[bestbits] Last day of WTPF - drafting concluding statement
Anriette Esterhuysen
anriette at apc.org
Thu May 16 09:41:38 EDT 2013
I support nnenna. I have been participating remotely. Not easy. And .
without the efforts of those in Geneva it would have been impossible.
These processes are imperfect. Under the circumstances I think the people on site have done their best to be inclusive.
Anriette
Sent from Samsung MobileNnenna Nwakanma <nnenna75 at gmail.com> wrote:Dear Michael
You were not the only one:
Who made comments
Who may have suggested edits
Who was denied access at the beginning of plenary
Who got an invite after lunch (30-40 minutes before plenary)
I was not in the original drafting committee because I am only participating remotely..
The difference might have been that I have been closely following and most of the views DO EMBODY already known and agreed principles.
Best
Nnenna
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:58 PM, michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com> wrote:
So, if you are going to deny access when a comment is made, close off discussion, and provide no response to a comment... Why bother to send the invitation at all... there being roughly 40 minutes from the invitation going out to my being denied further access to comment (I didn't make any intervention into the text... my comment being an attempt to get further context prior to attempting to make a comment in the text itself...
M
-----Original Message-----
From: bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net [mailto:bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 5:47 AM
To: bestbits at lists.bestbits.net
Subject: RE: [bestbits] Last day of WTPF - drafting concluding statement
The document was closed to all who had been working at a point so that it would not be in flux as we entered the meeting.
michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com> wrote:
>Interesting. I just followed up on Jeremy's invitation. made a comment.
>and
>was subsequently tossed out of the discussion and am now denied access
>to making any further comments. Any explanation for this?
>
>
>
>(
Avri Doria
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20130516/6b294a36/attachment.htm>
More information about the Bestbits
mailing list