[bestbits] Call for expressions of interest: 1net steering committee

[Anja Kovacs]

Dear all,

Just to flag that I'd be interested in a 1net steering committee role as
well.

And Jeremy, in terms of process, could you maybe clarify though whether the
CS coordination group is planning to select people as representatives of a
particular network, or simply as CS representatives? I would argue that the
latter makes more sense, but it would be good to know what the coordination
group has in mind.

Many thanks,
Anja




On 6 December 2013 01:53, Carolina Rossini <carolina.rossini at gmail.com>wrote:

> I am happy to play one of the roles, since I do believe we need
> consistency and coherency.
> Let me know where I could fit best.
> Carolina
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Dec 5, 2013, at 3:19 PM, matthew shears <mshears at cdt.org> wrote:
>
> My understanding from some time back was that we had the following:
>
> 4 (now 3) persons directly liaising with Brazil on the meeting (*not*through 1net)
>
> And to fill
>
> 5 civil society slots on the 1net steering committee (recognizing that
> civil society liaison for the Brazil meeting is as above).
>
> And
>
> Some number of civil society slots to be filled on some combination of the
> actual Brazil meeting committees (to be determined although there are
> suggestions that there should be 2 from civil society for at least two of
> the committees).
>
> From my perspective, and to echo a point made by Joana earlier, it would
> seem to make sense that those liaising with Brazil at the moment should
> probably be a part of the meeting committees to ensure consistency and
> coherency.
>
> As to 1net, it might also make sense for one of the Brazil liaisons to be
> a part of the 1net civil society steering committee component just to be
> sure that we have continuity across the various committees/liaisons.
>
> Finally, I realize that there is quite some debate about what 1net is or
> is not but I do believe that there is merit to participating and seeing
> where it leads us - as we have discussed before.  I would also note that
> there is considerable merit in bringing stakeholders together and to
> figuring out what pressing IG related issues those stakeholders can find
> commonality of purpose on and work together to progress.
>
> Matthew
>
> On 05/12/2013 13:22, Anja Kovacs wrote:
>
>  On 5 December 2013 17:32, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thursday 05 December 2013 04:35 PM, Anja Kovacs wrote:
>>
>>  I agree that Rafik would be a good choice.
>>
>> What I'm not so clear about is why the four Brazilian liaisons should
>> also continue to be de facto representatives in the 1net Steering Committee,
>>
>>  Anja
>>
>> I might have missed it, but I dont remember seeing any proposal to have
>> our 4 Brazilian liaisons to Brazil meeting organising structure also be CS
>> reps on the Steering Committee.
>>
>
>  That seemed to be what Jeremy proposed in his initial email, hence my
> response, but I also don't recall there being a broader discussion or
> agreement on this.
>
>  Best,
> Anja
>
>
>>
>   ____________________________________________________________
>
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>     http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>
>


-- 
Dr. Anja Kovacs
The Internet Democracy Project

+91 9899028053 | @anjakovacs
www.internetdemocracy.in
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20131206/c55ff676/attachment.htm>