[bestbits] Position by IT for Change and some other NGOs on enhanced cooperation

[JFC Morfin]

At 19:10 31/08/2013, David Allen wrote:
>  What we can hope for, and surely must encourage, are positions 
> that head in the right direction.

Dear David,

What is the definition to give to "direction"? What is the right 
direction? Who can uncovers and prove it to be right? Who has 
legitimacy to declare it right?
Until know we had an internet referent supposed to provide everyone 
guidance on hos to influence those who design, utilize and manage the 
internet to work better (RFC 3935). This was the IAB. Through RFC 
6852 the IAB has abandonned that role. And no one has replaced it 
(nor intends or is meant to).

All I know is that an architectonic esthetic has been documented by 
the WSIS. This esthetic is documented as "a people centered 
information society". From this I can only try to analyze and 
catalyze a "nethiquette" based on our good will, best effort, and 
lack of experience in our anthropo+botic society and digitally 
extended universe.

As long as the architectonic (what is to be the digital extension we 
are building to our 3D world) debate has not been carried, there is 
no way to target and support a global system concordance, that a 
multistakholder gouvernance can manage, and the operance service 
providers can neutraly propose.

jfc