[bestbits] Re: [discuss] [governance] Report from the BR meeting local organizing group - Dec 2013

[Ian Peter]

I think it would be good to find out from our Brazilian representatives why this change happened before framing any reaction. There may be other dimensions we are unaware of.

Ian 

From: parminder 
Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2013 4:53 AM
To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org ; mailto:bestbits at lists.bestbits.net 
Subject: Re: [bestbits] Re: [discuss] [governance] Report from the BR meeting local organizing group - Dec 2013

On the other hand, I also agree with Bill that this may be too important a matter to be decided just by the leadership  of various CS groups.

I propose that a vote be taken among membership of different groups here whether CS will like to deal directly with Brazilian hosts in the matter of participating in the Brazil meeting or go through the 1Net..

parminder 



On Saturday 28 December 2013 11:01 PM, parminder wrote:



  On Saturday 28 December 2013 10:52 PM, parminder wrote:

    This is some interesting congruence of views that is emerging..

    Can we hope that that 'responsibility holders' among us - various committees, their heads, cocordinators of networks, our appointed Liaisons, etc come out with their views and stand on this issue..... 


  and yes, of course those selected through various processes for 1Net committees .... 



    parminder 


    On Saturday 28 December 2013 10:40 PM, Louis Pouzin (well) wrote:

      On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 10:28 AM, William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com> wrote:

        Hi 

        Thanks Parminder, glad we are able to agree on this. 

        [snip]


        FWIW my view remains that if the networks involved refuse to work through the 1net mechanism to channel nominations to the Brazilians, they should not have taken positions on the 1net coordination committee, which to date has one identifiable function— channeling nominations to the Brazilians.   If the view is that because its launch and initial expiation were not handled well 1net therefore has no legitimacy as a channel, then the networks shouldn’t lend it legitimacy and should resign from its coordination committee.  I don’t share that view of 1net, but if someone else does they should behave according to their principles rather than trying to have it both ways. 

      + 2
      Louis 


        Best

        Bill









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
     http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20131229/ece5c3ae/attachment.htm>