[bestbits] FW: [IP] DNI releases Fact Sheet on PRISM, but the damage is already done

Katitza Rodriguez katitza at eff.org
Sat Jun 8 23:04:22 EDT 2013


We are working on a few international action focuses on protection of 
the privacy rights of foreigners, hopefully coming soon!

On 6/8/13 10:59 PM, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:
> On 09/06/2013, at 4:29 AM, "michael gurstein" <gurstein at gmail.com 
> <mailto:gurstein at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> What comes through loud and clear on this and the associated comments,
>> denials and disclaimers from all and sundry is that this is a global 
>> issue
>> requiring a global response and particularly initiatives from a 
>> global civil
>> society.
>
> Do you think that this is something that we should attempt through 
> Best Bits?  As you quite rightly pointed in response to the joint 
> letter posted to the webwewant list (and as I had also said in an 
> earlier reply), the joint letter from EFF, Free Press and ACLU is not 
> something that international organisations could support, yet 
> international Internet users are are even more affected by the PRISM 
> scandal than US Internet users are.
>
> In favour of such a response, one of the purposes of Best Bits was to 
> enable a broader perspective to attend the publication of statements 
> on human rights and the Internet, rather than a small cadre of 
> Internet freedom groups drafting and then pushing them out to the rest 
> of the world.  Against, is the concern is that "yet another statement" 
> isn't going to have much cumulative effect at this point, because 
> everybody and their dog has something to say about PRISM right now.
>
> If we do want to contribute something, then maybe our special 
> competence is in our knowledge of relevant international processes. 
>  So we could perhaps write our statement as a letter to the United 
> Nations Human Rights Council (particularly in the light of Frank La 
> Rue's latest report, 
> http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session23/A.HRC.23.40_EN.pdf). 
>  Or are there other international processes that people think would be 
> an appropriate target for such an intervention?
>
> Agreed that this is very important, but I just want to make sure we 
> don't issue a statement into the ether that will have zero impact.
>
> -- 
>
> *Dr Jeremy Malcolm
> Senior Policy Officer
> Consumers International | the global campaigning voice for consumers*
> Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
> Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur, 
> Malaysia
> Tel: +60 3 7726 1599
>
> WCRD 2013 – Consumer Justice Now! | Consumer Protection Map: 
> https://wcrd2013.crowdmap.com/main | #wcrd2013
>
> @Consumers_Int | www.consumersinternational.org 
> <http://www.consumersinternational.org/> | 
> www.facebook.com/consumersinternational 
> <http://www.facebook.com/consumersinternational>
>
> Read our email confidentiality notice 
> <http://www.consumersinternational.org/email-confidentiality>. Don't 
> print this email unless necessary.
>
>


-- 
Katitza Rodriguez
International Rights Director
Electronic Frontier Foundation
katitza at eff.org
katitza at datos-personales.org (personal email)

Please support EFF - Working to protect your digital rights and freedom of speech since 1990

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20130608/7003f0fa/attachment.htm>


More information about the Bestbits mailing list