[Governance] IGF Leadership panel: My personal stance
remmyn at gmail.com
Sun Nov 28 15:59:39 EST 2021
Nnenna nominated and seconded as well by us.
On Sun, 28 Nov 2021, 21:47 Lee W McKnight via Governance, <
governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote:
> Following on Nnenna’s excellent points, and example:
> - The 15 years ‘do nothing but talk’ history of IGF is an accident – a
> bug not a feature - because it was intentionally stifled at birth. And not
> permitted in the final WSIS negotiations, to do more.
> - I engaged in global civil disobedience at the 3rd IGF to register my
> objection to that stifling; by asking for a show of hands (gasp! The
> horror!) in a Hyderabad panel discussion I was moderating on the JPA that
> Milton among others may recall.
> - I wished to make the point that such stifling was foolish, and
> not in anyone’s long-term interest.
> - My breach of IGF etiquette did not pass unnoticed at the time,
> but that’s also not the point.
> - Some of the orgs most upset with me at the time -now – would also
> like the IGF to get out of the box it was put in at birth. So we all move
> - Many, dare I say most, recognize for the IGF to gain/have
> relevance going forward, more is needed than talk.
> - Whether the leadership panel is the ideal, or only way to make that
> happen is not the point.
> - Only issue now is whether IGC can get out of its own way to engage –
> with the Secretary General -and other multi-stakeholders.
> - To help us move ahead, I nominate, or second, and endorse 1000%
> Nnenna for the Leadership panel on behalf of IGC.
> *From:* Governance <governance-bounces at lists.igcaucus.org> *On Behalf Of *Nnenna
> Nwakanma via Governance
> *Sent:* Sunday, November 28, 2021 8:06 AM
> *To:* Governance <governance at lists.igcaucus.org>
> *Subject:* [Governance] IGF Leadership panel: My personal stance
> Dear all
> I do not have energy for drawn-out debates. However, let me state my
> personal perspective of the IGF Leadership panel
> - After 15 years of IGF, I, personally would like to see it take on
> more policy engagement, beyond the "talk, conversation, sharing experience"
> status in which it is at the moment. Wolfgang and Jovan's points provide
> enough background
> - I also do not think that the IGF Leadership panel will prove to be
> a silver bullet, but it is worth a try.
> - The process that led to the Digital Cooperation Roadmap, which gave
> birth to the IGF suggestion was fully mutlistakeholder. I have
> participated, in my personal capacity and via the Web Foundation for the
> past 3 years, right from BEFORE Paris IGF till today.
> - There is a Civil Society group (let me know if you or your
> organisation wishes to engage) that has kept in collaboration with the
> Office of the UN Tech Envoy since its inception. Many orgs in this list are
> also there.
> - Some of us plan to engage in Our Common Agenda
> <https://www.un.org/en/content/common-agenda-report/>, and most
> importantly, the Global Digital Compact, that we believe will be in the
> works mainly in 2022 and 2023. This is the "Rebuilding after COVID Pandemic
> Report" launched by the UNSG at the UNGA76 as requested by the UNGA75
> - Personally, I have been asked by many if it is okay to nominate me
> to the IGF Leadership panel and my response has been "Yes, if you consider
> it right and think I can bring value".
> - Again, as a personal principle, I do not self nominate for anything,
> All for now
> Governance mailing list
> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Governance