[bestbits] Call for expressions of interest: 1net steering committee

[Joana Varon]

I would also argue that going "simply as CS representatives" would make
more sense, as we dont want to divide ourselves as a person from this
network or another...


On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Anja Kovacs <anja at internetdemocracy.in>wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> Just to flag that I'd be interested in a 1net steering committee role as
> well.
>
> And Jeremy, in terms of process, could you maybe clarify though whether
> the CS coordination group is planning to select people as representatives
> of a particular network, or simply as CS representatives? I would argue
> that the latter makes more sense, but it would be good to know what the
> coordination group has in mind.
>
> Many thanks,
> Anja
>
>
>
>
> On 6 December 2013 01:53, Carolina Rossini <carolina.rossini at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I am happy to play one of the roles, since I do believe we need
>> consistency and coherency.
>> Let me know where I could fit best.
>> Carolina
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Dec 5, 2013, at 3:19 PM, matthew shears <mshears at cdt.org> wrote:
>>
>> My understanding from some time back was that we had the following:
>>
>> 4 (now 3) persons directly liaising with Brazil on the meeting (*not*through 1net)
>>
>> And to fill
>>
>> 5 civil society slots on the 1net steering committee (recognizing that
>> civil society liaison for the Brazil meeting is as above).
>>
>> And
>>
>> Some number of civil society slots to be filled on some combination of
>> the actual Brazil meeting committees (to be determined although there are
>> suggestions that there should be 2 from civil society for at least two of
>> the committees).
>>
>> From my perspective, and to echo a point made by Joana earlier, it would
>> seem to make sense that those liaising with Brazil at the moment should
>> probably be a part of the meeting committees to ensure consistency and
>> coherency.
>>
>> As to 1net, it might also make sense for one of the Brazil liaisons to be
>> a part of the 1net civil society steering committee component just to be
>> sure that we have continuity across the various committees/liaisons.
>>
>> Finally, I realize that there is quite some debate about what 1net is or
>> is not but I do believe that there is merit to participating and seeing
>> where it leads us - as we have discussed before.  I would also note that
>> there is considerable merit in bringing stakeholders together and to
>> figuring out what pressing IG related issues those stakeholders can find
>> commonality of purpose on and work together to progress.
>>
>> Matthew
>>
>> On 05/12/2013 13:22, Anja Kovacs wrote:
>>
>>  On 5 December 2013 17:32, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday 05 December 2013 04:35 PM, Anja Kovacs wrote:
>>>
>>>  I agree that Rafik would be a good choice.
>>>
>>> What I'm not so clear about is why the four Brazilian liaisons should
>>> also continue to be de facto representatives in the 1net Steering Committee,
>>>
>>>  Anja
>>>
>>> I might have missed it, but I dont remember seeing any proposal to have
>>> our 4 Brazilian liaisons to Brazil meeting organising structure also be CS
>>> reps on the Steering Committee.
>>>
>>
>>  That seemed to be what Jeremy proposed in his initial email, hence my
>> response, but I also don't recall there being a broader discussion or
>> agreement on this.
>>
>>  Best,
>> Anja
>>
>>
>>>
>>   ____________________________________________________________
>>
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>     http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Anja Kovacs
> The Internet Democracy Project
>
> +91 9899028053 | @anjakovacs
> www.internetdemocracy.in
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>



-- 
-- 

Joana Varon Ferraz
@joana_varon
PGP 0x016B8E73
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20131205/fe427756/attachment.htm>