[bestbits] Call for expressions of interest: 1net steering committee
matthew shears
mshears at cdt.org
Fri Dec 6 04:48:55 EST 2013
I am also interested in a 1net SC role.
Thanks.
Matthew
On 05/12/2013 20:57, Anja Kovacs wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Just to flag that I'd be interested in a 1net steering committee role
> as well.
>
> And Jeremy, in terms of process, could you maybe clarify though
> whether the CS coordination group is planning to select people as
> representatives of a particular network, or simply as CS
> representatives? I would argue that the latter makes more sense, but
> it would be good to know what the coordination group has in mind.
>
> Many thanks,
> Anja
>
>
>
>
> On 6 December 2013 01:53, Carolina Rossini <carolina.rossini at gmail.com
> <mailto:carolina.rossini at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I am happy to play one of the roles, since I do believe we need
> consistency and coherency.
> Let me know where I could fit best.
> Carolina
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Dec 5, 2013, at 3:19 PM, matthew shears <mshears at cdt.org
> <mailto:mshears at cdt.org>> wrote:
>
>> My understanding from some time back was that we had the following:
>>
>> 4 (now 3) persons directly liaising with Brazil on the meeting
>> (_not_ through 1net)
>>
>> And to fill
>>
>> 5 civil society slots on the 1net steering committee (recognizing
>> that civil society liaison for the Brazil meeting is as above).
>>
>> And
>>
>> Some number of civil society slots to be filled on some
>> combination of the actual Brazil meeting committees (to be
>> determined although there are suggestions that there should be 2
>> from civil society for at least two of the committees).
>>
>> From my perspective, and to echo a point made by Joana earlier,
>> it would seem to make sense that those liaising with Brazil at
>> the moment should probably be a part of the meeting committees to
>> ensure consistency and coherency.
>>
>> As to 1net, it might also make sense for one of the Brazil
>> liaisons to be a part of the 1net civil society steering
>> committee component just to be sure that we have continuity
>> across the various committees/liaisons.
>>
>> Finally, I realize that there is quite some debate about what
>> 1net is or is not but I do believe that there is merit to
>> participating and seeing where it leads us - as we have discussed
>> before. I would also note that there is considerable merit in
>> bringing stakeholders together and to figuring out what pressing
>> IG related issues those stakeholders can find commonality of
>> purpose on and work together to progress.
>>
>> Matthew
>>
>> On 05/12/2013 13:22, Anja Kovacs wrote:
>>> On 5 December 2013 17:32, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net
>>> <mailto:parminder at itforchange.net>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday 05 December 2013 04:35 PM, Anja Kovacs wrote:
>>>> I agree that Rafik would be a good choice.
>>>>
>>>> What I'm not so clear about is why the four Brazilian
>>>> liaisons should also continue to be de facto
>>>> representatives in the 1net Steering Committee,
>>> Anja
>>>
>>> I might have missed it, but I dont remember seeing any
>>> proposal to have our 4 Brazilian liaisons to Brazil meeting
>>> organising structure also be CS reps on the Steering Committee.
>>>
>>>
>>> That seemed to be what Jeremy proposed in his initial email,
>>> hence my response, but I also don't recall there being a broader
>>> discussion or agreement on this.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Anja
>>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>>
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> bestbits at lists.bestbits.net <mailto:bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>.
>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>> http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>
>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Anja Kovacs
> The Internet Democracy Project
>
> +91 9899028053 | @anjakovacs
> www.internetdemocracy.in <http://www.internetdemocracy.in/>
--
Matthew Shears
Director and Representative
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
mshears at cdt.org
+44 (0) 771 247 2987
Skype: mshears
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20131206/341803bd/attachment.htm>
More information about the Bestbits
mailing list