[governance] Landmark decision by ITU Council on proposal for public consultation and open access

Avri Doria avri at ella.com
Sat Jul 14 20:52:56 EDT 2012 

Hi,

Great idea.

We sort f did it in WGIG.  It would be a great recurring exercise for the IGF.

As for Dynamic Coalitions, do they work, or do we need some new mechanisms?

avri

On 14 Jul 2012, at 12:41, Kleinwächter, Wolfgang wrote:

> During the WGIG time some academics - as Alejandro will remember - started to call for a general becnhmnarking of all - intergovernmental and international - organisations according to criteria like openess, transparency, legitimacy, accountability, membership, acess, diversity, bottom up PDP etc. The analysis was never done. Would be a good subject for Baku or a new "Dynamic Coalition on Transparency and Accountybility of International Internet Organisations".
> 
> wolfgang
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> Von: michael gurstein [mailto:gurstein at gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Sa 14.07.2012 15:48
> An: 'Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch'; governance at lists.igcaucus.org; 'Izumi AIZU'
> Betreff: RE: [governance] Landmark decision by ITU Council on proposal for public consultation and open access
> 
> 
> 
> Good point Alejandro... to extend it a bit, I'm wondering whether we might rather begin a process of adopting the Open Government Partnership principles and process http://www.opengovpartnership.org/ here as benchmarks and something that the IGC might look to promote with other of the agencies with which it is in contact (the IGF being one... 
> 
> 
> 
> The ICANN A&T Review may be rather more robust than the OGP one at this stage but the longer term OGP process is gathering a significant head of steam and including international agencies within that process would be, I think, a significant step for forward for CS overall (no reason we couldn't include both as part of the review/benchmarking process you are suggesting, which BTW would make an excellent Master's thesis or extended research essay for some appropriate grad student...
> 
> 
> 
> M
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch [mailto:apisan at unam.mx] 
> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 11:55 PM
> To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org; Izumi AIZU; Michael Gurstein
> Subject: RE: [governance] Landmark decision by ITU Council on proposal for public consultation and open access
> 
> 
> 
> Izumi, 
> 
> 
> 
> a creative approach, and one which would speak for consistency in this community, would be to set up a benchmark and see how far the ITU complies with it as the process takes place over the coming months.
> 
> 
> 
> One particularly relevant benchmark would be the Accountability and Transparency Review of ICANN or related documents, mostly the updates on how ICANN  has taken measures to comply with the recommendations of the ATRT. See if non-governmental participants have access to key documents, access to discussions, the ability to organize themselves, and impact on decisions. 
> 
> 
> 
> We all know that ICANN needs to improve in all these aspects but it's a good benchmark. I've once graded several organizations related to WSIS. It's a complex exercise in evaluation but it can be done in a way that yields a few very clear results.
> 
> 
> 
> Yours,
> 
> 
> 
> Alejandro Pisanty
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ! !! !!! !!!!
> 
> NEW PHONE NUMBER - NUEVO NÚMERO DE TELÉFONO
> 
> 
> 
> +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD 
> 
> +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO 
> 
> SMS +525541444475 
>     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
> UNAM, Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
> 
> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com <http://pisanty.blogspot.com/> 
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
> Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
> ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org <http://www..isoc.org/> 
> .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> Desde: izumiaizu at gmail.com [izumiaizu at gmail.com] en nombre de Izumi AIZU [iza at anr.org]
> Enviado el: viernes, 13 de julio de 2012 14:49
> Hasta: governance at lists.igcaucus.org; Michael Gurstein
> Asunto: Re: [governance] Landmark decision by ITU Council on proposal for public consultation and open access
> 
> Wow. Any comments for IGC to react to this decision? Welcome statement? 
> 
> Further plan of action?
> 
> 
> 
> Izumi
> 
> 
> 
> 2012?7?14???? Michael Gurstein gurstein at gmail.com:
> 
> Landmark decision by ITU Council on proposal for public consultation and
> open access to key conference document: Online public platforms will be
> created to enable multi-stakeholder consultation....
> 
> http://www.itu.int/net/pressoffice/press_releases/2012/46.aspx
> 
> M
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
>>> Izumi Aizu <<
> Institute for InfoSocionomics, Tama University, Tokyo
> Institute for HyperNetwork Society, Oita,          
> Japan
> www.anr.org <http://www.anr.org/> 
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
> 
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
> 
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t

More information about the Governance mailing list