[governance] Potential IGC letter to US gov (was Re: NET NEUTRALITY AND MORE)

[Kabani]

Agree with Wolfgang +1

On Saturday, 1 June 2013, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" wrote:

> I agree with Bill, what ICANN has to do as the next step to clarify the
> procedures for the communication, coordination and collaboration in an
> enhanced PDP amont ALL stakewholders involved in ICANN, INCLUDING the GAC.
> This could be in a form of an AoC (or a FoC).
>
> BTW, a good issue both for the Durban workshop as well as for ATLAS II.
>
> wolfgang
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> Von: governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org <javascript:;> im Auftrag von
> William Drake
> Gesendet: Sa 01.06.2013 15:46
> An: governance at lists.igcaucus.org <javascript:;>; Mawaki Chango
> Cc: Avri Doria; John Curran
> Betreff: Re: [governance] Potential IGC letter to US gov (was Re: NET
> NEUTRALITY AND MORE)
>
>
> Hi Mawaki
>
> On Jun 1, 2013, at 12:18 PM, Mawaki Chango <kichango at gmail.com<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
>
>         Would a multilateral AoC between ICANN and GAC make sense?
>
>
> I'd argue a multistakeholder one evolved from the current structure if/as
> greater confidence and trust are built would be better.  This has been a
> subject of some consideration in relevant capitals, IGF sessions, etc.
>
> Cheers
>
> Bill
>
>

-- 
Sent from iPad
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130601/73fc0bad/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t