[bestbits] Important new joint submission to CSTD Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation

[Jeremy Malcolm]

On 23/08/2013, at 7:16 PM, genekimmelman at gmail.com wrote:

> I hope we will reconsider use of the word tyrannical to describe any regime or action.  If our goal is to make a strong statement and express some kind of parallelism between vastly different countries,  it may be more effective to use a less provocative word. 
> Maybe something that conveys disrespect for human rights principles? 


Thanks for this feedback.  Would it be OK if we just delete the second "tyrannical" leaving it as follows:

"And whilst the UN is characterised by some as being a haven for tyrranical regimes, the United States itself is widely criticised as having infringed global human rights norms through its global surveillance practices, and for its pursuit of whistleblowers such as Edward Snowden for exposing such practices."

-- 
Dr Jeremy Malcolm
Senior Policy Officer
Consumers International | the global campaigning voice for consumers
Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Tel: +60 3 7726 1599

Explore our new Resource Zone - the global consumer movement knowledge hub |http://www.consumersinternational.org/news-and-media/resource-zone

@Consumers_Int | www.consumersinternational.org | www.facebook.com/consumersinternational

Read our email confidentiality notice. Don't print this email unless necessary.

WARNING: This email has not been encrypted. You are strongly recommended to enable PGP or S/MIME encryption at your end. For instructions, see http://jere.my/l/8m.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20130824/3a4e07a0/attachment.htm>