ciroap.org> wrote:

> As you know, yesterday the WTPF concluded without a resolution on this proposal by Brazil titled "Operationalizing the role of Government in the multi-stakeholder framework for Internet Governance":
> 
> http://www.itu.int/md/S13-WTPF13-C-0005/en
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gTewmlgXNTRYuPvIWylV2K39owgXH8st642I7IaXjh0/edit
> 
> Two of the options for what could happen to it instead were either that it could go to the ITU's CWG Internet which is a government-only group that meets in a closed format with open consultations, or that it could go to the IGF.  The objection raised to the latter option was that the IGF does not produce outputs.
> 
> I think that it might be useful for us to quickly produce a note for next week's IGF to propose a method for discussing the resolution in a more output-oriented way, that could be an alternative to its discussion at the CWG Internet (but would explicitly not prevent it from also being discussed at the CSTD WG EC, given that it is also relatively multi-stakeholder).  This would not require the wholesale reform of the IGF, but would be more of a trial run, to demonstrate what is possible - and in an instance where there is a tangible need to do so.
> 
> I'm floating my intention to produce a first draft of this, which would then be open for comments and amendments.  In our usual fashion, anyone could endorse it if they agreed.  If one of us will be in Geneva for the MAG meeting and is willing to do so, they could introduce it there.  (I'm starting this on the Best Bits list rather than the IGC list because the latter is a bit dysfunctional at the moment, but once a draft is ready we'll post it there too.)
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> -- 
> Dr Jeremy Malcolm
> Senior Policy Officer
> Consumers International | the global campaigning voice for consumers
> Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
> Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
> Tel: +60 3 7726 1599
> 
> 
> WCRD 2013 – Consumer Justice Now! | Consumer Protection Map: https://wcrd2013.crowdmap.com/main | #wcrd2013
> 
> 
> @Consumers_Int | www.consumersinternational.org | www.facebook.com/consumersinternational
> 
> Read our email confidentiality notice. Don't print this email unless necessary.
> 
> 

-- 
Dr Jeremy Malcolm
Senior Policy Officer
Consumers International | the global campaigning voice for consumers
Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Tel: +60 3 7726 1599

WCRD 2013 – Consumer Justice Now! | Consumer Protection Map: https://wcrd2013.crowdmap.com/main | #wcrd2013

@Consumers_Int | www.consumersinternational.org | www.facebook.com/consumersinternational

Read our email confidentiality notice. Don't print this email unless necessary.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20130518/59642348/attachment.htm>