From 6.internet at gmail.com Sun May 2 10:06:28 2021 From: 6.internet at gmail.com (sivasubramanian muthusamy) Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 19:36:28 +0530 Subject: [Governance] 170 orgs send an open letter to UN SG to stop plans for a new High Level Multistakeholder Body In-Reply-To: <1CAFAAB4-CE71-AC41-B7AD-C4308DB9C0B3@hxcore.ol> References: <7795cc31-b355-8556-71d6-12e1d43e7ee9@itforchange.net> <02f04869-79ee-2cfd-55c2-323c59bbed4d@itforchange.net> <1559bbe8-369e-e603-066d-128368f15b3e@itforchange.net> <61d05ab7-19c3-ccdd-6573-3248829a4283@itforchange.net> <1CAFAAB4-CE71-AC41-B7AD-C4308DB9C0B3@hxcore.ol> Message-ID: I am wondering how appropriate it is to subject the Secretary General's initiative to constitute a high level body, at as high a level as the Secretary General might conceive. This is the well within the scope and expectations of the highest functionary of the UN. Subjecting the Secretary General's functions to an objection or a public criticism process in a mailing list somewhat exceeds the limits of the Civil Society MS processes. Inputs and comments are pertinent when programs are announced by the high level body that is not yet constituted, when called for, and where necessary. It ought to be well within the powers of the Secretary General to name individuals and Organisations as it pleases the Secretary General and so constitute the high level body as conceived for the good of the world. Sivasubramanian M On Mon, Apr 12, 2021, 12:10 suresh via Governance < governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > An interesting tirade I must say > > No point replying as Milton has replied to these to the extent that is > necessary > > Repeating the same thing with minor rewording doesn’t exactly make it true > you know > > --srs > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Governance on behalf of > parminder via Governance > *Sent:* Monday, April 12, 2021 12:06 PM > *To:* governance at listsigcaucus.org > *Subject:* Re: [Governance] 170 orgs send an open letter to UN SG to stop > plans for a new High Level Multistakeholder Body > > > > https://www.bbc.com/news/business-56701765 > > Jack Ma's Alibaba gets heavily fined for abusing its marker dominance for > many years. Bill Gates's Microsoft earned most of its money from its > monopoly OS and office applications, employing blatantly anti-competitive > practices in the 1990's and 2000's ... > > Great that It is for Jack Ma and Mrs Gates to give us the roadmap for > global digital cooperation and (non) regulation , as they did through the > "Digital Cooperation' initiative .... It is quick shocking that the irony > of it is entirely lost on most 'civil society' here. Not sure what is > happening. > > Under the new 'Digital Cooperation' rubric, being built right now, we > would of course soon have Facebook and Twitter leading policy work on > social media, and Google and Baidu on data governance. > > Already Microsoft plays the biggest part in developing outcomes from the > IGF's best Practices Forum on data and new technologies ... The new Digital > Cooperation rubric is explicitly supposed to carry forward work from > industry dominated activities in best practices forums to global digital > policy stage, stamped with the legitimacy of a 'bottom up process' and now > the authority of the new High Level Multistakeholder Body that is being set > up. > > Let the people here, and those actively involved in building and > supporting this new global digital policy architecture, not deny the > responsibility when the fully grown Frankenstein is up and active among us > .... > > ON OECD's digital policy making; > > This is an announcement today > https://www.oecd.org/digital/trusted-government-access-personal-data-private-sector.htm > > It says " The OECD Committee on Digital Economy Policy, which has long > been at the forefront of global data governance policy work," > > So, well people can still keep denying that OECD's CDEP does 'policy work' > and further that it does 'global policy work' , and in a fully colonial way > keep working with and supporting the OECD digital policy work, even as they > oppose similar possibilities at the global level. > > It further says, that the purpose is to "examine the possibility of > developing, as a matter of priority, an instrument setting out high-level > principles or policy guidance for trusted government access to personal > data held by the private sector." > > Not policy work, right! > > The " Committee agreed to convene a drafting group comprised of nominated > government representatives and experts, including from law enforcement and > national security agencies", for the purpose if developing a draft > instrument. > > All drafting group members are gov representatives or otherwise gov > nominated ... And this is just the drafting group, the final decision > making body, the Committee itself, is of course also fully governmental . > > But sure, people can keep calling OECD's digital policy work as > multistakholder, and call the same model at the UN level as multi--lateral > and gov capture of digital governance. > > parminder > > > On 03/04/21 12:31 pm, parminder wrote: > > > This part in addressed to others and not Milton. > > While I request your engagement with this debate, especially of those who > have involved themselves with the new 'digital cooperation' governance > models, I must clarify one thing. My use of personally targeted language, > if any, against Milton had only and exceptionally to do with, and was only > in response to, his habitual way of saying things like, as he did this > time, that the other person is totally ignorant, and that signing > organisations are some fringe inconsequential organisations, doing > ideological name-calling, and so on .. Take this as a kind of 'private > thing' between Milton and me, even as we do productively discuss very > important issues, concepts and ideas..... > > Let this bilateral idiosyncrasy of ours not deter you, others, from your > public duty to engage in this very important debate, and, as and if > required, respond to important issues and questions that have been raised > here. > > If the global CS Internet Governance Caucus were not to be discussing > global digital governance models at this critical juncture when one such > model is close to being installed, I do not know what the IGC is doing at > all. > > parminder > > > On 03/04/21 12:28 pm, parminder wrote: > > > On 03/04/21 3:55 am, Mueller, Milton L wrote: > > Wow, Parminder, you’re getting wordier and wordier and I am not sure I > have time to continue this, but let me provide some parting shots before we > agree to disagree and go our separate ways… > > Dear Milton, I wont wow! you .... Words are definitionally the body of > discursive democracy. If more were needed in this case that is for reasons > that you may at least equally be responsible for. This discussion is about > what mode of global governance is appropriate for (non CIR or non tech) > digital issues. It is but in order that key interlocutors let know what > kind of model they support and advocate in this regard. You spent a few > emails to reach there, but yes now from your last email I get a good idea - > though still quite vague. I quote from your email. > > "To deal with these other problems (meaning, non CIR or non-tech digital > issues) we will have to come up with something new. But, like ICANN, it > should try to be global and rooted in private law rather than in national > institutions. So in my view, that means we have to keep national > governments at bay to buy time for organic institutions to evolve." > > Very interesting! You want global digital governance to be based on > private law, or, I understand, institutions built on private law. That is a > quite clear, and also an extra-ordinarily bold, assertion. Entirely your > choice to take forward or not this important discussion on appropriate > institutional models for global digital governance, but can you please help > us understand this more. (Please do not ask me to read your book :) ) Maybe > provide us the outline of how such a thing would look in practice. It you > have written about it somewhere pl give us a link (again, pl not a whole > book though.) That would be an extremely valuable contribution to the > debate, and to the very cause of appropriate global digital governance. > > You may please provide one clarification -- what or whose private law > should these institutions for global digital governance be based on? US? > Some other country? Or you have some conception of global private law? > > I also understand from the above that such a private law based global > digital governance is in your mind an interim arrangement to 'buy time for > organise institutions to evolve'. I find this even more interesting, and > genuinely so... Again your choice to expound further what you have put > across somewhat cryptically, but can you tell us a little more about what > kind of organic institutions you have in mind even as a future possibility? > Are these too also be based on private law? Or, is this something going > towards directly elected global parliament kind of things? I am very > interesting in any and all such democratic yearnings and projects, and we > may indeed find common ground here. > > You have ridiculed my asking for clear respective positions on global > governance models.... Well, I do not know whether you know much about this > area or not but such mutual accountabilities and answer-abilities are at > core of global and infra-global civil society working and networking. IT > for Change, for instance has a 'your right to know' button on our website, > and we promise to respond to any question about us within 2 weeks... This > is because we use public money on public trust, and cannot refuse to answer > public questions about ourselves. It is in the same spirit that I ask > questions from you and others in this space. > > regards, parminder > > > > > Again, agree that this discussion is very important. I would invite others > closely involved with the proposal for the new MS body for digital > cooperation to please also get involved - Such important matters need to go > through the test and fire of discursive democracy. > > Yep. Yay, discursive democracy! That’s what we’re doing here, folks. > > > buckets. > > Buckets. Not a very cyber metaphor. Packets? Photons? Anyway…. > > >therefore you really do not approve of [OECD] You could be clearer and > more upfront about such > > > disapproval, here > > And why do I need to do that, here? I see no point in denouncing them on > public mailing lists. As I said, I approve of their research, it’s often > useful, good economists and policy analysts live there. But I did stop > participating. These advisory committees to IGOs have very little voice or > power in these organizations. Essentially you’re a worker for no pay. I > choose to voluntarily donate my time elsewhere. > > >when pushed into an argumentative corner, > > That, sir, is an excellent description of your tactics on these email > lists. But I can’t complain, I do the same thing. > > >Here I will request others who actively work with the OECD model to let > us know their views on > > >that model, clearly and upfront. > > Parminder, this is a mailing list of a diverse civil society coalition, > not the monthly meeting of a Trotskyite advocacy collective. Nobody has to > make their views known, “clearly and upfront,” to pass your loyalty test. > > Let’s go back to what this disagreement was fundamentally about. You want > the internet to be controlled by sovereign states, and I want it to be > self-governing and independent of sovereign states, insofar as that’s > possible. Those are two distinct paths for internet governance. I will > fight for its autonomy, you will fight for its subordination to > nation-states. We meet in this space because that is the space that was set > up to have those debates. > > 2 The appropriate model for global digital policy making, as per you: You > have earlier made a clear distinction between CIR governance (ICANN etc) > and governance of other Internet/ digital issues, and rightly so. I > understand that in the latter category we can include platform governance, > data governance, AI governance etc. Right. I now understand, though once > again you state is very mutely, that you would like to see global > governance of platforms, data, AI, and other digital issues undertaken in > the same way as ICANN is governed Right? You need to be clear and upfront > about what is the model you propose for global governance of these non-CIR > digital issues -- because that is what is at the centre of this discussion. > > Here you make a good point, I do need to be clear about that, as a matter > of practical reality if not logical consistency. So I stated this “very > mutely,” did I? LOL! OK, I will speak louder. Undertaken the same way as > ICANN? Depends on what you mean. You mean, organize it under ICANN? or > start with the US government and then privatize it? No. ICANN was a > governance experiment that can never be repeated. To deal with these other > problems we will have to come up with something new. But, like ICANN, it > should try to be global and rooted in private law rather than in national > institutions. So in my view, that means we have to keep national > governments at bay to buy time for organic institutions to evolve. > > Milton, are you really saying we should be dealing with various non-CIR > digital public policy issues in the same manner? Where private sector sits > at the same or higher level as governments? > > Definitely. We need a coalition of governments, private sector and civil > society to work together in nonhierarchical forms of cooperation, and we > need to have governments refrain from militarizing, territorializing, > surveilling, censoring and restricting cyberspace for enough time for > peaceful forms of cooperation to remain possible. > > Well, I repeat, it is scandalous... > > Parminder, scandalizing you is what I live for. It’s the only reason I’m > on this list. > > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sheetal at gp-digital.org Tue May 4 05:20:31 2021 From: sheetal at gp-digital.org (Sheetal Kumar) Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 10:20:31 +0100 Subject: [Governance] UNSG Roadmap on digital cooperation: a brief status-check In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear all, This is just a gentle reminder that our status-check is happening later today, at *12 PM UTC.* Please find the joining details below. Best Sheetal. Tuesday, 4 May 2021 13:00 | (UTC+01:00) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London | 1 hr Join meeting *More ways to join:* *Join from the meeting link* https://globalpartnersdigital-aae.my.webex.com/globalpartnersdigital-aae.my/j.php?MTID=m83d95e9858c11c41a6b40091b8af3683 *Join by meeting number* Meeting number (access code): 163 789 5578 Meeting password: 8DVfYTbCk62 (83839822 from phones and video systems) *Tap to join from a mobile device (attendees only)* +44-20-7660-8149,,1637895578#83839822# <%2B44-20-7660-8149,,*01*1637895578%2383839822%23*01*> United Kingdom Toll Some mobile devices may ask attendees to enter a numeric password. *Join by phone* +44-20-7660-8149 United Kingdom Toll Global call-in numbers *Join by video system, application or Skype for business* Dial 1637895578 at webex.com You can also dial 62.109.219.4 and enter your meeting number. On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 at 18:03, Sheetal Kumar wrote: > Dear all, > > Thank you for taking the time to fill out the doodle. The time/date that > works for most is > *12 PM UTC on Tuesday, 04 May. * > > I have therefore set up a room to meet in. Please see the joining details > below. Note, the timezone indicated is BST (UTC+1) > > See you there! > > Best > Sheetal. > > Tuesday, 4 May 2021 > 13:00 | (UTC+01:00) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London | 1 hr > > Join meeting > > > *More ways to join:* > > *Join from the meeting link* > > https://globalpartnersdigital-aae.my.webex.com/globalpartnersdigital-aae.my/j.php?MTID=m83d95e9858c11c41a6b40091b8af3683 > > *Join by meeting number* > Meeting number (access code): 163 789 5578 > Meeting password: 8DVfYTbCk62 (83839822 from phones and video systems) > > *Tap to join from a mobile device (attendees only)* > +44-20-7660-8149,,1637895578#83839822# > <%2B44-20-7660-8149,,*01*1637895578%2383839822%23*01*> United Kingdom Toll > Some mobile devices may ask attendees to enter a numeric password. > > *Join by phone* > +44-20-7660-8149 United Kingdom Toll > Global call-in numbers > > > *Join by video system, application or Skype for business* > Dial 1637895578 at webex.com > You can also dial 62.109.219.4 and enter your meeting number. > > > On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 at 14:51, Bruna Martins dos Santos < > bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hey all, >> >> Hope this email finds you well and safe! >> >> This is another reminder about our doodle for the* Overview of the UN's >> Digital Cooperation Roadmap & relevant CS efforts* Meeting: >> https://doodle.com/poll/hxvk5ribmq4sxk78 >> >> So far May 4th is the winning date, but we will close this doodle >> tomorrow COB, so please register your interest and availability! >> >> Best, >> Bruna and Sheetal >> >> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 1:44 PM Sheetal Kumar >> wrote: >> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> We've had a few responses to the doodle, which is great to see! >>> >>> This is just a gentle reminder to register your interest & availability >>> for an overview of the UN's Digital Cooperation Roadmap & relevant CS >>> efforts so far by filling out the doodle here: >>> https://doodle.com/poll/hxvk5ribmq4sxk78 >>> >>> >>> Best >>> Sheetal. >>> >>> On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 12:52, Sheetal Kumar >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Dear all, >>>> >>>> There have been interesting exchanges on this list regarding the UNSG's >>>> Roadmap on digital cooperation, and in particular the proposal for a IGF + >>>> and a new 'high level multistakeholder advisory group' or MHLB. >>>> >>>> Bruna and I thought it might be helpful for those less acquainted with >>>> the discussions and with civil society engagement so far to have an >>>> overview of how civil society has contributed so far to these discussions >>>> and what their current status is. >>>> >>>> We'd be happy to dedicate an hour or so in the coming weeks to catch >>>> people up with what's been happening and answer any questions you may have, >>>> as well as provide a space for reflection on the discussions so far. >>>> >>>> For timezone purposes we suggest holding the call at 1 PM UTC. Please >>>> fill out this doodle with some proposed dates in May: >>>> https://doodle.com/poll/hxvk5ribmq4sxk78 >>>> >>>> Best >>>> Sheetal & Bruna >>>> >>>> >>>> UN Digital Cooperation Process >>>> >>>> - >>>> - >>>> >>>> Road map for digital cooperation: implementation of the >>>> recommendations of the High-level Panel on Digital Cooperation >>>> >>>> - >>>> >>>> DiploFoundation summary of the Roadmap on Digital Cooperation >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> IGF and Mechanisms for Global Digital Cooperation >>>> >>>> - >>>> >>>> "Recommendation 5A/BOptions for the Future of Global Digital >>>> Cooperation" Paper. >>>> >>>> - >>>> >>>> MAG WG on Strengthening the IGF paper >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Civil Society Statements, positions and inputs >>>> >>>> - >>>> >>>> Just Net Coalition Statement - More than 170 Civil Society Groups >>>> Worldwide Oppose Plans for a Big Tech Dominated Body for Global Digital >>>> Governance >>>> , >>>> 2021. >>>> - >>>> >>>> Letter of intent for engagement with the UN SG's Digital >>>> Cooperation efforts >>>> , >>>> October 2020; >>>> - >>>> >>>> IGF - Civil Society Joint Statement for Main Session on Digital >>>> Cooperation >>>> , >>>> November 2020; >>>> - >>>> >>>> The UN HLP on Digital Cooperation: Top-down Calls for More >>>> Cooperation >>>> , >>>> Internet Governance Project Blog Post >>>> - >>>> >>>> Open letter on the interpretation of paragraph 93(a) of the UN >>>> Secretary-General's Roadmap on Digital Cooperation >>>> >>>> - >>>> >>>> Non-State Actors’ Position Paper on the appointment of the UN Tech >>>> Envoy >>>> >>>> - Civil Society Initial Feedback "Developing System-Wide Guidance >>>> on Human Rights Due Diligence for Technology Concept Note." >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Engagements >>>> >>>> - >>>> >>>> IGF High-Level session on Digital Cooperation >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>> Senior Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: UTC | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>> Senior Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: UTC | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> >> *Bruna Martins dos Santos * >> >> Advocacy Coordinator | Data Privacy Brazil Research >> >> >> Member | Coalizão Direitos na Rede >> Chair | Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group at ICANN >> >> Co-Coordinator | Internet Governance Caucus >> >> Twitter: @boomartins // Skype: >> bruna.martinsantos >> bruna at dataprivacybr.org and bruna.mrtns at gmail.com >> > > > -- > > *Sheetal Kumar* > Senior Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: UTC | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | > PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 > DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > > > > -- *Sheetal Kumar* Senior Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: UTC | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From joly at punkcast.com Tue May 4 09:12:49 2021 From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie) Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 09:12:49 -0400 Subject: [Governance] =?utf-8?q?WEBCAST_-_VIRTUAL_PEERING_SERIES_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=80=93_AFRICA_9=3A_Franchise_vs_Homegrown_IXPs_2_=7C_?= =?utf-8?q?LA_S=C3=89RIE_VIRTUAL_PEERING_-_AFRIQUE_9=3A_Franchise_v?= =?utf-8?q?s_IXP_locaux_2?= Message-ID: This has just started - Cela vient juste de commencer ISOC Live posted: "On Tuesday May 4 2021, at 13:00-14.30 UTC, the African IXP Association, in partnership with the Internet Society, in the ninth webinar in the Virtual Peering Series – Africa, by popular demand, present part two of 'Franchise vs Homegrown IXPs'. There are" [image: livestream] On *Tuesday May 4 2021*, at *13:00-14.30 UTC*, the *African IXP Association *, in partnership with the *Internet Society *, in the ninth webinar in the *Virtual Peering Series – Africa *, by popular demand, present part two of '*Franchise vs Homegrown IXPs * '. There are many approaches to establishing and running an Internet Exchange Point today including Home-grown initiatives, Franchise deployments, “Powered by” solutions, Government mandated projects as well as Turnkey IXPs. This session, just as the first one, aims to provide a balanced discussion on the possible benefits and the drawbacks of the different approaches to the establishment and management of IXPs, allowing the audience to draw their own conclusions on what best fits their local peering environment. [image: livestream] Le *mardi 4 mai 2021*, de *13h00 à 14h30 UTC*, l'*Association africaine des IXP *, en partenariat avec l'*Internet Society* , dans le neuvième webinaire de la série *Virtual Peering - Afrique *, à la demande générale, presente la deuxième partie de « *Franchise vs IXP locaux * ». Il existe aujourd’hui de nombreuses approches pour établir et gérer un point d’échange Internet, y compris des initiatives locales, des déploiements de franchise, des solutions «Powered by», des projets mandatés par le gouvernement ainsi que des IXP clé en main. Cette session, tout comme le premier, vise à fournir une discussion équilibrée sur les avantages possibles et les inconvénients des différentes approches de l’établissement et de la gestion des IXP, permettant au public de tirer ses propres conclusions sur ce qui convient le mieux à son environnement local de peering. *SPEAKERS / CONFERENCIERS* *Nurani Nimpuno*, Head of Global Engagement, London Internet Exchange (LINX) *Julio Sirota*, Infrastructure Manager, IX.br *Donald Jolley*, Volunteer, Durban Internet Exchange (DINX) *Tashi Phuntsho*, Senior Network Analyst, APNIC *Patrick W. Gilmore*, Founder and an Advisor, Deep Edge Technologies *MODERATORS / MODÉRATEURS* *Hisham Ibrahim*, Community Engagement and Development Manager, RIPE NCC *Fearghas McKay*, Flexoptix *LIVESTREAMS* *https://livestream.com/internetsociety/afpeering9 * (English) (open captions) *https://livestream.com/internetsociety2/afpeering9 * (Francais) *PARTICIPATE VIA ZOOM https://bit.ly/2QOQOTC *(EN/FR Interpretation, English closed captions) *REAL TIME TEXT* *https://www.streamtext.net/text.aspx?event=CFI-ISOC * (English) *TWITTER #IPeerinAfrica @internetsociety @AfIX @nnimpuno @LINX_Network Julio Sirota #IXbr Donald Jolley #DINX Tashi Phuntsho @apnic @PatrickWGilmore Hisham Ibrahim @RIPE_NCC @calanish @flexOptix* *SIMULCASTS_* *https://www.twitter.com/isoc_live* *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive* (English only) *https://www.facebook.com/InternetSociety/live * *https://www.facebook.com/ISOCAfrica/live * *ARCHIVE* *https://archive.org/details/afpeering9 * *Permalink* https://isoc.live/14004/ - -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -------------------------------------- - -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From carolina.rossini at gmail.com Tue May 4 11:28:24 2021 From: carolina.rossini at gmail.com (Carolina Rossini) Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 11:28:24 -0400 Subject: [Governance] Event with Cade Metz, a NY Times Reporter and author of "Genius Makers: The Mavericks Who Brought AI to Google, Facebook, and the World." In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello, If you're interested and available today, CAIDP is hosting a free webinar event with *Cade Metz, a NY Times Reporter and author of "Genius Makers: The Mavericks Who Brought AI to Google, Facebook, and the World." It's a live Q and A session about AI and social media.* *It's today at 3:30pm EST. * You can register at this link: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_xCNBd1xUTN-4umXmmzKjAQ After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar. Feel free to forward this message to anyone who may be interested! For more information about CAIDP and future events, please visit https://www.caidp.org/ Webinar Speakers Cade Metz (Author and NYT Reporter @NYT) Cade Metz is a reporter with The New York Times, covering artificial intelligence, driverless cars, virtual reality, and other emerging areas. Previously, he was a senior staff writer with Wired magazine. He works in The New York Times' San Francisco bureau and lives across the Bay with his wife, Taylor, and two daughters. His book, "Genius Makers: The Mavericks Who Brought AI to Google, Facebook, and the World" arrived in March. Lorraine G Kisselburgh (Chair, ACM Technology Policy Council and CERIAS Fellow @Purdue University) Lorraine Kisselburgh (Ph.D., Purdue University) is the inaugural Chair of ACM’s global Technology Policy Council, where she oversees global technology policy engagement. Drawing on the expertise of 100,000 members, ACM’s policy groups provide nonpartisan technical expertise to policy leaders, stakeholders, and the public. In 2018 she was a member of ACM’s Code of Ethics Task Force and a Scholar in Residence at the Electronic Privacy Information Center in Washington DC where she helped develop the University Guidelines for Artificial Intelligence. At Purdue University, Dr. Kisselburgh is a lecturer, fellow in the Center for Research in Information Assurance and Security and former professor of media, technology, and society. *__Carolina A. Rossini, JD, LLM, MBA* *Skype:* carolina.rossini_2 | Twitter: @carolinarossini https://www.linkedin.com/in/carolinarossini/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From joly at punkcast.com Tue May 4 14:43:39 2021 From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie) Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 14:43:39 -0400 Subject: [Governance] =?utf-8?q?WEBCAST_TODAY_=E2=80=93_=C2=AB_Digital_Co?= =?utf-8?q?operation_to_Leave_No_One_Behind=3A_Implementing_the_Sec?= =?utf-8?q?retary-General=E2=80=99s_Roadmap_=C2=BB?= Message-ID: This is under way. Ellen Blackler just called for more funding for the IGF. ISOC Live posted: "Today, Tuesday 4 May 2021 at 2pm-3pm EDT (18:00-19:00 UTC) the Office of the UN Secretary-General’s Envoy on Technology hosts a panel 'Digital Cooperation to Leave No One Behind: Implementing the Secretary-General’s Roadmap' as a side event to the side ev" [image: livestream] Today,* Tuesday 4 May 2021* at *2pm-3pm EDT* (18:00-19:00 UTC) the *Office of the UN Secretary-General’s Envoy on Technology * hosts a panel '*Digital Cooperation to Leave No One Behind: Implementing the Secretary-General’s Roadmap *' as a side event to the side event to the 6th *Multi-stakeholder Forum on Science, Technology and Innovation for the Sustainable Development Goals * (STI Forum). In June 2020, the United Nations Secretary-General* launched * his *Roadmap for Digital Cooperation *. The event will inform attendees on the progress of implementation of the Secretary-General's Roadmap for Digital Cooperation, and on the work of the United Nations on digital cooperation, particularly in responding to COVID-19, achieving the SDGs, and promoting digital inclusion. *WELCOME* *H.E. Ambassador Mohammad Koba*, Chargé d’Affaires, Permanent Mission of the Republic of Indonesia to the United Nations *PANEL* Ms *Maria-Francesca Spatolisano*, Assistant-Secretary-General and Officer-in-Charge of the Office of the Envoy on Technology Mr *Vint Cerf*, Vice President and Chief Internet Evangelist, Google Ms *Nnenna Nwakanma*, Director, Chief Web Advocate, Web Foundation Ms* Doreen Bogdan-Martin*, Director, Development Bureau, International Telecommunication Union (ITU) *LIVESTREAM http://livestream.com/internetsociety/leave-no-one-behind * *REAL TIME TEXT https://bit.ly/3b3EDsX * *TWITTER #DigitalCooperation #STIForum2021 @UNTechEnvoy @nnenna @vgcerf @mohammadkoba @indonesiaunny* *SIMULCASTS* *https://www.webtv.un.org * *https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/ * *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive * *https://www.facebook.com/isocny/live * *ARCHIVE* *https://archive.org/details/leave-no-one-behind * *Permalink* https://isoc.live/14011/ - -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -------------------------------------- - -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sheetal at gp-digital.org Mon May 10 13:02:07 2021 From: sheetal at gp-digital.org (Sheetal Kumar) Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 18:02:07 +0100 Subject: [Governance] UNSG Roadmap on digital cooperation: a brief status-check In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear all, Thanks to those who joined the call last week! Please find below the notes for your reference. Don't hesitate to reach out if you have any questions, Best Sheetal. UNSG Roadmap on digital cooperation: a brief status-check call, *Tuesday 04 May* *Present: Raquel, Amrita, Nnenna, Bruna, Judith, Sheetal, Jovan* Sheetal explained that the reason for the call was to provide an overview of the UNSG's efforts so far w/r/t Digital Cooperation, from the High Level Panel to the Roadmap. - High-level expert panel was appointed in 2018 - We had a meeting at the global IGF in Paris in 2018 and decided to submit an input - The input focused on the values and principles we recommended the report emphasise, as well as existing efforts at the UN level/elsewhere - The HLP report was released in 2019 at RightsCon Tunis - UNSG's office launched roundtables - A number of civil society groups were invited to join roundtables as participants/champions - Tech Envoy - Nnenna/Web Foundation has been spearheading a group which has sent a position paper on the appointment of the Tech Envoy (c 99 groups) - Roadmap includes various suggestions which roundtables have taken up, e.g - Reform to IGF - We have supported the relevant IGF’s WG’s output on this - A number of groups/IGC members have inputted into a consultation that the IGF hosted and which closed last month - Due diligence guidance - A number of groups, coordinated by Access Now, sent an input - Trust and security statement - Digital inclusion metrics - Appointment of Tech Envoy - We have sent a position paper and followed up - The Tech Envoy is currently on leave pending an investigation into sexual harassment claims - A few of the NGOs part of the aforementioned coalition had a meeting with the Tech Envoy Office a couple of months ago, to introduce ourselves and learn more about the priorities of the Office. The Office wants to prioritise the implementation of the Roadmap in an inclusive way. We then discussed the IGF+ model, Jovan made the following points: - IGF+ model: was an ‘obvious’ one/ IGF mandate in Tunis Agenda / tested model in practice / rare spaces where civil society has reasonable ‘footprint’ compared to other spaces where governments and businesses have much more influence. - IGF needs to evolve - otherwise it will slide slowly into irrelevance. In 2006 IGF was almost only space for digital debates. Today, there are tens of spaces/places where digital/cyber/tech policy issues are addressed. Many of these spaces are not open or fully transparent. - IGF irrelevance would be the biggest loss for civil society; some governments unease with IGF; some business in ‘wait and see mode’. in 2005 IGF was Irrelevance - there are a growing number of spaces and places where digital issues are discussed; - On the leadership/high-level track; it is clear that the IGF does not have ‘buy-in’ among leaders in governments, business and civil society. Many of them are not aware of the existence of the IGF (an exception is a limited segment of the tech community and civil society - ‘usual IGF suspects’). If the leadership gap exists, the second question is how to fill this gap. It is the background to the current discussion at the IGF where we may (dis) agree about details and approaches. - During pandemics governments and the tech sector gained power and relevance comparing to civil society. IGF Plus can help ‘check’ the growing power of governments and tech business. If it is done in transparent and inclusive ways, it could be a great contribution to global governance in general. - The ultimate question: do we need prominent and solid IGF. If it is the case changed are needed (including leadership ‘buy in’). With status quo IGF will slide into irrelevance rather soon given the growing need for digital governance solutions. - Clarity of priority and next steps is needed. It is our responsibility not only for the future of IGF but also to global public which in search for digital governance solutions. We agreed we need civil society people who want an improved IGF to speak more loudly - we need to amplify those voices. Office of the Tech Envoy: - Still deliberating on various options for IGF reform based on feedback received. - UN agencies are expected to make the decision- maybe by June? *Next steps: * *Start drafting support letter:* - See the points of groups (e.g JustNet) who have voiced concern and make sure we’re responding to them/reach out - Upcoming event where we can voice support for IGF reform: Stockholm Internet Forum session on 11th *Other processes:* Judith will send information about Open Consultation about the next CWG at the ITU *IGF session proposal: * Bruna and Sheetal to work on a session that discusses the IGF's place in the IG ecosystem/addresses how the ecosystem has developed On Tue, 4 May 2021 at 10:20, Sheetal Kumar wrote: > Dear all, > > This is just a gentle reminder that our status-check is happening later > today, at *12 PM UTC.* > > Please find the joining details below. > > Best > Sheetal. > > Tuesday, 4 May 2021 > 13:00 | (UTC+01:00) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London | 1 hr > > Join meeting > > > *More ways to join:* > > *Join from the meeting link* > > https://globalpartnersdigital-aae.my.webex.com/globalpartnersdigital-aae.my/j.php?MTID=m83d95e9858c11c41a6b40091b8af3683 > > *Join by meeting number* > Meeting number (access code): 163 789 5578 > Meeting password: 8DVfYTbCk62 (83839822 from phones and video systems) > > *Tap to join from a mobile device (attendees only)* > +44-20-7660-8149,,1637895578#83839822# > <%2B44-20-7660-8149,,*01*1637895578%2383839822%23*01*> United Kingdom Toll > Some mobile devices may ask attendees to enter a numeric password. > > *Join by phone* > +44-20-7660-8149 United Kingdom Toll > Global call-in numbers > > > *Join by video system, application or Skype for business* > Dial 1637895578 at webex.com > You can also dial 62.109.219.4 and enter your meeting number. > > On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 at 18:03, Sheetal Kumar > wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> Thank you for taking the time to fill out the doodle. The time/date that >> works for most is >> *12 PM UTC on Tuesday, 04 May. * >> >> I have therefore set up a room to meet in. Please see the joining details >> below. Note, the timezone indicated is BST (UTC+1) >> >> See you there! >> >> Best >> Sheetal. >> >> Tuesday, 4 May 2021 >> 13:00 | (UTC+01:00) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London | 1 hr >> >> Join meeting >> >> >> *More ways to join:* >> >> *Join from the meeting link* >> >> https://globalpartnersdigital-aae.my.webex.com/globalpartnersdigital-aae.my/j.php?MTID=m83d95e9858c11c41a6b40091b8af3683 >> >> *Join by meeting number* >> Meeting number (access code): 163 789 5578 >> Meeting password: 8DVfYTbCk62 (83839822 from phones and video systems) >> >> *Tap to join from a mobile device (attendees only)* >> +44-20-7660-8149,,1637895578#83839822# >> <%2B44-20-7660-8149,,*01*1637895578%2383839822%23*01*> United Kingdom >> Toll >> Some mobile devices may ask attendees to enter a numeric password. >> >> *Join by phone* >> +44-20-7660-8149 United Kingdom Toll >> Global call-in numbers >> >> >> *Join by video system, application or Skype for business* >> Dial 1637895578 at webex.com >> You can also dial 62.109.219.4 and enter your meeting number. >> >> >> On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 at 14:51, Bruna Martins dos Santos < >> bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hey all, >>> >>> Hope this email finds you well and safe! >>> >>> This is another reminder about our doodle for the* Overview of the UN's >>> Digital Cooperation Roadmap & relevant CS efforts* Meeting: >>> https://doodle.com/poll/hxvk5ribmq4sxk78 >>> >>> So far May 4th is the winning date, but we will close this doodle >>> tomorrow COB, so please register your interest and availability! >>> >>> Best, >>> Bruna and Sheetal >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 1:44 PM Sheetal Kumar >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Dear all, >>>> >>>> We've had a few responses to the doodle, which is great to see! >>>> >>>> This is just a gentle reminder to register your interest & availability >>>> for an overview of the UN's Digital Cooperation Roadmap & relevant CS >>>> efforts so far by filling out the doodle here: >>>> https://doodle.com/poll/hxvk5ribmq4sxk78 >>>> >>>> >>>> Best >>>> Sheetal. >>>> >>>> On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 12:52, Sheetal Kumar >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear all, >>>>> >>>>> There have been interesting exchanges on this list regarding the >>>>> UNSG's Roadmap on digital cooperation, and in particular the proposal for a >>>>> IGF + and a new 'high level multistakeholder advisory group' or MHLB. >>>>> >>>>> Bruna and I thought it might be helpful for those less acquainted with >>>>> the discussions and with civil society engagement so far to have an >>>>> overview of how civil society has contributed so far to these discussions >>>>> and what their current status is. >>>>> >>>>> We'd be happy to dedicate an hour or so in the coming weeks to catch >>>>> people up with what's been happening and answer any questions you may have, >>>>> as well as provide a space for reflection on the discussions so far. >>>>> >>>>> For timezone purposes we suggest holding the call at 1 PM UTC. Please >>>>> fill out this doodle with some proposed dates in May: >>>>> https://doodle.com/poll/hxvk5ribmq4sxk78 >>>>> >>>>> Best >>>>> Sheetal & Bruna >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> UN Digital Cooperation Process >>>>> >>>>> - >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> Road map for digital cooperation: implementation of the >>>>> recommendations of the High-level Panel on Digital Cooperation >>>>> >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> DiploFoundation summary of the Roadmap on Digital Cooperation >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> IGF and Mechanisms for Global Digital Cooperation >>>>> >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> "Recommendation 5A/BOptions for the Future of Global Digital >>>>> Cooperation" Paper. >>>>> >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> MAG WG on Strengthening the IGF paper >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Civil Society Statements, positions and inputs >>>>> >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> Just Net Coalition Statement - More than 170 Civil Society Groups >>>>> Worldwide Oppose Plans for a Big Tech Dominated Body for Global Digital >>>>> Governance >>>>> , >>>>> 2021. >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> Letter of intent for engagement with the UN SG's Digital >>>>> Cooperation efforts >>>>> , >>>>> October 2020; >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> IGF - Civil Society Joint Statement for Main Session on Digital >>>>> Cooperation >>>>> , >>>>> November 2020; >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> The UN HLP on Digital Cooperation: Top-down Calls for More >>>>> Cooperation >>>>> , >>>>> Internet Governance Project Blog Post >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> Open letter on the interpretation of paragraph 93(a) of the UN >>>>> Secretary-General's Roadmap on Digital Cooperation >>>>> >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> Non-State Actors’ Position Paper on the appointment of the UN Tech >>>>> Envoy >>>>> >>>>> - Civil Society Initial Feedback "Developing System-Wide Guidance >>>>> on Human Rights Due Diligence for Technology Concept Note." >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Engagements >>>>> >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> IGF High-Level session on Digital Cooperation >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>>> Senior Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: UTC | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >>>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>> Senior Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: UTC | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> *Bruna Martins dos Santos * >>> >>> Advocacy Coordinator | Data Privacy Brazil Research >>> >>> >>> Member | Coalizão Direitos na Rede >>> Chair | Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group at ICANN >>> >>> Co-Coordinator | Internet Governance Caucus >>> >>> Twitter: @boomartins // Skype: >>> bruna.martinsantos >>> bruna at dataprivacybr.org and bruna.mrtns at gmail.com >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> *Sheetal Kumar* >> Senior Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: UTC | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >> >> >> >> > > -- > > *Sheetal Kumar* > Senior Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: UTC | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | > PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 > DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > > > > -- *Sheetal Kumar* Senior Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: UTC | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From LB at lucabelli.net Mon May 10 14:10:05 2021 From: LB at lucabelli.net (LB at lucabelli.net) Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 11:10:05 -0700 Subject: [Governance] Digital Transformation & Cybersecurity in the BRICS | Webinar Message-ID: <20210510111005.2700328f4bbfc197480209526f2a1375.79ee5b8e28.mailapi@email07.godaddy.com> Dear colleagues, Please see below the invitation for our upcoming CyberBRICS webinar on “Digital Transformation and Cybersecurity in the BRICS Countries”, this Friday May 14th, at 10 AM (Rio time, GMT -3). You can register here https://evento.fgv.br/cybersecuritybrics/ The webinar will explore the most recent developments in Digital Transformation and Cybersecurity in the BRICS countries. The special guests opening the event will be Mr Bruno Ramos, Director for the Americas Regional Office of the International Telecommunication Union and CyberBRICS Advisory Board member; Mr Colm Murphy, Huawei's Senior Cybersecurity Advisor; Dr Lucienne Abrahams, Director of the Learning, Information, Networking, Knowledge Centre at Wits University; and Prof Sizwe Snail, Commissioner at the Information Regulator of South Africa and CyberBRICS Advisory Board member. For further information about the webinar, please check https://cyberbrics.info/digital-transformation-and-cybersecurity-in-the-brics-countries/ For further information about the CyberBRICS project, please check our website: https://cyberbrics.info/ Please feel free to share this email via your networks. Kind regards Luca Luca Belli, PhD Professor of Internet Governance and Regulation +55 21 3799 5763 t at 1lucabelli Praia de Botafogo, 190 13º andar Botafogo - Rio de Janeiro, RJ - CEP: 22250-900 luca.belli at fgv.br www.cyberBRICS.info | www.CPDP.lat CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message, as well as any attached document, may contain personal data and information that is confidential and privileged and is intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution of this email or attached documents, or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email by mistake. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: webinar cyberbrics digital transformation cybersec.png Type: image/png Size: 346573 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Outlook-http___www.png Type: image/png Size: 14321 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Outlook-http___www.png Type: image/png Size: 365 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Outlook-http___www.png Type: image/png Size: 566 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Outlook-http___www.png Type: image/png Size: 709 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Outlook-http___www.png Type: image/png Size: 668 bytes Desc: not available URL: From parminder at itforchange.net Tue May 11 05:52:59 2021 From: parminder at itforchange.net (parminder) Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 15:22:59 +0530 Subject: [Governance] UNSG Roadmap on digital cooperation: a brief status-check In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Some passing thought: The world is amidst a pandemic with global civil society fighting to free medical technologies from monopolistic profiteers . A article describes the US support for TRPS intellectual property waiver thus: The U.S. government’s announcement Wednesday that it will enter negotiations to waive World Trade Organization (WTO) intellectual property rules is a victory for democratizing technology, for rebalancing power toward governments and away from corporations, and for the power of countries working /together /to fight the global pandemic. This may also be the most significant departure from the U.S. government’s longstanding commitment to global pharmaceutical monopolies since that regime was first introduced via NAFTA negotiations 30 years ago. https://democracyjournal.org/arguments/first-the-waiver-next-lets-vaccinate-the-world/ ENDS But if the groups like the big supporters of new MS digital coop policy body would have their way, we should have Pfizers, and Johnson and Johnsons, and the such, sitting at the apex global policy systems determining how our covid response should be market-based and we should not make such foolish demands like asking for societal needs to trump profit, and regulators weighing on production and distribution issues ... Fortunately, 'they' could not succeed in the health sector, but in the digital sector it seems they are close to succeeding, with liberal help from civil society quarters. But remember, Apples and Googles of today would be some of the biggest health companies of tomorrow. BTW, our great Bill Gates --  the same one who was asked to co-head the Digi Cooperation panel but passed it on to his wife --  stoutly holds firm that TRIP intellectual property waiver for covid is not at all needed. This, even as the biggest political force defending pharma monopolies, the US government, later supported the waiver, leaving that self professed czar of global public health blushing, and subject to much global reprobation. If likes of Bill Gates give such advice in an area which he chose voluntarily to do his philanthropy in, what kind of advice he, and his ilk, would give in an area where Gates earned all his fortune, and still earns it! But both the irony and profanity of rooting for such global policy systems as the proposed MS Digi Coop body so completely misses the civil society here! One wonders why exactly, what is it that one is missing? Anyway, do what you would. But know that the world is watching, will ask for accountabilities at some time. Even CS has to be accountable. BTW, if you all are so righteous about what you are up to, why not open up an interaction with social movements and big civil society groups in all different areas. After all, digital being a cross-cutting horizontal area, the civil society in this area should have close connections with groups in other areas and be serving their interests, as all sectors get digitalisation. Or do people disagree with this proposition? My call to open a dialogue with other global CS groups in different sectors, and justify your stances, is a serious one. Any takers? best, parminder On 10/05/21 10:32 pm, Sheetal Kumar via Governance wrote: > Dear all, > > Thanks to those who joined the call last week! > > Please find below the notes for your reference. Don't hesitate to > reach out if you have any questions, > > Best > Sheetal. > > > UNSG Roadmap on digital cooperation: a brief status-check call, > > /Tuesday 04 May/ > > /Present: Raquel, Amrita, Nnenna, Bruna, Judith, Sheetal, Jovan/ > > Sheetal explained that the reason for the call was to provide an > overview of the UNSG's efforts so far w/r/t Digital Cooperation, from > the High Level Panel to the Roadmap. > > * > > High-level expert panel was appointed in 2018 > > * > > We had a meeting at the global IGF in Paris in 2018 and decided to > submit an input  > > * > > The input focused on the values and principles we recommended the > report emphasise, as well as existing efforts at the UN > level/elsewhere > > * > > The HLP report was released in 2019 at RightsCon Tunis  > > * > > UNSG's office launched roundtables > > * > > A number of civil society groups were invited to join roundtables > as participants/champions > > * > > Tech Envoy > > o > > Nnenna/Web Foundation has been spearheading a group which has > sent a position paper on the appointment of the Tech Envoy (c > 99 groups) > > * > > Roadmap includes various suggestions which roundtables have taken > up, e.g > > o > > Reform to IGF  > > + > > We have supported the relevant IGF’s WG’s output on this > > + > > A number of groups/IGC members have inputted into a > consultation that the IGF hosted and which closed last month  > > o > > Due diligence guidance  > > + > > A number of groups, coordinated by Access Now, sent an input  > > o > > Trust and security statement  > > o > > Digital inclusion metrics  > > o > > Appointment of Tech Envoy  > > + > > We have sent a position paper and followed up  > > + The Tech Envoy is currently on leave pending an > investigation into sexual harassment claims > + A few of the NGOs part of the aforementioned coalition had > a meeting with the Tech Envoy Office a couple of months > ago, to introduce ourselves and learn more about the > priorities of the Office. The Office wants to prioritise > the implementation of the Roadmap in an inclusive way. > > > We then discussed the IGF+ model, Jovan made the following points: > > * IGF+ model: was an ‘obvious’ one/ IGF mandate in Tunis Agenda / > tested model in practice / rare spaces where civil society has > reasonable ‘footprint’ compared to other spaces where governments > and businesses have much more influence. > * IGF needs to evolve - otherwise it will slide slowly into > irrelevance. In 2006 IGF was almost only space for digital > debates. Today, there are tens of spaces/places where > digital/cyber/tech policy issues are addressed. Many of these > spaces are not open or fully transparent. > * IGF irrelevance would be the biggest loss for civil society; some > governments unease with IGF; some business in ‘wait and see mode’. > in 2005 IGF was Irrelevance - there are a growing number of spaces > and places where digital issues are discussed; > * On the leadership/high-level track; it is clear that the IGF does > not have ‘buy-in’ among leaders in governments, business and civil > society. Many of them are not aware of the existence of the IGF > (an exception is a limited segment of the tech community and civil > society - ‘usual IGF suspects’). If the leadership gap exists, the > second question is how to fill this gap. It is the background to > the current discussion at the IGF where we may (dis) agree about > details and approaches. > * During pandemics  governments and the tech sector gained power and > relevance comparing to civil society. IGF Plus can help ‘check’ > the growing power of governments and tech business. If it is done > in transparent and inclusive ways, it could be a great > contribution to global governance in general. > * The ultimate question: do we need prominent and solid IGF. If it > is the case changed are needed (including leadership ‘buy in’). > With status quo IGF will slide into irrelevance rather soon given > the growing need for digital governance solutions.   > * Clarity of priority and next steps is needed. It is our > responsibility not only for the future of IGF but also to global > public which in search for digital governance solutions. > > We agreed we need civil society people who want an improved IGF to > speak more loudly - we need to amplify those voices. > >   > > Office of the Tech Envoy: > > * Still deliberating on various options for IGF reformbased on > feedback received. > * UN agencies are expected to make the decision- maybe by June? > > _*Next steps: *_ > > /Start drafting support letter:/ > > * > > See the points of groups (e.g JustNet) who have voiced concern and > make sure we’re responding to them/reach out > > * > > Upcoming event where we can voice support for IGF reform: > Stockholm Internet Forum session on 11th > > > /Other processes:/ > > Judith will send information about Open Consultation about the next > CWG at the ITU > > > /IGF session proposal: / > > Bruna and Sheetal to work on a sessionthat discusses the IGF's place > in the IG ecosystem/addresses how the ecosystem has developed > > > > > > On Tue, 4 May 2021 at 10:20, Sheetal Kumar > wrote: > > Dear all, > > This is just a gentle reminder that our status-check is happening > later today, at _*12 PM UTC.*_ > _* > *_ > Please find the joining details below. > > Best > Sheetal. > > Tuesday, 4 May 2021 > 13:00  |  (UTC+01:00) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London  |  1 hr > >   > > Join meeting > > > >   > *More ways to join:* >   > *Join from the meeting link* > https://globalpartnersdigital-aae.my.webex.com/globalpartnersdigital-aae.my/j.php?MTID=m83d95e9858c11c41a6b40091b8af3683 > > >   > > *Join by meeting number* > Meeting number (access code): 163 789 5578 > Meeting password: 8DVfYTbCk62 (83839822 from phones and video > systems) > >   > > *Tap to join from a mobile device (attendees only)* > +44-20-7660-8149,,1637895578#83839822# > United > Kingdom Toll > Some mobile devices may ask attendees to enter a numeric password. >   > > *Join by phone* > +44-20-7660-8149 United Kingdom Toll > Global call-in numbers > > > >   > > *Join by video system, application or Skype for business* > Dial 1637895578 at webex.com > You can also dial 62.109.219.4 and enter your meeting number. > > > On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 at 18:03, Sheetal Kumar > > wrote: > > Dear all, > > Thank you for taking the time to fill out the doodle. The > time/date that works for most is _*12 PM UTC on Tuesday, 04 May. > *_ > > I have therefore set up a room to meet in. Please see the > joining details below. Note, the timezone indicated is BST (UTC+1) > > See you there! > > Best > Sheetal. > > Tuesday, 4 May 2021 > 13:00  |  (UTC+01:00) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London  |  1 hr > >   > > Join meeting > > > >   > *More ways to join:* >   > *Join from the meeting link* > https://globalpartnersdigital-aae.my.webex.com/globalpartnersdigital-aae.my/j.php?MTID=m83d95e9858c11c41a6b40091b8af3683 > > >   > > *Join by meeting number* > Meeting number (access code): 163 789 5578 > Meeting password: 8DVfYTbCk62 (83839822 from phones and video > systems) > >   > > *Tap to join from a mobile device (attendees only)* > +44-20-7660-8149,,1637895578#83839822# > > United Kingdom Toll > Some mobile devices may ask attendees to enter a numeric > password. >   > > *Join by phone* > +44-20-7660-8149 United Kingdom Toll > Global call-in numbers > > > >   > > *Join by video system, application or Skype for business* > Dial 1637895578 at webex.com > You can also dial 62.109.219.4 and enter your meeting number. > >   > > > On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 at 14:51, Bruna Martins dos Santos > > wrote: > > Hey all,  > > Hope this email finds you well and safe!  > > This is another reminder about our doodle for > the/ Overview of the UN's Digital Cooperation Roadmap & > relevant CS > efforts/ Meeting: https://doodle.com/poll/hxvk5ribmq4sxk78 > > So far May 4th is the winning date, but we will close this > doodle tomorrow COB, so please register your interest and > availability!  > > Best,  > Bruna and Sheetal  > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 1:44 PM Sheetal Kumar > > > wrote: > > Dear all, > > We've had a few responses to the doodle, which is > great to see! > > This is just a gentle reminder to register your > interest & availability for an overview of the UN's > Digital Cooperation Roadmap & relevant CS efforts so > far by filling out the doodle here: > https://doodle.com/poll/hxvk5ribmq4sxk78 > > > Best > Sheetal. > > On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 12:52, Sheetal Kumar > > wrote: > > Dear all, > > There have been interesting exchanges on this list > regarding the UNSG's Roadmap on digital > cooperation, and in particular the proposal for a > IGF + and a new 'high level multistakeholder > advisory group' or MHLB. > > Bruna and I thought it might be helpful for those > less acquainted with the discussions and with > civil society engagement so far to have an > overview of how civil society has contributed so > far to these discussions and what their current > status is. > > We'd be happy to dedicate an hour or so in the > coming weeks to catch people up with what's been > happening and answer any questions you may have, > as well as provide a space for reflection on the > discussions so far. > > For timezone purposes we suggest holding the call > at 1 PM UTC. Please fill out this doodle with some > proposed dates in May: > https://doodle.com/poll/hxvk5ribmq4sxk78 > > Best > Sheetal & Bruna > > > UN Digital Cooperation Process > > * > * > > Road map for digital cooperation: > implementation of the recommendations of the > High-level Panel on Digital Cooperation > > > * > > DiploFoundation summary of the Roadmap on > Digital Cooperation > > > > IGF and Mechanisms for Global Digital Cooperation > > * > > "Recommendation 5A/BOptions for the Future of > Global Digital Cooperation" Paper. > > > * > > MAG WG on Strengthening the IGF paper > > > > Civil Society Statements, positions and inputs > > * > > Just Net Coalition Statement - More than 170 > Civil Society Groups Worldwide Oppose Plans > for a Big Tech Dominated Body for Global > Digital Governance > , > 2021.  > > * > > Letter of intent for engagement with the UN > SG's Digital Cooperation efforts > , > October 2020;  > > * > > IGF - Civil Society Joint Statement for Main > Session on Digital Cooperation > , > November 2020; > > * > > The UN HLP on Digital Cooperation: Top-down > Calls for More Cooperation > , > Internet Governance Project Blog Post  > > * > > Open letter on the interpretation of paragraph > 93(a) of the UN Secretary-General's Roadmap on > Digital Cooperation > > > * > > Non-State Actors’ Position Paper on the > appointment of the UN Tech Envoy   > > > * Civil Society Initial Feedback "Developing > System-Wide Guidance on Human Rights Due > Diligence for Technology Concept Note." >   > > > > Engagements  > > * > > IGF High-Level session on Digital Cooperation > > > -- > * > * > *Sheetal Kumar* > Senior Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: UTC | M: +44 > (0)7739569514  | > PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 > 114D 173B E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > > > > > > -- > * > * > *Sheetal Kumar* > Senior Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: UTC | M: +44 > (0)7739569514  | > PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D > 173B E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > > > > > > -- > */Bruna Martins dos Santos  > /* > > Advocacy Coordinator | Data Privacy Brazil Research > > > Member | Coalizão Direitos na Rede >   > Chair | Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group at ICANN > > Co-Coordinator | Internet Governance Caucus  > > > Twitter: @boomartins >  // Skype: bruna.martinsantos > bruna at dataprivacybr.org >  and bruna.mrtns at gmail.com > > > > > -- > * > * > *Sheetal Kumar* > Senior Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: UTC | M: +44 (0)7739569514  | > PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B > E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > > > > > > -- > * > * > *Sheetal Kumar* > Senior Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: UTC | M: +44 (0)7739569514  | > PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 > 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > > > > > > -- > * > * > *Sheetal Kumar* > Senior Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: UTC | M: +44 (0)7739569514  | > PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 > DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From parminder at itforchange.net Tue May 11 07:16:48 2021 From: parminder at itforchange.net (parminder) Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 16:46:48 +0530 Subject: [Governance] UNSG Roadmap on digital cooperation: a brief status-check In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <860a41ca-87de-b373-a9e1-625dc7ffcbf0@itforchange.net> And for those who have so thoroughly pooh poohed and trashed the 170 organisations globally that expressed their support to the JNC letter opposing the new MS digital policy body, in just 3 days that we had before the deadline, I would like to inform you that we have kept on getting more support for the letter, on the JNC elist and privately. Just now I received the following: Dear all, I'm happy to inform you that the Italian Association for Open Science (AISA) has publicly endorsed the JNC letter to the UN and will be shortly get in touch with you for formally including the association among the signatories: https://aisa.sp.unipi.it/lettera-aperta-al-segretario-onu-contro-il-progetto-di-un-high-level-multistakeholder-body-for-digital-cooperation/ I think there could be other Italian national groups interested both in endorsing the letter and joining the activities of the JNC. Is there an Italian "chapter" of the JNC that we can connect to? Warmest regards, Domenico ENDS You can sure keep calling these groups inconsequential, at the cost of your own credibility .... best, parminder On 11/05/21 3:22 pm, parminder via Governance wrote: > > Some passing thought: > > The world is amidst a pandemic with global civil society fighting to > free medical technologies from monopolistic profiteers . A article > describes the US support for TRPS intellectual property waiver thus: > > The U.S. government’s announcement Wednesday that it will enter > negotiations to waive World Trade Organization (WTO) intellectual > property rules is a victory for democratizing technology, for > rebalancing power toward governments and away from corporations, > and for the power of countries working /together /to fight the > global pandemic. This may also be the most significant departure > from the U.S. government’s longstanding commitment to global > pharmaceutical monopolies since that regime was first introduced > via NAFTA negotiations 30 years ago. > > https://democracyjournal.org/arguments/first-the-waiver-next-lets-vaccinate-the-world/ > > ENDS > > But if the groups like the big supporters of new MS digital coop > policy body would have their way, we should have Pfizers, and Johnson > and Johnsons, and the such, sitting at the apex global policy systems > determining how our covid response should be market-based and we > should not make such foolish demands like asking for societal needs to > trump profit, and regulators weighing on production and distribution > issues ... > > Fortunately, 'they' could not succeed in the health sector, but in the > digital sector it seems they are close to succeeding, with liberal > help from civil society quarters. But remember, Apples and Googles of > today would be some of the biggest health companies of tomorrow. > > BTW, our great Bill Gates --  the same one who was asked to co-head > the Digi Cooperation panel but passed it on to his wife --  stoutly > holds firm that TRIP intellectual property waiver for covid is not at > all needed. This, even as the biggest political force defending pharma > monopolies, the US government, later supported the waiver, leaving > that self professed czar of global public health blushing, and subject > to much global reprobation. If likes of Bill Gates give such advice in > an area which he chose voluntarily to do his philanthropy in, what > kind of advice he, and his ilk, would give in an area where Gates > earned all his fortune, and still earns it! > > But both the irony and profanity of rooting for such global policy > systems as the proposed MS Digi Coop body so completely misses the > civil society here! One wonders why exactly, what is it that one is > missing? > > Anyway, do what you would. But know that the world is watching, will > ask for accountabilities at some time. Even CS has to be accountable. > > BTW, if you all are so righteous about what you are up to, why not > open up an interaction with social movements and big civil society > groups in all different areas. After all, digital being a > cross-cutting horizontal area, the civil society in this area should > have close connections with groups in other areas and be serving their > interests, as all sectors get digitalisation. Or do people disagree > with this proposition? > > My call to open a dialogue with other global CS groups in different > sectors, and justify your stances, is a serious one. Any takers? > > best, parminder > > > On 10/05/21 10:32 pm, Sheetal Kumar via Governance wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> Thanks to those who joined the call last week! >> >> Please find below the notes for your reference. Don't hesitate to >> reach out if you have any questions, >> >> Best >> Sheetal. >> >> >> UNSG Roadmap on digital cooperation: a brief status-check call, >> >> /Tuesday 04 May/ >> >> /Present: Raquel, Amrita, Nnenna, Bruna, Judith, Sheetal, Jovan/ >> >> Sheetal explained that the reason for the call was to provide an >> overview of the UNSG's efforts so far w/r/t Digital Cooperation, from >> the High Level Panel to the Roadmap. >> >> * >> >> High-level expert panel was appointed in 2018 >> >> * >> >> We had a meeting at the global IGF in Paris in 2018 and decided >> to submit an input  >> >> * >> >> The input focused on the values and principles we recommended the >> report emphasise, as well as existing efforts at the UN >> level/elsewhere >> >> * >> >> The HLP report was released in 2019 at RightsCon Tunis  >> >> * >> >> UNSG's office launched roundtables >> >> * >> >> A number of civil society groups were invited to join roundtables >> as participants/champions >> >> * >> >> Tech Envoy >> >> o >> >> Nnenna/Web Foundation has been spearheading a group which has >> sent a position paper on the appointment of the Tech Envoy (c >> 99 groups) >> >> * >> >> Roadmap includes various suggestions which roundtables have taken >> up, e.g >> >> o >> >> Reform to IGF  >> >> + >> >> We have supported the relevant IGF’s WG’s output on this >> >> + >> >> A number of groups/IGC members have inputted into a >> consultation that the IGF hosted and which closed last month  >> >> o >> >> Due diligence guidance  >> >> + >> >> A number of groups, coordinated by Access Now, sent an input  >> >> o >> >> Trust and security statement  >> >> o >> >> Digital inclusion metrics  >> >> o >> >> Appointment of Tech Envoy  >> >> + >> >> We have sent a position paper and followed up  >> >> + The Tech Envoy is currently on leave pending an >> investigation into sexual harassment claims >> + A few of the NGOs part of the aforementioned coalition >> had a meeting with the Tech Envoy Office a couple of >> months ago, to introduce ourselves and learn more about >> the priorities of the Office. The Office wants to >> prioritise the implementation of the Roadmap in an >> inclusive way. >> >> >> We then discussed the IGF+ model, Jovan made the following points: >> >> * IGF+ model: was an ‘obvious’ one/ IGF mandate in Tunis Agenda / >> tested model in practice / rare spaces where civil society has >> reasonable ‘footprint’ compared to other spaces where governments >> and businesses have much more influence. >> * IGF needs to evolve - otherwise it will slide slowly into >> irrelevance. In 2006 IGF was almost only space for digital >> debates. Today, there are tens of spaces/places where >> digital/cyber/tech policy issues are addressed. Many of these >> spaces are not open or fully transparent. >> * IGF irrelevance would be the biggest loss for civil society; some >> governments unease with IGF; some business in ‘wait and see >> mode’. in 2005 IGF was Irrelevance - there are a growing number >> of spaces and places where digital issues are discussed; >> * On the leadership/high-level track; it is clear that the IGF does >> not have ‘buy-in’ among leaders in governments, business and >> civil society. Many of them are not aware of the existence of the >> IGF (an exception is a limited segment of the tech community and >> civil society - ‘usual IGF suspects’). If the leadership gap >> exists, the second question is how to fill this gap. It is the >> background to the current discussion at the IGF where we may >> (dis) agree about details and approaches. >> * During pandemics  governments and the tech sector gained power >> and relevance comparing to civil society. IGF Plus can help >> ‘check’ the growing power of governments and tech business. If it >> is done in transparent and inclusive ways, it could be a great >> contribution to global governance in general. >> * The ultimate question: do we need prominent and solid IGF. If it >> is the case changed are needed (including leadership ‘buy in’). >> With status quo IGF will slide into irrelevance rather soon given >> the growing need for digital governance solutions.   >> * Clarity of priority and next steps is needed. It is our >> responsibility not only for the future of IGF but also to global >> public which in search for digital governance solutions. >> >> We agreed we need civil society people who want an improved IGF to >> speak more loudly - we need to amplify those voices. >> >>   >> >> Office of the Tech Envoy: >> >> * Still deliberating on various options for IGF reformbased on >> feedback received. >> * UN agencies are expected to make the decision- maybe by June? >> >> _*Next steps: *_ >> >> /Start drafting support letter:/ >> >> * >> >> See the points of groups (e.g JustNet) who have voiced concern >> and make sure we’re responding to them/reach out >> >> * >> >> Upcoming event where we can voice support for IGF reform: >> Stockholm Internet Forum session on 11th >> >> >> /Other processes:/ >> >> Judith will send information about Open Consultation about the next >> CWG at the ITU >> >> >> /IGF session proposal: / >> >> Bruna and Sheetal to work on a sessionthat discusses the IGF's place >> in the IG ecosystem/addresses how the ecosystem has developed >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 4 May 2021 at 10:20, Sheetal Kumar > > wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> This is just a gentle reminder that our status-check is happening >> later today, at _*12 PM UTC.*_ >> _* >> *_ >> Please find the joining details below. >> >> Best >> Sheetal. >> >> Tuesday, 4 May 2021 >> 13:00  |  (UTC+01:00) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London  |  1 hr >> >>   >> >> Join meeting >> >> >> >>   >> *More ways to join:* >>   >> *Join from the meeting link* >> https://globalpartnersdigital-aae.my.webex.com/globalpartnersdigital-aae.my/j.php?MTID=m83d95e9858c11c41a6b40091b8af3683 >> >> >>   >> >> *Join by meeting number* >> Meeting number (access code): 163 789 5578 >> Meeting password: 8DVfYTbCk62 (83839822 from phones and video >> systems) >> >>   >> >> *Tap to join from a mobile device (attendees only)* >> +44-20-7660-8149,,1637895578#83839822# >> United >> Kingdom Toll >> Some mobile devices may ask attendees to enter a numeric password. >>   >> >> *Join by phone* >> +44-20-7660-8149 United Kingdom Toll >> Global call-in numbers >> >> >> >>   >> >> *Join by video system, application or Skype for business* >> Dial 1637895578 at webex.com >> You can also dial 62.109.219.4 and enter your meeting number. >> >> >> On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 at 18:03, Sheetal Kumar >> > wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> Thank you for taking the time to fill out the doodle. The >> time/date that works for most is _*12 PM UTC on Tuesday, 04 May. >> *_ >> >> I have therefore set up a room to meet in. Please see the >> joining details below. Note, the timezone indicated is BST >> (UTC+1) >> >> See you there! >> >> Best >> Sheetal. >> >> Tuesday, 4 May 2021 >> 13:00  |  (UTC+01:00) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London  |  1 hr >> >>   >> >> Join meeting >> >> >> >>   >> *More ways to join:* >>   >> *Join from the meeting link* >> https://globalpartnersdigital-aae.my.webex.com/globalpartnersdigital-aae.my/j.php?MTID=m83d95e9858c11c41a6b40091b8af3683 >> >> >>   >> >> *Join by meeting number* >> Meeting number (access code): 163 789 5578 >> Meeting password: 8DVfYTbCk62 (83839822 from phones and video >> systems) >> >>   >> >> *Tap to join from a mobile device (attendees only)* >> +44-20-7660-8149,,1637895578#83839822# >> >> United Kingdom Toll >> Some mobile devices may ask attendees to enter a numeric >> password. >>   >> >> *Join by phone* >> +44-20-7660-8149 United Kingdom Toll >> Global call-in numbers >> >> >> >>   >> >> *Join by video system, application or Skype for business* >> Dial 1637895578 at webex.com >> You can also dial 62.109.219.4 and enter your meeting number. >> >>   >> >> >> On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 at 14:51, Bruna Martins dos Santos >> > wrote: >> >> Hey all,  >> >> Hope this email finds you well and safe!  >> >> This is another reminder about our doodle for >> the/ Overview of the UN's Digital Cooperation Roadmap & >> relevant CS >> efforts/ Meeting: https://doodle.com/poll/hxvk5ribmq4sxk78 >> >> So far May 4th is the winning date, but we will close >> this doodle tomorrow COB, so please register your >> interest and availability!  >> >> Best,  >> Bruna and Sheetal  >> >> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 1:44 PM Sheetal Kumar >> > >> wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> We've had a few responses to the doodle, which is >> great to see! >> >> This is just a gentle reminder to register your >> interest & availability for an overview of the UN's >> Digital Cooperation Roadmap & relevant CS efforts so >> far by filling out the doodle here: >> https://doodle.com/poll/hxvk5ribmq4sxk78 >> >> >> Best >> Sheetal. >> >> On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 12:52, Sheetal Kumar >> > > wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> There have been interesting exchanges on this >> list regarding the UNSG's Roadmap on digital >> cooperation, and in particular the proposal for a >> IGF + and a new 'high level multistakeholder >> advisory group' or MHLB. >> >> Bruna and I thought it might be helpful for those >> less acquainted with the discussions and with >> civil society engagement so far to have an >> overview of how civil society has contributed so >> far to these discussions and what their current >> status is. >> >> We'd be happy to dedicate an hour or so in the >> coming weeks to catch people up with what's been >> happening and answer any questions you may have, >> as well as provide a space for reflection on the >> discussions so far. >> >> For timezone purposes we suggest holding the call >> at 1 PM UTC. Please fill out this doodle with >> some proposed dates in May: >> https://doodle.com/poll/hxvk5ribmq4sxk78 >> >> Best >> Sheetal & Bruna >> >> >> UN Digital Cooperation Process >> >> * >> * >> >> Road map for digital cooperation: >> implementation of the recommendations of the >> High-level Panel on Digital Cooperation >> >> >> * >> >> DiploFoundation summary of the Roadmap on >> Digital Cooperation >> >> >> >> IGF and Mechanisms for Global Digital Cooperation >> >> * >> >> "Recommendation 5A/BOptions for the Future of >> Global Digital Cooperation" Paper. >> >> >> * >> >> MAG WG on Strengthening the IGF paper >> >> >> >> Civil Society Statements, positions and inputs >> >> * >> >> Just Net Coalition Statement - More than 170 >> Civil Society Groups Worldwide Oppose Plans >> for a Big Tech Dominated Body for Global >> Digital Governance >> , >> 2021.  >> >> * >> >> Letter of intent for engagement with the UN >> SG's Digital Cooperation efforts >> , >> October 2020;  >> >> * >> >> IGF - Civil Society Joint Statement for Main >> Session on Digital Cooperation >> , >> November 2020; >> >> * >> >> The UN HLP on Digital Cooperation: Top-down >> Calls for More Cooperation >> , >> Internet Governance Project Blog Post  >> >> * >> >> Open letter on the interpretation of >> paragraph 93(a) of the UN Secretary-General's >> Roadmap on Digital Cooperation >> >> >> * >> >> Non-State Actors’ Position Paper on the >> appointment of the UN Tech Envoy   >> >> >> * Civil Society Initial Feedback "Developing >> System-Wide Guidance on Human Rights Due >> Diligence for Technology Concept Note." >>   >> >> >> >> Engagements  >> >> * >> >> IGF High-Level session on Digital Cooperation >> >> >> -- >> * >> * >> *Sheetal Kumar* >> Senior Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: UTC | M: +44 >> (0)7739569514  | >> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 >> 114D 173B E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> * >> * >> *Sheetal Kumar* >> Senior Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: UTC | M: +44 >> (0)7739569514  | >> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 >> 114D 173B E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> */Bruna Martins dos Santos  >> /* >> >> Advocacy Coordinator | Data Privacy Brazil Research >> >> >> Member | Coalizão Direitos na Rede >>   >> Chair | Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group at ICANN >> >> Co-Coordinator | Internet Governance Caucus  >> >> >> Twitter: @boomartins >>  // Skype: bruna.martinsantos >> bruna at dataprivacybr.org >>  and >> bruna.mrtns at gmail.com >> >> >> >> -- >> * >> * >> *Sheetal Kumar* >> Senior Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: UTC | M: +44 >> (0)7739569514  | >> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B >> E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> * >> * >> *Sheetal Kumar* >> Senior Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: UTC | M: +44 (0)7739569514  | >> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 >> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> * >> * >> *Sheetal Kumar* >> Senior Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: UTC | M: +44 (0)7739569514  | >> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >> >> >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From suresh at hserus.net Wed May 12 01:32:46 2021 From: suresh at hserus.net (Suresh Ramasubramanian) Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 11:02:46 +0530 Subject: [Governance] UNSG Roadmap on digital cooperation: a brief status-check In-Reply-To: <860a41ca-87de-b373-a9e1-625dc7ffcbf0@itforchange.net> References: , <860a41ca-87de-b373-a9e1-625dc7ffcbf0@itforchange.net> Message-ID: An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jovank at diplomacy.edu Wed May 12 07:20:09 2021 From: jovank at diplomacy.edu (Jovan Kurbalija) Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 13:20:09 +0200 Subject: [Governance] UNSG Roadmap on digital cooperation: a brief status-check In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, Parminder Since e-mail when I was mentioned triggered comments from you, I can say that I agree with your two points. On the question of the JNC letter I have some comments (and disagreements) which I can share with JNC or here. Please advise. Back to two points from your message…. First, it is true that big civil society networks and organisations are out of the IGF. Their absence is one of the major weaknesses of the IGF. In addition, it remains to be seen if the IGF community will respond proactively to the new wave of grassroots organisations which are articulating concerns regarding data, privacy, identity, and other issues that have come into focus during our shift to online due to COVID-19. Second, governments (and parliaments) should adopt laws and make public policy decisions as the US White House did on the WTO patent waivers during pandemics. The policy confusion should be reduced by having clarity on the core functions of each actor: governments (public policy), businesses (providing services for society and fostering innovation), and civil society (making sure that governments and businesses are not ‘carried away’ by their respective powers in the digital realm). If there is shared clarity on the core functions, we can develop all other forms of multistakeholder consultations and engagement reflecting legal requirements, technical functionality and the policy reality. During my work with the UN Panel, I have never heard that the IGF (or IGF Plus) should become rule/law making organisation. Best regards, Jovan On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:53 AM parminder via Governance < governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > Some passing thought: > > The world is amidst a pandemic with global civil society fighting to free > medical technologies from monopolistic profiteers . A article describes the > US support for TRPS intellectual property waiver thus: > > The U.S. government’s announcement Wednesday that it will enter > negotiations to waive World Trade Organization (WTO) intellectual property > rules is a victory for democratizing technology, for rebalancing power > toward governments and away from corporations, and for the power of > countries working *together *to fight the global pandemic. This may also > be the most significant departure from the U.S. government’s longstanding > commitment to global pharmaceutical monopolies since that regime was first > introduced via NAFTA negotiations 30 years ago. > > > https://democracyjournal.org/arguments/first-the-waiver-next-lets-vaccinate-the-world/ > > ENDS > > But if the groups like the big supporters of new MS digital coop policy > body would have their way, we should have Pfizers, and Johnson and > Johnsons, and the such, sitting at the apex global policy systems > determining how our covid response should be market-based and we should not > make such foolish demands like asking for societal needs to trump profit, > and regulators weighing on production and distribution issues ... > > Fortunately, 'they' could not succeed in the health sector, but in the > digital sector it seems they are close to succeeding, with liberal help > from civil society quarters. But remember, Apples and Googles of today > would be some of the biggest health companies of tomorrow. > > BTW, our great Bill Gates -- the same one who was asked to co-head the > Digi Cooperation panel but passed it on to his wife -- stoutly holds firm > that TRIP intellectual property waiver for covid is not at all needed. > This, even as the biggest political force defending pharma monopolies, the > US government, later supported the waiver, leaving that self professed czar > of global public health blushing, and subject to much global reprobation. > If likes of Bill Gates give such advice in an area which he chose > voluntarily to do his philanthropy in, what kind of advice he, and his ilk, > would give in an area where Gates earned all his fortune, and still earns > it! > > But both the irony and profanity of rooting for such global policy systems > as the proposed MS Digi Coop body so completely misses the civil society > here! One wonders why exactly, what is it that one is missing? > > Anyway, do what you would. But know that the world is watching, will ask > for accountabilities at some time. Even CS has to be accountable. > > BTW, if you all are so righteous about what you are up to, why not open up > an interaction with social movements and big civil society groups in all > different areas. After all, digital being a cross-cutting horizontal area, > the civil society in this area should have close connections with groups in > other areas and be serving their interests, as all sectors get > digitalisation. Or do people disagree with this proposition? > > My call to open a dialogue with other global CS groups in different > sectors, and justify your stances, is a serious one. Any takers? > > best, parminder > > > On 10/05/21 10:32 pm, Sheetal Kumar via Governance wrote: > > Dear all, > > Thanks to those who joined the call last week! > > Please find below the notes for your reference. Don't hesitate to reach > out if you have any questions, > > Best > Sheetal. > > UNSG Roadmap on digital cooperation: a brief status-check call, > *Tuesday 04 May* > > *Present: Raquel, Amrita, Nnenna, Bruna, Judith, Sheetal, Jovan* > > Sheetal explained that the reason for the call was to provide an overview > of the UNSG's efforts so far w/r/t Digital Cooperation, from the High Level > Panel to the Roadmap. > > - > > High-level expert panel was appointed in 2018 > - > > We had a meeting at the global IGF in Paris in 2018 and decided to > submit an input > - > > The input focused on the values and principles we recommended the > report emphasise, as well as existing efforts at the UN level/elsewhere > - > > The HLP report was released in 2019 at RightsCon Tunis > - > > UNSG's office launched roundtables > - > > A number of civil society groups were invited to join roundtables as > participants/champions > - > > Tech Envoy > - > > Nnenna/Web Foundation has been spearheading a group which has sent > a position paper on the appointment of the Tech Envoy (c 99 groups) > - > > Roadmap includes various suggestions which roundtables have taken up, > e.g > - > > Reform to IGF > - > > We have supported the relevant IGF’s WG’s output on this > - > > A number of groups/IGC members have inputted into a consultation > that the IGF hosted and which closed last month > - > > Due diligence guidance > - > > A number of groups, coordinated by Access Now, sent an input > - > > Trust and security statement > - > > Digital inclusion metrics > - > > Appointment of Tech Envoy > - > > We have sent a position paper and followed up > - The Tech Envoy is currently on leave pending an investigation > into sexual harassment claims > - A few of the NGOs part of the aforementioned coalition had a > meeting with the Tech Envoy Office a couple of months ago, to introduce > ourselves and learn more about the priorities of the Office. The Office > wants to prioritise the implementation of the Roadmap in an inclusive way. > > > We then discussed the IGF+ model, Jovan made the following points: > > - IGF+ model: was an ‘obvious’ one/ IGF mandate in Tunis Agenda / > tested model in practice / rare spaces where civil society has reasonable > ‘footprint’ compared to other spaces where governments and businesses have > much more influence. > - IGF needs to evolve - otherwise it will slide slowly into > irrelevance. In 2006 IGF was almost only space for digital debates. Today, > there are tens of spaces/places where digital/cyber/tech policy issues are > addressed. Many of these spaces are not open or fully transparent. > - IGF irrelevance would be the biggest loss for civil society; some > governments unease with IGF; some business in ‘wait and see mode’. in 2005 > IGF was Irrelevance - there are a growing number of spaces and places where > digital issues are discussed; > - On the leadership/high-level track; it is clear that the IGF does > not have ‘buy-in’ among leaders in governments, business and civil society. > Many of them are not aware of the existence of the IGF (an exception is a > limited segment of the tech community and civil society - ‘usual IGF > suspects’). If the leadership gap exists, the second question is how to > fill this gap. It is the background to the current discussion at the IGF > where we may (dis) agree about details and approaches. > - During pandemics governments and the tech sector gained power and > relevance comparing to civil society. IGF Plus can help ‘check’ the growing > power of governments and tech business. If it is done in transparent and > inclusive ways, it could be a great contribution to global governance in > general. > - The ultimate question: do we need prominent and solid IGF. If it is > the case changed are needed (including leadership ‘buy in’). With status > quo IGF will slide into irrelevance rather soon given the growing need for > digital governance solutions. > - Clarity of priority and next steps is needed. It is our > responsibility not only for the future of IGF but also to global public > which in search for digital governance solutions. > > We agreed we need civil society people who want an improved IGF to speak > more loudly - we need to amplify those voices. > > > > Office of the Tech Envoy: > > - Still deliberating on various options for IGF reform based on > feedback received. > - UN agencies are expected to make the decision- maybe by June? > > *Next steps: * > > *Start drafting support letter:* > > - > > See the points of groups (e.g JustNet) who have voiced concern and > make sure we’re responding to them/reach out > - > > Upcoming event where we can voice support for IGF reform: Stockholm > Internet Forum session on 11th > > > *Other processes:* > > Judith will send information about Open Consultation about the next CWG at > the ITU > > *IGF session proposal: * > > Bruna and Sheetal to work on a session that discusses the IGF's place in > the IG ecosystem/addresses how the ecosystem has developed > > > > > On Tue, 4 May 2021 at 10:20, Sheetal Kumar wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> This is just a gentle reminder that our status-check is happening later >> today, at *12 PM UTC.* >> >> Please find the joining details below. >> >> Best >> Sheetal. >> >> Tuesday, 4 May 2021 >> 13:00 | (UTC+01:00) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London | 1 hr >> >> Join meeting >> >> >> *More ways to join:* >> >> *Join from the meeting link* >> >> https://globalpartnersdigital-aae.my.webex.com/globalpartnersdigital-aae.my/j.php?MTID=m83d95e9858c11c41a6b40091b8af3683 >> >> *Join by meeting number* >> Meeting number (access code): 163 789 5578 >> Meeting password: 8DVfYTbCk62 (83839822 from phones and video systems) >> >> *Tap to join from a mobile device (attendees only)* >> +44-20-7660-8149,,1637895578#83839822# >> <%2B44-20-7660-8149,,*01*1637895578%2383839822%23*01*> United Kingdom >> Toll >> Some mobile devices may ask attendees to enter a numeric password. >> >> *Join by phone* >> +44-20-7660-8149 United Kingdom Toll >> Global call-in numbers >> >> >> *Join by video system, application or Skype for business* >> Dial 1637895578 at webex.com >> You can also dial 62.109.219.4 and enter your meeting number. >> >> On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 at 18:03, Sheetal Kumar >> wrote: >> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> Thank you for taking the time to fill out the doodle. The time/date that >>> works for most is >>> *12 PM UTC on Tuesday, 04 May. * >>> >>> I have therefore set up a room to meet in. Please see the joining >>> details below. Note, the timezone indicated is BST (UTC+1) >>> >>> See you there! >>> >>> Best >>> Sheetal. >>> >>> Tuesday, 4 May 2021 >>> 13:00 | (UTC+01:00) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London | 1 hr >>> >>> Join meeting >>> >>> >>> *More ways to join:* >>> >>> *Join from the meeting link* >>> >>> https://globalpartnersdigital-aae.my.webex.com/globalpartnersdigital-aae.my/j.php?MTID=m83d95e9858c11c41a6b40091b8af3683 >>> >>> *Join by meeting number* >>> Meeting number (access code): 163 789 5578 >>> Meeting password: 8DVfYTbCk62 (83839822 from phones and video systems) >>> >>> *Tap to join from a mobile device (attendees only)* >>> +44-20-7660-8149,,1637895578#83839822# >>> <%2B44-20-7660-8149,,*01*1637895578%2383839822%23*01*> United Kingdom >>> Toll >>> Some mobile devices may ask attendees to enter a numeric password. >>> >>> *Join by phone* >>> +44-20-7660-8149 United Kingdom Toll >>> Global call-in numbers >>> >>> >>> *Join by video system, application or Skype for business* >>> Dial 1637895578 at webex.com >>> You can also dial 62.109.219.4 and enter your meeting number. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 at 14:51, Bruna Martins dos Santos < >>> bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey all, >>>> >>>> Hope this email finds you well and safe! >>>> >>>> This is another reminder about our doodle for the* Overview of the >>>> UN's Digital Cooperation Roadmap & relevant CS efforts* Meeting: >>>> https://doodle.com/poll/hxvk5ribmq4sxk78 >>>> >>>> So far May 4th is the winning date, but we will close this doodle >>>> tomorrow COB, so please register your interest and availability! >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Bruna and Sheetal >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 1:44 PM Sheetal Kumar >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear all, >>>>> >>>>> We've had a few responses to the doodle, which is great to see! >>>>> >>>>> This is just a gentle reminder to register your interest & >>>>> availability for an overview of the UN's Digital Cooperation Roadmap & >>>>> relevant CS efforts so far by filling out the doodle here: >>>>> https://doodle.com/poll/hxvk5ribmq4sxk78 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Best >>>>> Sheetal. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 12:52, Sheetal Kumar >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>> >>>>>> There have been interesting exchanges on this list regarding the >>>>>> UNSG's Roadmap on digital cooperation, and in particular the proposal for a >>>>>> IGF + and a new 'high level multistakeholder advisory group' or MHLB. >>>>>> >>>>>> Bruna and I thought it might be helpful for those less acquainted >>>>>> with the discussions and with civil society engagement so far to have an >>>>>> overview of how civil society has contributed so far to these discussions >>>>>> and what their current status is. >>>>>> >>>>>> We'd be happy to dedicate an hour or so in the coming weeks to catch >>>>>> people up with what's been happening and answer any questions you may have, >>>>>> as well as provide a space for reflection on the discussions so far. >>>>>> >>>>>> For timezone purposes we suggest holding the call at 1 PM UTC. Please >>>>>> fill out this doodle with some proposed dates in May: >>>>>> https://doodle.com/poll/hxvk5ribmq4sxk78 >>>>>> >>>>>> Best >>>>>> Sheetal & Bruna >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> UN Digital Cooperation Process >>>>>> >>>>>> - >>>>>> - >>>>>> >>>>>> Road map for digital cooperation: implementation of the >>>>>> recommendations of the High-level Panel on Digital Cooperation >>>>>> >>>>>> - >>>>>> >>>>>> DiploFoundation summary of the Roadmap on Digital Cooperation >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> IGF and Mechanisms for Global Digital Cooperation >>>>>> >>>>>> - >>>>>> >>>>>> "Recommendation 5A/BOptions for the Future of Global Digital >>>>>> Cooperation" Paper. >>>>>> >>>>>> - >>>>>> >>>>>> MAG WG on Strengthening the IGF paper >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Civil Society Statements, positions and inputs >>>>>> >>>>>> - >>>>>> >>>>>> Just Net Coalition Statement - More than 170 Civil Society Groups >>>>>> Worldwide Oppose Plans for a Big Tech Dominated Body for Global Digital >>>>>> Governance >>>>>> , >>>>>> 2021. >>>>>> - >>>>>> >>>>>> Letter of intent for engagement with the UN SG's Digital >>>>>> Cooperation efforts >>>>>> , >>>>>> October 2020; >>>>>> - >>>>>> >>>>>> IGF - Civil Society Joint Statement for Main Session on Digital >>>>>> Cooperation >>>>>> , >>>>>> November 2020; >>>>>> - >>>>>> >>>>>> The UN HLP on Digital Cooperation: Top-down Calls for More >>>>>> Cooperation >>>>>> , >>>>>> Internet Governance Project Blog Post >>>>>> - >>>>>> >>>>>> Open letter on the interpretation of paragraph 93(a) of the UN >>>>>> Secretary-General's Roadmap on Digital Cooperation >>>>>> >>>>>> - >>>>>> >>>>>> Non-State Actors’ Position Paper on the appointment of the UN >>>>>> Tech Envoy >>>>>> >>>>>> - Civil Society Initial Feedback "Developing System-Wide Guidance >>>>>> on Human Rights Due Diligence for Technology Concept Note." >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Engagements >>>>>> >>>>>> - >>>>>> >>>>>> IGF High-Level session on Digital Cooperation >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>>>> Senior Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: UTC | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 >>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>>> Senior Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: UTC | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >>>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> *Bruna Martins dos Santos * >>>> >>>> Advocacy Coordinator | Data Privacy Brazil Research >>>> >>>> >>>> Member | Coalizão Direitos na Rede >>>> Chair | Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group at ICANN >>>> >>>> Co-Coordinator | Internet Governance Caucus >>>> >>>> Twitter: @boomartins // Skype: >>>> bruna.martinsantos >>>> bruna at dataprivacybr.org and bruna.mrtns at gmail.com >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>> Senior Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: UTC | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> >> *Sheetal Kumar* >> Senior Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: UTC | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >> >> >> >> > > -- > > *Sheetal Kumar* > Senior Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: UTC | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | > PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 > DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > > > > > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From LB at lucabelli.net Fri May 14 07:50:27 2021 From: LB at lucabelli.net (LB at lucabelli.net) Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 04:50:27 -0700 Subject: [Governance] Digital Transformation & Cybersecurity in the BRICS | Webinar In-Reply-To: <20210510111005.2700328f4bbfc197480209526f2a1375.79ee5b8e28.mailapi@email07.godaddy.com> Message-ID: <20210514045027.2700328f4bbfc197480209526f2a1375.c91c904357.mailapi@email07.godaddy.com> Good morning (or afternoon) Just a friendly reminder this event is starting in one hour, in case you are interested! Best Luca -- Dear colleagues, Please see below the invitation for our upcoming CyberBRICS webinar on “Digital Transformation and Cybersecurity in the BRICS Countries”, this Friday May 14th, at 10 AM (Rio time, GMT -3). You can register here https://evento.fgv.br/cybersecuritybrics/ The webinar will explore the most recent developments in Digital Transformation and Cybersecurity in the BRICS countries. The special guests opening the event will be Mr Bruno Ramos, Director for the Americas Regional Office of the International Telecommunication Union and CyberBRICS Advisory Board member; Mr Colm Murphy, Huawei's Senior Cybersecurity Advisor; Dr Lucienne Abrahams, Director of the Learning, Information, Networking, Knowledge Centre at Wits University; and Prof Sizwe Snail, Commissioner at the Information Regulator of South Africa and CyberBRICS Advisory Board member. For further information about the webinar, please check https://cyberbrics.info/digital-transformation-and-cybersecurity-in-the-brics-countries/ For further information about the CyberBRICS project, please check our website: https://cyberbrics.info/ Please feel free to share this email via your networks. Kind regards Luca Luca Belli, PhD Professor of Internet Governance and Regulation +55 21 3799 5763 t at 1lucabelli Praia de Botafogo, 190 13º andar Botafogo - Rio de Janeiro, RJ - CEP: 22250-900 luca.belli at fgv.br www.cyberBRICS.info | www.CPDP.lat CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message, as well as any attached document, may contain personal data and information that is confidential and privileged and is intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution of this email or attached documents, or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email by mistake. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: webinar cyberbrics digital transformation cybersec.png Type: image/png Size: 346573 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Outlook-http___www.png Type: image/png Size: 14321 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Outlook-http___www.png Type: image/png Size: 365 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Outlook-http___www.png Type: image/png Size: 566 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Outlook-http___www.png Type: image/png Size: 709 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Outlook-http___www.png Type: image/png Size: 668 bytes Desc: not available URL: From joly at punkcast.com Tue May 18 12:47:47 2021 From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie) Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 12:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Governance] =?utf-8?q?WEBCAST_TODAY_=E2=80=93_CyberSecurity=3A_?= =?utf-8?q?Fast-tracking_Botswana_to_Prosperity?= In-Reply-To: <151329629.14035.0@wordpress.com> References: <151329629.14035.0@wordpress.com> Message-ID: First of a webinar series collab between ISOC Botswana and the University of Botswana. ISOC Live posted: "Today Tuesday 18 May 2021 at 18:00 CAT (16:00 UTC) the Computer Society of Botswana (CSB) and ISOC Botswana Chapter will collaborate to host the ‘CyberSecurity: Fast-tracking Botswana to Prosperity' Webinar. The webinar will invite industry experts to dis" [image: Livestream] Today* Tuesday 18 May 2021* at *18:00 CAT* (16:00 UTC) the *Computer Society of Botswana * (CSB) and *ISOC Botswana Chapter * will collaborate to host the ‘CyberSecurity: Fast-tracking Botswana to Prosperity' Webinar. The webinar will invite industry experts to discuss (i) the current cybersecurity situation of Botswana (ii) fast-tracking the implementation of relevant legislation and frameworks. *GUEST* *Dr Oteng Tabona*, Botswana International University of Science and Technology *LIVESTREAM http://livestream.com/internetsociety/isocbw * *PARTICIPATE VIA ZOOM https://bit.ly/3eJLJVM * *TWITTER #CyberProsperityBW @ISOCBotswana @CSBotswana @biustbw* *SIMULCASTS* *https://www.facebook.com/ISOCBotswana/ * *https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/ * *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive * *ARCHIVE* *https://archive.org/details/isocbw * *Permalink* https://isoc.live/14035/ - -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From y.morenets at againstcybercrime.eu Wed May 19 17:55:17 2021 From: y.morenets at againstcybercrime.eu (Yuliya MORENETS) Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 21:55:17 +0000 Subject: [Governance] Join the First ever Cybersecurity Skills Summit In-Reply-To: References: , Message-ID: Dear all, Today, The Youth IGF Movement launched together with the Swiss Government and Microsoft, the First ever Cybersecurity Skills Summit. You can review the Day 1 of the event at: https://www.facebook.com/globalyouthigf/videos/373645644072004 The agenda is available at www.cyberskills.today . We would like to invite all to join us at our Day 2. It starts on May 20 at 2:30PM Geneva time. The live facebook stream for day 2: https://www.facebook.com/events/810397253215548 We will have an amazing Opening by the Head of Cabinet of the EU Commission Vice-President Schinas -Ms Despina Spanou and Stephen Bereaux - Deputy Director BDT, ITU. On day 2, session 3 is about meeting Human Resources of major IT companies to get the tips; You can take part in session 3 (3:00pm CET - 3:45pm CET), by registering and joining at: https://live.remo.co/e/european-cybersecurity-skills-su-7(limited seats available) 1. Follow us on Twitter at @yourcyberskills and Facebook @globalyouthigf 2. Ask your question or make a comment during the event on both days Stay tuned; we are looking forward in welcoming you! Yuliya Morenets -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From joly at punkcast.com Thu May 20 07:13:34 2021 From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie) Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 07:13:34 -0400 Subject: [Governance] =?utf-8?q?WEBCAST_TODAY=3A_The_Past=2C_Present_and_?= =?utf-8?q?Future_of_Accessibility_in_Mozilla_Hubs_=E2=80=93_Dan_Fe?= =?utf-8?q?rnie-Harper?= Message-ID: Happy Global Accessibility Global Awareness Day! Apart from this A11yVR event A11ySIG will be streaming, a whole bunch more is happening, see https://globalaccessibilityawarenessday.org/events/ ISOC Live posted: "On Thursday May 20 2021 at 19:00 EDT / 23:00 UTC / 08:00 JST (Fri) the Accessibility VR Meetup hosts 'The Past, Present and Future of Accessibility in Mozilla Hubs' on Mozilla Hubs. The Mozilla Hubs team highly values the accessibility community's voice i" [image: livestream] On* Thursday May 20 2021* at *19:00 EDT / 23:00 UTC / 08:00 JST* (Fri) the *Accessibility VR Meetup * hosts '*The Past, Present and Future of Accessibility in Mozilla Hubs *' on Mozilla Hubs. The Mozilla Hubs team highly values the accessibility community's voice in helping to make Hubs a more usable and accessible product. *Dan Fernie-Harper * from the Hubs Design and People Experiences team will present an update on accessibility in Mozilla Hubs, speaking about the user experience design process. The session will be webcast live via a partnership with the* Internet Society Accessibility SIG * (A11ySIG). *LIVESTREAM: https://livestream.com/internetsociety/a11yvr14 * (open captions) *PARTICIPATE: https://hubs.mozilla.com/G6edX79/a11yvr-project/ *(open captions) *REAL TIME TEXT: https://www.streamtext.net/player?event=a11yvr * *TWITTER: @a11yvr @fernzharp @MozillaHubs #GAAD #VR #XR* *SIMULCASTS *(open captions) *https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/ * *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive * *https://youtu.be/V5U_jrufweA * *ARCHIVE https://archive.org/details/a11yvr14 * *Permalink* https://isoc.live/14040/ - -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -------------------------------------- - -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From joly at punkcast.com Fri May 21 08:56:31 2021 From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie) Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 08:56:31 -0400 Subject: [Governance] =?utf-8?q?WEBCAST_TODAY_=E2=80=93_What_are_Internet?= =?utf-8?q?_Exchange_Points_=28=23IXPs=29_and_why_are_they_importan?= =?utf-8?q?t_in_Zimbabwe=E2=80=99s_Internet_Ecosystem=3F?= Message-ID: Although this event focuses on Zimbabwe, there are sure to be many valuable takeaways for any locale. ISOC Live posted: "Today Friday May 21 2021, at 3pm CAT (13:00 UTC) the Internet Society Zimbabwe Chapter (ISOC ZIM) presents a Tech Talk - 'What are Internet Exchange Points (IXPs) and why are they important in Zimbabwe's Internet Ecosystem?'. SPEAKERS Bonnie Mtengwa - IT" Today *Friday May 21 2021*, at *3pm CAT* (13:00 UTC) the *Internet Society Zimbabwe Chapter * (ISOC ZIM) presents a Tech Talk - '*What are Internet Exchange Points (IXPs) and why are they important in Zimbabwe's Internet Ecosystem?*'. *SPEAKERS* *Bonnie Mtengwa* - IT Manager, POTRAZ *Michuki Mwangi* - Senior Director, Internet Technology and Development, Internet Society *Keith Rose* - Senior Network & Security Consultnat *Nomsa Mwayenga* - Partner Engineer - Network Investments - Facebook - ZimNOG Founder *MODERATOR* *Jasper Mangwana*, President, ISOC Zimbabwe *LIVESTREAM http://livestream.com/internetsociety/isoczim2 * *PARTICIPATE VIA ZOOM https://bit.ly/3u7a50i * *TWITTER #IXPs @ISOCZIM #TechTalkSeries @mangwana_jasper @Nomsarm @BonnieM6 @michukis @mangwana_jasper @Potraz_zw* *SIMULCASTS* *https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/ * *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive * *https://www.facebook.com/ISOCAfrica/live * (AI Captions) *ARCHIVE* *https://archive.org/details/isoczim2 * *Permalink* https://isoc.live/14044/ - -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -------------------------------------- - -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From joly at punkcast.com Tue May 25 07:47:07 2021 From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie) Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 07:47:07 -0400 Subject: [Governance] WEBCAST TODAY: Digital Watch Internet Governance Briefing for May 2021 Message-ID: About to begin ISOC Live posted: "On Tuesday May 25 2021 at 2pm CEST (12:00 UTC) ISOC LIVE will simulcast the Digital Watch Internet Governance Briefing for May 2021. Catch up on the major internet governance and digital policy updates from all around the globe and join experts as they an" [image: livestream] On *Tuesday May 25 2021* at *2pm CEST* (12:00 UTC) ISOC LIVE will simulcast the *Digital Watch Internet Governance Briefing for May 2021 *. Catch up on the major internet governance and digital policy updates from all around the globe and join experts as they analyse the existing and emerging policy trends. Special guest this month is *Marc Limon *, Executive Director, Universal Rights Group, who will reflect on the implications of Facebook Oversight Board's decision which reconfirmed former US President Donald Trump's ban from Facebook. Other main issues this month: The ransomware attacks and the cryptocurrency rollercoaster. TEAM *Vladimir Radunovic*, Diplo *Stephanie Borg Psaila*, Diplo *Katarina Andjelkovic*, Diplo *Jovan Kurbalija*, Diplo *Andrijana Gavrilovic*, Diplo *Marco Lotti*, Diplo *Amrita Choudhry* *Hanane Boujemi* *Grace Mtung'u* *Ana Maria Corrêa* *LIVESTREAM https://livestream.com/internetsociety/gipdw05-21 * *PARTICIPATE VIA ZOOM https://bit.ly/2QPBc29 * *REAL TIME TEXT https://bit.ly/3upX95S * *TWITTER #thegip @GenevaGIP @marc_limon* *SIMULCASTS* *https://youtu.be/jdEepknCz9w *(Diplo) *https://www.facebook.com/DiploFoundation/live * *https://www.pscp.tv/ISOC_Live/ * *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive * *https://www.facebook.com/isocny/live * *ARCHIVE* *https://archive.org/details/gipdw05-21 * *Permalink* https://isoc.live/14052/ -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -------------------------------------- - -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From joly at punkcast.com Wed May 26 07:27:04 2021 From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie) Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 07:27:04 -0400 Subject: [Governance] =?utf-8?q?WEBCAST_TODAY=3A_Impact_Assessment_of_Nig?= =?utf-8?q?eria=E2=80=99s_Proposed_Social_Media_Bill?= Message-ID: A great example of ISOC's Internet Way of Networking effort bearing fruit! ISOC Live posted: "On Wednesday 26 May 2021 at 12pm WAT (11:00 UTC) the Internet Society Nigeria Chapter (ISOC NG) and #DearGovernments Organization (DearGovs), presents a webinar 'Impact Assessment of Nigeria’s Proposed Social Media Bill'. A research project has been under" [image: livestream] On *Wednesday 26 May 2021* at *12pm WAT* (11:00 UTC) the *Internet Society Nigeria Chapter * (ISOC NG) and *#DearGovernments Organization * (DearGovs), presents a webinar '*Impact Assessment of Nigeria’s Proposed Social Media Bill *'. A *research project * has been undertaken over the course of the last four months by a joint team of the DearGovs and the Internet Society. The multi-phased project aims to assess the impact on the global Internet of certain Internet-related government regulations drawn from various countries, using the *Internet Impact Assessment Toolkit *(IIAT). The first tranche of this Project has been focused on Nigeria’s proposed Social Media Bill. This webinar brings together Internet stakeholders from the Nigerian ecosystem to deliberate on the implications and recommendations of this *Project's Report *. *SPEAKERS* *Caleb Olumuyiwa Ogundele*, ISOC-Nigeria President *Veronica Piccolo*, Co-founder & VP Research @ DearGovs *Verengai Mabika*, Senior Policy Advisor, ISOC *Emmanuel C. Ogu*, Founder / President @ DearGovs *Bukola Oronti*, ISOC-Nigeria Treasurer *Oluwatosin Abolaji*, Digital Inclusion Program Manager, Paradigm Initiative (PI) *Abdul-Hakeem Ajijola* (AhA), Chair, Nigerian National Cybersecurity Policy & Strategy Committee, 2021 *LIVESTREAM https://livestream.com/internetsociety/ngsocialmedia * *PARTICIPATE VIA ZOOM https://bit.ly/3bKrXYr * *TWITTER #ngsocialmedia @isocngchapter @DearGovs @Mojirayopet @Abolajitosin @readeroy @VerengaiMabika* *SIMULCASTS* *https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/ * *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive * *https://www.facebook.com/ISOCAfrica/live * *https://www.facebook.com/isocngchapter/live * *ARCHIVE* *https://archive.org/details/ngsocialmedia * *Permalink* https://isoc.live/14059/ -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -------------------------------------- - -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From muyiwacaleb at gmail.com Wed May 26 07:29:54 2021 From: muyiwacaleb at gmail.com (Caleb Olumuyiwa Ogundele) Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 14:29:54 +0300 Subject: [Governance] =?utf-8?q?WEBCAST_TODAY=3A_Impact_Assessment_of_Nig?= =?utf-8?q?eria=E2=80=99s_Proposed_Social_Media_Bill?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thank you Joly for helping us Livestream this webinar. Caleb Ogundele President, Internet Society, Nigeria Chapter +2348077377378 On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 2:27 PM Joly MacFie via Governance < governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > A great example of ISOC's Internet Way of Networking effort bearing fruit! > > ISOC Live posted: "On Wednesday 26 May 2021 at 12pm WAT (11:00 UTC) the > Internet Society Nigeria Chapter (ISOC NG) and #DearGovernments > Organization (DearGovs), presents a webinar 'Impact Assessment of Nigeria’s > Proposed Social Media Bill'. A research project has been under" > > > [image: livestream] On > *Wednesday 26 May 2021* at *12pm WAT* (11:00 UTC) the *Internet Society > Nigeria Chapter * (ISOC NG) and *#DearGovernments > Organization * (DearGovs), presents a webinar > '*Impact Assessment of Nigeria’s Proposed Social Media Bill > *'. > A *research project > * > has been undertaken over the course of the last four months by a joint team > of the DearGovs and the Internet Society. The multi-phased project aims to > assess the impact on the global Internet of certain Internet-related > government regulations drawn from various countries, using the *Internet > Impact Assessment Toolkit > > *(IIAT). The first tranche of this Project has been focused on Nigeria’s > proposed Social Media Bill. This webinar brings together Internet > stakeholders from the Nigerian ecosystem to deliberate on the implications > and recommendations of this *Project's Report *. > > *SPEAKERS* > *Caleb Olumuyiwa Ogundele*, ISOC-Nigeria President > *Veronica Piccolo*, Co-founder & VP Research @ DearGovs > *Verengai Mabika*, Senior Policy Advisor, ISOC > *Emmanuel C. Ogu*, Founder / President @ DearGovs > *Bukola Oronti*, ISOC-Nigeria Treasurer > *Oluwatosin Abolaji*, Digital Inclusion Program Manager, Paradigm > Initiative (PI) > *Abdul-Hakeem Ajijola* (AhA), Chair, Nigerian National Cybersecurity > Policy & Strategy Committee, 2021 > > *LIVESTREAM https://livestream.com/internetsociety/ngsocialmedia > * > > *PARTICIPATE VIA ZOOM https://bit.ly/3bKrXYr * > > *TWITTER #ngsocialmedia @isocngchapter @DearGovs > @Mojirayopet @Abolajitosin @readeroy @VerengaiMabika* > > *SIMULCASTS* > *https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/ * > *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive * > *https://www.facebook.com/ISOCAfrica/live > * > *https://www.facebook.com/isocngchapter/live > * > > *ARCHIVE* > *https://archive.org/details/ngsocialmedia > * > > > > *Permalink* > https://isoc.live/14059/ > > > -- > -------------------------------------- > Joly MacFie +12185659365 > -------------------------------------- > - > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > -- *Ogundele Olumuyiwa Caleb* *muyiwacaleb at gmail.com * *234 - 8077377378* *234 - 07030777969* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bruna.mrtns at gmail.com Wed May 26 15:33:52 2021 From: bruna.mrtns at gmail.com (Bruna Martins dos Santos) Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 16:33:52 -0300 Subject: [Governance] [MAG Working on IGF Strengthening and Strategy] "Proposals on strategic improvements to the IGF and operational measures in 2021" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear IGC, Sharing with you the MAG Working Group on IGF Strengthening and Strategy “*Proposals on strategic improvements to the IGF and operational measures in 2021” . * *The document was presented by the *MAG Working Group assembled last year as a response to the call for “suggestions for improvements for IGF 2021 issued by the MAG in December 2020, and includes the WG-strategy’s vision for a more strategic, inclusive and impactful IGF and concrete proposals for the planning and design of this year's event. Please find the document attached and more info about the WG here . Best, -- *Bruna Martins dos Santos * Advocacy Coordinator | Data Privacy Brazil Research Member | Coalizão Direitos na Rede Chair | Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group at ICANN Co-Coordinator | Internet Governance Caucus Twitter: @boomartins // Skype: bruna.martinsantos bruna at dataprivacybr.org and bruna.mrtns at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: MAG WG-strategy proposals on strategic improvements to the IGF and operational measures in 2021.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 182463 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ayden at ferdeline.com Wed May 26 19:24:19 2021 From: ayden at ferdeline.com (=?utf-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 23:24:19 +0000 Subject: [Governance] Internet governance history podcast POWER PLAYS Message-ID: Dear all, Apologies for the self-promotion here. Last year I launched an Internet governance history podcast, [POWER PLAYS](https://www.powerplays.xyz), which has been interviewing the movers and shakers responsible for making/negotiating/contributing to key decisions that continue to impact the Internet's infrastructure and institutions. I have personally enjoyed hearing and learning from the anecdotes and stories that these Internet pioneers have to offer. And I think you might too. Here are links to the most recent conversations I've had: - Esther Dyson, who chaired the ICANN Board from 1998 to 2000, and who Wired described as the most powerful woman in computing, on why she thinks ICANN has become a "protection racket": https://www.powerplays.xyz/podcast/s1-e8 - Richard Hill, who spent a decade with the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) dealing with numbering and tariffing issues, network operations, and economic and policy issues, on why he is not convinced the ITU can reinvent itself to stay relevant: https://www.powerplays.xyz/podcast/s1-e7 - Sarah Deutsch, who was a negotiator in the negotiations that led to the passage of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, on whether she thinks the DCMA is fit for purpose today: https://www.powerplays.xyz/podcast/s1-e6 - Mance Harmon, the chief executive at Hedera Hashgraph, on how distributed ledger technologies have evolved over time — and why he is skeptical about Bitcoin: https://www.powerplays.xyz/podcast/s1-e5 - Marilyn Cade, a long-time AT&T lobbyist who was instrumental in developing formal governance mechanisms for the Internet's Domain Name System, spoke to me about her professional accomplishments, leadership style, and hopes for the future just a few weeks before her death: https://www.powerplays.xyz/podcast/s1-e4 - Clara Tsao, a senior fellow with the Atlantic Council who previously served as the Senior Advisor for Emerging Technology at the United States Department of Homeland Security, on who is spreading mis- and dis- information: https://www.powerplays.xyz/podcast/s1-e3 - Stephanie Perrin, who led the drafting initiative that resulted in Canada's first piece of privacy legislation to cover the private sector, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, tells the story behind the development of that law: https://www.powerplays.xyz/podcast/s1-e2 - Erika Mann, who represented Germany in the European Parliament from 1994 to 2009, was the rapporteur behind the European Union's eCommerce Directive. This directive is still in force as the legal framework for online services in the European Union's internal market. We speak about how fit for purpose this directive is today: https://www.powerplays.xyz/podcast/s1-e1 You can also find the podcast on [Apple Podcasts](https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/power-plays/id1521285039), [Spotify](https://open.spotify.com/show/2wnwefldHYZHoXKQdck8Gm), and all major listening apps. Finally, if you know of someone who would make a great interview subject, please consider completing this [super short form](https://airtable.com/shrIcuDu0fI1T4KZP) to add their details to my bank of potential guests. Self-nominations are also welcome. Thank you so much! Best wishes, Ayden Férdeline -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From joly at punkcast.com Thu May 27 18:36:38 2021 From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie) Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 18:36:38 -0400 Subject: [Governance] WEBCAST TODAY: Digital Watch Internet Governance Briefing for May 2021 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: The archive of this is now available, with captions in English, Arabic, Franch, Spanish, German, Chinese and Russian https://archive.org/details/gipdw05-21 Transcript https://archive.org/download/gipdw05-21/gipdw05-21_TRANSCRIPT.pdf Audio https://archive.org/download/gipdw03-21/gipdw03-21.mp3 On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 7:47 AM Joly MacFie wrote: > About to begin > > ISOC Live posted: "On Tuesday May 25 2021 at 2pm CEST (12:00 UTC) ISOC > LIVE will simulcast the Digital Watch Internet Governance Briefing for May > 2021. Catch up on the major internet governance and digital policy updates > from all around the globe and join experts as they an" > > [image: livestream] On *Tuesday > May 25 2021* at *2pm CEST* (12:00 UTC) ISOC LIVE will simulcast the *Digital > Watch Internet Governance Briefing for May 2021 > *. > Catch up on the major internet governance and digital policy updates from > all around the globe and join experts as they analyse the existing and > emerging policy trends. Special guest this month is *Marc Limon > *, > Executive Director, Universal Rights Group, who will reflect on the > implications of Facebook Oversight Board's decision which reconfirmed > former US President Donald Trump's ban from Facebook. Other main issues > this month: The ransomware attacks and the cryptocurrency rollercoaster. > > TEAM > *Vladimir Radunovic*, Diplo > *Stephanie Borg Psaila*, Diplo > *Katarina Andjelkovic*, Diplo > *Jovan Kurbalija*, Diplo > *Andrijana Gavrilovic*, Diplo > *Marco Lotti*, Diplo > *Amrita Choudhry* > *Hanane Boujemi* > *Grace Mtung'u* > *Ana Maria Corrêa* > > *LIVESTREAM https://livestream.com/internetsociety/gipdw05-21 > * > > *PARTICIPATE VIA ZOOM https://bit.ly/2QPBc29 * > > *REAL TIME TEXT https://bit.ly/3upX95S * > > *TWITTER #thegip @GenevaGIP @marc_limon* > > *SIMULCASTS* > *https://youtu.be/jdEepknCz9w *(Diplo) > *https://www.facebook.com/DiploFoundation/live > * > *https://www.pscp.tv/ISOC_Live/ * > *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive * > *https://www.facebook.com/isocny/live > * > > *ARCHIVE* > *https://archive.org/details/gipdw05-21 > * > > > > *Permalink* > https://isoc.live/14052/ > > > > > -- > -------------------------------------- > Joly MacFie +12185659365 > -------------------------------------- > - > -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -------------------------------------- - -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From willi.uebelherr at riseup.net Fri May 28 16:27:40 2021 From: willi.uebelherr at riseup.net (willi uebelherr) Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 16:27:40 -0400 Subject: [Governance] Global Update: Your input is needed! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <50ed1f36-6e8c-afa0-d80b-464da913785d@riseup.net> Dear friends, this email i received from the global ISOC maillist. In the text from Andrew Sullivan i read: "But there remain plenty of people in the world who do not believe in the Internet as we do. They do not care for an open, globally-connected Internet. They do not want it to be secure, and if they are successful the Internet cannot be trustworthy. So, we must keep up our efforts." 1) Many people use the term "Internet". But in reality, they speak about an InterStar System and never they like to go in direction to an Internet, "the Inter-connection of local Net-works". 2) The consequence ist, that if we follow the ideas for an InterNet, we have to focus our view to the local networks in all communities, autonom instances with cliensts, servers and connections, and to interconnect this local networks. And only this interconnection is then the InterNet. 3) In order to easily connect these local networks, we need to move to geophysical addressing and completely end today's virtualisation. Each community will then have its own unique address. 3) The internet is a transport system for digital data in packet form. It has absolutely nothing to do with the application level. And it follows that error checking and correction of the data transmission must be part of the transport system and thus TCP and UDP disappear. 4) The internet rests on independent local networks that connect to each other. This means that all local decisions are left exclusively to the local networks. Only global interaction requires a global language, the IP protocol, which has no meaning locally. 5) Again and again we read the nonsense about the need for virtual spaces. This is completely uninteresting for the world's population. And if the very few want this, then let them make it for themselves. I know that the essential prerequisites for an internet are data transmission in the connections and data processing in the nodes, the router points. For this, only a free technology, without private and state, helps to give the people in all regions of this planet the possibilities to produce these technical systems themselves. This is where ISOC (Internet Society) and IGF (Internet Governance Forum) and all other instances can really make a positive contribution. Not more, but not less either. with many greetings, willi Asuncion, Paraguay Am 28.05.2021 um 09:08 schrieb Lia Kiessling, Internet Society: > from Internet Society has sent you an email but it appears that your email client only allows plain text. > > Please copy and paste the following link to view the contents of this email: > http://portal.internetsociety.org/622619/bulletin/ViewSent/700059da-6e40-42cd-82b4-5fc0baf2ea78/67916bb8-ddec-4022-ac7b-4233d522529f?mid=da91ab3f-f5b6-4c9a-be88-32e92f1095ff&type=e > If we follow this link, we find: Dear, In 2019, we outlined our vision for what the Internet Society should work towards through 2025. In keeping with the mission established by the Board of Trustees, we said we needed to build, promote, and defend the Internet. We said we would do that through our efforts to grow the Internet and to make it stronger. Together, we have already made a lot of progress, as can be seen in our 2020 Impact Report. But there remain plenty of people in the world who do not believe in the Internet as we do. They do not care for an open, globally-connected Internet. They do not want it to be secure, and if they are successful the Internet cannot be trustworthy. So, we must keep up our efforts. Consideration of this wider environment has given us some priorities on which to concentrate as we build our plan for 2022: While Internet access is growing, it is still growing unequally. The pandemic has made it clear to the world how important access is, but many people still need help. So, in 2022 we will continue to prioritize extending the Internet to communities that do not have it and need it most, concentrating especially on building the movement to make sure the Internet really is for everyone. There is a struggle over the Internet. On one side are global corporations who own the environment that many of us depend upon, with effective control of some technology markets. This gives them some of the power traditionally held by nation-states. On the other side are governments using laws and regulations trying to bring these corporations to heel. The result is an environment that threatens the Internet. So, we will continue to prioritize promoting and defending those properties that underpin the Internet as the preferred model for network development in 2022. Internet users and the transactions they undertake live at a complex intersection of privacy and security, and the Internet will never be trustworthy as long as communications are not reliably private and safe. Yet even as people have lived through a period of sharing their most personal details online, forces work to make us less safe by ensuring applications remain vulnerable and by undermining end-to-end encryption. So, we will continue our emphasis on the importance and value of strong encryption. Internet shutdowns within countries, either whole or partial, continue to undermine the utility and value of the Internet. Other countries, even some that used to be Internet advocates, have begun imposing restrictions on connections and regulating infrastructure to filter content. “Network sovereignty” erodes the Internet’s critical properties. So, we will continue our efforts to show how greater network resilience is advantageous to all, including those opposed to it. These priorities continue our efforts to build, promote, and defend the Internet. The more we can align our multiple efforts, the greater the effect we will have to ensure the Internet is a force for good in society. Staff efforts are intended to complement the many different things the Internet Society community is undertaking. We want to understand whether you believe what staff are doing is useful and complementary. We request that you take a brief (3 minute) survey to help us: Does this priority list align with your own? Are we overlooking work the community has already done and duplicating it? Where might the Internet Society amplify work the community is already doing, to make us all more effective? The results of this survey will be shared with you in August. The list of priorities is not exhaustive, so there will also be other opportunities to talk about things we should be doing together, such as the upcoming consultation about Special Interest Groups (June). In the meantime, if you have any questions, please contact AP2022 at isoc.org. The Internet is a shared resource to enrich people’s lives, but it is threatened in a way it has not been in the past. To be successful in our efforts to build, promote, and defend it, we must work together. The real Internet gives humanity so much, if only we will use it for the good of all. We hope that through clear prioritization we will realize our vision that, truly, the Internet is for everyone. ### Once you click on this link, you will be redirected to the Internet Society member portal to login. If you have not accessed the member portal in the past, or have forgotten your login information, click "Forgot Login?" and enter your email address to retrieve your information. You will be sent an email with instructions to reset your password. Regards, Andrew Sullivan President & CEO Internet Society From parminder at itforchange.net Sun May 30 10:13:27 2021 From: parminder at itforchange.net (parminder) Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 19:43:27 +0530 Subject: [Governance] [MAG Working on IGF Strengthening and Strategy] "Proposals on strategic improvements to the IGF and operational measures in 2021" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I have a small question, when and how was the MAG WG on IGF strengthening and Strategy organised I am sure there must have been announcements and discussions here that I might have missed... Thanks, parminder On 27/05/21 1:03 am, Bruna Martins dos Santos via Governance wrote: > Dear IGC,  > > Sharing with you the MAG Working Group on IGF Strengthening and > Strategy “/Proposals on strategic improvements to the IGF and > operational measures in 2021” > . / > > / > / > > /The document was presented by the /MAG Working Group assembled last > year as a response to the call for  “suggestions for improvements for > IGF 2021 > issued > by the MAG in December 2020, and  includes the WG-strategy’s vision > for a more strategic, inclusive and impactful IGF and concrete > proposals for the planning and design of this year's event.  > > > Please find the document attached and more info about the WG here > .  > > > Best,  > --  > */Bruna Martins dos Santos  > /* > > Advocacy Coordinator | Data Privacy Brazil Research > > > Member | Coalizão Direitos na Rede   > Chair | Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group at ICANN > > Co-Coordinator | Internet Governance Caucus  > > Twitter: @boomartins  // Skype: > bruna.martinsantos > bruna at dataprivacybr.org  and > bruna.mrtns at gmail.com > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From joly at punkcast.com Mon May 31 07:54:45 2021 From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie) Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 07:54:45 -0400 Subject: [Governance] SIMULCAST: AfNOG Day 2021 Message-ID: I will segment this into sessions when done. Vint is up next. ISOC Live posted: "On Monday May 31 2021, at 09:00 UTC, the Africa Network Operators Group (AfNOG) will hold AfNOG Day 2021 as part of the Africa Internet Summit 2021 SPEAKERS Nancy Dotse, Secretariat, AfNOG Dr. Nii Narku Quaynor, Convenor, AfNOG Dr. Dawit Bekele, Regional" [image: livestream] On* Monday May 31 2021*, at *09:00 UTC*, the *Africa Network Operators Group * (AfNOG) will hold *AfNOG Day 2021 * as part of the *Africa Internet Summit 2021 * *SPEAKERS* *Nancy Dotse*, Secretariat, AfNOG *Dr. Nii Narku Quaynor*, Convenor, AfNOG *Dr. Dawit Bekele*, Regional Vice President - Africa, Internet Society *Dr. Philip Smith*, Senior Network Engineer, Network Startup Resource Center (NSRC) *Israel Bionyi Nyoh*, Communications and Outreach Manager, Internet Society *Jody van Wyk*, Head, Telecom Infra Project Africa *Subramanian Moonesamy*, Chairman, Board of Directors, AFRINIC *Noah Maina*, AfNOG *Logan Velvindron*, Infrastructure Security Engineer, AFRINIC *Prof. Shin'ichiro Matsuo*, Research Professor, Georgetown University *Vint Cerf*, Chief Internet evangelist, Google *Alain Aina*, Prof. Shin'ichiro Matsuo *LIVESTREAM http://livestream.com/internetsociety/afnog21 * *AGENDA https://2021.internetsummit.africa/programme * *TWITTER #afnog2021 #AIS21 @AfNOGWorkshops @AIS_Africa* *SIMULCASTS* *https://youtu.be/cy6CtSDQ2OU* (EN) *https://youtu.be/29nsIzPJ1BY *(FR) *https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/ * *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive * *https://www.facebook.com/ISOCAfrica/live * *ARCHIVE* *https://archive.org/details/afnog21 * *Permalink* https://isoc.live/14076/ - -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -------------------------------------- - -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: