<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
I am also interested in a 1net SC role.<br>
<br>
Thanks.<br>
<br>
Matthew<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 05/12/2013 20:57, Anja Kovacs wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAJqNAHDT2P_Fmd-h8KjPUWp6WFA78tYaD9=U0mvvAVnJsTadBg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Dear all, <br>
<br>
Just to flag that I'd be interested in a 1net steering committee
role as well.<br>
<br>
<div>And Jeremy, in terms of process, could you maybe clarify
though whether the CS coordination group is planning to select
people as representatives of a particular network, or simply
as CS representatives? I would argue that the latter makes
more sense, but it would be good to know what the coordination
group has in mind. <br>
<br>
</div>
Many thanks, <br>
Anja<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 6 December 2013 01:53, Carolina
Rossini <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:carolina.rossini@gmail.com" target="_blank">carolina.rossini@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="auto">
<div>I am happy to play one of the roles, since I do
believe we need consistency and coherency.</div>
<div>
Let me know where I could fit best. </div>
<div>Carolina<br>
<br>
Sent from my iPad</div>
<div>
<div class="h5">
<div><br>
On Dec 5, 2013, at 3:19 PM, matthew shears <<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org" target="_blank">mshears@cdt.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div> My understanding from some time back was that
we had the following:<br>
<br>
4 (now 3) persons directly liaising with Brazil on
the meeting (<u>not</u> through 1net)<br>
<br>
And to fill<br>
<br>
5 civil society slots on the 1net steering
committee (recognizing that civil society liaison
for the Brazil meeting is as above). <br>
<br>
And <br>
<br>
Some number of civil society slots to be filled on
some combination of the actual Brazil meeting
committees (to be determined although there are
suggestions that there should be 2 from civil
society for at least two of the committees).<br>
<br>
From my perspective, and to echo a point made by
Joana earlier, it would seem to make sense that
those liaising with Brazil at the moment should
probably be a part of the meeting committees to
ensure consistency and coherency.<br>
<br>
As to 1net, it might also make sense for one of
the Brazil liaisons to be a part of the 1net civil
society steering committee component just to be
sure that we have continuity across the various
committees/liaisons.<br>
<br>
Finally, I realize that there is quite some debate
about what 1net is or is not but I do believe that
there is merit to participating and seeing where
it leads us - as we have discussed before. I
would also note that there is considerable merit
in bringing stakeholders together and to figuring
out what pressing IG related issues those
stakeholders can find commonality of purpose on
and work together to progress. <br>
<br>
Matthew<br>
<br>
<div>On 05/12/2013 13:22, Anja Kovacs wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">On 5 December 2013
17:32, parminder <span dir="ltr"><<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:parminder@itforchange.net"
target="_blank">parminder@itforchange.net</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div> <br>
<div>On Thursday 05 December 2013
04:35 PM, Anja Kovacs wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>I agree that Rafik would
be a good choice.<br>
<br>
What I'm not so clear about
is why the four Brazilian
liaisons should also
continue to be de facto
representatives in the 1net
Steering Committee,</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
Anja<br>
<br>
I might have missed it, but I dont
remember seeing any proposal to have
our 4 Brazilian liaisons to Brazil
meeting organising structure also be
CS reps on the Steering Committee. <br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>That seemed to be what Jeremy
proposed in his initial email, hence my
response, but I also don't recall there
being a broader discussion or agreement
on this. <br>
<br>
</div>
<div>Best,<br>
Anja<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><span><font
color="#888888"> </font></span> </div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div><span>____________________________________________________________</span>
<div class="im"><br>
<span>You received this message as a subscriber on
the list:</span><br>
<span> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:bestbits@lists.bestbits.net"
target="_blank">bestbits@lists.bestbits.net</a>.</span><br>
<span>To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:</span><br>
<span> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits"
target="_blank">http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits</a></span></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br clear="all">
<br>
-- <br>
Dr. Anja Kovacs<br>
The Internet Democracy Project<br>
<br>
+91 9899028053 | @anjakovacs<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.internetdemocracy.in/" target="_blank">www.internetdemocracy.in</a><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Matthew Shears
Director and Representative
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org">mshears@cdt.org</a>
+44 (0) 771 247 2987
Skype: mshears
</pre>
</body>
</html>