<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body><div>I support nnenna. I have been participating remotely. Not easy. And .</div><div>without the efforts of those in Geneva it would have been impossible.</div><div><br></div><div>These processes are imperfect. Under the circumstances I think the people on site have done their best to be inclusive. </div><div>Anriette</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><div style="font-size:100%">Sent from Samsung Mobile</div></div> <br>Nnenna Nwakanma <nnenna75@gmail.com> wrote:<br><div dir="ltr"><div>Dear Michael<br><br></div>You were not the only one:<br><ol><li>Who made comments</li><li>Who may have suggested edits</li><li>Who was denied access at the beginning of plenary</li><li>Who got an invite after lunch (30-40 minutes before plenary)</li>
</ol><p>I was not in the original drafting committee because I am only participating remotely.. <br></p><p>The difference might have been that I have been closely following and most of the views DO EMBODY already known and agreed principles.</p>
<p>Best</p><p><br></p><p>Nnenna<br></p></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:58 PM, michael gurstein <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gurstein@gmail.com" target="_blank">gurstein@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">So, if you are going to deny access when a comment is made, close off discussion, and provide no response to a comment... Why bother to send the invitation at all... there being roughly 40 minutes from the invitation going out to my being denied further access to comment (I didn't make any intervention into the text... my comment being an attempt to get further context prior to attempting to make a comment in the text itself...<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
M<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: <a href="mailto:bestbits-request@lists.bestbits.net">bestbits-request@lists.bestbits.net</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:bestbits-request@lists.bestbits.net">bestbits-request@lists.bestbits.net</a>] On Behalf Of Avri Doria<br>
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 5:47 AM<br>
To: <a href="mailto:bestbits@lists.bestbits.net">bestbits@lists.bestbits.net</a><br>
Subject: RE: [bestbits] Last day of WTPF - drafting concluding statement<br>
<br>
The document was closed to all who had been working at a point so that it would not be in flux as we entered the meeting.<br>
<br>
michael gurstein <<a href="mailto:gurstein@gmail.com">gurstein@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
>Interesting. I just followed up on Jeremy's invitation. made a comment.<br>
>and<br>
>was subsequently tossed out of the discussion and am now denied access<br>
>to making any further comments. Any explanation for this?<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
>(<br>
Avri Doria<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div> </body>