From parminder at itforchange.net Wed Dec 1 05:02:59 2021 From: parminder at itforchange.net (parminder) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 15:32:59 +0530 Subject: [Governance] IGF Leadership panel: My personal stance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 28/11/21 6:35 pm, Nnenna Nwakanma via Governance wrote: > Dear all > > I do not have energy for  drawn-out debates. However, let me state my > personal perspective of the IGF Leadership panel > > * After 15 years of IGF, I, personally would like to see it take on > more policy engagement, beyond the "talk, conversation, sharing > experience" status in which it is at the moment. Wolfgang and > Jovan's points provide enough background > * I also do  not think that the IGF Leadership panel will prove to > be a silver bullet, but it is worth a try.  > * The process that led to the Digital Cooperation Roadmap, which > gave birth to the IGF suggestion was fully mutlistakeholder.  I > have participated, in my personal capacity and via the Web > Foundation for the past 3 years, right from BEFORE Paris IGF till > today. > * There is a Civil Society group (let me know if you  or your > organisation wishes to engage) that has kept in collaboration with > the Office of the UN Tech Envoy since its inception. Many orgs in > this list are also there. > Sure Nnenna, we, as in IT for Change and Just Net Coalition, would like to engage. Please tell us what we should do for that .. .thanks, parminder > * Some of us plan to engage in Our Common Agenda > , and most > importantly, the Global Digital Compact, that we believe will be > in the works mainly in 2022 and 2023. This is the "Rebuilding > after COVID Pandemic Report" launched by the UNSG at the UNGA76 as > requested by the UNGA75 > * Personally, I have been asked by many if it is okay to nominate me > to the IGF Leadership panel and my response has been "Yes, if you > consider it right and think I can bring value". > * Again, as a personal principle, I do not self nominate for > anything, anywhere. > > All for now > > Nnenna > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Wed Dec 1 05:30:48 2021 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 05:30:48 -0500 Subject: [Governance] IGF Leadership panel: My personal stance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks Nenna. How about IGC appoints a liaison to that civil society group that is in touch with the tech-envoy, so that everyone can periodically get updated on this list? I think Sheetal and Bruna kept us updated but perhaps it would be good to distribute the workload to someone who can specifically focus on this liaison role. If Sheetal or Bruna can do this, that would be great too. (and to be clear, I am not volunteering... sorry,I know I am probably creating work for someone else, but I would love to see someone to volunteer, I think it will help us greatly) Farzaneh On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 8:06 AM Nnenna Nwakanma via Governance < governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > Dear all > > I do not have energy for drawn-out debates. However, let me state my > personal perspective of the IGF Leadership panel > > > - After 15 years of IGF, I, personally would like to see it take on > more policy engagement, beyond the "talk, conversation, sharing experience" > status in which it is at the moment. Wolfgang and Jovan's points provide > enough background > - I also do not think that the IGF Leadership panel will prove to be > a silver bullet, but it is worth a try. > - The process that led to the Digital Cooperation Roadmap, which gave > birth to the IGF suggestion was fully mutlistakeholder. I have > participated, in my personal capacity and via the Web Foundation for the > past 3 years, right from BEFORE Paris IGF till today. > - There is a Civil Society group (let me know if you or your > organisation wishes to engage) that has kept in collaboration with the > Office of the UN Tech Envoy since its inception. Many orgs in this list are > also there. > - Some of us plan to engage in Our Common Agenda > , and most > importantly, the Global Digital Compact, that we believe will be in the > works mainly in 2022 and 2023. This is the "Rebuilding after COVID Pandemic > Report" launched by the UNSG at the UNGA76 as requested by the UNGA75 > - Personally, I have been asked by many if it is okay to nominate me > to the IGF Leadership panel and my response has been "Yes, if you consider > it right and think I can bring value". > - Again, as a personal principle, I do not self nominate for anything, > anywhere. > > All for now > > Nnenna > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From parminder at itforchange.net Wed Dec 1 05:33:51 2021 From: parminder at itforchange.net (parminder) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:03:51 +0530 Subject: [Governance] IGF Leadership panel: My personal stance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <37db9696-df59-b7c1-fac6-5dcb07848876@itforchange.net> On 28/11/21 6:35 pm, Nnenna Nwakanma via Governance wrote: > Dear all > > I do not have energy for  drawn-out debates. However, let me state my > personal perspective of the IGF Leadership panel > > * After 15 years of IGF, I, personally would like to see it take on > more policy engagement, beyond the "talk, conversation, sharing > experience" status in which it is at the moment. Wolfgang and > Jovan's points provide enough background > * I also do  not think that the IGF Leadership panel will prove to > be a silver bullet, but it is worth a try.  > * The process that led to the Digital Cooperation Roadmap, which > gave birth to the IGF suggestion was fully mutlistakeholder. > Nnenna, Can you please help us with some information on how the process that led to the Digital Cooperation Roadmap was as you say*" fully multistakeholder" (*MS) ... Sometimes we may just be understanding different things with that hold-all term, MS, which is at the centre of IG debates, so better to be clear .. In my view the process was *fully UN SG led and determined ,***and not at all what is known as 'fully' multistakeholder .. .. But happy to hear why you think it was a fully multistakeholder process. The DG process did involve some consultative processes, but most governmental and multi-lateral law making processes do also involve such processes. We also know that on the last public consultation on the structure of the High Level Multi-stakeholder Body, the official summary of the responses itself is very clear that the LP structure as now proposed was NOT the favored one in public opinion, meaning, in other words, such a structure was rejected by the public. Nonetheless, within a few months the UNSG goes ahead and announces the formation of LP .. Multistakeholder??? > * I have participated, in my personal capacity and via the Web > Foundation for the past 3 years, right from BEFORE Paris IGF till > today. > * There is a Civil Society group (let me know if you  or your > organisation wishes to engage) that has kept in collaboration with > the Office of the UN Tech Envoy since its inception. Many orgs in > this list are also there. > * Some of us plan to engage in Our Common Agenda > , and most > importantly, the Global Digital Compact, that we believe will be > in the works mainly in 2022 and 2023. > Yes, I know .. that is my problem... If we do not speak up and resist now, *t**hese processes and their outcomes ,with even deeper global consequence and impact, too will be determined by some insider elite groups and people *.. I dont want that to happen .. But to prevent that, we must speak up and act now .. parminder > * This is the "Rebuilding after COVID Pandemic Report" launched by > the UNSG at the UNGA76 as requested by the UNGA75 > * Personally, I have been asked by many if it is okay to nominate me > to the IGF Leadership panel and my response has been "Yes, if you > consider it right and think I can bring value". > * Again, as a personal principle, I do not self nominate for > anything, anywhere. > > All for now > > Nnenna > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From valeriab at apc.org Wed Dec 1 09:30:49 2021 From: valeriab at apc.org (Valeria Betancourt) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 09:30:49 -0500 Subject: [Governance] APC remains committed to strengthening the Internet Governance Forum Message-ID: <009d305c-1242-3d73-e10d-32cddbff1c89@apc.org> Dear all, We have been following the profuse and necessary exchange, positions and reflections over the last days in relation to the IGF Leadership Panel. The statement below briefly explains our stance. https://www.apc.org/en/pubs/association-progressive-communications-remains-committed-strengthening-internet-governance Best regards, Valeria -- Valeria Betancourt Directora / Manager Programa de Políticas de Information y Comunicación / Communication and Information Policy Programme Global Policy Advocacy / Incidencia política global Asociación para el Progreso de las Comunicaciones / Association for Progressive Communications, APC http://www.apc.org From ca at cafonso.ca Wed Dec 1 10:28:51 2021 From: ca at cafonso.ca (Carlos Afonso) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 12:28:51 -0300 Subject: [Governance] APC remains committed to strengthening the Internet Governance Forum In-Reply-To: <009d305c-1242-3d73-e10d-32cddbff1c89@apc.org> References: <009d305c-1242-3d73-e10d-32cddbff1c89@apc.org> Message-ID: Valeria, thanks. It clearly explains APC's position, and I agree entirely with it. fraternal regards --c.a. On 01/12/2021 11:30, Valeria Betancourt via Governance wrote: > Dear all, > > We have been following the profuse and necessary exchange, positions and > reflections over the last days in relation to the IGF Leadership Panel. > > The statement below briefly explains our stance. > > https://www.apc.org/en/pubs/association-progressive-communications-remains-committed-strengthening-internet-governance > > Best regards, > > Valeria > -- Carlos A. Afonso [emails são pessoais exceto quando explicitamente indicado em contrário] [emails are personal unless explicitly indicated otherwise] Instituto Nupef - https://nupef.org.br From mariliamaciel at gmail.com Wed Dec 1 10:48:51 2021 From: mariliamaciel at gmail.com (Marilia Maciel) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:48:51 +0100 Subject: [Governance] Master programme with specialisation on Internet Governance In-Reply-To: References: <89e7299f9fe54eed66d45cf3d.330e500107.20211130165230.0fe4c8c769.71731230@mail205.atl21.rsgsv.net> Message-ID: Dear all, This opportunity could be of interest to those wishing to pursue an academic career or build up their professional profile in the fields of International relations, diplomacy, and digital policy. It is possible to select "Internet Governance" as an area of specialisation within the Master programme. With the pandemic and limited travel, this all-online option is great for those who otherwise might not be able to take on an MA at this time. Thank you for sharing within your networks. All the best wishes, Marilia Here's why our Master in Contemporary Diplomacy (and internet governance) is now within YOUR reach View this email in your browser Earn your Master in Contemporary Diplomacy entirely online Choosing to further your studies is a smart decision. But choosing a programme that helps you make the best use of your time is *even smarter*. *An online 24/7 programme* Our Master in Contemporary Diplomacy , offered in cooperation with the University of Malta , is entirely online, making it both time- and cost-effective. You can adapt your study schedule around your family and work commitments. *Scholarships to support your goal* Thanks to the support of the Government of Malta, up to 50% of the fees can be covered by a scholarship (for eligible applicants). What will you learn? Areas of study include both traditional and contemporary topics of diplomacy, including: *✓ Multilateral Diplomacy ✓ Bilateral Diplomacy ✓ Diplomatic Theory and Practice ✓ Language and Diplomacy ✓ E-diplomacy ✓ Internet Technology and Policy ✓ Artificial Intelligence Policy* *✓ Cybersecurity* and more. You can also select *internet governance as an area of specialisation *within the Master's programme, which allows you to focus on digital policy and diplomacy. Find out more about the programme Apply now (deadline is 15 December 2021) Why enrol in the Master's programme? *✓ Accredited:* The degree has a European postgraduate accreditation and is recognised worldwide. *✓ Relevant: *The programme covers contemporary and traditional topics while discussing current events. *✓ Flexible:* Design your own study programme from a wide range of 15 online courses . *✓ Expertise: *Faculty members are practising and retired diplomats, and experts with both theoretical expertise and practical experience. *✓ Affordable: *The programme provides the highest quality of education and highly competitive fees compared to similar programmes. *✓ Practical: *Online courses enable you to continue to work, earn income, and further your professional experience while studying for a degree. *✓ Networking:* Extend your professional network through your lecturers, classmates, and Diplo’s network of over 6,700 alumni . *✓ Personalised:* Small groups enable you to draw on the experience of your lecturers and classmates. *✓ Effective:* Master's alumni have seen immediate and lasting benefits, ranging from career advances to personal development. Watch our alumni testimonials . [image: Forward this e-mail] Forward this e-mail [image: Share it] Share it [image: Tweet it] Tweet it [image: Share it] Share it What our graduates have to say *Amir Kiyaei*, from South Africa, completed his Master's in 2019. Here are his impressions of the Master's programme (click below, or watch on YouTube ): Why study with Diplo? Diplo is a renowned capacity development institution, set up by the Governments of Malta and Switzerland in 2002, to help increase the participation of diplomats, especially from small and developing countries, in global policy process. To date, over 6,000 participants from around the world have studied with Diplo. *For queries, reach out to us at admissions at diplomacy.edu * [image: LinkedIn] [image: Facebook] [image: Twitter] [image: Instagram] [image: YouTube] [image: SoundCloud] Copyright © 2021 DiploFoundation All rights reserved. You are receiving this email because you expressed an interest in DiploFoundation and the Geneva Internet Platform. Our mailing address is: DiploFoundation, Anutruf (Ground Floor), Hriereb Street, Msida, Malta Want to change how you receive these emails? You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list . -- *______________________________* *Marília Maciel* Digital Policy Senior Researcher | DiploFoundation WMO | 7bis, Avenue de la Paix | 1202 Geneva - Switzerland MariliaM at diplomacy.edu | @MariliaM www.diplomacy.edu -- *Marília Maciel* Digital Policy Senior Researcher, DiploFoundation WMO Building *|* 7bis, Avenue de la Paix *| *1211 Geneva - Switzerland *Email*: *MariliaM at diplomacy.edu * *|** Twitter: * *@MariliaM* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From parminder at itforchange.net Wed Dec 1 13:12:20 2021 From: parminder at itforchange.net (parminder) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 23:42:20 +0530 Subject: [Governance] JNC event at the IGF: "Digital policy making from below -- Ask the impacted sectors first" In-Reply-To: <67e40b01-b392-2baf-f437-e223e16158e2@itforchange.net> References: <67e40b01-b392-2baf-f437-e223e16158e2@itforchange.net> Message-ID: <945a85d9-73dc-ff56-ce37-2b8c511577e2@itforchange.net> Dear All Just Net Coalition (JNC) has been regularly doing half day events at the UN Internet Governance Forum's annual meetings, bringing some key contemporary issues in JNC's work and journey to a public discussion. At the last in-person meeting we did at the IGF, Berlin, in Dec, 2019, we released the JNC's Manifesto for Digital Justice and organized a panel around it. In 2020, we had a virtual session at the IGF, because the IGF itself was fully virtual. This year, the IGF is to be held in Katowice, Poland, in a part virtual part physical manner... Most of us would not be attending in person. But we would have a few persons from JNC there. Just Net Coalition plans a two and half hour event on December 6th, from 930 to 1200 UTC, on what is emerging as *the key way JNC would like to organize and work going forward*. Let me explain. We have been developing an umbrella project this year, which has sub-projects co-led along with JNC by a top global progressive group in a particular sector undergoing digitalisation -- from trade, agro- diversity and labor to health, gender, finance, media and welfare state. These specific sector- oriented sub projects bring together 'sectoral' experts and digital experts to (1) map the terrain of digitalisation in that sector -- its challenges and opportunities, and (2) try to come up with some early norms and principles that must guide how digitalisation should be undertaken in that sector. The JNC has always been a coalition that consisted not just of 'core' digital area activists, but also various organizations in different sectors that have become increasingly interested in issues of digital fairness and justice especially as it intersects with their area of work. Our new initiative has the objective of giving these '*sectoral' (as against 'core' digital) organizations a greater role in influencing and shaping digital policies that strongly impact all of them*. This requires first of all to build their 'confidence' to step right up to directly address core digital governance issues like 'who owns data', and 'what are the appropriate rules of platform management', what is 'just and fair AI' and so on. It of course calls for collective capacity building of all actors in and with respect to a given sector. Digital actors thus learn as much about the digital phenomenon from 'sectoral' actors as vice versa, because it is the latter who know what is the 'digital' actually 'doing'. The basic premise of the project, and JNC's approach generally, is that new paradigms of digital policy development should emerge from these cross -sectoral spaces, even as the digital phenomenon becomes one of the strongest determinants of our collective futures. To illustrate: Understanding the dynamics and the needs of governance of health data needs health related expertise. What does 'data governance', in any case, mean other than governance of health data, education data, agriculture data, military data, and so on? But, then there are also generic attributes of 'digital data' and processes around it, that requires generic expertise of the 'digital area' . Digital policy and governance must be based on an acknowlegement and understanding of this complex and dynamic web of digital policy and governance relevant facts, knowledge and expertise.    Going forward, the key strategic focus of JNC will be to work most on developing and sustaining institutionalized interactions among digital actors and actors from different 'impacted sectors' as a principal need and basis of digital policy development. ... JNC would also bring together actors from different sectors in one 'place' to take a cross-sectoral view of the digital phenomenon, so that best fit policies most appropriate for the society can be developed.  Our JNC event on Dec 6th is titled*"Digital policy making from below -- Ask the impacted sectors first"* .  The first panel will have organizations from different sectors that are engaging with JNC in these efforts present their views and their current work as a part of this JNC initiative. A second panel will then take up a general discussion about the thinking behind and the objectives of the new approach of JNC (which actually is only the fine-tuning of and making explicit its existing approach), how different impacted sectors can best and continually be involved in digital policy making, and how to structure standing cross-sectoral interactions in this regard.  The last section of this virtual event will be in the form of an open session to discuss JNC's thinking and work plans for the coming year. Some may have advice and suggestions, others may have questions -- about this new approach of JNC, or about JNC in general. All are welcome. * * More details will follow soon. Thanks, and best regards parminder -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From joly at punkcast.com Wed Dec 1 14:02:51 2021 From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 14:02:51 -0500 Subject: [Governance] WEBCAST: 2021 Indigenous Connectivity Summit Policy Recommendations Launch Webinar Message-ID: This is just starting. Real Time Text https://bit.ly/31iOqJQ These recommendations focus on the following critical areas: • Inclusivity, community consultation, and engagement • spectrum rights and sovereignty • engaging local capacity in Indigenous communities • infrastructure and ownership • digital literacy, data sovereignty, and sustainability • affordability • effective and accurate mapping. ISOC Live posted: "On Wednesday December 1 2021 at 14:00 EST (19:00 UTC) the Internet Society will host a webinar to formally release the 2021 Indigenous Connectivity Summit (ICS) Policy Recommendations. This release event will provide an overview of the Policy Recommendati" [image: livestream] On *Wednesday December 1 2021* at *14:00 EST* (19:00 UTC) the* Internet Society * will host a webinar to formally release the *2021 Indigenous Connectivity Summit (ICS) Policy Recommendations. * This release event will provide an overview of the Policy Recommendations and the impact that they can have on the state of connectivity in Indigenous communities in the US and Canada. The conversation will be led by members of the ICS community. The Recommendations were the culmination of six weeks of trainings on the role of policy and advocacy in the current connectivity environment. Participants — which included over 80 individuals from the US and Canada, most of whom are members of Indigenous communities —used the dialogue over these trainings to collaboratively develop a set of recommendations that aim to support Indigenous Communities in providing their own connectivity solutions. On the final day of the *2021 ICS *, participants reviewed, contributed to, and ultimately adopted these recommendations as an official output of the summit. The Policy Recommendations build on previous documents in *2019 * and *2020 * . *SPEAKERS* *Leonardo Wassilie* (Alaska) *Niniau Kawaihae* (Hawai'i) *Madeleine Redfern* (Nunavut) (+ more) *HOST* *Anna Higgins*, Internet Society *LIVESTREAM http://livestream.com/internetsociety/ICS2021RECS * *PARTICIPATE VIA ZOOM https://bit.ly/3DUqn2f * *REAL TIME TEXT* (see ISOC.LIVE) *TWITTER #2021ICS @ISOC_NA #indigenous* *SIMULCASTS* *https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/ * *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive * *https://www.facebook.com/liveisoc/* (AI Captions) *https://www.facebook.com/ISOCNewMexico/ * (AI Captions) *ARCHIVE* *https://archive.org/details/ICS2021RECS * *PHOTO*: Jim Schlichting *Permalink* https://isoc.live/14828/ - -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -------------------------------------- - -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From joly at punkcast.com Thu Dec 2 23:54:11 2021 From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie) Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 23:54:11 -0500 Subject: [Governance] =?utf-8?q?WEBCAST_FRI=3A_Ph_Peering_ForUm_Women_in_?= =?utf-8?q?Tech_webinar_=E2=80=98Peering_Perspectives_in_the_Philip?= =?utf-8?b?cGluZXPigJk=?= Message-ID: This is just starting. Real time text https://bit.ly/3DoaWOt ISOC Live posted: "On Friday 3 December 2021 at 13:00 PST (05:00 UTC) the yInternet Society and the Philippine Network Operator Group (PhNOG) host a Ph Peering ForUm Women in Tech webinar with the theme 'Peering Perspectives in the Philippines'. SESSION 1 : Ph Peering Land" [image: livestream] On *Friday 3 December 2021* at *13:00 PST* (05:00 UTC) the *Internet Society * and the *Philippine Network Operator Group * (PhNOG) host a *Ph Peering ForUm Women in Tech webinar * with the theme '*Peering Perspectives in the Philippines*'. *SESSION 1 : Ph Peering Landscape* *Achie Atienza* – Peering, Interconnection & Strategy, Globe Telecom *Naveed Haq* – Regional Director, Infrastructure and Connectivity, Internet Society *MODERATOR Willa Ortiz* - Senior Business Development Manager, HGC Global Communications *SESSION 2 : Peering Perspectives : Women in Tech* *Kate Tampinco-Echavarria* - Broadband & Data Center, PLDT *Queenie Rosales* - Network Engineer, RISE *Estela Libiran* - IP Services Engineer, Globe Telecom *Ana Liezel Z. Mananga*n - IP Core Engineering, SKY Cable *MODERATOR Sheryl (Shane) Hermoso* - Network Operations Engineer, APNIC *LIVESTREAM http://livestream.com/internetsociety/phpeering-women * *PARTICIPATE VIA ZOOM https://bit.ly/PF_Women_in_Tech * *REAL TIME TEXT* (see* ISOC.LIVE *) *TWITTER #Philippines #peering @ISOCapac #PhNOG @APNIC @NaveedHaq @pcta_news @GlobeTelecomPH @HGC_Intl @mySKYupdates * *SIMULCASTS* *https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/ * *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive * *https://www.facebook.com/liveisoc/ (*AI Captions) *https://www.facebook.com/isocasiapacific/ *(AI Captions) *ARCHIVE* *https://archive.org/details/phpeering-women * *Permalink* https://isoc.live/14832/ - -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -------------------------------------- - -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From parminder at itforchange.net Sat Dec 4 04:52:20 2021 From: parminder at itforchange.net (parminder) Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2021 15:22:20 +0530 Subject: [Governance] Inviting JNC members and friends to a workshop on JNC's new directions of work In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5c801002-4903-debd-5616-73539425e134@itforchange.net> Dear All The Just Net Coalition (JNC) is doing a 2.5 hours event, consisting of 3 panels, on ***"Digital policy making from below -- Ask the impacted sectors first"*, on *December 6th*, from 09.30 to 12.00 UTC. Those at the venue of the Internet Governance Forum in Katowice, Poland, the physical place will be Ballroom A.  As will be clear from the workshop note below, and enclosed, the event is around discussing *a new paradigm of digital policy development*, which in our view should be the best way of discovering and anchoring public interest with respect to our digital future. In pursuance of this belief of JNC, which is still shaping up, and this event is a part of that exercise, it is also expected that JNC will re-orient itself more consciously to this new direction in its work -- developing the required networks of civil society groups, from inside and outside digital arena, and proposing and advocating for institutions that would best enable and facilitate this new context and the needs of the proposed new paradigm of digital policy making.  The event should therefore be interesting and useful for *all JNC members and friends*, as well as *all those who grapple with* *institutional issues around how to best develop digital policies*, so key to humanity's future. We invite all of you to attend. Instructions on how to attend are in the workshop note. For those never been to an IGF and/or not registered for this one, please do *register right away - -meaning today* - -to be able to participate. See you at the discussions. parminder /*Digital Policy Making from Below – Ask the Impacted Sectors First*/ *Hybrid****e**vent organized by Just Net Coalition at **the* *16th **United National Internet Governance Forum (IGF)* *December 06, 09.30-12.00 UTC* *Ballroom A (onsite) /Online * The Just Net Coalition (JNC) invites you to our hybridevent, ‘/*Digital Policy Making from Below – Ask the Impacted Sectors First’*/, taking place on December 6^th 2021, from 09.30 to 12.00 UTC. JNC has been conveningregular events at the UN Internet Governance Forum’s (IGF) annual meetings, bringing key contemporary issues in digital justice, as well asJNC’s work and journey, intoa public discussion. At the last in-person meeting, at the IGF Berlin in December 2019, we released the _JNC Manifesto for Digital Justice_ . In 2020, our virtual session at the IGFon‘Digital Justice Conversations’, witha keynote from Saskia Sassen,saw a renewed commitment and dialoguetowards a _Digital New Deal_ . This year, the IGF will be held at Katowice, Poland, in a hybrid formant and we convene again to push the needle on aprogressive agenda for digital justice. It is crucial to open up avenues and create spaces for organizations and civil society from sectorsthat are actually impacted by the ‘digital’ – health, education, agriculture, labor, trade, finance, media, etc., that enable them toinfluenceand shapedigital policies. They should be able to engage with central digital policy issues such as 'who owns data’, 'what are the appropriate rules of platform management’, what is ‘just and fair AI', etc. Such ‘sectoral actors’ need to be put intoa sustained dialogue with actors in the digital arena on digital policy issues. This has to be undertakenin a manner that respects and employs their respective competences to together determine what is public interest in a digital society. This we think must bethe future of how digital policy is made. Just Net Coalition plans to orient itself towards building such possibilities, and appropriate networks and institutions, for cross-sectoral, participatory, digital policy making. The Coalition has embarked on a project in this regard, working with leading progressive organizations in various sectors. At theevent on/*Digital Policy Making from Below – Ask the Impacted Sectors First’, */the first panel discussion will bring together some of the ‘sectoral organisations’ collaboratingwith JNC to present their views, ideas, as well as the current work that they are undertakingin JNC’sproject on cross-sectoral engagement for digital policy making. A second panel will pick up from the first panel’s presentions to build upa more general discussion about the way digital policies should be shaped with equitable and empowering participation of actors from the ‘impacted sectors’, ***towards **a new****paradigm of digital policy **making**. * In the end, we will have an open discussion on what role the Just Net Coalition, and other progressive groups, both in the digital arena and the ‘impacted sectors’, couldplay to develop the needed networks, as well as advocate for development of *the**institutional **conditions **required **for **the new policy paradi**gm**.*Here wewill zoom in to explore some specific directions that JNC maytake in the coming years. We invite you to be a part of this urgent and important conversation. *How to join:* * If attending in person, please join us at Ballroom A at the IGF venue in Katowice, Poland * If attending virtually o If you are already registered to attend IGF, please add our session to your IGF schedule and click the register and attend option 24 hours before to receive your meeting link. o If you haven’t registered for the IGF 2021, you can do so here to attend our sessions as well as other workshops. *Agenda* *Time Slot (UTC) * *Session Details * 9.30 to 9.35 Check-in 9.35 to 9.45 Opening remarks Sean O'Siochru & Parminder Jeet Singh , Just Net Coalition – who will also anchor the event with its three panels 9.45 to 11.00 *Session**1 – **A view from the sectors impacted by the ‘digital’* * Lara Merling, International Trade Union Confederation * Jun Ho Jung, People’s Health Movement * Chee Yoke Ling, Third World Network * C/é/dric Leterme, The Tricontinental Centre * Elenita Dāno, ETC Group 11.00-11.30 *Session 2 – ‘Impacted sectors first’ – A new paradigm of digital policy making* *Speakers* * Deborah James, Centre for Economic Policy and Research * Nachiket Udupa, Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan * Richard Hill, Association for Proper Internet Governance * Amber Sinha, Center for Internet and Society 11.30-11.55 *Open discussion on the future role and directions of Just Net Coalition, and other progressive actors interested in digital policies * 11.55-12.00 *Closing remarks * -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: JNC @ IGF - Digital policy making from below.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 64523 bytes Desc: not available URL: From parminder at itforchange.net Sat Dec 4 05:39:56 2021 From: parminder at itforchange.net (parminder) Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2021 16:09:56 +0530 Subject: [Governance] Inviting JNC members and friends to a workshop on JNC's new directions of work In-Reply-To: <5c801002-4903-debd-5616-73539425e134@itforchange.net> References: <5c801002-4903-debd-5616-73539425e134@itforchange.net> Message-ID: <99eb59e0-ec73-4d0d-bd7c-0c6f7d769ccf@itforchange.net> T o be (constructively) provocative, let me call the below as an exercise in exploring post-multistakeholderism models of participatory digital policy making, since MS ism is mostly corporate captured now: ... Worth some collective thought perhaps. We welcome your engagement. parminder On 04/12/21 3:22 pm, parminder wrote: > > Dear All > > The Just Net Coalition (JNC) is doing a 2.5 hours event, consisting of > 3 panels, on ***"Digital policy making from below -- Ask the impacted > sectors first"*, on *December 6th*, from 09.30 to 12.00 UTC. Those at > the venue of the Internet Governance Forum in Katowice, Poland, the > physical place will be Ballroom A.  > > As will be clear from the workshop note below, and enclosed, the event > is around discussing *a new paradigm of digital policy development*, > which in our view should be the best way of discovering and anchoring > public interest with respect to our digital future. > > In pursuance of this belief of JNC, which is still shaping up, and > this event is a part of that exercise, it is also expected that JNC > will re-orient itself more consciously to this new direction in its > work -- developing the required networks of civil society groups, from > inside and outside digital arena, and proposing and advocating for > institutions that would best enable and facilitate this new context > and the needs of the proposed new paradigm of digital policy making.  > > The event should therefore be interesting and useful for *all JNC > members and friends*, as well as *all those who grapple with* > *institutional issues around how to best develop digital policies*, so > key to humanity's future. > > We invite all of you to attend. Instructions on how to attend are in > the workshop note. For those never been to an IGF and/or not > registered for this one, please do *register right away - -meaning > today* - -to be able to participate. > > See you at the discussions. > > parminder > > > /*Digital Policy Making from Below – Ask the Impacted Sectors First*/ > > > *Hybrid****e**vent organized by Just Net Coalition at **the* > > > *16th **United National Internet Governance Forum (IGF)* > > *December 06, 09.30-12.00 UTC* > > > *Ballroom A (onsite) /Online * > > > The Just Net Coalition > (JNC) > invites you to our hybridevent, ‘/*Digital Policy Making from Below – > Ask the Impacted Sectors First’*/, taking place on December 6^th 2021, > from 09.30 to 12.00 UTC. > > > JNC has been conveningregular events at the UN Internet Governance > Forum’s (IGF) annual meetings, bringing key contemporary issues in > digital justice, as well asJNC’s work and journey, intoa public > discussion. At the last in-person meeting, at the IGF Berlin in > December 2019, we released the _JNC Manifesto for Digital Justice_ > . In 2020, our > virtual session at the IGFon‘Digital Justice Conversations’, witha > keynote from Saskia Sassen,saw a renewed commitment and > dialoguetowards a _Digital New Deal_ > . This year, the IGF will > be held at Katowice, Poland, in a hybrid formant and we convene again > to push the needle on aprogressive agenda for digital justice. > > It is crucial to open up avenues and create spaces for organizations > and civil society from sectorsthat are actually impacted by the > ‘digital’ – health, education, agriculture, labor, trade, finance, > media, etc., that enable them toinfluenceand shapedigital policies. > They should be able to engage with central digital policy issues such > as 'who owns data’, 'what are the appropriate rules of platform > management’, what is ‘just and fair AI', etc. Such ‘sectoral actors’ > need to be put intoa sustained dialogue with actors in the digital > arena on digital policy issues. This has to be undertakenin a manner > that respects and employs their respective competences to together > determine what is public interest in a digital society. This we think > must bethe future of how digital policy is made. > > Just Net Coalition plans to orient itself towards building such > possibilities, and appropriate networks and institutions, for > cross-sectoral, participatory, digital policy making. The Coalition > has embarked on a project in this regard, working with leading > progressive organizations in various sectors. > > At theevent on/*Digital Policy Making from Below – Ask the Impacted > Sectors First’, */the first panel discussion will bring together some > of the ‘sectoral organisations’ collaboratingwith JNC to present their > views, ideas, as well as the current work that they are undertakingin > JNC’sproject on cross-sectoral engagement for digital policy making. > > A second panel will pick up from the first panel’s presentions to > build upa more general discussion about the way digital policies > should be shaped with equitable and empowering participation of actors > from the ‘impacted sectors’, ***towards **a new****paradigm of digital > policy **making**. * > > In the end, we will have an open discussion on what role the Just Net > Coalition, and other progressive groups, both in the digital arena and > the ‘impacted sectors’, couldplay to develop the needed networks, as > well as advocate for development of *the**institutional **conditions > **required **for **the new policy paradi**gm**.*Here wewill zoom in to > explore some specific directions that JNC maytake in the coming years. > > We invite you to be a part of this urgent and important conversation. > > *How to join:* > > * > > If attending in person, please join us at Ballroom A at the IGF > venue in Katowice, Poland > > * > > If attending virtually > > o > > If you are already registered to attend IGF, please add our > session > to > your IGF schedule and click the register and attend option 24 > hours before to receive your meeting link. > > o > > If you haven’t registered for the IGF 2021, you can do so here > to > attend our sessions as well as other workshops. > > *Agenda* > > *Time Slot (UTC) * > > > > *Session Details * > > 9.30 to 9.35 > > > > Check-in > > 9.35 to 9.45 > > > > Opening remarks > > > Sean O'Siochru & Parminder Jeet Singh , Just Net Coalition – who will > also anchor the event with its three panels > > 9.45 to 11.00 > > > > *Session**1 – **A view from the sectors impacted by the ‘digital’* > > * > > Lara Merling, International Trade Union Confederation > > * > > Jun Ho Jung, People’s Health Movement > > * > > Chee Yoke Ling, Third World Network > > * > > C/é/dric Leterme, The Tricontinental Centre > > * > > Elenita Dāno, ETC Group > > 11.00-11.30 > > > > *Session 2 – ‘Impacted sectors first’ – A new paradigm of digital > policy making* > > > *Speakers* > > * > > Deborah James, Centre for Economic Policy and Research > > * > > Nachiket Udupa, Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan > > * > > Richard Hill, Association for Proper Internet Governance > > * > > Amber Sinha, Center for Internet and Society > > 11.30-11.55 > > > > *Open discussion on the future role and directions of Just Net > Coalition, and other progressive actors interested in digital policies * > > 11.55-12.00 > > > > *Closing remarks * > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lb at lucabelli.net Sat Dec 4 09:40:03 2021 From: lb at lucabelli.net (lb lucabelli.net) Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2021 14:40:03 +0000 Subject: [Governance] Internet Commons Forum, at IGF Message-ID: Dear all, In case you are interested, on Monday we will organise the 2021 edition of the Internet Commons Forum, during the IGF Day 0, from 14:45 to 16:45 UTC http://www.intcomforum.org/ Below a concise description of the event, the line-up, and some logistic info Please feel free to share this email through your networks! All the best Luca Description The structures of the Internet affect us more deeply than ever before, reaching out to all aspects of our lives, from our societies and cultures to our finances and politics – to our very individual human behaviours and identities. This event will explore different views of Internet Commons, Digital Commons, and Digital Public Goods, exploring strategies for a less concentrated Internet. Time Monday, 6th December, 2021 14:45 - 16:45 UTC) Add to your IGF Calendar https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/igf-2021-day-0-event-58-internet-commons-forum Agenda Opening remarks: Luca Belli, FGV, and Adam Burns, Free2Air Segment one: Evolving Conceptions of Digital Commons * Yu Ping, Office of the UN Secretary-General's Envoy on Technology * Rebecca MacKinnon, Wikimedia Foundation * Renata Avila, Open Knowledge Foundation * Alek Tarkowski, Open Future Luca Belli, FGV, and Adam Burns, Free2Air, moderate First Q&A (15 min) Segment two: Digital Commons and Digital Public Goods. * Lucy Harris, UNICEF / Digital Public Good Alliance * Osama Manzar, Digital Empowerment Foundation * Denis "Jaromil" Roio, Dyne.org Jane Coffin, ISOC, and Alek Tarkowski, Open Future, moderate Second Q&A + open debate (15 min) Concluding remarks: Anriette Esterhuysen, UN IGF MAG Chair Wrap-up and takeaways: Luca Belli, FGV, and Adam Burns, Free2Air  [http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_direito_rio.jpg] Luca Belli, PhD Professor | FGV Law Schoool Coordinator | Center for Technology & Society [http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_tel.jpg]+55 21 3799 5763 t at 1lucabelli [http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_direito_rio_map.jpg]Praia de Botafogo, 190 13º andar Botafogo - Rio de Janeiro, RJ - CEP: 22250-900 [http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_ass_email.jpg]luca.belli at fgv.br [http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_ass_url.jpg]CTS-FGV direitorio.fgv.br/cts [http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_ass_url.jpg]cyberBRICS www.cyberbrics.info [http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_ass_url.jpg]CPDP LatAm www.cpdp.lat CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message, as well as any attached document, may contain personal data and information that is confidential and privileged and is intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution of this email or attached documents, or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email by mistake. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 16441 bytes Desc: image.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 434 bytes Desc: image.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 617 bytes Desc: image.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 733 bytes Desc: image.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 770 bytes Desc: image.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 770 bytes Desc: image.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 770 bytes Desc: image.png URL: From joly at punkcast.com Sat Dec 4 09:58:15 2021 From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie) Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2021 09:58:15 -0500 Subject: [Governance] =?utf-8?q?WEBCAST_TODAY=3A_ISOC_Mumbai_Webinar_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=80=93_Governance_of_Financial_Technologies=3A_Global?= =?utf-8?q?_Perspectives?= Message-ID: This is just about to start. Real time text https://bit.ly/2ZWAGEc ISOC Live posted: "On Saturday 4th December 2021 at 8:30pm IST (15:00 UTC) Internet Society India Mumbai Chapter hosts a webinar 'Governance of Financial Technologies: Global Perspectives'. The webinar aims to address how the emerging technologies are changing the way we in" [image: livestream] On *Saturday 4th December 2021* at *8:30pm IST* (15:00 UTC) *Internet Society India Mumbai Chapter * hosts a webinar '*Governance of Financial Technologies: Global Perspectives *'. The webinar aims to address how the emerging technologies are changing the way we interacted with our financial systems, and will talk about the governance challenges that traditional, new and upcoming institutions of finance face when technology is integrated with finance. *SPEAKERS* *Karan Gupta*, Capital One (USA) *Sofia Elena Gomez de Silva*, CIBC (Canada) *Sohrab Kalra*, Interac (Canada) *HOST* *Shveta Kolkash*, President, ISOC India Mumbai *LIVESTREAM http://livestream.com/internetsociety/mumbai-finance * *PARTICIPATE VIA ZOOM https://bit.ly/3FXh0iL * *REAL TIME TEXT (see ISOC.LIVE)* *TWITTER #fintech #governance Karan Gupta @CapitalOne Sofia Elena Gomez de Silva @cibc @sohrabkalra @INTERAC @kokash_shveta #isocmumbai* *SIMULCASTS* *https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/ * *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive * *https://www.facebook.com/liveisoc/ *(AI Captions) *https://www.facebook.com/isocasiapacific/ * (AI Captions) *ARCHIVE* *https://archive.org/details/mumbai-finance * *Permalink* https://isoc.live/14821/ - -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -------------------------------------- - -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sheetal at gp-digital.org Mon Dec 6 07:16:44 2021 From: sheetal at gp-digital.org (Sheetal Kumar) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 16:16:44 +0400 Subject: [Governance] IGF Day 0 pre-event: information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear all, Just a polite reminder for those interested that the pre-event will take place today, at 2:45 PM GMT. You'll need to add the session to your calendar to receive the link. https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/igf-2021-day-0-event-68-civil-society-pre-event-internet-governance-in-times-of-crisis I know that there were issues earlier today with the website, but they seem to have been resolved now. Best Sheetal On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 14:20, Judith Hellerstein wrote: > HI All, > Looks great!! I will be there in person so look forward to seeing others > > Best > Judith > > Sent from my iPad > judith at jhellerstein.com > Skype ID:JudithHellerstein > > On Nov 30, 2021, at 5:17 AM, Sheetal Kumar via Governance < > governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > >  > Thanks, Nnenna! I've added that into the 'context' at the beginning > (agenda item 2) and provide a bit more time for that. Will you be able to > attend? > > > - 1) Introductions and agenda/aims of pre-event *10-15 minutes * > - 2) Global Digital Compact: context (Digital Cooperation agenda, UNSG > Roadmap and UNSG Common Agenda, general landscape) - > *20 minutes * > - 3) Process/consultation/engagement with Tech Envoy's so far and > expected going forward *10 minutes* > - * 5) *Break - *10 minutes * > - 4) Depending on the above - possible discussion of key > priorities/principles under seven proposed areas of the Digital Compact 1) Connect > all people to the Internet, including all schools 2) Avoid Internet > fragmentation 3) Protect data 4) Apply human rights online 5) Introduce > accountability criteria for discrimination and misleading content 6) Promote > regulation of artificial intelligence 7) Digital commons as a global public > good *30 minutes* > - 6) Next steps *10 minutes* > > > On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 14:13, Nnenna Nwakanma wrote: > >> Hi Sheetal >> >> Maybe worth giving some background info on Civil Society engagement with >> "Digital Cooperation agenda" in addition to Tech Envoy. >> >> The Digital Cooperation precedes the UN Tech Envoy. >> >> We might also want to look into global digital Cooperation "emerging >> issues".. >> - Tech for Democracy >> - Freedom Online Coalition >> - The proposed Alliance for the Future of the Internet.. >> - The proposed New IP.. >> - Etc.. >> >> Just so folks get general info on how the landscape is shaping up or >> moving.. >> >> All for now.. >> >> Nnenna >> >> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021, 09:59 Sheetal Kumar via Governance, < >> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> Here is the proposed agenda for the pre-event. We propose to focus it on >>> the Global Digital Compact, but if you would like to discuss anything else >>> please do let us know! >>> >>> - 1) Introductions and agenda/aims of pre-event *10-15 minutes * >>> - 2) Global Digital Compact: context (UNSG Roadmap and UNSG Common >>> Agenda) - *10-15 minutes * >>> - Guiding questions >>> - What do you think about the Compact idea? Do you think civil >>> society should engage? How? >>> - 3) Process/consultation/engagement with Tech Envoy's so far and >>> expected going forward *10 minutes* >>> - * 5) *Break - *10 minutes * >>> - 4) Depending on the above - possible discussion of key >>> priorities/principles under seven proposed areas of the Digital Compact 1) Connect >>> all people to the Internet, including all schools 2) Avoid Internet >>> fragmentation 3) Protect data 4) Apply human rights online 5) Introduce >>> accountability criteria for discrimination and misleading content 6) Promote >>> regulation of artificial intelligence 7) Digital commons as a global public >>> good *30 minutes* >>> - 6) Next steps *10 minutes* >>> >>> Please do chime in with any inputs if you have any ahead of the event >>> next week. >>> >>> Best >>> Sheetal. >>> >>> On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 11:48, Sheetal Kumar >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Dear all, >>>> >>>> Bruna and I will follow up with more information on the agenda for the >>>> CS pre-event at this year's IGF but in the meantime,if you are interested >>>> in attending, please block the time and date below. >>>> >>>> IGF 2021 Day 0 Event #68 Civil Society Pre-event: Internet Governance >>>> in times of Crisis >>>> >>>> Ballroom A | >>>> 14:45 GMT (6 Dec) -16:15 GMT (6 Dec) >>>> Best >>>> -- >>>> >>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Governance mailing list >>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>> >> > > -- > > *Sheetal Kumar* > Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | > PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 > DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > > > > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > > -- *Sheetal Kumar* Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From 6.internet at gmail.com Mon Dec 6 07:51:08 2021 From: 6.internet at gmail.com (sivasubramanian muthusamy) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 18:21:08 +0530 Subject: [Governance] IGF Day 0 pre-event: information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Sheetal It would be useful if you could post the zoom link and password for this session because of the IGF website issue which makes it difficult to find session details and zoom details. Sivasubramanian M On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 5:47 PM Sheetal Kumar via Governance < governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > Dear all, > > Just a polite reminder for those interested that the pre-event will take > place today, at 2:45 PM GMT. You'll need to add the session to your > calendar to receive the link. > > > https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/igf-2021-day-0-event-68-civil-society-pre-event-internet-governance-in-times-of-crisis > > I know that there were issues earlier today with the website, but they > seem to have been resolved now. > > Best > Sheetal > > On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 14:20, Judith Hellerstein > wrote: > >> HI All, >> Looks great!! I will be there in person so look forward to seeing others >> >> Best >> Judith >> >> Sent from my iPad >> judith at jhellerstein.com >> Skype ID:JudithHellerstein >> >> On Nov 30, 2021, at 5:17 AM, Sheetal Kumar via Governance < >> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >> >>  >> Thanks, Nnenna! I've added that into the 'context' at the beginning >> (agenda item 2) and provide a bit more time for that. Will you be able to >> attend? >> >> >> - 1) Introductions and agenda/aims of pre-event *10-15 minutes * >> - 2) Global Digital Compact: context (Digital Cooperation agenda, >> UNSG Roadmap and UNSG Common Agenda, general landscape) - >> *20 minutes * >> - 3) Process/consultation/engagement with Tech Envoy's so far and >> expected going forward *10 minutes* >> - * 5) *Break - *10 minutes * >> - 4) Depending on the above - possible discussion of key >> priorities/principles under seven proposed areas of the Digital Compact 1) Connect >> all people to the Internet, including all schools 2) Avoid Internet >> fragmentation 3) Protect data 4) Apply human rights online 5) Introduce >> accountability criteria for discrimination and misleading content 6) Promote >> regulation of artificial intelligence 7) Digital commons as a global public >> good *30 minutes* >> - 6) Next steps *10 minutes* >> >> >> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 14:13, Nnenna Nwakanma wrote: >> >>> Hi Sheetal >>> >>> Maybe worth giving some background info on Civil Society engagement with >>> "Digital Cooperation agenda" in addition to Tech Envoy. >>> >>> The Digital Cooperation precedes the UN Tech Envoy. >>> >>> We might also want to look into global digital Cooperation "emerging >>> issues".. >>> - Tech for Democracy >>> - Freedom Online Coalition >>> - The proposed Alliance for the Future of the Internet.. >>> - The proposed New IP.. >>> - Etc.. >>> >>> Just so folks get general info on how the landscape is shaping up or >>> moving.. >>> >>> All for now.. >>> >>> Nnenna >>> >>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021, 09:59 Sheetal Kumar via Governance, < >>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Dear all, >>>> >>>> Here is the proposed agenda for the pre-event. We propose to focus it >>>> on the Global Digital Compact, but if you would like to discuss anything >>>> else please do let us know! >>>> >>>> - 1) Introductions and agenda/aims of pre-event *10-15 minutes * >>>> - 2) Global Digital Compact: context (UNSG Roadmap and UNSG Common >>>> Agenda) - *10-15 minutes * >>>> - Guiding questions >>>> - What do you think about the Compact idea? Do you think >>>> civil society should engage? How? >>>> - 3) Process/consultation/engagement with Tech Envoy's so far >>>> and expected going forward *10 minutes* >>>> - * 5) *Break - *10 minutes * >>>> - 4) Depending on the above - possible discussion of key >>>> priorities/principles under seven proposed areas of the Digital Compact 1) Connect >>>> all people to the Internet, including all schools 2) Avoid >>>> Internet fragmentation 3) Protect data 4) Apply human rights online >>>> 5) Introduce accountability criteria for discrimination and >>>> misleading content 6) Promote regulation of artificial intelligence >>>> 7) Digital commons as a global public good *30 minutes* >>>> - 6) Next steps *10 minutes* >>>> >>>> Please do chime in with any inputs if you have any ahead of the event >>>> next week. >>>> >>>> Best >>>> Sheetal. >>>> >>>> On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 11:48, Sheetal Kumar >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear all, >>>>> >>>>> Bruna and I will follow up with more information on the agenda for the >>>>> CS pre-event at this year's IGF but in the meantime,if you are interested >>>>> in attending, please block the time and date below. >>>>> >>>>> IGF 2021 Day 0 Event #68 Civil Society Pre-event: Internet Governance >>>>> in times of Crisis >>>>> >>>>> Ballroom A | >>>>> 14:45 GMT (6 Dec) -16:15 GMT (6 Dec) >>>>> Best >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >>>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Governance mailing list >>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> >> *Sheetal Kumar* >> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >> >> >> >> -- >> Governance mailing list >> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >> >> > > -- > > *Sheetal Kumar* > Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | > PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 > DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > > > > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nnenna75 at gmail.com Mon Dec 6 08:35:34 2021 From: nnenna75 at gmail.com (Nnenna Nwakanma) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 13:35:34 +0000 Subject: [Governance] IGF Day 0 pre-event: information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: The Zoom link is personalised. So each participant needs to sign in and get their link Best N On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 12:51 PM sivasubramanian muthusamy via Governance < governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > > Sheetal > > It would be useful if you could post the zoom link and password for this > session because of the IGF website issue which makes it difficult to find > session details and zoom details. > > Sivasubramanian M > > > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 5:47 PM Sheetal Kumar via Governance < > governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> Just a polite reminder for those interested that the pre-event will take >> place today, at 2:45 PM GMT. You'll need to add the session to your >> calendar to receive the link. >> >> >> https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/igf-2021-day-0-event-68-civil-society-pre-event-internet-governance-in-times-of-crisis >> >> I know that there were issues earlier today with the website, but they >> seem to have been resolved now. >> >> Best >> Sheetal >> >> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 14:20, Judith Hellerstein >> wrote: >> >>> HI All, >>> Looks great!! I will be there in person so look forward to seeing >>> others >>> >>> Best >>> Judith >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> judith at jhellerstein.com >>> Skype ID:JudithHellerstein >>> >>> On Nov 30, 2021, at 5:17 AM, Sheetal Kumar via Governance < >>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >>> >>>  >>> Thanks, Nnenna! I've added that into the 'context' at the beginning >>> (agenda item 2) and provide a bit more time for that. Will you be able to >>> attend? >>> >>> >>> - 1) Introductions and agenda/aims of pre-event *10-15 minutes * >>> - 2) Global Digital Compact: context (Digital Cooperation agenda, >>> UNSG Roadmap and UNSG Common Agenda, general landscape) - >>> *20 minutes * >>> - 3) Process/consultation/engagement with Tech Envoy's so far and >>> expected going forward *10 minutes* >>> - * 5) *Break - *10 minutes * >>> - 4) Depending on the above - possible discussion of key >>> priorities/principles under seven proposed areas of the Digital Compact 1) Connect >>> all people to the Internet, including all schools 2) Avoid Internet >>> fragmentation 3) Protect data 4) Apply human rights online 5) Introduce >>> accountability criteria for discrimination and misleading content 6) Promote >>> regulation of artificial intelligence 7) Digital commons as a global public >>> good *30 minutes* >>> - 6) Next steps *10 minutes* >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 14:13, Nnenna Nwakanma >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Sheetal >>>> >>>> Maybe worth giving some background info on Civil Society engagement >>>> with "Digital Cooperation agenda" in addition to Tech Envoy. >>>> >>>> The Digital Cooperation precedes the UN Tech Envoy. >>>> >>>> We might also want to look into global digital Cooperation "emerging >>>> issues".. >>>> - Tech for Democracy >>>> - Freedom Online Coalition >>>> - The proposed Alliance for the Future of the Internet.. >>>> - The proposed New IP.. >>>> - Etc.. >>>> >>>> Just so folks get general info on how the landscape is shaping up or >>>> moving.. >>>> >>>> All for now.. >>>> >>>> Nnenna >>>> >>>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021, 09:59 Sheetal Kumar via Governance, < >>>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Dear all, >>>>> >>>>> Here is the proposed agenda for the pre-event. We propose to focus it >>>>> on the Global Digital Compact, but if you would like to discuss anything >>>>> else please do let us know! >>>>> >>>>> - 1) Introductions and agenda/aims of pre-event *10-15 minutes * >>>>> - 2) Global Digital Compact: context (UNSG Roadmap and UNSG Common >>>>> Agenda) - *10-15 minutes * >>>>> - Guiding questions >>>>> - What do you think about the Compact idea? Do you think >>>>> civil society should engage? How? >>>>> - 3) Process/consultation/engagement with Tech Envoy's so far >>>>> and expected going forward *10 minutes* >>>>> - * 5) *Break - *10 minutes * >>>>> - 4) Depending on the above - possible discussion of key >>>>> priorities/principles under seven proposed areas of the Digital Compact 1) Connect >>>>> all people to the Internet, including all schools 2) Avoid >>>>> Internet fragmentation 3) Protect data 4) Apply human rights online >>>>> 5) Introduce accountability criteria for discrimination and >>>>> misleading content 6) Promote regulation of artificial intelligence >>>>> 7) Digital commons as a global public good *30 minutes* >>>>> - 6) Next steps *10 minutes* >>>>> >>>>> Please do chime in with any inputs if you have any ahead of the event >>>>> next week. >>>>> >>>>> Best >>>>> Sheetal. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 11:48, Sheetal Kumar >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>> >>>>>> Bruna and I will follow up with more information on the agenda for >>>>>> the CS pre-event at this year's IGF but in the meantime,if you are >>>>>> interested in attending, please block the time and date below. >>>>>> >>>>>> IGF 2021 Day 0 Event #68 Civil Society Pre-event: Internet Governance >>>>>> in times of Crisis >>>>>> >>>>>> Ballroom A | >>>>>> 14:45 GMT (6 Dec) -16:15 GMT (6 Dec) >>>>>> Best >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 >>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >>>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Governance mailing list >>>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Governance mailing list >>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>> >>> >> >> -- >> >> *Sheetal Kumar* >> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >> >> >> >> -- >> Governance mailing list >> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >> > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From 6.internet at gmail.com Mon Dec 6 08:49:09 2021 From: 6.internet at gmail.com (sivasubramanian muthusamy) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 19:19:09 +0530 Subject: [Governance] IGF Day 0 pre-event: information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Nnenna The problem surrounds the solution offered: for the participant to sign in, the intgovforum.org site must be accessible, it is not, even now. Sivasubramanian M On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 7:05 PM Nnenna Nwakanma wrote: > The Zoom link is personalised. So each participant needs to sign in and > get their link > > Best > > N > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 12:51 PM sivasubramanian muthusamy via Governance < > governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > >> >> Sheetal >> >> It would be useful if you could post the zoom link and password for this >> session because of the IGF website issue which makes it difficult to find >> session details and zoom details. >> >> Sivasubramanian M >> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 5:47 PM Sheetal Kumar via Governance < >> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> Just a polite reminder for those interested that the pre-event will take >>> place today, at 2:45 PM GMT. You'll need to add the session to your >>> calendar to receive the link. >>> >>> >>> https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/igf-2021-day-0-event-68-civil-society-pre-event-internet-governance-in-times-of-crisis >>> >>> I know that there were issues earlier today with the website, but they >>> seem to have been resolved now. >>> >>> Best >>> Sheetal >>> >>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 14:20, Judith Hellerstein < >>> judith at jhellerstein.com> wrote: >>> >>>> HI All, >>>> Looks great!! I will be there in person so look forward to seeing >>>> others >>>> >>>> Best >>>> Judith >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPad >>>> judith at jhellerstein.com >>>> Skype ID:JudithHellerstein >>>> >>>> On Nov 30, 2021, at 5:17 AM, Sheetal Kumar via Governance < >>>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>  >>>> Thanks, Nnenna! I've added that into the 'context' at the beginning >>>> (agenda item 2) and provide a bit more time for that. Will you be able to >>>> attend? >>>> >>>> >>>> - 1) Introductions and agenda/aims of pre-event *10-15 minutes * >>>> - 2) Global Digital Compact: context (Digital Cooperation agenda, >>>> UNSG Roadmap and UNSG Common Agenda, general landscape) - >>>> *20 minutes * >>>> - 3) Process/consultation/engagement with Tech Envoy's so far and >>>> expected going forward *10 minutes* >>>> - * 5) *Break - *10 minutes * >>>> - 4) Depending on the above - possible discussion of key >>>> priorities/principles under seven proposed areas of the Digital Compact 1) Connect >>>> all people to the Internet, including all schools 2) Avoid >>>> Internet fragmentation 3) Protect data 4) Apply human rights online >>>> 5) Introduce accountability criteria for discrimination and >>>> misleading content 6) Promote regulation of artificial intelligence >>>> 7) Digital commons as a global public good *30 minutes* >>>> - 6) Next steps *10 minutes* >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 14:13, Nnenna Nwakanma >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Sheetal >>>>> >>>>> Maybe worth giving some background info on Civil Society engagement >>>>> with "Digital Cooperation agenda" in addition to Tech Envoy. >>>>> >>>>> The Digital Cooperation precedes the UN Tech Envoy. >>>>> >>>>> We might also want to look into global digital Cooperation "emerging >>>>> issues".. >>>>> - Tech for Democracy >>>>> - Freedom Online Coalition >>>>> - The proposed Alliance for the Future of the Internet.. >>>>> - The proposed New IP.. >>>>> - Etc.. >>>>> >>>>> Just so folks get general info on how the landscape is shaping up or >>>>> moving.. >>>>> >>>>> All for now.. >>>>> >>>>> Nnenna >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021, 09:59 Sheetal Kumar via Governance, < >>>>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>> >>>>>> Here is the proposed agenda for the pre-event. We propose to focus it >>>>>> on the Global Digital Compact, but if you would like to discuss anything >>>>>> else please do let us know! >>>>>> >>>>>> - 1) Introductions and agenda/aims of pre-event *10-15 minutes * >>>>>> - 2) Global Digital Compact: context (UNSG Roadmap and UNSG >>>>>> Common Agenda) - *10-15 minutes * >>>>>> - Guiding questions >>>>>> - What do you think about the Compact idea? Do you think >>>>>> civil society should engage? How? >>>>>> - 3) Process/consultation/engagement with Tech Envoy's so far >>>>>> and expected going forward *10 minutes* >>>>>> - * 5) *Break - *10 minutes * >>>>>> - 4) Depending on the above - possible discussion of key >>>>>> priorities/principles under seven proposed areas of the Digital Compact 1) Connect >>>>>> all people to the Internet, including all schools 2) Avoid >>>>>> Internet fragmentation 3) Protect data 4) Apply human rights >>>>>> online 5) Introduce accountability criteria for discrimination >>>>>> and misleading content 6) Promote regulation of artificial >>>>>> intelligence 7) Digital commons as a global public good *30 >>>>>> minutes* >>>>>> - 6) Next steps *10 minutes* >>>>>> >>>>>> Please do chime in with any inputs if you have any ahead of the event >>>>>> next week. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best >>>>>> Sheetal. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 11:48, Sheetal Kumar >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bruna and I will follow up with more information on the agenda for >>>>>>> the CS pre-event at this year's IGF but in the meantime,if you are >>>>>>> interested in attending, please block the time and date below. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> IGF 2021 Day 0 Event #68 Civil Society Pre-event: Internet >>>>>>> Governance in times of Crisis >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ballroom A | >>>>>>> 14:45 GMT (6 Dec) -16:15 GMT (6 Dec) >>>>>>> Best >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 >>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 >>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Governance mailing list >>>>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>>>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Governance mailing list >>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Governance mailing list >>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>> >> -- >> Governance mailing list >> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tapani.tarvainen at effi.org Mon Dec 6 08:55:15 2021 From: tapani.tarvainen at effi.org (Tapani Tarvainen) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 15:55:15 +0200 Subject: [Governance] IGF Day 0 pre-event: information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: It appears that now the zoom links work without authentication. Whether they disabled authentication because it's broken or it never worked, I don't know. But now sharing the zoom links works (at least has worked for some sessions). Tapani On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 07:19:09PM +0530, sivasubramanian muthusamy via Governance (governance at lists.igcaucus.org) wrote: > > Nnenna > > The problem surrounds the solution offered: for the participant to sign > in, the intgovforum.org site must be accessible, it is not, even now. > > Sivasubramanian M > > > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 7:05 PM Nnenna Nwakanma wrote: > > > The Zoom link is personalised. So each participant needs to sign in and > > get their link > > > > Best > > > > N > > > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 12:51 PM sivasubramanian muthusamy via Governance < > > governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > > > >> > >> Sheetal > >> > >> It would be useful if you could post the zoom link and password for this > >> session because of the IGF website issue which makes it difficult to find > >> session details and zoom details. > >> > >> Sivasubramanian M > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 5:47 PM Sheetal Kumar via Governance < > >> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > >> > >>> Dear all, > >>> > >>> Just a polite reminder for those interested that the pre-event will take > >>> place today, at 2:45 PM GMT. You'll need to add the session to your > >>> calendar to receive the link. > >>> > >>> > >>> https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/igf-2021-day-0-event-68-civil-society-pre-event-internet-governance-in-times-of-crisis > >>> > >>> I know that there were issues earlier today with the website, but they > >>> seem to have been resolved now. > >>> > >>> Best > >>> Sheetal > >>> > >>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 14:20, Judith Hellerstein < > >>> judith at jhellerstein.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> HI All, > >>>> Looks great!! I will be there in person so look forward to seeing > >>>> others > >>>> > >>>> Best > >>>> Judith > >>>> > >>>> Sent from my iPad > >>>> judith at jhellerstein.com > >>>> Skype ID:JudithHellerstein > >>>> > >>>> On Nov 30, 2021, at 5:17 AM, Sheetal Kumar via Governance < > >>>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>  > >>>> Thanks, Nnenna! I've added that into the 'context' at the beginning > >>>> (agenda item 2) and provide a bit more time for that. Will you be able to > >>>> attend? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> - 1) Introductions and agenda/aims of pre-event *10-15 minutes * > >>>> - 2) Global Digital Compact: context (Digital Cooperation agenda, > >>>> UNSG Roadmap and UNSG Common Agenda, general landscape) - > >>>> *20 minutes * > >>>> - 3) Process/consultation/engagement with Tech Envoy's so far and > >>>> expected going forward *10 minutes* > >>>> - * 5) *Break - *10 minutes * > >>>> - 4) Depending on the above - possible discussion of key > >>>> priorities/principles under seven proposed areas of the Digital Compact 1) Connect > >>>> all people to the Internet, including all schools 2) Avoid > >>>> Internet fragmentation 3) Protect data 4) Apply human rights online > >>>> 5) Introduce accountability criteria for discrimination and > >>>> misleading content 6) Promote regulation of artificial intelligence > >>>> 7) Digital commons as a global public good *30 minutes* > >>>> - 6) Next steps *10 minutes* > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 14:13, Nnenna Nwakanma > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi Sheetal > >>>>> > >>>>> Maybe worth giving some background info on Civil Society engagement > >>>>> with "Digital Cooperation agenda" in addition to Tech Envoy. > >>>>> > >>>>> The Digital Cooperation precedes the UN Tech Envoy. > >>>>> > >>>>> We might also want to look into global digital Cooperation "emerging > >>>>> issues".. > >>>>> - Tech for Democracy > >>>>> - Freedom Online Coalition > >>>>> - The proposed Alliance for the Future of the Internet.. > >>>>> - The proposed New IP.. > >>>>> - Etc.. > >>>>> > >>>>> Just so folks get general info on how the landscape is shaping up or > >>>>> moving.. > >>>>> > >>>>> All for now.. > >>>>> > >>>>> Nnenna > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021, 09:59 Sheetal Kumar via Governance, < > >>>>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Dear all, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Here is the proposed agenda for the pre-event. We propose to focus it > >>>>>> on the Global Digital Compact, but if you would like to discuss anything > >>>>>> else please do let us know! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> - 1) Introductions and agenda/aims of pre-event *10-15 minutes * > >>>>>> - 2) Global Digital Compact: context (UNSG Roadmap and UNSG > >>>>>> Common Agenda) - *10-15 minutes * > >>>>>> - Guiding questions > >>>>>> - What do you think about the Compact idea? Do you think > >>>>>> civil society should engage? How? > >>>>>> - 3) Process/consultation/engagement with Tech Envoy's so far > >>>>>> and expected going forward *10 minutes* > >>>>>> - * 5) *Break - *10 minutes * > >>>>>> - 4) Depending on the above - possible discussion of key > >>>>>> priorities/principles under seven proposed areas of the Digital Compact 1) Connect > >>>>>> all people to the Internet, including all schools 2) Avoid > >>>>>> Internet fragmentation 3) Protect data 4) Apply human rights > >>>>>> online 5) Introduce accountability criteria for discrimination > >>>>>> and misleading content 6) Promote regulation of artificial > >>>>>> intelligence 7) Digital commons as a global public good *30 > >>>>>> minutes* > >>>>>> - 6) Next steps *10 minutes* > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Please do chime in with any inputs if you have any ahead of the event > >>>>>> next week. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Best > >>>>>> Sheetal. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 11:48, Sheetal Kumar > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Dear all, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Bruna and I will follow up with more information on the agenda for > >>>>>>> the CS pre-event at this year's IGF but in the meantime,if you are > >>>>>>> interested in attending, please block the time and date below. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> IGF 2021 Day 0 Event #68 Civil Society Pre-event: Internet > >>>>>>> Governance in times of Crisis > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Ballroom A | > >>>>>>> 14:45 GMT (6 Dec) -16:15 GMT (6 Dec) > >>>>>>> Best > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* > >>>>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > >>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | > >>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 > >>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* > >>>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > >>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | > >>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 > >>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Governance mailing list > >>>>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > >>>>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> > >>>> *Sheetal Kumar* > >>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > >>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | > >>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 > >>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Governance mailing list > >>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > >>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> > >>> *Sheetal Kumar* > >>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > >>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | > >>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 > >>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| From 6.internet at gmail.com Mon Dec 6 09:13:51 2021 From: 6.internet at gmail.com (sivasubramanian muthusamy) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 19:43:51 +0530 Subject: [Governance] IGF Day 0 pre-event: information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Tapani What is the link please? Sivasubramanian M On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 7:25 PM Tapani Tarvainen via Governance < governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > It appears that now the zoom links work without authentication. > > Whether they disabled authentication because it's broken or > it never worked, I don't know. But now sharing the zoom > links works (at least has worked for some sessions). > > Tapani > > On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 07:19:09PM +0530, sivasubramanian muthusamy via > Governance (governance at lists.igcaucus.org) wrote: > > > > Nnenna > > > > The problem surrounds the solution offered: for the participant to sign > > in, the intgovforum.org site must be accessible, it is not, even now. > > > > Sivasubramanian M > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 7:05 PM Nnenna Nwakanma > wrote: > > > > > The Zoom link is personalised. So each participant needs to sign in > and > > > get their link > > > > > > Best > > > > > > N > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 12:51 PM sivasubramanian muthusamy via > Governance < > > > governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> Sheetal > > >> > > >> It would be useful if you could post the zoom link and password for > this > > >> session because of the IGF website issue which makes it difficult to > find > > >> session details and zoom details. > > >> > > >> Sivasubramanian M > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 5:47 PM Sheetal Kumar via Governance < > > >> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Dear all, > > >>> > > >>> Just a polite reminder for those interested that the pre-event will > take > > >>> place today, at 2:45 PM GMT. You'll need to add the session to your > > >>> calendar to receive the link. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/igf-2021-day-0-event-68-civil-society-pre-event-internet-governance-in-times-of-crisis > > >>> > > >>> I know that there were issues earlier today with the website, but > they > > >>> seem to have been resolved now. > > >>> > > >>> Best > > >>> Sheetal > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 14:20, Judith Hellerstein < > > >>> judith at jhellerstein.com> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> HI All, > > >>>> Looks great!! I will be there in person so look forward to seeing > > >>>> others > > >>>> > > >>>> Best > > >>>> Judith > > >>>> > > >>>> Sent from my iPad > > >>>> judith at jhellerstein.com > > >>>> Skype ID:JudithHellerstein > > >>>> > > >>>> On Nov 30, 2021, at 5:17 AM, Sheetal Kumar via Governance < > > >>>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>  > > >>>> Thanks, Nnenna! I've added that into the 'context' at the beginning > > >>>> (agenda item 2) and provide a bit more time for that. Will you be > able to > > >>>> attend? > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> - 1) Introductions and agenda/aims of pre-event *10-15 minutes * > > >>>> - 2) Global Digital Compact: context (Digital Cooperation agenda, > > >>>> UNSG Roadmap and UNSG Common Agenda, general landscape) - > > >>>> *20 minutes * > > >>>> - 3) Process/consultation/engagement with Tech Envoy's so far and > > >>>> expected going forward *10 minutes* > > >>>> - * 5) *Break - *10 minutes * > > >>>> - 4) Depending on the above - possible discussion of key > > >>>> priorities/principles under seven proposed areas of the Digital > Compact 1) Connect > > >>>> all people to the Internet, including all schools 2) Avoid > > >>>> Internet fragmentation 3) Protect data 4) Apply human rights > online > > >>>> 5) Introduce accountability criteria for discrimination and > > >>>> misleading content 6) Promote regulation of artificial > intelligence > > >>>> 7) Digital commons as a global public good *30 minutes* > > >>>> - 6) Next steps *10 minutes* > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 14:13, Nnenna Nwakanma > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Hi Sheetal > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Maybe worth giving some background info on Civil Society engagement > > >>>>> with "Digital Cooperation agenda" in addition to Tech Envoy. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> The Digital Cooperation precedes the UN Tech Envoy. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> We might also want to look into global digital Cooperation > "emerging > > >>>>> issues".. > > >>>>> - Tech for Democracy > > >>>>> - Freedom Online Coalition > > >>>>> - The proposed Alliance for the Future of the Internet.. > > >>>>> - The proposed New IP.. > > >>>>> - Etc.. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Just so folks get general info on how the landscape is shaping up > or > > >>>>> moving.. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> All for now.. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Nnenna > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021, 09:59 Sheetal Kumar via Governance, < > > >>>>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Dear all, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Here is the proposed agenda for the pre-event. We propose to > focus it > > >>>>>> on the Global Digital Compact, but if you would like to discuss > anything > > >>>>>> else please do let us know! > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> - 1) Introductions and agenda/aims of pre-event *10-15 minutes > * > > >>>>>> - 2) Global Digital Compact: context (UNSG Roadmap and UNSG > > >>>>>> Common Agenda) - *10-15 minutes * > > >>>>>> - Guiding questions > > >>>>>> - What do you think about the Compact idea? Do you think > > >>>>>> civil society should engage? How? > > >>>>>> - 3) Process/consultation/engagement with Tech Envoy's so > far > > >>>>>> and expected going forward *10 minutes* > > >>>>>> - * 5) *Break - *10 minutes * > > >>>>>> - 4) Depending on the above - possible discussion of key > > >>>>>> priorities/principles under seven proposed areas of the > Digital Compact 1) Connect > > >>>>>> all people to the Internet, including all schools 2) Avoid > > >>>>>> Internet fragmentation 3) Protect data 4) Apply human rights > > >>>>>> online 5) Introduce accountability criteria for discrimination > > >>>>>> and misleading content 6) Promote regulation of artificial > > >>>>>> intelligence 7) Digital commons as a global public good *30 > > >>>>>> minutes* > > >>>>>> - 6) Next steps *10 minutes* > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Please do chime in with any inputs if you have any ahead of the > event > > >>>>>> next week. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Best > > >>>>>> Sheetal. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 11:48, Sheetal Kumar < > sheetal at gp-digital.org> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Dear all, > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Bruna and I will follow up with more information on the agenda > for > > >>>>>>> the CS pre-event at this year's IGF but in the meantime,if you > are > > >>>>>>> interested in attending, please block the time and date below. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> IGF 2021 Day 0 Event #68 Civil Society Pre-event: Internet > > >>>>>>> Governance in times of Crisis > > >>>>>>> < > https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/igf-2021-day-0-event-68-civil-society-pre-event-internet-governance-in-times-of-crisis > > > > >>>>>>> Ballroom A | > > >>>>>>> 14:45 GMT (6 Dec) -16:15 GMT (6 Dec) > > >>>>>>> Best > > >>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* > > >>>>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > > >>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | > > >>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 > > >>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -- > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* > > >>>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > > >>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | > > >>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 > > >>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -- > > >>>>>> Governance mailing list > > >>>>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > > >>>>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> > > >>>> *Sheetal Kumar* > > >>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > > >>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | > > >>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 > 0603 > > >>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Governance mailing list > > >>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > > >>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> > > >>> *Sheetal Kumar* > > >>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > > >>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | > > >>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 > > >>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ca at cafonso.ca Mon Dec 6 09:23:06 2021 From: ca at cafonso.ca (Carlos Afonso) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 11:23:06 -0300 Subject: [Governance] IGF Day 0 pre-event: information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <09ffaaca-dda8-e77d-54c7-b273bc2e40e2@cafonso.ca> Dear Siva, this is a problem affecting us all right now. The system seems to be caving under heavy load. In any case, Nnenna is correct: zoom access to all sessions is personalized and is received upon online registration in each event. fraternal regards --c.a. On 06/12/2021 10:49, sivasubramanian muthusamy via Governance wrote: > Nnenna > > The problem surrounds the solution offered: for the participant to sign > in, the intgovforum.org site must be accessible, it is not, even now. > > Sivasubramanian M > > > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 7:05 PM Nnenna Nwakanma wrote: > >> The Zoom link is personalised. So each participant needs to sign in and >> get their link >> >> Best >> >> N >> >> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 12:51 PM sivasubramanian muthusamy via Governance < >> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> Sheetal >>> >>> It would be useful if you could post the zoom link and password for this >>> session because of the IGF website issue which makes it difficult to find >>> session details and zoom details. >>> >>> Sivasubramanian M >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 5:47 PM Sheetal Kumar via Governance < >>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Dear all, >>>> >>>> Just a polite reminder for those interested that the pre-event will take >>>> place today, at 2:45 PM GMT. You'll need to add the session to your >>>> calendar to receive the link. >>>> >>>> >>>> https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/igf-2021-day-0-event-68-civil-society-pre-event-internet-governance-in-times-of-crisis >>>> >>>> I know that there were issues earlier today with the website, but they >>>> seem to have been resolved now. >>>> >>>> Best >>>> Sheetal >>>> >>>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 14:20, Judith Hellerstein < >>>> judith at jhellerstein.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> HI All, >>>>> Looks great!! I will be there in person so look forward to seeing >>>>> others >>>>> >>>>> Best >>>>> Judith >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPad >>>>> judith at jhellerstein.com >>>>> Skype ID:JudithHellerstein >>>>> >>>>> On Nov 30, 2021, at 5:17 AM, Sheetal Kumar via Governance < >>>>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>  >>>>> Thanks, Nnenna! I've added that into the 'context' at the beginning >>>>> (agenda item 2) and provide a bit more time for that. Will you be able to >>>>> attend? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> - 1) Introductions and agenda/aims of pre-event *10-15 minutes * >>>>> - 2) Global Digital Compact: context (Digital Cooperation agenda, >>>>> UNSG Roadmap and UNSG Common Agenda, general landscape) - >>>>> *20 minutes * >>>>> - 3) Process/consultation/engagement with Tech Envoy's so far and >>>>> expected going forward *10 minutes* >>>>> - * 5) *Break - *10 minutes * >>>>> - 4) Depending on the above - possible discussion of key >>>>> priorities/principles under seven proposed areas of the Digital Compact 1) Connect >>>>> all people to the Internet, including all schools 2) Avoid >>>>> Internet fragmentation 3) Protect data 4) Apply human rights online >>>>> 5) Introduce accountability criteria for discrimination and >>>>> misleading content 6) Promote regulation of artificial intelligence >>>>> 7) Digital commons as a global public good *30 minutes* >>>>> - 6) Next steps *10 minutes* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 14:13, Nnenna Nwakanma >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Sheetal >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe worth giving some background info on Civil Society engagement >>>>>> with "Digital Cooperation agenda" in addition to Tech Envoy. >>>>>> >>>>>> The Digital Cooperation precedes the UN Tech Envoy. >>>>>> >>>>>> We might also want to look into global digital Cooperation "emerging >>>>>> issues".. >>>>>> - Tech for Democracy >>>>>> - Freedom Online Coalition >>>>>> - The proposed Alliance for the Future of the Internet.. >>>>>> - The proposed New IP.. >>>>>> - Etc.. >>>>>> >>>>>> Just so folks get general info on how the landscape is shaping up or >>>>>> moving.. >>>>>> >>>>>> All for now.. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nnenna >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021, 09:59 Sheetal Kumar via Governance, < >>>>>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here is the proposed agenda for the pre-event. We propose to focus it >>>>>>> on the Global Digital Compact, but if you would like to discuss anything >>>>>>> else please do let us know! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - 1) Introductions and agenda/aims of pre-event *10-15 minutes * >>>>>>> - 2) Global Digital Compact: context (UNSG Roadmap and UNSG >>>>>>> Common Agenda) - *10-15 minutes * >>>>>>> - Guiding questions >>>>>>> - What do you think about the Compact idea? Do you think >>>>>>> civil society should engage? How? >>>>>>> - 3) Process/consultation/engagement with Tech Envoy's so far >>>>>>> and expected going forward *10 minutes* >>>>>>> - * 5) *Break - *10 minutes * >>>>>>> - 4) Depending on the above - possible discussion of key >>>>>>> priorities/principles under seven proposed areas of the Digital Compact 1) Connect >>>>>>> all people to the Internet, including all schools 2) Avoid >>>>>>> Internet fragmentation 3) Protect data 4) Apply human rights >>>>>>> online 5) Introduce accountability criteria for discrimination >>>>>>> and misleading content 6) Promote regulation of artificial >>>>>>> intelligence 7) Digital commons as a global public good *30 >>>>>>> minutes* >>>>>>> - 6) Next steps *10 minutes* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please do chime in with any inputs if you have any ahead of the event >>>>>>> next week. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best >>>>>>> Sheetal. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 11:48, Sheetal Kumar >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bruna and I will follow up with more information on the agenda for >>>>>>>> the CS pre-event at this year's IGF but in the meantime,if you are >>>>>>>> interested in attending, please block the time and date below. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> IGF 2021 Day 0 Event #68 Civil Society Pre-event: Internet >>>>>>>> Governance in times of Crisis >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ballroom A | >>>>>>>> 14:45 GMT (6 Dec) -16:15 GMT (6 Dec) >>>>>>>> Best >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>>>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 >>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 >>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Governance mailing list >>>>>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>>>>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >>>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Governance mailing list >>>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Governance mailing list >>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>>> >>> -- >>> Governance mailing list >>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>> >> > > -- Carlos A. Afonso [emails são pessoais exceto quando explicitamente indicado em contrário] [emails are personal unless explicitly indicated otherwise] Instituto Nupef - https://nupef.org.br From sheetal at gp-digital.org Mon Dec 6 09:38:59 2021 From: sheetal at gp-digital.org (Sheetal Kumar) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 18:38:59 +0400 Subject: [Governance] IGF Day 0 pre-event: information In-Reply-To: <09ffaaca-dda8-e77d-54c7-b273bc2e40e2@cafonso.ca> References: <09ffaaca-dda8-e77d-54c7-b273bc2e40e2@cafonso.ca> Message-ID: Dear all, Both Bruna and I are in the waiting room. Best Sheetal. On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 18:23, Carlos Afonso via Governance < governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > Dear Siva, this is a problem affecting us all right now. The system seems > to be caving under heavy load. > > In any case, Nnenna is correct: zoom access to all sessions is > personalized and is received upon online registration in each event. > > fraternal regards > > --c.a. > > On 06/12/2021 10:49, sivasubramanian muthusamy via Governance wrote: > > Nnenna > > > > The problem surrounds the solution offered: for the participant to sign > > in, the intgovforum.org site must be accessible, it is not, even now. > > > > Sivasubramanian M > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 7:05 PM Nnenna Nwakanma > wrote: > > > >> The Zoom link is personalised. So each participant needs to sign in and > >> get their link > >> > >> Best > >> > >> N > >> > >> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 12:51 PM sivasubramanian muthusamy via > Governance < > >> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Sheetal > >>> > >>> It would be useful if you could post the zoom link and password for > this > >>> session because of the IGF website issue which makes it difficult to > find > >>> session details and zoom details. > >>> > >>> Sivasubramanian M > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 5:47 PM Sheetal Kumar via Governance < > >>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Dear all, > >>>> > >>>> Just a polite reminder for those interested that the pre-event will > take > >>>> place today, at 2:45 PM GMT. You'll need to add the session to your > >>>> calendar to receive the link. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/igf-2021-day-0-event-68-civil-society-pre-event-internet-governance-in-times-of-crisis > >>>> > >>>> I know that there were issues earlier today with the website, but they > >>>> seem to have been resolved now. > >>>> > >>>> Best > >>>> Sheetal > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 14:20, Judith Hellerstein < > >>>> judith at jhellerstein.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> HI All, > >>>>> Looks great!! I will be there in person so look forward to seeing > >>>>> others > >>>>> > >>>>> Best > >>>>> Judith > >>>>> > >>>>> Sent from my iPad > >>>>> judith at jhellerstein.com > >>>>> Skype ID:JudithHellerstein > >>>>> > >>>>> On Nov 30, 2021, at 5:17 AM, Sheetal Kumar via Governance < > >>>>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>  > >>>>> Thanks, Nnenna! I've added that into the 'context' at the beginning > >>>>> (agenda item 2) and provide a bit more time for that. Will you be > able to > >>>>> attend? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> - 1) Introductions and agenda/aims of pre-event *10-15 minutes * > >>>>> - 2) Global Digital Compact: context (Digital Cooperation agenda, > >>>>> UNSG Roadmap and UNSG Common Agenda, general landscape) - > >>>>> *20 minutes * > >>>>> - 3) Process/consultation/engagement with Tech Envoy's so far and > >>>>> expected going forward *10 minutes* > >>>>> - * 5) *Break - *10 minutes * > >>>>> - 4) Depending on the above - possible discussion of key > >>>>> priorities/principles under seven proposed areas of the Digital > Compact 1) Connect > >>>>> all people to the Internet, including all schools 2) Avoid > >>>>> Internet fragmentation 3) Protect data 4) Apply human rights > online > >>>>> 5) Introduce accountability criteria for discrimination and > >>>>> misleading content 6) Promote regulation of artificial > intelligence > >>>>> 7) Digital commons as a global public good *30 minutes* > >>>>> - 6) Next steps *10 minutes* > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 14:13, Nnenna Nwakanma > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hi Sheetal > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Maybe worth giving some background info on Civil Society engagement > >>>>>> with "Digital Cooperation agenda" in addition to Tech Envoy. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The Digital Cooperation precedes the UN Tech Envoy. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> We might also want to look into global digital Cooperation "emerging > >>>>>> issues".. > >>>>>> - Tech for Democracy > >>>>>> - Freedom Online Coalition > >>>>>> - The proposed Alliance for the Future of the Internet.. > >>>>>> - The proposed New IP.. > >>>>>> - Etc.. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Just so folks get general info on how the landscape is shaping up or > >>>>>> moving.. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> All for now.. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Nnenna > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021, 09:59 Sheetal Kumar via Governance, < > >>>>>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Dear all, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Here is the proposed agenda for the pre-event. We propose to focus > it > >>>>>>> on the Global Digital Compact, but if you would like to discuss > anything > >>>>>>> else please do let us know! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> - 1) Introductions and agenda/aims of pre-event *10-15 minutes > * > >>>>>>> - 2) Global Digital Compact: context (UNSG Roadmap and UNSG > >>>>>>> Common Agenda) - *10-15 minutes * > >>>>>>> - Guiding questions > >>>>>>> - What do you think about the Compact idea? Do you think > >>>>>>> civil society should engage? How? > >>>>>>> - 3) Process/consultation/engagement with Tech Envoy's so > far > >>>>>>> and expected going forward *10 minutes* > >>>>>>> - * 5) *Break - *10 minutes * > >>>>>>> - 4) Depending on the above - possible discussion of key > >>>>>>> priorities/principles under seven proposed areas of the > Digital Compact 1) Connect > >>>>>>> all people to the Internet, including all schools 2) Avoid > >>>>>>> Internet fragmentation 3) Protect data 4) Apply human rights > >>>>>>> online 5) Introduce accountability criteria for discrimination > >>>>>>> and misleading content 6) Promote regulation of artificial > >>>>>>> intelligence 7) Digital commons as a global public good *30 > >>>>>>> minutes* > >>>>>>> - 6) Next steps *10 minutes* > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Please do chime in with any inputs if you have any ahead of the > event > >>>>>>> next week. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Best > >>>>>>> Sheetal. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 11:48, Sheetal Kumar < > sheetal at gp-digital.org> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Dear all, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Bruna and I will follow up with more information on the agenda for > >>>>>>>> the CS pre-event at this year's IGF but in the meantime,if you are > >>>>>>>> interested in attending, please block the time and date below. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> IGF 2021 Day 0 Event #68 Civil Society Pre-event: Internet > >>>>>>>> Governance in times of Crisis > >>>>>>>> < > https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/igf-2021-day-0-event-68-civil-society-pre-event-internet-governance-in-times-of-crisis > > > >>>>>>>> Ballroom A | > >>>>>>>> 14:45 GMT (6 Dec) -16:15 GMT (6 Dec) > >>>>>>>> Best > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* > >>>>>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > >>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | > >>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 > >>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* > >>>>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > >>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | > >>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 > >>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> Governance mailing list > >>>>>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > >>>>>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> > >>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* > >>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > >>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | > >>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 > >>>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Governance mailing list > >>>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > >>>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> > >>>> *Sheetal Kumar* > >>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > >>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | > >>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 > >>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Governance mailing list > >>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > >>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > >>>> > >>> -- > >>> Governance mailing list > >>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > >>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > >>> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Carlos A. Afonso > [emails são pessoais exceto quando explicitamente indicado em contrário] > [emails are personal unless explicitly indicated otherwise] > > Instituto Nupef - https://nupef.org.br > > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > -- *Sheetal Kumar* Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From 6.internet at gmail.com Mon Dec 6 09:42:47 2021 From: 6.internet at gmail.com (sivasubramanian muthusamy) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 20:12:47 +0530 Subject: [Governance] IGF Day 0 pre-event: information In-Reply-To: References: <09ffaaca-dda8-e77d-54c7-b273bc2e40e2@cafonso.ca> Message-ID: At this very moment, this is what zoom shows when I am using YOUR link, if this is not the waiting room, then the link works only for the person to whom it is sent. (update) Worked ! Sivasubramanian M On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 8:09 PM Sheetal Kumar wrote: > Dear all, > > Both Bruna and I are in the waiting room. > > Best > Sheetal. > > On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 18:23, Carlos Afonso via Governance < > governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > >> Dear Siva, this is a problem affecting us all right now. The system seems >> to be caving under heavy load. >> >> In any case, Nnenna is correct: zoom access to all sessions is >> personalized and is received upon online registration in each event. >> >> fraternal regards >> >> --c.a. >> >> On 06/12/2021 10:49, sivasubramanian muthusamy via Governance wrote: >> > Nnenna >> > >> > The problem surrounds the solution offered: for the participant to sign >> > in, the intgovforum.org site must be accessible, it is not, even now. >> > >> > Sivasubramanian M >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 7:05 PM Nnenna Nwakanma >> wrote: >> > >> >> The Zoom link is personalised. So each participant needs to sign in >> and >> >> get their link >> >> >> >> Best >> >> >> >> N >> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 12:51 PM sivasubramanian muthusamy via >> Governance < >> >> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >>> Sheetal >> >>> >> >>> It would be useful if you could post the zoom link and password for >> this >> >>> session because of the IGF website issue which makes it difficult to >> find >> >>> session details and zoom details. >> >>> >> >>> Sivasubramanian M >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 5:47 PM Sheetal Kumar via Governance < >> >>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Dear all, >> >>>> >> >>>> Just a polite reminder for those interested that the pre-event will >> take >> >>>> place today, at 2:45 PM GMT. You'll need to add the session to your >> >>>> calendar to receive the link. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/igf-2021-day-0-event-68-civil-society-pre-event-internet-governance-in-times-of-crisis >> >>>> >> >>>> I know that there were issues earlier today with the website, but >> they >> >>>> seem to have been resolved now. >> >>>> >> >>>> Best >> >>>> Sheetal >> >>>> >> >>>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 14:20, Judith Hellerstein < >> >>>> judith at jhellerstein.com> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> HI All, >> >>>>> Looks great!! I will be there in person so look forward to seeing >> >>>>> others >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Best >> >>>>> Judith >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Sent from my iPad >> >>>>> judith at jhellerstein.com >> >>>>> Skype ID:JudithHellerstein >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Nov 30, 2021, at 5:17 AM, Sheetal Kumar via Governance < >> >>>>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>>  >> >>>>> Thanks, Nnenna! I've added that into the 'context' at the beginning >> >>>>> (agenda item 2) and provide a bit more time for that. Will you be >> able to >> >>>>> attend? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> - 1) Introductions and agenda/aims of pre-event *10-15 minutes * >> >>>>> - 2) Global Digital Compact: context (Digital Cooperation >> agenda, >> >>>>> UNSG Roadmap and UNSG Common Agenda, general landscape) - >> >>>>> *20 minutes * >> >>>>> - 3) Process/consultation/engagement with Tech Envoy's so far >> and >> >>>>> expected going forward *10 minutes* >> >>>>> - * 5) *Break - *10 minutes * >> >>>>> - 4) Depending on the above - possible discussion of key >> >>>>> priorities/principles under seven proposed areas of the Digital >> Compact 1) Connect >> >>>>> all people to the Internet, including all schools 2) Avoid >> >>>>> Internet fragmentation 3) Protect data 4) Apply human rights >> online >> >>>>> 5) Introduce accountability criteria for discrimination and >> >>>>> misleading content 6) Promote regulation of artificial >> intelligence >> >>>>> 7) Digital commons as a global public good *30 minutes* >> >>>>> - 6) Next steps *10 minutes* >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 14:13, Nnenna Nwakanma >> >>>>> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> Hi Sheetal >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Maybe worth giving some background info on Civil Society engagement >> >>>>>> with "Digital Cooperation agenda" in addition to Tech Envoy. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> The Digital Cooperation precedes the UN Tech Envoy. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> We might also want to look into global digital Cooperation >> "emerging >> >>>>>> issues".. >> >>>>>> - Tech for Democracy >> >>>>>> - Freedom Online Coalition >> >>>>>> - The proposed Alliance for the Future of the Internet.. >> >>>>>> - The proposed New IP.. >> >>>>>> - Etc.. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Just so folks get general info on how the landscape is shaping up >> or >> >>>>>> moving.. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> All for now.. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Nnenna >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021, 09:59 Sheetal Kumar via Governance, < >> >>>>>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Dear all, >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Here is the proposed agenda for the pre-event. We propose to >> focus it >> >>>>>>> on the Global Digital Compact, but if you would like to discuss >> anything >> >>>>>>> else please do let us know! >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> - 1) Introductions and agenda/aims of pre-event *10-15 >> minutes * >> >>>>>>> - 2) Global Digital Compact: context (UNSG Roadmap and UNSG >> >>>>>>> Common Agenda) - *10-15 minutes * >> >>>>>>> - Guiding questions >> >>>>>>> - What do you think about the Compact idea? Do you think >> >>>>>>> civil society should engage? How? >> >>>>>>> - 3) Process/consultation/engagement with Tech Envoy's so >> far >> >>>>>>> and expected going forward *10 minutes* >> >>>>>>> - * 5) *Break - *10 minutes * >> >>>>>>> - 4) Depending on the above - possible discussion of key >> >>>>>>> priorities/principles under seven proposed areas of the >> Digital Compact 1) Connect >> >>>>>>> all people to the Internet, including all schools 2) Avoid >> >>>>>>> Internet fragmentation 3) Protect data 4) Apply human rights >> >>>>>>> online 5) Introduce accountability criteria for discrimination >> >>>>>>> and misleading content 6) Promote regulation of artificial >> >>>>>>> intelligence 7) Digital commons as a global public good *30 >> >>>>>>> minutes* >> >>>>>>> - 6) Next steps *10 minutes* >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Please do chime in with any inputs if you have any ahead of the >> event >> >>>>>>> next week. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Best >> >>>>>>> Sheetal. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 11:48, Sheetal Kumar < >> sheetal at gp-digital.org> >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Dear all, >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Bruna and I will follow up with more information on the agenda >> for >> >>>>>>>> the CS pre-event at this year's IGF but in the meantime,if you >> are >> >>>>>>>> interested in attending, please block the time and date below. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> IGF 2021 Day 0 Event #68 Civil Society Pre-event: Internet >> >>>>>>>> Governance in times of Crisis >> >>>>>>>> < >> https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/igf-2021-day-0-event-68-civil-society-pre-event-internet-governance-in-times-of-crisis >> > >> >>>>>>>> Ballroom A | >> >>>>>>>> 14:45 GMT (6 Dec) -16:15 GMT (6 Dec) >> >>>>>>>> Best >> >>>>>>>> -- >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >> >>>>>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >> >>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >> >>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 >> >>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> -- >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >> >>>>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >> >>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >> >>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 >> >>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> -- >> >>>>>>> Governance mailing list >> >>>>>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >> >>>>>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> >> >>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >> >>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >> >>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >> >>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 >> 0603 >> >>>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> Governance mailing list >> >>>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >> >>>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> >> >>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >> >>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >> >>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >> >>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >> >>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> Governance mailing list >> >>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >> >>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >> >>>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Governance mailing list >> >>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >> >>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> -- >> >> Carlos A. Afonso >> [emails são pessoais exceto quando explicitamente indicado em contrário] >> [emails are personal unless explicitly indicated otherwise] >> >> Instituto Nupef - https://nupef.org.br >> >> -- >> Governance mailing list >> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >> > > > -- > > *Sheetal Kumar* > Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | > PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 > DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: wait for the host.png Type: image/png Size: 36730 bytes Desc: not available URL: From 6.internet at gmail.com Mon Dec 6 09:51:10 2021 From: 6.internet at gmail.com (sivasubramanian muthusamy) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 20:21:10 +0530 Subject: [Governance] IGF Day 0 pre-event: information In-Reply-To: References: <09ffaaca-dda8-e77d-54c7-b273bc2e40e2@cafonso.ca> Message-ID: If anyone uses Sheetal's link that she shared in the list, he or she might succeed but lock Sheetal out, apart from having to be seen in the room in the guise of Sheetal. You might try to use the meeting information, meeting id 878 4274 1596, it does pull up the zoom registration link and asks for the email address, and works ! Sivasubramanian M On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 8:12 PM sivasubramanian muthusamy < 6.internet at gmail.com> wrote: > At this very moment, this is what zoom shows when I am using YOUR link, > if this is not the waiting room, then the link works only for the person to > whom it is sent. > > (update) Worked ! > > Sivasubramanian M > > > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 8:09 PM Sheetal Kumar > wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> Both Bruna and I are in the waiting room. >> >> Best >> Sheetal. >> >> On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 18:23, Carlos Afonso via Governance < >> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >> >>> Dear Siva, this is a problem affecting us all right now. The system >>> seems to be caving under heavy load. >>> >>> In any case, Nnenna is correct: zoom access to all sessions is >>> personalized and is received upon online registration in each event. >>> >>> fraternal regards >>> >>> --c.a. >>> >>> On 06/12/2021 10:49, sivasubramanian muthusamy via Governance wrote: >>> > Nnenna >>> > >>> > The problem surrounds the solution offered: for the participant to >>> sign >>> > in, the intgovforum.org site must be accessible, it is not, even now. >>> > >>> > Sivasubramanian M >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 7:05 PM Nnenna Nwakanma >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> The Zoom link is personalised. So each participant needs to sign in >>> and >>> >> get their link >>> >> >>> >> Best >>> >> >>> >> N >>> >> >>> >> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 12:51 PM sivasubramanian muthusamy via >>> Governance < >>> >> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> Sheetal >>> >>> >>> >>> It would be useful if you could post the zoom link and password for >>> this >>> >>> session because of the IGF website issue which makes it difficult to >>> find >>> >>> session details and zoom details. >>> >>> >>> >>> Sivasubramanian M >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 5:47 PM Sheetal Kumar via Governance < >>> >>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Dear all, >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Just a polite reminder for those interested that the pre-event will >>> take >>> >>>> place today, at 2:45 PM GMT. You'll need to add the session to your >>> >>>> calendar to receive the link. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/igf-2021-day-0-event-68-civil-society-pre-event-internet-governance-in-times-of-crisis >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I know that there were issues earlier today with the website, but >>> they >>> >>>> seem to have been resolved now. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Best >>> >>>> Sheetal >>> >>>> >>> >>>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 14:20, Judith Hellerstein < >>> >>>> judith at jhellerstein.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> HI All, >>> >>>>> Looks great!! I will be there in person so look forward to seeing >>> >>>>> others >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Best >>> >>>>> Judith >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>>>> judith at jhellerstein.com >>> >>>>> Skype ID:JudithHellerstein >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> On Nov 30, 2021, at 5:17 AM, Sheetal Kumar via Governance < >>> >>>>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>  >>> >>>>> Thanks, Nnenna! I've added that into the 'context' at the beginning >>> >>>>> (agenda item 2) and provide a bit more time for that. Will you be >>> able to >>> >>>>> attend? >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> - 1) Introductions and agenda/aims of pre-event *10-15 minutes >>> * >>> >>>>> - 2) Global Digital Compact: context (Digital Cooperation >>> agenda, >>> >>>>> UNSG Roadmap and UNSG Common Agenda, general landscape) - >>> >>>>> *20 minutes * >>> >>>>> - 3) Process/consultation/engagement with Tech Envoy's so far >>> and >>> >>>>> expected going forward *10 minutes* >>> >>>>> - * 5) *Break - *10 minutes * >>> >>>>> - 4) Depending on the above - possible discussion of key >>> >>>>> priorities/principles under seven proposed areas of the >>> Digital Compact 1) Connect >>> >>>>> all people to the Internet, including all schools 2) Avoid >>> >>>>> Internet fragmentation 3) Protect data 4) Apply human rights >>> online >>> >>>>> 5) Introduce accountability criteria for discrimination and >>> >>>>> misleading content 6) Promote regulation of artificial >>> intelligence >>> >>>>> 7) Digital commons as a global public good *30 minutes* >>> >>>>> - 6) Next steps *10 minutes* >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 14:13, Nnenna Nwakanma >>> >>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>> Hi Sheetal >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> Maybe worth giving some background info on Civil Society >>> engagement >>> >>>>>> with "Digital Cooperation agenda" in addition to Tech Envoy. >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> The Digital Cooperation precedes the UN Tech Envoy. >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> We might also want to look into global digital Cooperation >>> "emerging >>> >>>>>> issues".. >>> >>>>>> - Tech for Democracy >>> >>>>>> - Freedom Online Coalition >>> >>>>>> - The proposed Alliance for the Future of the Internet.. >>> >>>>>> - The proposed New IP.. >>> >>>>>> - Etc.. >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> Just so folks get general info on how the landscape is shaping up >>> or >>> >>>>>> moving.. >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> All for now.. >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> Nnenna >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021, 09:59 Sheetal Kumar via Governance, < >>> >>>>>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Dear all, >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Here is the proposed agenda for the pre-event. We propose to >>> focus it >>> >>>>>>> on the Global Digital Compact, but if you would like to discuss >>> anything >>> >>>>>>> else please do let us know! >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> - 1) Introductions and agenda/aims of pre-event *10-15 >>> minutes * >>> >>>>>>> - 2) Global Digital Compact: context (UNSG Roadmap and UNSG >>> >>>>>>> Common Agenda) - *10-15 minutes * >>> >>>>>>> - Guiding questions >>> >>>>>>> - What do you think about the Compact idea? Do you >>> think >>> >>>>>>> civil society should engage? How? >>> >>>>>>> - 3) Process/consultation/engagement with Tech Envoy's so >>> far >>> >>>>>>> and expected going forward *10 minutes* >>> >>>>>>> - * 5) *Break - *10 minutes * >>> >>>>>>> - 4) Depending on the above - possible discussion of key >>> >>>>>>> priorities/principles under seven proposed areas of the >>> Digital Compact 1) Connect >>> >>>>>>> all people to the Internet, including all schools 2) Avoid >>> >>>>>>> Internet fragmentation 3) Protect data 4) Apply human rights >>> >>>>>>> online 5) Introduce accountability criteria for >>> discrimination >>> >>>>>>> and misleading content 6) Promote regulation of artificial >>> >>>>>>> intelligence 7) Digital commons as a global public good *30 >>> >>>>>>> minutes* >>> >>>>>>> - 6) Next steps *10 minutes* >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Please do chime in with any inputs if you have any ahead of the >>> event >>> >>>>>>> next week. >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> Best >>> >>>>>>> Sheetal. >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 11:48, Sheetal Kumar < >>> sheetal at gp-digital.org> >>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> Dear all, >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> Bruna and I will follow up with more information on the agenda >>> for >>> >>>>>>>> the CS pre-event at this year's IGF but in the meantime,if you >>> are >>> >>>>>>>> interested in attending, please block the time and date below. >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> IGF 2021 Day 0 Event #68 Civil Society Pre-event: Internet >>> >>>>>>>> Governance in times of Crisis >>> >>>>>>>> < >>> https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/igf-2021-day-0-event-68-civil-society-pre-event-internet-governance-in-times-of-crisis >>> > >>> >>>>>>>> Ballroom A | >>> >>>>>>>> 14:45 GMT (6 Dec) -16:15 GMT (6 Dec) >>> >>>>>>>> Best >>> >>>>>>>> -- >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>> >>>>>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>> >>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 >>> | >>> >>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 >>> >>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> -- >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>> >>>>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>> >>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>> >>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 >>> >>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> -- >>> >>>>>>> Governance mailing list >>> >>>>>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>> >>>>>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>> >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> -- >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>> >>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>> >>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>> >>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 >>> 0603 >>> >>>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> -- >>> >>>>> Governance mailing list >>> >>>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>> >>>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> -- >>> >>>> >>> >>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>> >>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>> >>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>> >>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 >>> 0603 >>> >>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> -- >>> >>>> Governance mailing list >>> >>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>> >>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Governance mailing list >>> >>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>> >>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>> >>> >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Carlos A. Afonso >>> [emails são pessoais exceto quando explicitamente indicado em contrário] >>> [emails are personal unless explicitly indicated otherwise] >>> >>> Instituto Nupef - https://nupef.org.br >>> >>> -- >>> Governance mailing list >>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> *Sheetal Kumar* >> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >> >> >> >> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From 6.internet at gmail.com Mon Dec 6 09:55:40 2021 From: 6.internet at gmail.com (sivasubramanian muthusamy) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 20:25:40 +0530 Subject: [Governance] IGF Day 0 pre-event: information In-Reply-To: References: <09ffaaca-dda8-e77d-54c7-b273bc2e40e2@cafonso.ca> Message-ID: Zoom link: the meeting information, meeting id 878 4274 1596, it does pull up the zoom registration link and asks for the email address, and works ! Sivasubramanian M On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 8:23 PM Sheetal Kumar wrote: > Thanks, I'm in! > > On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 18:51, sivasubramanian muthusamy < > 6.internet at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I did Sheetal. I logged off from the computer. Please try now. >> >> >> Sivasubramanian M >> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 8:17 PM Sheetal Kumar >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Siva, >>> Sorry. I can no longer access the meeting! Would you be able to leave >>> the meeting so I can access it? >>> >>> Best >>> Sheetal. >>> >>> On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 18:44, Sheetal Kumar >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Would you be able to leave so I can enter? And can you register for >>>> your own personal link? Otherwise I can't facilitate the meeting. >>>> >>>> On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 18:43, Sheetal Kumar >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Are you in Siva? Unfortunately because I shared my link with you, I >>>>> can no longer access the meeting. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 18:43, sivasubramanian muthusamy < >>>>> 6.internet at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> At this very moment, this is what zoom shows when I am using YOUR >>>>>> link, if this is not the waiting room, then the link works only for the >>>>>> person to whom it is sent. >>>>>> >>>>>> (update) Worked ! >>>>>> >>>>>> Sivasubramanian M >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 8:09 PM Sheetal Kumar >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Both Bruna and I are in the waiting room. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best >>>>>>> Sheetal. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 18:23, Carlos Afonso via Governance < >>>>>>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dear Siva, this is a problem affecting us all right now. The system >>>>>>>> seems to be caving under heavy load. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In any case, Nnenna is correct: zoom access to all sessions is >>>>>>>> personalized and is received upon online registration in each event. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> fraternal regards >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --c.a. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 06/12/2021 10:49, sivasubramanian muthusamy via Governance wrote: >>>>>>>> > Nnenna >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > The problem surrounds the solution offered: for the participant >>>>>>>> to sign >>>>>>>> > in, the intgovforum.org site must be accessible, it is not, even >>>>>>>> now. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > Sivasubramanian M >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 7:05 PM Nnenna Nwakanma < >>>>>>>> nnenna75 at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >> The Zoom link is personalised. So each participant needs to >>>>>>>> sign in and >>>>>>>> >> get their link >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> Best >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> N >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 12:51 PM sivasubramanian muthusamy via >>>>>>>> Governance < >>>>>>>> >> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> Sheetal >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> It would be useful if you could post the zoom link and password >>>>>>>> for this >>>>>>>> >>> session because of the IGF website issue which makes it >>>>>>>> difficult to find >>>>>>>> >>> session details and zoom details. >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> Sivasubramanian M >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 5:47 PM Sheetal Kumar via Governance < >>>>>>>> >>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>>> Dear all, >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> Just a polite reminder for those interested that the pre-event >>>>>>>> will take >>>>>>>> >>>> place today, at 2:45 PM GMT. You'll need to add the session to >>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>> >>>> calendar to receive the link. >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/igf-2021-day-0-event-68-civil-society-pre-event-internet-governance-in-times-of-crisis >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> I know that there were issues earlier today with the website, >>>>>>>> but they >>>>>>>> >>>> seem to have been resolved now. >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> Best >>>>>>>> >>>> Sheetal >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 14:20, Judith Hellerstein < >>>>>>>> >>>> judith at jhellerstein.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> HI All, >>>>>>>> >>>>> Looks great!! I will be there in person so look forward to >>>>>>>> seeing >>>>>>>> >>>>> others >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> Best >>>>>>>> >>>>> Judith >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPad >>>>>>>> >>>>> judith at jhellerstein.com >>>>>>>> >>>>> Skype ID:JudithHellerstein >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> On Nov 30, 2021, at 5:17 AM, Sheetal Kumar via Governance < >>>>>>>> >>>>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>  >>>>>>>> >>>>> Thanks, Nnenna! I've added that into the 'context' at the >>>>>>>> beginning >>>>>>>> >>>>> (agenda item 2) and provide a bit more time for that. Will >>>>>>>> you be able to >>>>>>>> >>>>> attend? >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> - 1) Introductions and agenda/aims of pre-event *10-15 >>>>>>>> minutes * >>>>>>>> >>>>> - 2) Global Digital Compact: context (Digital Cooperation >>>>>>>> agenda, >>>>>>>> >>>>> UNSG Roadmap and UNSG Common Agenda, general landscape) - >>>>>>>> >>>>> *20 minutes * >>>>>>>> >>>>> - 3) Process/consultation/engagement with Tech Envoy's so >>>>>>>> far and >>>>>>>> >>>>> expected going forward *10 minutes* >>>>>>>> >>>>> - * 5) *Break - *10 minutes * >>>>>>>> >>>>> - 4) Depending on the above - possible discussion of key >>>>>>>> >>>>> priorities/principles under seven proposed areas of the >>>>>>>> Digital Compact 1) Connect >>>>>>>> >>>>> all people to the Internet, including all schools 2) >>>>>>>> Avoid >>>>>>>> >>>>> Internet fragmentation 3) Protect data 4) Apply human >>>>>>>> rights online >>>>>>>> >>>>> 5) Introduce accountability criteria for discrimination >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> >>>>> misleading content 6) Promote regulation of artificial >>>>>>>> intelligence >>>>>>>> >>>>> 7) Digital commons as a global public good *30 minutes* >>>>>>>> >>>>> - 6) Next steps *10 minutes* >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 14:13, Nnenna Nwakanma < >>>>>>>> nnenna75 at gmail.com> >>>>>>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Sheetal >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe worth giving some background info on Civil Society >>>>>>>> engagement >>>>>>>> >>>>>> with "Digital Cooperation agenda" in addition to Tech Envoy. >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> The Digital Cooperation precedes the UN Tech Envoy. >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> We might also want to look into global digital Cooperation >>>>>>>> "emerging >>>>>>>> >>>>>> issues".. >>>>>>>> >>>>>> - Tech for Democracy >>>>>>>> >>>>>> - Freedom Online Coalition >>>>>>>> >>>>>> - The proposed Alliance for the Future of the Internet.. >>>>>>>> >>>>>> - The proposed New IP.. >>>>>>>> >>>>>> - Etc.. >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> Just so folks get general info on how the landscape is >>>>>>>> shaping up or >>>>>>>> >>>>>> moving.. >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> All for now.. >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> Nnenna >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021, 09:59 Sheetal Kumar via Governance, < >>>>>>>> >>>>>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here is the proposed agenda for the pre-event. We propose >>>>>>>> to focus it >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> on the Global Digital Compact, but if you would like to >>>>>>>> discuss anything >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> else please do let us know! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> - 1) Introductions and agenda/aims of pre-event *10-15 >>>>>>>> minutes * >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> - 2) Global Digital Compact: context (UNSG Roadmap and >>>>>>>> UNSG >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Common Agenda) - *10-15 minutes * >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Guiding questions >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> - What do you think about the Compact idea? Do >>>>>>>> you think >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> civil society should engage? How? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> - 3) Process/consultation/engagement with Tech >>>>>>>> Envoy's so far >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> and expected going forward *10 minutes* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> - * 5) *Break - *10 minutes * >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> - 4) Depending on the above - possible discussion of key >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> priorities/principles under seven proposed areas of the >>>>>>>> Digital Compact 1) Connect >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> all people to the Internet, including all schools 2) >>>>>>>> Avoid >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Internet fragmentation 3) Protect data 4) Apply human >>>>>>>> rights >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> online 5) Introduce accountability criteria for >>>>>>>> discrimination >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> and misleading content 6) Promote regulation of >>>>>>>> artificial >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> intelligence 7) Digital commons as a global public good >>>>>>>> *30 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> minutes* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> - 6) Next steps *10 minutes* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please do chime in with any inputs if you have any ahead of >>>>>>>> the event >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> next week. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sheetal. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 11:48, Sheetal Kumar < >>>>>>>> sheetal at gp-digital.org> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bruna and I will follow up with more information on the >>>>>>>> agenda for >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> the CS pre-event at this year's IGF but in the meantime,if >>>>>>>> you are >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> interested in attending, please block the time and date >>>>>>>> below. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> IGF 2021 Day 0 Event #68 Civil Society Pre-event: Internet >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Governance in times of Crisis >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>> https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/igf-2021-day-0-event-68-civil-society-pre-event-internet-governance-in-times-of-crisis >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ballroom A | >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 14:45 GMT (6 Dec) -16:15 GMT (6 Dec) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS >>>>>>>> DIGITAL >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 >>>>>>>> (0)7739569514 | >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D >>>>>>>> 173B E9E2 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS >>>>>>>> DIGITAL >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 >>>>>>>> (0)7739569514 | >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B >>>>>>>> E9E2 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Governance mailing list >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>>>>>> >>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS >>>>>>>> DIGITAL >>>>>>>> >>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 >>>>>>>> (0)7739569514 | >>>>>>>> >>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B >>>>>>>> E9E2 0603 >>>>>>>> >>>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>> Governance mailing list >>>>>>>> >>>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>>>>>>> >>>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>>>>>> >>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS >>>>>>>> DIGITAL >>>>>>>> >>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 >>>>>>>> (0)7739569514 | >>>>>>>> >>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B >>>>>>>> E9E2 0603 >>>>>>>> >>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>> Governance mailing list >>>>>>>> >>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>>>>>>> >>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>> -- >>>>>>>> >>> Governance mailing list >>>>>>>> >>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>>>>>>> >>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Carlos A. Afonso >>>>>>>> [emails são pessoais exceto quando explicitamente indicado em >>>>>>>> contrário] >>>>>>>> [emails are personal unless explicitly indicated otherwise] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Instituto Nupef - https://nupef.org.br >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Governance mailing list >>>>>>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>>>>>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 >>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >>>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>> >>> >>> >>> > > -- > > *Sheetal Kumar* > Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | > PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 > DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sheetal at gp-digital.org Mon Dec 6 13:19:43 2021 From: sheetal at gp-digital.org (Sheetal Kumar) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 22:19:43 +0400 Subject: [Governance] IGF Day 0 pre-event: information In-Reply-To: References: <09ffaaca-dda8-e77d-54c7-b273bc2e40e2@cafonso.ca> Message-ID: Dear all, Thanks to those who joined earlier, it was a vibrant discussion! Notes are in the Googledoc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OKxLqD9L6fzLlNyMjhZG7AyFfruUyTXKYW-_URXb7FU/edit As for the most time-sensitive output: it was suggested we put some key points together for the digital cooperation session on Wednesday that could be used/echoed by those attending. I've copied the draft ones that came out of our discussion below. If you can add your feedback to the doc by COB tomorrow that would be much appreciated. Otherwise, feel free to respond to this thread: DRAFT KEY POINTS FOR WEDNESDAY SESSION ON DIGITAL COOPERATION - We had previously sent a letter re: the appointment of the Tech Envoy for the TE’s Office stipulating the need for an inclusive selection process. Disappointed this was not adhered to, and that the outcome was a delay to the mandate holder being able to take office and arguably tarnishing of the Office. - However, a number of us are committed to supporting a meaningfully inclusive GDC development by 2023. - Going forward, need more transparency, including on - How does the SG see the links between the Global Digital Compact (GDC) the role of the TE’s Office and the IGF/other relevant processes? - What is/will be the role of the TE’s Office with the Global Digital Compact? - Suggest commitment to increased resources/funding for the TE’s Office so that it can, if it is going to play a role in the GLobal Digital Compact, be meaningfully inclusive of all stakeholders On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 18:56, sivasubramanian muthusamy via Governance < governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > Zoom link: > > the meeting information, meeting id 878 4274 1596, it does pull up the > zoom registration link and asks for the email address, and works ! > > Sivasubramanian M > > > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 8:23 PM Sheetal Kumar > wrote: > >> Thanks, I'm in! >> >> On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 18:51, sivasubramanian muthusamy < >> 6.internet at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I did Sheetal. I logged off from the computer. Please try now. >>> >>> >>> Sivasubramanian M >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 8:17 PM Sheetal Kumar >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Siva, >>>> Sorry. I can no longer access the meeting! Would you be able to leave >>>> the meeting so I can access it? >>>> >>>> Best >>>> Sheetal. >>>> >>>> On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 18:44, Sheetal Kumar >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Would you be able to leave so I can enter? And can you register for >>>>> your own personal link? Otherwise I can't facilitate the meeting. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 18:43, Sheetal Kumar >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Are you in Siva? Unfortunately because I shared my link with you, I >>>>>> can no longer access the meeting. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 18:43, sivasubramanian muthusamy < >>>>>> 6.internet at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> At this very moment, this is what zoom shows when I am using YOUR >>>>>>> link, if this is not the waiting room, then the link works only for the >>>>>>> person to whom it is sent. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (update) Worked ! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sivasubramanian M >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 8:09 PM Sheetal Kumar >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Both Bruna and I are in the waiting room. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best >>>>>>>> Sheetal. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 18:23, Carlos Afonso via Governance < >>>>>>>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Dear Siva, this is a problem affecting us all right now. The >>>>>>>>> system seems to be caving under heavy load. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In any case, Nnenna is correct: zoom access to all sessions is >>>>>>>>> personalized and is received upon online registration in each event. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> fraternal regards >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> --c.a. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 06/12/2021 10:49, sivasubramanian muthusamy via Governance >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> > Nnenna >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > The problem surrounds the solution offered: for the participant >>>>>>>>> to sign >>>>>>>>> > in, the intgovforum.org site must be accessible, it is not, >>>>>>>>> even now. >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > Sivasubramanian M >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 7:05 PM Nnenna Nwakanma < >>>>>>>>> nnenna75 at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> >> The Zoom link is personalised. So each participant needs to >>>>>>>>> sign in and >>>>>>>>> >> get their link >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> Best >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> N >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 12:51 PM sivasubramanian muthusamy via >>>>>>>>> Governance < >>>>>>>>> >> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> Sheetal >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> It would be useful if you could post the zoom link and >>>>>>>>> password for this >>>>>>>>> >>> session because of the IGF website issue which makes it >>>>>>>>> difficult to find >>>>>>>>> >>> session details and zoom details. >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> Sivasubramanian M >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> >>> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 5:47 PM Sheetal Kumar via Governance < >>>>>>>>> >>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> Dear all, >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> Just a polite reminder for those interested that the >>>>>>>>> pre-event will take >>>>>>>>> >>>> place today, at 2:45 PM GMT. You'll need to add the session >>>>>>>>> to your >>>>>>>>> >>>> calendar to receive the link. >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/igf-2021-day-0-event-68-civil-society-pre-event-internet-governance-in-times-of-crisis >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> I know that there were issues earlier today with the website, >>>>>>>>> but they >>>>>>>>> >>>> seem to have been resolved now. >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> Best >>>>>>>>> >>>> Sheetal >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 14:20, Judith Hellerstein < >>>>>>>>> >>>> judith at jhellerstein.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> HI All, >>>>>>>>> >>>>> Looks great!! I will be there in person so look forward to >>>>>>>>> seeing >>>>>>>>> >>>>> others >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> Best >>>>>>>>> >>>>> Judith >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPad >>>>>>>>> >>>>> judith at jhellerstein.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>> Skype ID:JudithHellerstein >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> On Nov 30, 2021, at 5:17 AM, Sheetal Kumar via Governance < >>>>>>>>> >>>>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>  >>>>>>>>> >>>>> Thanks, Nnenna! I've added that into the 'context' at the >>>>>>>>> beginning >>>>>>>>> >>>>> (agenda item 2) and provide a bit more time for that. Will >>>>>>>>> you be able to >>>>>>>>> >>>>> attend? >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> - 1) Introductions and agenda/aims of pre-event *10-15 >>>>>>>>> minutes * >>>>>>>>> >>>>> - 2) Global Digital Compact: context (Digital >>>>>>>>> Cooperation agenda, >>>>>>>>> >>>>> UNSG Roadmap and UNSG Common Agenda, general landscape) - >>>>>>>>> >>>>> *20 minutes * >>>>>>>>> >>>>> - 3) Process/consultation/engagement with Tech Envoy's >>>>>>>>> so far and >>>>>>>>> >>>>> expected going forward *10 minutes* >>>>>>>>> >>>>> - * 5) *Break - *10 minutes * >>>>>>>>> >>>>> - 4) Depending on the above - possible discussion of key >>>>>>>>> >>>>> priorities/principles under seven proposed areas of the >>>>>>>>> Digital Compact 1) Connect >>>>>>>>> >>>>> all people to the Internet, including all schools 2) >>>>>>>>> Avoid >>>>>>>>> >>>>> Internet fragmentation 3) Protect data 4) Apply human >>>>>>>>> rights online >>>>>>>>> >>>>> 5) Introduce accountability criteria for discrimination >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> >>>>> misleading content 6) Promote regulation of artificial >>>>>>>>> intelligence >>>>>>>>> >>>>> 7) Digital commons as a global public good *30 minutes* >>>>>>>>> >>>>> - 6) Next steps *10 minutes* >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 14:13, Nnenna Nwakanma < >>>>>>>>> nnenna75 at gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Sheetal >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe worth giving some background info on Civil Society >>>>>>>>> engagement >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> with "Digital Cooperation agenda" in addition to Tech Envoy. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> The Digital Cooperation precedes the UN Tech Envoy. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> We might also want to look into global digital Cooperation >>>>>>>>> "emerging >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> issues".. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> - Tech for Democracy >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> - Freedom Online Coalition >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> - The proposed Alliance for the Future of the Internet.. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> - The proposed New IP.. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> - Etc.. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Just so folks get general info on how the landscape is >>>>>>>>> shaping up or >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> moving.. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> All for now.. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> Nnenna >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021, 09:59 Sheetal Kumar via Governance, < >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here is the proposed agenda for the pre-event. We propose >>>>>>>>> to focus it >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> on the Global Digital Compact, but if you would like to >>>>>>>>> discuss anything >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> else please do let us know! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> - 1) Introductions and agenda/aims of pre-event *10-15 >>>>>>>>> minutes * >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> - 2) Global Digital Compact: context (UNSG Roadmap and >>>>>>>>> UNSG >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Common Agenda) - *10-15 minutes * >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Guiding questions >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> - What do you think about the Compact idea? Do >>>>>>>>> you think >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> civil society should engage? How? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> - 3) Process/consultation/engagement with Tech >>>>>>>>> Envoy's so far >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> and expected going forward *10 minutes* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> - * 5) *Break - *10 minutes * >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> - 4) Depending on the above - possible discussion of >>>>>>>>> key >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> priorities/principles under seven proposed areas of >>>>>>>>> the Digital Compact 1) Connect >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> all people to the Internet, including all schools 2) >>>>>>>>> Avoid >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Internet fragmentation 3) Protect data 4) Apply human >>>>>>>>> rights >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> online 5) Introduce accountability criteria for >>>>>>>>> discrimination >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> and misleading content 6) Promote regulation of >>>>>>>>> artificial >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> intelligence 7) Digital commons as a global public >>>>>>>>> good *30 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> minutes* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> - 6) Next steps *10 minutes* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please do chime in with any inputs if you have any ahead >>>>>>>>> of the event >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> next week. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sheetal. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 11:48, Sheetal Kumar < >>>>>>>>> sheetal at gp-digital.org> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bruna and I will follow up with more information on the >>>>>>>>> agenda for >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> the CS pre-event at this year's IGF but in the >>>>>>>>> meantime,if you are >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> interested in attending, please block the time and date >>>>>>>>> below. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> IGF 2021 Day 0 Event #68 Civil Society Pre-event: Internet >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Governance in times of Crisis >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>> https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/igf-2021-day-0-event-68-civil-society-pre-event-internet-governance-in-times-of-crisis >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ballroom A | >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 14:45 GMT (6 Dec) -16:15 GMT (6 Dec) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS >>>>>>>>> DIGITAL >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 >>>>>>>>> (0)7739569514 | >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D >>>>>>>>> 173B E9E2 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS >>>>>>>>> DIGITAL >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 >>>>>>>>> (0)7739569514 | >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D >>>>>>>>> 173B E9E2 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Governance mailing list >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>>>>>>> >>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS >>>>>>>>> DIGITAL >>>>>>>>> >>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 >>>>>>>>> (0)7739569514 | >>>>>>>>> >>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B >>>>>>>>> E9E2 0603 >>>>>>>>> >>>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> >>>>> Governance mailing list >>>>>>>>> >>>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>>>>>>>> >>>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> -- >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>>>>>>> >>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS >>>>>>>>> DIGITAL >>>>>>>>> >>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 >>>>>>>>> (0)7739569514 | >>>>>>>>> >>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B >>>>>>>>> E9E2 0603 >>>>>>>>> >>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> -- >>>>>>>>> >>>> Governance mailing list >>>>>>>>> >>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>>>>>>>> >>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>> -- >>>>>>>>> >>> Governance mailing list >>>>>>>>> >>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>>>>>>>> >>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Carlos A. Afonso >>>>>>>>> [emails são pessoais exceto quando explicitamente indicado em >>>>>>>>> contrário] >>>>>>>>> [emails are personal unless explicitly indicated otherwise] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Instituto Nupef - https://nupef.org.br >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Governance mailing list >>>>>>>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>>>>>>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>>>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 >>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 >>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >>>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> -- >> >> *Sheetal Kumar* >> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >> >> >> >> -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > -- *Sheetal Kumar* Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sheetal at gp-digital.org Tue Dec 7 06:35:09 2021 From: sheetal at gp-digital.org (Sheetal Kumar) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 15:35:09 +0400 Subject: [Governance] NOTICE: CSCG nomination process for IGF Leadership Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear all, (cc'ing Bruna, consulted) As the Leadership Panel nominations deadline has ended, I wanted to provide a sense of where we are in the discussion and a possible way forward. I recommend *that we jointly monitor the Leadership Panel according to the criteria outlined in joint letters so far* (accountable, transparent, inclusive, participatory and effective) and commit to having a healthy debate in a few months time about whether the criteria are being met, and to withdrawing our support or taking other action if that is not the case. * Having read the various statements and views that have been shared, it seems there this is an overall commitment to the IGF and to strengthening it. However, there are different views as to what 'strengthening' it means, and disagreement as to whether the LP will strengthen the IGF, or in fact undermine its bottom-up and inclusive mission. More specifically, it seems there are two overall views: - 1) Those that believe that the LP undermines the IGF, its bottom-up nature and will enforce corporate capture. For this reason, they do not want to try it. - 2) Those that have those concerns but are willing to 'give it a go' because of the potential (whether high or minimal) for it not to do the above, and strengthen the IGF in a way that will be beneficial to civil society and the constituencies we serve. This may include those who want to provide nominations because they are concerned that the civil society positions will not be occupied by those who would serve the public interest. It was pointed out that this joint letter was against the Leadership Panel perhaps because it states *"It is our view that no separate new structure should be created outside of the IGF architecture that determines or shapes the IGF, its processes and procedures. Any body created should be structured as peer and complementary to the MAG and should not take decisions on behalf of the IGF community."* It is possible to interpret the Leadership Panel as peer and complementary to the MAG. I know not everyone interprets it this way, but it is possible. I understand that the second view may be considered naive by some, even disingenuous by others, but it is a view that is held and it has been put on the record by some so far who have explained their position to provide nominations, without endorsing the mechanism. The scepticism is fully understood and the concern that the Panel will not work out as stated, and will do a disservice, is also understood, it seems to me by all. Among all the disagreement, there is something that unites us. Generally, from what I can gather, we want the IGF to not only be preserved but to be strengthened. Even among those who are concerned about the Leadership Panel making the IGF 'top-down' and changing it fundamentally. Therefore, as noted above, I suggest that whether we boycott the Panel or not, that we be committed to monitoring the Leadership Panel, including as Farzaneh suggested on another thread, by promoting information sharing and transparency from the civil society representatives to the wider civil society community. We can also commit to having a healthy debate in a few months time about whether the criteria that have been set by various groups and networks so far 'open, transparent, inclusive, participatory, effective' criteria are being met, we can commit to withdrawing our support or taking other action if that is not the case. This would require a strong level of trust and honesty, including among the civil society reps who are successful in their application. It helps, I believe, that so many have put their views and reservations on the record. It might be risky. But I would suggest it might at least lead to less of a fracturing and the potential to work together on whatever issues we commonly agree on in the future. Best Sheetal. **Joint letters/statements - *(please add if I've missed any) - Internet Technical Collaboration Group (sent via a thread) - JNC and IGC (sent via a thread) - APC - Email from ISOC CEO (sent via a thread) -- *Sheetal Kumar* Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 at 17:30, Suresh Ramasubramanian via Governance < governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > I find myself wondering whether it actually is a mistake rather than a > particular choice of wording. What motivated that choice of words is an > interesting question. > > --srs > ------------------------------ > *From:* Deirdre Williams > *Sent:* Sunday, November 28, 2021 6:42:56 PM > *To:* Suresh Ramasubramanian > *Cc:* parminder ; governance at lists.igcaucus.org > > *Subject:* Re: [Governance] NOTICE: CSCG nomination process for IGF > Leadership Panel > > It seems to me that Suresh and Parminder have hit the nail on the head > together. > The semantics and semiotics of the English language (and I expect of > others as well) have been rudely interfered with in this new digital world. > Computer programs reject shades of meaning. But those shades still exist > inside people's understanding. > To call something a "Leadership" panel in a world where hierarchies are > supposed to have been broken down, where the process purports to be flat > and inclusive, is surely a mistake? > Stay safe > Deirdre > > On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 at 07:31, Suresh Ramasubramanian via Governance < > governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > > People who sit on committees appointed by the Indian government calling > others “leadership class”? > > Global south buzzwords fit some people Parminder but you least of all > > > --srs > ------------------------------ > *From:* Governance on behalf of > parminder via Governance > *Sent:* Sunday, November 28, 2021 3:26:40 PM > *To:* governance at lists.igcaucus.org > *Subject:* Re: [Governance] NOTICE: CSCG nomination process for IGF > Leadership Panel > > > Dear Nnenna and Jovan, and indeed, Wolfgang, > > I know things may look different to leadership class people like you :) > > But the view from the streets is quite a bit different. > > My best wishes in any case, parmidner > > > On 26/11/21 7:22 pm, Nnenna Nwakanma via Governance wrote: > > Thanks, Jovan, for this apt articulation. > > You represent my thoughts > > Best > > Nnenna > > On Fri, 26 Nov 2021, 13:36 Jovan Kurbalija via Governance, < > governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > > Dear colleagues, > > This discussion is important not only for IGF Leadership Panel, but for > the future of the IGF as a whole. Civil society and other non-state > actors should be particularly concerned about the future of IGF as it is a > rare space in which we can all participate equally. > For almost ten years, reform of the IGF has been in the works in various > iterations. It is not new. > > The Leadership Panel should be seen as part of a broader attempts to > reform IGF. > > > I think that the Leadership Panel is a timely and relevant steps in the > right direction of strengthening the IGF. > > However, these steps should be taken with necessary caution as outlined in > the following text: > https://www.diplomacy.edu/blog/5-reasons-and-5-concerns-for-the-igf-leadership-panel/ > > > > - 5 REASONS for the IGF Leadership Panel > > - 1. Policy footprint: increasing the relevance of IGF as a space > to address digital policy > > - 2. Louder voices: amplify IGF messages and expertise > > - 3. Policy conveyor belt: linking the IGF to other policy spaces > > - 4. Genuine inclusion: from nominal to substantive participation > > - 5. Policy efficiency: reducing forum shopping > > - > - 5 CONCERNS for the IGF Leadership Panel > > - 1. The Leadership Panel is only one aspect of IGF Plus > > - 2. IGF and Digital Compact > > - 3. Preserving IGF as a space for vibrant discussions > > - 4. Avoid capturing by vested interest > > - 5. Solve terminological confusion > > - > - In sum…. > > > > Best regards, > > Jovan > > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 10:52 AM Sheetal Kumar via Governance < > governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > > Dear all, > > We did not receive a requisite number of eligible nominations for this > process launched last week. We are therefore unable to proceed with the > nomination process for the Leadership Panel as CSCG. > > While this does not constitute a boycott, we understand that the level of > doubt and concerns around the Leadership Panel may indicate that there > isn't the support required. > > We will continue to follow the process and to demand the transparency and > diversity required in all areas of the IGF, and to work towards > strengthening it in the coming years with the view to realising the true > spirit of the IGF's multistakeholder mission. More on our previous/relevant > position here: > https://www.apc.org/en/pubs/open-letter-interpretation-paragraph-93a-un-secretary-generals-roadmap-digital-cooperation. > There we say "Multistakeholderism, diversity and inclusion should guide any > new structure, building on the IGF legacy thus far and be the basis for > putting the structure in function of shaping the global internet governance > agenda in a way that effectively addresses the persistent, exacerbated and > new challenges derived from the pandemic situation, including the > increasing power of some parts of the industry, in particular the large > technology companies, and the lack of voices from more vulnerable and > marginalised groups." > > We do not want this to be seen as discouragement to anyone planning to > nominate themselves. However, as a network, it is clear that we don't have > the support or interest to continue with this specific nomination process. > > Best > Sheetal and Bruna > > On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 at 16:25, Sheetal Kumar > wrote: > > Dear all, > > This is a polite reminder to share your nominations to the CSCG for the > IGF's leadership panel, as per the process outlined below. We request this > is done by *COB November 22 *so that we are able to submit by the > deadline of > *November 29. * > > > We look forward to receiving your nomination/s. > Best > Sheetal > > > > > > On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 13:51, Sheetal Kumar > wrote: > > Dear all, > > As you may have seen, the IGF Secretariat has launched the nomination > process at the request of the Executive Office of the United Nations > Secretary-General for the *inaugural Leadership Panel of the 2022 and > 2023 Internet Governance Forum (IGF) cycles* > . > > > > > Following several rounds of open consultations, the Leadership Panel is a > response to the Secretary-General’s Roadmap for Digital Cooperation > , which calls for strengthening of the IGF > through, among other aspects, *’’creating a strategic and empowered > multi-stakeholder high-level body, building on the experience of the > existing multi-stakeholder advisory group, which would address urgent > issues, coordinate follow-up action on Forum discussions and relay proposed > policy approaches and recommendations from the Forum to the appropriate > normative and decision-making forums*.’’ > > > CSCG, and for this process, this includes APC and IGC, will run a > nomination process to identify nominees for the two categories: > > - Two [2] at-large members (distinguished or prominent persons who do > not fall under above stakeholder groups) and > - Two [2] CEO-level (or deputy-level) representatives from each of the > other three stakeholder groups (civil society) > > Please note, this does not mean we endorse the process or the mechanism > itself. We will send a letter with the nominations that clearly reiterates > our previous publicly stated positions (such as this Open letter on the > interpretation of paragraph 93(a) of the UNSG's Roadmap on Digital > Cooperation > > and this on the future of the IGF > on > the Leadership Panel/Higher-level MAG > ), > including the importance of maintaining the MAG's current role and not > supplanting it, the importance of diversity and inclusion, transparency etc > and make clear that our submission of nominees should not be read as > endorsement. > > > We intend that our nominations reflect the above criteria. Please note > that to receive a CSCG nomination for the IGF leadership panel you'll need > to send us (me and Valeria and Bruna cc'd) the information required on the online > form > . > We request this is done by *COB November 22 *so that we are able to > submit by the deadline of > *November 29. * > > > We look forward to receiving your nomination/s. > Best > Sheetal > > > -- > > *Sheetal Kumar* > Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | > PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 > DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > > > > > > -- > > *Sheetal Kumar* > Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | > PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 > DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > > > > > > -- > > *Sheetal Kumar* > Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | > PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 > DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > > > > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > > > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > > > > -- > “The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge" Sir William > Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979 > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > -- *Sheetal Kumar* Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ayden at ferdeline.com Wed Dec 8 05:49:25 2021 From: ayden at ferdeline.com (=?utf-8?Q?Ayden_F=C3=A9rdeline?=) Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2021 10:49:25 +0000 Subject: [Governance] NOTICE: CSCG nomination process for IGF Leadership Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear Sheetal, Bruna- Thank you for this update and for taking the time to capture the full range of sentiments expressed on this list. I support your proposed way forward. Thanks again. Best wishes, Ayden Férdeline ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Tuesday, December 7th, 2021 at 12:35, Sheetal Kumar via Governance wrote: > Dear all, > > (cc'ing Bruna, consulted) As the Leadership Panel nominations deadline has ended, I wanted to provide a sense of where we are in the discussion and a possible way forward. I recommend that we jointly monitor the Leadership Panel according to the criteria outlined in joint letters so far* (accountable, transparent, inclusive, participatory and effective) and commit to having a healthy debate in a few months time about whether the criteria are being met, and to withdrawing our support or taking other action if that is not the case. > > Having read the various statements and views that have been shared, it seems there this is an overall commitment to the IGF and to strengthening it. However, there are different views as to what 'strengthening' it means, and disagreement as to whether the LP will strengthen the IGF, or in fact undermine its bottom-up and inclusive mission. More specifically, it seems there are two overall views: > > - 1) Those that believe that the LP undermines the IGF, its bottom-up nature and will enforce corporate capture. For this reason, they do not want to try it. > - 2) Those that have those concerns but are willing to 'give it a go' because of the potential (whether high or minimal) for it not to do the above, and strengthen the IGF in a way that will be beneficial to civil society and the constituencies we serve. This may include those who want to provide nominations because they are concerned that the civil society positions will not be occupied by those who would serve the public interest. > > It was pointed out that this joint letter was against the Leadership Panel perhaps because it states "It is our view that no separate new structure should be created outside of the IGF architecture that determines or shapes the IGF, its processes and procedures. Any body created should be structured as peer and complementary to the MAG and should not take decisions on behalf of the IGF community." It is possible to interpret the Leadership Panel as peer and complementary to the MAG. I know not everyone interprets it this way, but it is possible. > > I understand that the second view may be considered naive by some, even disingenuous by others, but it is a view that is held and it has been put on the record by some so far who have explained their position to provide nominations, without endorsing the mechanism. The scepticism is fully understood and the concern that the Panel will not work out as stated, and will do a disservice, is also understood, it seems to me by all. > > Among all the disagreement, there is something that unites us. Generally, from what I can gather, we want the IGF to not only be preserved but to be strengthened. Even among those who are concerned about the Leadership Panel making the IGF 'top-down' and changing it fundamentally. > > Therefore, as noted above, I suggest that whether we boycott the Panel or not, that we be committed to monitoring the Leadership Panel, including as Farzaneh suggested on another thread, by promoting information sharing and transparency from the civil society representatives to the wider civil society community. We can also commit to having a healthy debate in a few months time about whether the criteria that have been set by various groups and networks so far 'open, transparent, inclusive, participatory, effective' criteria are being met, we can commit to withdrawing our support or taking other action if that is not the case. This would require a strong level of trust and honesty, including among the civil society reps who are successful in their application. It helps, I believe, that so many have put their views and reservations on the record. It might be risky. But I would suggest it might at least lead to less of a fracturing and the potential to work together on whatever issues we commonly agree on in the future. > > Best > Sheetal. > > *Joint letters/statements - (please add if I've missed any) > > - Internet Technical Collaboration Group (sent via a thread) > - JNC and IGC (sent via a thread) > - [APC](https://www.apc.org/en/pubs/association-progressive-communications-remains-committed-strengthening-internet-governance) > - Email from ISOC CEO (sent via a thread) > > -- > > Sheetal Kumar > Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | > PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > > On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 at 17:30, Suresh Ramasubramanian via Governance wrote: > >> I find myself wondering whether it actually is a mistake rather than a particular choice of wording. What motivated that choice of words is an interesting question. >> >> --srs >> --------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> From: Deirdre Williams >> Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2021 6:42:56 PM >> To: Suresh Ramasubramanian >> Cc: parminder ; governance at lists.igcaucus.org >> Subject: Re: [Governance] NOTICE: CSCG nomination process for IGF Leadership Panel >> >> It seems to me that Suresh and Parminder have hit the nail on the head together. >> The semantics and semiotics of the English language (and I expect of others as well) have been rudely interfered with in this new digital world. Computer programs reject shades of meaning. But those shades still exist inside people's understanding. >> To call something a "Leadership" panel in a world where hierarchies are supposed to have been broken down, where the process purports to be flat and inclusive, is surely a mistake? >> Stay safe >> Deirdre >> >> On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 at 07:31, Suresh Ramasubramanian via Governance wrote: >> >>> People who sit on committees appointed by the Indian government calling others “leadership class”? >>> >>> Global south buzzwords fit some people Parminder but you least of all >>> >>> --srs >>> --------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> From: Governance on behalf of parminder via Governance >>> Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2021 3:26:40 PM >>> To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>> Subject: Re: [Governance] NOTICE: CSCG nomination process for IGF Leadership Panel >>> >>> Dear Nnenna and Jovan, and indeed, Wolfgang, >>> >>> I know things may look different to leadership class people like you :) >>> >>> But the view from the streets is quite a bit different. >>> >>> My best wishes in any case, parmidner >>> >>> On 26/11/21 7:22 pm, Nnenna Nwakanma via Governance wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks, Jovan, for this apt articulation. >>>> >>>> You represent my thoughts >>>> >>>> Best >>>> >>>> Nnenna >>>> >>>> On Fri, 26 Nov 2021, 13:36 Jovan Kurbalija via Governance, wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear colleagues, >>>>> >>>>> This discussion is important not only for IGF Leadership Panel, but for the future of the IGF as a whole. Civil society and other non-state actors should be particularly concerned about the future of IGF as it is a rare space in which we can all participate equally. >>>>> >>>>> For almost ten years, reform of the IGF has been in the works in various iterations.It is not new. >>>>> >>>>> The Leadership Panel should be seen as part of a broader attempts to reform IGF. >>>>> >>>>> I think that the Leadership Panel is a timely and relevant steps in the right direction of strengthening the IGF. >>>>> >>>>> However, these steps should be taken with necessary caution as outlined in the following text: https://www.diplomacy.edu/blog/5-reasons-and-5-concerns-for-the-igf-leadership-panel/ >>>>> >>>>> - [5 REASONS for the IGF Leadership Panel](https://www.diplomacy.edu/blog/5-reasons-and-5-concerns-for-the-igf-leadership-panel/#5_REASONS_for_the_IGF_Leadership_Panel) >>>>> >>>>> - [1. Policy footprint: increasing the relevance of IGF as a space to address digital policy](https://www.diplomacy.edu/blog/5-reasons-and-5-concerns-for-the-igf-leadership-panel/#1_Policy_footprint_increasing_the_relevance_of_IGF_as_a_space_to_address_digital_policy) >>>>> - [2. Louder voices: amplify IGF messages and expertise](https://www.diplomacy.edu/blog/5-reasons-and-5-concerns-for-the-igf-leadership-panel/#2_Louder_voices_amplify_IGF_messages_and_expertise) >>>>> - [3. Policy conveyor belt: linking the IGF to other policy spaces](https://www.diplomacy.edu/blog/5-reasons-and-5-concerns-for-the-igf-leadership-panel/#3_Policy_conveyor_belt_linking_the_IGF_to_other_policy_spaces) >>>>> - [4. Genuine inclusion: from nominal to substantive participation](https://www.diplomacy.edu/blog/5-reasons-and-5-concerns-for-the-igf-leadership-panel/#4_Genuine_inclusion_from_nominal_to_substantive_participation) >>>>> - [5. Policy efficiency: reducing forum shopping](https://www.diplomacy.edu/blog/5-reasons-and-5-concerns-for-the-igf-leadership-panel/#5_Policy_efficiency_reducing_forum_shopping) >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> - [5 CONCERNS for the IGF Leadership Panel](https://www.diplomacy.edu/blog/5-reasons-and-5-concerns-for-the-igf-leadership-panel/#5_CONCERNS_for_the_IGF_Leadership_Panel) >>>>> >>>>> - [1. The Leadership Panel is only one aspect of IGF Plus](https://www.diplomacy.edu/blog/5-reasons-and-5-concerns-for-the-igf-leadership-panel/#1_The_Leadership_Panel_is_only_one_aspect_of_IGF_Plus) >>>>> - [2. IGF and Digital Compact](https://www.diplomacy.edu/blog/5-reasons-and-5-concerns-for-the-igf-leadership-panel/#2_IGF_and_Digital_Compact) >>>>> - [3. Preserving IGF as a space for vibrant discussions](https://www.diplomacy.edu/blog/5-reasons-and-5-concerns-for-the-igf-leadership-panel/#3_Preserving_IGF_as_a_space_for_vibrant_discussions) >>>>> - [4. Avoid capturing by vested interest](https://www.diplomacy.edu/blog/5-reasons-and-5-concerns-for-the-igf-leadership-panel/#4_Avoid_capturing_by_vested_interest) >>>>> - [5. Solve terminological confusion](https://www.diplomacy.edu/blog/5-reasons-and-5-concerns-for-the-igf-leadership-panel/#5_Solve_terminological_confusion) >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> - [In sum….](https://www.diplomacy.edu/blog/5-reasons-and-5-concerns-for-the-igf-leadership-panel/#In_sum%E2%80%A6) >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>>> Jovan >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 10:52 AM Sheetal Kumar via Governance wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>> >>>>>> We did not receive a requisite number of eligible nominations for this process launched last week. We are therefore unable to proceed with the nomination process for the Leadership Panel as CSCG. >>>>>> >>>>>> While this does not constitute a boycott, we understand that the level of doubt and concerns around the Leadership Panel may indicate that there isn't the support required. >>>>>> >>>>>> We will continue to follow the process and to demand the transparency and diversity required in all areas of the IGF, and to work towards strengthening it in the coming years with the view to realising the true spirit of the IGF's multistakeholder mission. More on our previous/relevant position here: https://www.apc.org/en/pubs/open-letter-interpretation-paragraph-93a-un-secretary-generals-roadmap-digital-cooperation. There we say "Multistakeholderism, diversity and inclusion should guide any new structure, building on the IGF legacy thus far and be the basis for putting the structure in function of shaping the global internet governance agenda in a way that effectively addresses the persistent, exacerbated and new challenges derived from the pandemic situation, including the increasing power of some parts of the industry, in particular the large technology companies, and the lack of voices from more vulnerable and marginalised groups." >>>>>> >>>>>> We do not want this to be seen as discouragement to anyone planning to nominate themselves. However, as a network, it is clear that we don't have the support or interest to continue with this specific nomination process. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best >>>>>> Sheetal and Bruna >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 at 16:25, Sheetal Kumar wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is a polite reminder to share your nominations to the CSCG for the IGF's leadership panel, as per the process outlined below. We request this is done by COB November 22 so that we are able to submit by the deadline of November 29. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We look forward to receiving your nomination/s. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best Sheetal >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 13:51, Sheetal Kumar wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As you may have seen, the IGF Secretariat has launched the nomination process at the request of the Executive Office of the United Nations Secretary-General for the [inaugural Leadership Panel of the 2022 and 2023 Internet Governance Forum (IGF) cycles](https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/internet-governance-forum-leadership-panel-call-for-nominations). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Following several rounds of open consultations, the Leadership Panel is a response to the Secretary-General’s [Roadmap for Digital Cooperation](https://undocs.org/A/74/821), which calls for strengthening of the IGF through, among other aspects, ’’creating a strategic and empowered multi-stakeholder high-level body, building on the experience of the existing multi-stakeholder advisory group, which would address urgent issues, coordinate follow-up action on Forum discussions and relay proposed policy approaches and recommendations from the Forum to the appropriate normative and decision-making forums.’’ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> CSCG, and for this process, this includes APC and IGC, will run a nomination process to identify nominees for the two categories: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Two [2] at-large members (distinguished or prominent persons who do not fall under above stakeholder groups) and >>>>>>>> - Two [2] CEO-level (or deputy-level) representatives from each of the other three stakeholder groups (civil society) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please note, this does not mean we endorse the process or the mechanism itself. We will send a letter with the nominations that clearly reiterates our previous publicly stated positions (such as this [Open letter on the interpretation of paragraph 93(a) of the UNSG's Roadmap on Digital Cooperation](https://www.apc.org/en/pubs/open-letter-interpretation-paragraph-93a-un-secretary-generals-roadmap-digital-cooperation) and this on the [future of the IGF](https://www.apc.org/en/pubs/why-inclusive-transparent-and-accessible-global-digital-governance-more-crucial-ever)[on the Leadership Panel/Higher-level MAG](https://www.apc.org/en/pubs/why-inclusive-transparent-and-accessible-global-digital-governance-more-crucial-ever)), including the importance of maintaining the MAG's current role and not supplanting it, the importance of diversity and inclusion, transparency etc and make clear that our submission of nominees should not be read as endorsement. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We intend that our nominations reflect the above criteria. Please note that to receive a CSCG nomination for the IGF leadership panel you'll need to send us (me and Valeria and Bruna cc'd) the information required on the [online form](https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/leadership-panel-nomination-2022). We request this is done by COB November 22 so that we are able to submit by the deadline of November 29. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We look forward to receiving your nomination/s. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best >>>>>>>> Sheetal >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sheetal Kumar >>>>>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sheetal Kumar >>>>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> Sheetal Kumar >>>>>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Governance mailing list >>>>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>>>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Governance mailing list >>>>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>>>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>> >>> -- >>> Governance mailing list >>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >> >> -- >> >> “The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge" Sir William Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979 >> -- >> Governance mailing list >> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > > -- > > Sheetal Kumar > Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | > PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From amritachoudhury8 at gmail.com Thu Dec 9 00:13:29 2021 From: amritachoudhury8 at gmail.com (Amrita Choudhury) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 10:43:29 +0530 Subject: [Governance] Invitation to the IGF BPF Gender and Digital 2021: 'Open Interactive Roundtable Discussion exploring Gendered Disinformation' 9 December 9:30 CET to 8:30 UTC Message-ID: <00bc01d7ecbb$82549620$86fdc260$@gmail.com> Hi Everyone, You are invited to the “'Open Interactive Roundtable Discussion exploring Gendered Disinformation'” organised by the BPF Gender and Access on 9 December 9:30 CET to 8:30 UTC. Kindly register to attend the session and share your views. You will find more details of the session in this link: https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/igf-2021-main-session-bpf-gender-and-digital-rights The draft output report on gendered disinformation is now available on the BPF webpage: https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/bpf-gender-and-digital-rights . Comments and feedback on the report are welcome on gender at intgovforum.org and you can also share the same during the round table Regards, Amrita -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From capdasiege at gmail.com Thu Dec 9 02:37:45 2021 From: capdasiege at gmail.com (Capda Capda) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 08:37:45 +0100 Subject: [Governance] =?utf-8?q?Invitation=3A_IGF_2021_WS=23246_Construct?= =?utf-8?q?ion_of_an_institutional_digital_infrastructure_//_Invita?= =?utf-8?q?ion=3A_FGI_2021_WS=23246_Construction_d=27une_infrastruc?= =?utf-8?q?ture_Num=C3=A9rique_institutionnelle?= Message-ID: English | French *[You Are Invited]* Dear colleagues and members of IGF community, We hope my email finds you well. We are writing to you in relation to IGF 2021 and are inviting you on the 9 th December at 8:30am - 10:00am UTC (9:30am - 11:00am Yaoundé time) to the session organized by IGF Cameroon on the theme "Construction of an institutional digital infrastructure". Date: 9/12/2021 8:30 - 10:00 (UTC), 9:30 - 11h:00 (Yaoundé time) Session:* IGF 2021 WS #246 Construction of an institutional digital infrastructure* Venue: Online and in Katowice in Multifunctional Conference Room 3 Zoom link (Registration): https://intgovforum.zoom.us/j/81293507990 You can find more information about the session in the following link: https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/igf-2021-ws-246-construction-of-an-institutional-digital-infrastructure The session will be both in English and in French. We would like both to invite you to follow the session, and to ask you if you could promote it in your channels. We will really appreciate it. Thank you very much in advance. ------------------------------------------------------ *[Vous êtes invité]* Cher(e)s Collègues et membre de la communauté, Nous espérons que cet email vous trouvera en bonne santé. Nous vous écrivons dans le cadre de l'IGF 2021 et vous invitons le 9 décembre à 8h30 - 10h00 UTC (9h30 - 11h00 heure de Yaoundé) à prendre part à la session organisée par l'IGF Cameroun sur le thème « Construction d'une infrastructure numérique institutionnelle ». Date: 9/12/2021 8:30 - 10:00 (UTC), 9:30 - 11h:00 (Heure de Yaoundé) Session:* IGF 2021 WS #246 Construction d'une Infrastructure Numérique institutionnelle* Lieu: En ligne et à Katowice salle de Conférence N0 3 Zoom link (Enregistrement): https://intgovforum.zoom.us/j/81293507990 Plus d'information sur la session: https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/igf-2021-ws-246-construction-of-an-institutional-digital-infrastructure La session sera bilingue (Anglais et Français). Nous aimerions vous inviter à suivre la session et vous demander si vous pouvez en faire la promotion dans vos réseaux. Nous l'apprécions grandement. *Michel TCHONANG LINZE* *Coordinateur Général* *Secrétaire Exécutif // Executive Secretary * Forum National sur la Gouvernance de l'Internet - Cameroun // National Internet Governance Forum - Cameroon *ÉVÉNEMENTS** SUR LES TIC * - *AfIGF du 14 au 16 decembre 2021 Nigeria* - *Conférence mondiale de développement des télécommunications (CMDT-21) Addis-Abeba (Éthiopie), 06 au 15 juin 2022.* - *16ème FGI se tiendra en Pologne à Katowice du 06 au 10 décembre 2021* *C**APDA (Consortium d'Appui aux Actions pour la Promotion et le Développement de l'Afrique)* *BP : 15 151 DOUALA - CAMEROUN Tél. : (237) 67775-39-63 / 24212-9493 Email : capdasiege at gmail.com Site : www.capda.cm * -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From joly at punkcast.com Thu Dec 9 04:37:53 2021 From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 04:37:53 -0500 Subject: [Governance] =?utf-8?q?WEBCAST_TODAY=3A_The_Internet_Growth_Proj?= =?utf-8?q?ect_Teams_=E2=80=93_Jane_Coffin_-_ISOC_Philippines_?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=80=93_Women_in_Networking?= Message-ID: As you may or may not have heard, Jane Coffin has recently departed her post at ISOC for fresh pastures. Thus this is an opportune session to catch up with her thoughts on what she, and the Internet Growth team, have achieved, and the path forward. ISOC Live posted: "On Thursday 9 December 2021 at 6pm PHT (10:00 UTC) the Internet Society Philippines Chapter, in partnership with IEEE Women in Engineering Philippines Chapter, and IEEE Republic of the Philippines Section, presents the ultimate episode in their Women in N" [image: livestream] On *Thursday 9 December 2021* at *6pm PHT* (10:00 UTC) the* Internet Society Philippines Chapter *, in partnership with *IEEE Women in Engineering Philippines Chapter *, and *IEEE Republic of the Philippines Section *, presents the ultimate episode in their *Women in Networking Series (*WINS). *Jane Coffin*, former Senior Vice President of the Internet Society for Internet Growth, talks about her experiences working towards closing the digital divide through Community Networks and Internet Exchange Points (IXPs), fostering infrastructure and community development, and measuring the health of the Internet. Jane will provide a retrospective on the *Internet Growth Project Teams *, her various experiences with people around the world and how they worked on closing the digital divide. WINS is co-organized by *PCARI PRIME * and *PHNOG *. *SPEAKER* *Jane Coffin,* former Senior Vice President for Internet Growth, Internet Society *HOST* *Engr. Isabel Montes-Austria*, President, ISOC Philippines Chapter *LIVESTREAM http://livestream.com/internetsociety/ph-wins * *PARTICIPATE VIA ZOOM https://bit.ly/3dzfJSV * *REAL TIME TEXT https://bit.ly/3rMQUuX * *TWITTER #Philippines #womeninnetworking @isocph @jane_coffin @Internet Society #PhNOG @IEEEWIE @PCARIPRIME @ISOCapac* *#communitynetworks #ixps #growinternet* *SIMULCASTS* *https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/ * *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive * *https://www.facebook.com/liveisoc/* (AI Captions) *https://www.facebook.com/isocasiapacific/ * (AI Captions) *https://www.facebook.com/isoc.ph * (AI Captions) *ARCHIVE* *https://archive.org/details/ph-wins * *Permalink* https://isoc.live/14853/ -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -------------------------------------- - -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From milton at gatech.edu Thu Dec 9 07:59:20 2021 From: milton at gatech.edu (Mueller, Milton L) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 12:59:20 +0000 Subject: [Governance] Multistakeholderism and Content Moderation Message-ID: Colleagues: The term "multistakeholder" (MS) is now claimed as a legitimizing feature of various international, Internet-related policy development entities. While in many ways the advance of MS governance is a good thing, it also means that the term can be applied loosely or even deceptively. We need to ask what multistakeholderism really means in a particular policy environment, and we need to assess critically how organizations that adopt the label are set up. In our upcoming IGF workshop (Friday at 11:15 CET, 10:15 UTC) we showcase a set of criteria for analyzing and contrasting multistakeholder initiatives. We will then apply those criteria to 3 recent initiatives related to content governance: the Christchurch Call and its Advisory Network, the Facebook Oversight Board, and the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism (GIFCT). We will have representatives of all three initiatives on the panel as well as civil society advocates. The link to the panel is here: https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/igf-2021-ws-57-multistakeholder-initiatives-in-content-governance Format: 1. Farzaneh Badiei: Moderator and Introduction 2. Milton Mueller - Presentation of Multistakeholder Governance Criteria 3. Discuss specific initiatives: - Ellen Strickland, NZ Government, CC Call and CCAN - Erin Saltman (GIFCT) - Rachel Wolbers (Facebook Oversight Board) 4. Dia Kayali and Courtney Radsch, commentary 5. Audience Q&A Please join us tomorrow, we look forward to your participation in the workshop. Regards, Dr. Milton L Mueller Georgia Institute of Technology School of Public Policy [IGP_logo_gold block] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.png Type: image/png Size: 17987 bytes Desc: image003.png URL: From sheetal at gp-digital.org Fri Dec 10 03:26:23 2021 From: sheetal at gp-digital.org (Sheetal Kumar) Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 12:26:23 +0400 Subject: [Governance] NOTICE: CSCG nomination process for IGF Leadership Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thank you, Ayden! On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 at 14:49, Ayden Férdeline wrote: > Dear Sheetal, Bruna- > > Thank you for this update and for taking the time to capture the full > range of sentiments expressed on this list. I support your proposed way > forward. Thanks again. > > Best wishes, > > Ayden Férdeline > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > On Tuesday, December 7th, 2021 at 12:35, Sheetal Kumar via Governance < > governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > > Dear all, > > (cc'ing Bruna, consulted) As the Leadership Panel nominations deadline has > ended, I wanted to provide a sense of where we are in the discussion and a > possible way forward. I recommend *that we jointly monitor the Leadership > Panel according to the criteria outlined in joint letters so far* > (accountable, transparent, inclusive, participatory and effective) and > commit to having a healthy debate in a few months time about whether the > criteria are being met, and to withdrawing our support or taking other > action if that is not the case. * > > Having read the various statements and views that have been shared, it > seems there this is an overall commitment to the IGF and to strengthening > it. However, there are different views as to what 'strengthening' it means, > and disagreement as to whether the LP will strengthen the IGF, or in fact > undermine its bottom-up and inclusive mission. More specifically, it seems > there are two overall views: > > - 1) Those that believe that the LP undermines the IGF, its bottom-up > nature and will enforce corporate capture. For this reason, they do not > want to try it. > - 2) Those that have those concerns but are willing to 'give it a go' > because of the potential (whether high or minimal) for it not to do the > above, and strengthen the IGF in a way that will be beneficial to civil > society and the constituencies we serve. This may include those who want to > provide nominations because they are concerned that the civil society > positions will not be occupied by those who would serve the public interest. > > It was pointed out that this joint letter was against the Leadership Panel > perhaps because it states *"It is our view that no separate new structure > should be created outside of the IGF architecture that determines or shapes > the IGF, its processes and procedures. Any body created should be > structured as peer and complementary to the MAG and should not take > decisions on behalf of the IGF community."* It is possible to interpret > the Leadership Panel as peer and complementary to the MAG. I know not > everyone interprets it this way, but it is possible. > > I understand that the second view may be considered naive by some, even > disingenuous by others, but it is a view that is held and it has been put > on the record by some so far who have explained their position to provide > nominations, without endorsing the mechanism. The scepticism is fully > understood and the concern that the Panel will not work out as stated, and > will do a disservice, is also understood, it seems to me by all. > > Among all the disagreement, there is something that unites us. Generally, > from what I can gather, we want the IGF to not only be preserved but to be > strengthened. Even among those who are concerned about the Leadership Panel > making the IGF 'top-down' and changing it fundamentally. > > Therefore, as noted above, I suggest that whether we boycott the Panel or > not, that we be committed to monitoring the Leadership Panel, including as > Farzaneh suggested on another thread, by promoting information sharing and > transparency from the civil society representatives to the wider civil > society community. We can also commit to having a healthy debate in a few > months time about whether the criteria that have been set by various groups > and networks so far 'open, transparent, inclusive, participatory, > effective' criteria are being met, we can commit to withdrawing our support > or taking other action if that is not the case. This would require a strong > level of trust and honesty, including among the civil society reps who are > successful in their application. It helps, I believe, that so many have put > their views and reservations on the record. It might be risky. But I would > suggest it might at least lead to less of a fracturing and the potential to > work together on whatever issues we commonly agree on in the future. > > Best > Sheetal. > > **Joint letters/statements - *(please add if I've missed any) > > - Internet Technical Collaboration Group (sent via a thread) > - JNC and IGC (sent via a thread) > - APC > > - Email from ISOC CEO (sent via a thread) > > -- > > *Sheetal Kumar* > Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | > PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 DD7F > E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > > > > > On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 at 17:30, Suresh Ramasubramanian via Governance < > governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > >> I find myself wondering whether it actually is a mistake rather than a >> particular choice of wording. What motivated that choice of words is an >> interesting question. >> >> --srs >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Deirdre Williams >> *Sent:* Sunday, November 28, 2021 6:42:56 PM >> *To:* Suresh Ramasubramanian >> *Cc:* parminder ; >> governance at lists.igcaucus.org >> *Subject:* Re: [Governance] NOTICE: CSCG nomination process for IGF >> Leadership Panel >> It seems to me that Suresh and Parminder have hit the nail on the head >> together. >> The semantics and semiotics of the English language (and I expect of >> others as well) have been rudely interfered with in this new digital world. >> Computer programs reject shades of meaning. But those shades still exist >> inside people's understanding. >> To call something a "Leadership" panel in a world where hierarchies are >> supposed to have been broken down, where the process purports to be flat >> and inclusive, is surely a mistake? >> Stay safe >> Deirdre >> >> On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 at 07:31, Suresh Ramasubramanian via Governance < >> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >> >> People who sit on committees appointed by the Indian government calling >> others “leadership class”? >> >> Global south buzzwords fit some people Parminder but you least of all >> >> >> --srs >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Governance on behalf of >> parminder via Governance >> *Sent:* Sunday, November 28, 2021 3:26:40 PM >> *To:* governance at lists.igcaucus.org >> *Subject:* Re: [Governance] NOTICE: CSCG nomination process for IGF >> Leadership Panel >> >> Dear Nnenna and Jovan, and indeed, Wolfgang, >> >> I know things may look different to leadership class people like you :) >> >> But the view from the streets is quite a bit different. >> >> My best wishes in any case, parmidner >> >> >> On 26/11/21 7:22 pm, Nnenna Nwakanma via Governance wrote: >> >> Thanks, Jovan, for this apt articulation. >> >> You represent my thoughts >> >> Best >> >> Nnenna >> >> On Fri, 26 Nov 2021, 13:36 Jovan Kurbalija via Governance, < >> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >> >> Dear colleagues, >> >> This discussion is important not only for IGF Leadership Panel, but for >> the future of the IGF as a whole. Civil society and other non-state >> actors should be particularly concerned about the future of IGF as it is a >> rare space in which we can all participate equally. >> For almost ten years, reform of the IGF has been in the works in various >> iterations. It is not new. >> >> The Leadership Panel should be seen as part of a broader attempts to >> reform IGF. >> >> >> I think that the Leadership Panel is a timely and relevant steps in the >> right direction of strengthening the IGF. >> >> However, these steps should be taken with necessary caution as outlined >> in the following text: >> https://www.diplomacy.edu/blog/5-reasons-and-5-concerns-for-the-igf-leadership-panel/ >> >> >> >> - 5 REASONS for the IGF Leadership Panel >> >> - 1. Policy footprint: increasing the relevance of IGF as a space >> to address digital policy >> >> - 2. Louder voices: amplify IGF messages and expertise >> >> - 3. Policy conveyor belt: linking the IGF to other policy spaces >> >> - 4. Genuine inclusion: from nominal to substantive participation >> >> - 5. Policy efficiency: reducing forum shopping >> >> - >> - 5 CONCERNS for the IGF Leadership Panel >> >> - 1. The Leadership Panel is only one aspect of IGF Plus >> >> - 2. IGF and Digital Compact >> >> - 3. Preserving IGF as a space for vibrant discussions >> >> - 4. Avoid capturing by vested interest >> >> - 5. Solve terminological confusion >> >> - >> - In sum…. >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> Jovan >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 10:52 AM Sheetal Kumar via Governance < >> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> We did not receive a requisite number of eligible nominations for this >> process launched last week. We are therefore unable to proceed with the >> nomination process for the Leadership Panel as CSCG. >> >> While this does not constitute a boycott, we understand that the level of >> doubt and concerns around the Leadership Panel may indicate that there >> isn't the support required. >> >> We will continue to follow the process and to demand the transparency and >> diversity required in all areas of the IGF, and to work towards >> strengthening it in the coming years with the view to realising the true >> spirit of the IGF's multistakeholder mission. More on our previous/relevant >> position here: >> https://www.apc.org/en/pubs/open-letter-interpretation-paragraph-93a-un-secretary-generals-roadmap-digital-cooperation. >> There we say "Multistakeholderism, diversity and inclusion should guide any >> new structure, building on the IGF legacy thus far and be the basis for >> putting the structure in function of shaping the global internet governance >> agenda in a way that effectively addresses the persistent, exacerbated and >> new challenges derived from the pandemic situation, including the >> increasing power of some parts of the industry, in particular the large >> technology companies, and the lack of voices from more vulnerable and >> marginalised groups." >> >> We do not want this to be seen as discouragement to anyone planning to >> nominate themselves. However, as a network, it is clear that we don't have >> the support or interest to continue with this specific nomination process. >> >> Best >> Sheetal and Bruna >> >> On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 at 16:25, Sheetal Kumar >> wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> This is a polite reminder to share your nominations to the CSCG for the >> IGF's leadership panel, as per the process outlined below. We request this >> is done by *COB November 22 *so that we are able to submit by the >> deadline of >> *November 29. * >> >> >> We look forward to receiving your nomination/s. >> Best >> Sheetal >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 13:51, Sheetal Kumar >> wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> As you may have seen, the IGF Secretariat has launched the nomination >> process at the request of the Executive Office of the United Nations >> Secretary-General for the *inaugural Leadership Panel of the 2022 and >> 2023 Internet Governance Forum (IGF) cycles* >> . >> >> >> Following several rounds of open consultations, the Leadership Panel is a >> response to the Secretary-General’s Roadmap for Digital Cooperation >> , which calls for strengthening of the IGF >> through, among other aspects, *’’creating a strategic and empowered >> multi-stakeholder high-level body, building on the experience of the >> existing multi-stakeholder advisory group, which would address urgent >> issues, coordinate follow-up action on Forum discussions and relay proposed >> policy approaches and recommendations from the Forum to the appropriate >> normative and decision-making forums*.’’ >> >> >> CSCG, and for this process, this includes APC and IGC, will run a >> nomination process to identify nominees for the two categories: >> >> - Two [2] at-large members (distinguished or prominent persons who do >> not fall under above stakeholder groups) and >> - Two [2] CEO-level (or deputy-level) representatives from each of >> the other three stakeholder groups (civil society) >> >> Please note, this does not mean we endorse the process or the mechanism >> itself. We will send a letter with the nominations that clearly reiterates >> our previous publicly stated positions (such as this Open letter on the >> interpretation of paragraph 93(a) of the UNSG's Roadmap on Digital >> Cooperation >> >> and this on the future of the IGF >> on >> the Leadership Panel/Higher-level MAG >> ), >> including the importance of maintaining the MAG's current role and not >> supplanting it, the importance of diversity and inclusion, transparency etc >> and make clear that our submission of nominees should not be read as >> endorsement. >> >> >> We intend that our nominations reflect the above criteria. Please note >> that to receive a CSCG nomination for the IGF leadership panel you'll need >> to send us (me and Valeria and Bruna cc'd) the information required on the online >> form >> . >> We request this is done by *COB November 22 *so that we are able to >> submit by the deadline of >> *November 29. * >> >> >> We look forward to receiving your nomination/s. >> Best >> Sheetal >> >> >> -- >> >> *Sheetal Kumar* >> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> *Sheetal Kumar* >> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> *Sheetal Kumar* >> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >> >> >> >> -- >> Governance mailing list >> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >> >> -- >> Governance mailing list >> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >> >> >> -- >> Governance mailing list >> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >> >> >> >> -- >> “The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge" Sir William >> Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979 >> -- >> Governance mailing list >> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >> > > > -- > > *Sheetal Kumar* > Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | > PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 DD7F > E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > > > > > -- *Sheetal Kumar* Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT+4 | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From arsenebaguma at gmail.com Fri Dec 10 03:32:53 2021 From: arsenebaguma at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ars=C3=A8ne_Tungali?=) Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 10:32:53 +0200 Subject: [Governance] NOTICE: CSCG nomination process for IGF Leadership Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: +1 2021-12-10 10:26 UTC+02:00, Sheetal Kumar via Governance : > Thank you, Ayden! > > On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 at 14:49, Ayden Férdeline wrote: > >> Dear Sheetal, Bruna- >> >> Thank you for this update and for taking the time to capture the full >> range of sentiments expressed on this list. I support your proposed way >> forward. Thanks again. >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Ayden Férdeline >> >> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >> On Tuesday, December 7th, 2021 at 12:35, Sheetal Kumar via Governance < >> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> (cc'ing Bruna, consulted) As the Leadership Panel nominations deadline >> has >> ended, I wanted to provide a sense of where we are in the discussion and >> a >> possible way forward. I recommend *that we jointly monitor the Leadership >> Panel according to the criteria outlined in joint letters so far* >> (accountable, transparent, inclusive, participatory and effective) and >> commit to having a healthy debate in a few months time about whether the >> criteria are being met, and to withdrawing our support or taking other >> action if that is not the case. * >> >> Having read the various statements and views that have been shared, it >> seems there this is an overall commitment to the IGF and to strengthening >> it. However, there are different views as to what 'strengthening' it >> means, >> and disagreement as to whether the LP will strengthen the IGF, or in fact >> undermine its bottom-up and inclusive mission. More specifically, it >> seems >> there are two overall views: >> >> - 1) Those that believe that the LP undermines the IGF, its bottom-up >> nature and will enforce corporate capture. For this reason, they do >> not >> want to try it. >> - 2) Those that have those concerns but are willing to 'give it a go' >> because of the potential (whether high or minimal) for it not to do >> the >> above, and strengthen the IGF in a way that will be beneficial to >> civil >> society and the constituencies we serve. This may include those who >> want to >> provide nominations because they are concerned that the civil society >> positions will not be occupied by those who would serve the public >> interest. >> >> It was pointed out that this joint letter was against the Leadership >> Panel >> perhaps because it states *"It is our view that no separate new structure >> should be created outside of the IGF architecture that determines or >> shapes >> the IGF, its processes and procedures. Any body created should be >> structured as peer and complementary to the MAG and should not take >> decisions on behalf of the IGF community."* It is possible to interpret >> the Leadership Panel as peer and complementary to the MAG. I know not >> everyone interprets it this way, but it is possible. >> >> I understand that the second view may be considered naive by some, even >> disingenuous by others, but it is a view that is held and it has been put >> on the record by some so far who have explained their position to provide >> nominations, without endorsing the mechanism. The scepticism is fully >> understood and the concern that the Panel will not work out as stated, >> and >> will do a disservice, is also understood, it seems to me by all. >> >> Among all the disagreement, there is something that unites us. Generally, >> from what I can gather, we want the IGF to not only be preserved but to >> be >> strengthened. Even among those who are concerned about the Leadership >> Panel >> making the IGF 'top-down' and changing it fundamentally. >> >> Therefore, as noted above, I suggest that whether we boycott the Panel or >> not, that we be committed to monitoring the Leadership Panel, including >> as >> Farzaneh suggested on another thread, by promoting information sharing >> and >> transparency from the civil society representatives to the wider civil >> society community. We can also commit to having a healthy debate in a few >> months time about whether the criteria that have been set by various >> groups >> and networks so far 'open, transparent, inclusive, participatory, >> effective' criteria are being met, we can commit to withdrawing our >> support >> or taking other action if that is not the case. This would require a >> strong >> level of trust and honesty, including among the civil society reps who >> are >> successful in their application. It helps, I believe, that so many have >> put >> their views and reservations on the record. It might be risky. But I >> would >> suggest it might at least lead to less of a fracturing and the potential >> to >> work together on whatever issues we commonly agree on in the future. >> >> Best >> Sheetal. >> >> **Joint letters/statements - *(please add if I've missed any) >> >> - Internet Technical Collaboration Group (sent via a thread) >> - JNC and IGC (sent via a thread) >> - APC >> >> >> - Email from ISOC CEO (sent via a thread) >> >> -- >> >> *Sheetal Kumar* >> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 DD7F >> E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 at 17:30, Suresh Ramasubramanian via Governance < >> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >> >>> I find myself wondering whether it actually is a mistake rather than a >>> particular choice of wording. What motivated that choice of words is an >>> interesting question. >>> >>> --srs >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From:* Deirdre Williams >>> *Sent:* Sunday, November 28, 2021 6:42:56 PM >>> *To:* Suresh Ramasubramanian >>> *Cc:* parminder ; >>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>> *Subject:* Re: [Governance] NOTICE: CSCG nomination process for IGF >>> Leadership Panel >>> It seems to me that Suresh and Parminder have hit the nail on the head >>> together. >>> The semantics and semiotics of the English language (and I expect of >>> others as well) have been rudely interfered with in this new digital >>> world. >>> Computer programs reject shades of meaning. But those shades still exist >>> inside people's understanding. >>> To call something a "Leadership" panel in a world where hierarchies are >>> supposed to have been broken down, where the process purports to be flat >>> and inclusive, is surely a mistake? >>> Stay safe >>> Deirdre >>> >>> On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 at 07:31, Suresh Ramasubramanian via Governance < >>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >>> >>> People who sit on committees appointed by the Indian government calling >>> others “leadership class”? >>> >>> Global south buzzwords fit some people Parminder but you least of all >>> >>> >>> --srs >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From:* Governance on behalf of >>> parminder via Governance >>> *Sent:* Sunday, November 28, 2021 3:26:40 PM >>> *To:* governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>> *Subject:* Re: [Governance] NOTICE: CSCG nomination process for IGF >>> Leadership Panel >>> >>> Dear Nnenna and Jovan, and indeed, Wolfgang, >>> >>> I know things may look different to leadership class people like you :) >>> >>> But the view from the streets is quite a bit different. >>> >>> My best wishes in any case, parmidner >>> >>> >>> On 26/11/21 7:22 pm, Nnenna Nwakanma via Governance wrote: >>> >>> Thanks, Jovan, for this apt articulation. >>> >>> You represent my thoughts >>> >>> Best >>> >>> Nnenna >>> >>> On Fri, 26 Nov 2021, 13:36 Jovan Kurbalija via Governance, < >>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >>> >>> Dear colleagues, >>> >>> This discussion is important not only for IGF Leadership Panel, but for >>> the future of the IGF as a whole. Civil society and other non-state >>> actors should be particularly concerned about the future of IGF as it is >>> a >>> rare space in which we can all participate equally. >>> For almost ten years, reform of the IGF has been in the works in various >>> iterations. It is not new. >>> >>> The Leadership Panel should be seen as part of a broader attempts to >>> reform IGF. >>> >>> >>> I think that the Leadership Panel is a timely and relevant steps in the >>> right direction of strengthening the IGF. >>> >>> However, these steps should be taken with necessary caution as outlined >>> in the following text: >>> https://www.diplomacy.edu/blog/5-reasons-and-5-concerns-for-the-igf-leadership-panel/ >>> >>> >>> >>> - 5 REASONS for the IGF Leadership Panel >>> >>> >>> - 1. Policy footprint: increasing the relevance of IGF as a space >>> to address digital policy >>> >>> >>> - 2. Louder voices: amplify IGF messages and expertise >>> >>> >>> - 3. Policy conveyor belt: linking the IGF to other policy spaces >>> >>> >>> - 4. Genuine inclusion: from nominal to substantive participation >>> >>> >>> - 5. Policy efficiency: reducing forum shopping >>> >>> >>> - >>> - 5 CONCERNS for the IGF Leadership Panel >>> >>> >>> - 1. The Leadership Panel is only one aspect of IGF Plus >>> >>> >>> - 2. IGF and Digital Compact >>> >>> >>> - 3. Preserving IGF as a space for vibrant discussions >>> >>> >>> - 4. Avoid capturing by vested interest >>> >>> >>> - 5. Solve terminological confusion >>> >>> >>> - >>> - In sum…. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Jovan >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 10:52 AM Sheetal Kumar via Governance < >>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> We did not receive a requisite number of eligible nominations for this >>> process launched last week. We are therefore unable to proceed with the >>> nomination process for the Leadership Panel as CSCG. >>> >>> While this does not constitute a boycott, we understand that the level >>> of >>> doubt and concerns around the Leadership Panel may indicate that there >>> isn't the support required. >>> >>> We will continue to follow the process and to demand the transparency >>> and >>> diversity required in all areas of the IGF, and to work towards >>> strengthening it in the coming years with the view to realising the true >>> spirit of the IGF's multistakeholder mission. More on our >>> previous/relevant >>> position here: >>> https://www.apc.org/en/pubs/open-letter-interpretation-paragraph-93a-un-secretary-generals-roadmap-digital-cooperation. >>> There we say "Multistakeholderism, diversity and inclusion should guide >>> any >>> new structure, building on the IGF legacy thus far and be the basis for >>> putting the structure in function of shaping the global internet >>> governance >>> agenda in a way that effectively addresses the persistent, exacerbated >>> and >>> new challenges derived from the pandemic situation, including the >>> increasing power of some parts of the industry, in particular the large >>> technology companies, and the lack of voices from more vulnerable and >>> marginalised groups." >>> >>> We do not want this to be seen as discouragement to anyone planning to >>> nominate themselves. However, as a network, it is clear that we don't >>> have >>> the support or interest to continue with this specific nomination >>> process. >>> >>> Best >>> Sheetal and Bruna >>> >>> On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 at 16:25, Sheetal Kumar >>> wrote: >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> This is a polite reminder to share your nominations to the CSCG for the >>> IGF's leadership panel, as per the process outlined below. We request >>> this >>> is done by *COB November 22 *so that we are able to submit by the >>> deadline of >>> *November 29. * >>> >>> >>> We look forward to receiving your nomination/s. >>> Best >>> Sheetal >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 13:51, Sheetal Kumar >>> wrote: >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> As you may have seen, the IGF Secretariat has launched the nomination >>> process at the request of the Executive Office of the United Nations >>> Secretary-General for the *inaugural Leadership Panel of the 2022 and >>> 2023 Internet Governance Forum (IGF) cycles* >>> . >>> >>> >>> Following several rounds of open consultations, the Leadership Panel is >>> a >>> response to the Secretary-General’s Roadmap for Digital Cooperation >>> , which calls for strengthening of the IGF >>> through, among other aspects, *’’creating a strategic and empowered >>> multi-stakeholder high-level body, building on the experience of the >>> existing multi-stakeholder advisory group, which would address urgent >>> issues, coordinate follow-up action on Forum discussions and relay >>> proposed >>> policy approaches and recommendations from the Forum to the appropriate >>> normative and decision-making forums*.’’ >>> >>> >>> CSCG, and for this process, this includes APC and IGC, will run a >>> nomination process to identify nominees for the two categories: >>> >>> - Two [2] at-large members (distinguished or prominent persons who do >>> not fall under above stakeholder groups) and >>> - Two [2] CEO-level (or deputy-level) representatives from each of >>> the other three stakeholder groups (civil society) >>> >>> Please note, this does not mean we endorse the process or the mechanism >>> itself. We will send a letter with the nominations that clearly >>> reiterates >>> our previous publicly stated positions (such as this Open letter on the >>> interpretation of paragraph 93(a) of the UNSG's Roadmap on Digital >>> Cooperation >>> >>> and this on the future of the IGF >>> on >>> the Leadership Panel/Higher-level MAG >>> ), >>> including the importance of maintaining the MAG's current role and not >>> supplanting it, the importance of diversity and inclusion, transparency >>> etc >>> and make clear that our submission of nominees should not be read as >>> endorsement. >>> >>> >>> We intend that our nominations reflect the above criteria. Please note >>> that to receive a CSCG nomination for the IGF leadership panel you'll >>> need >>> to send us (me and Valeria and Bruna cc'd) the information required on >>> the online >>> form >>> . >>> We request this is done by *COB November 22 *so that we are able to >>> submit by the deadline of >>> *November 29. * >>> >>> >>> We look forward to receiving your nomination/s. >>> Best >>> Sheetal >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> *Sheetal Kumar* >>> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 >>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Governance mailing list >>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>> >>> -- >>> Governance mailing list >>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Governance mailing list >>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> “The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge" Sir >>> William >>> Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979 >>> -- >>> Governance mailing list >>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> *Sheetal Kumar* >> Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL >> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | >> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 DD7F >> E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| >> >> >> >> >> > > -- > > *Sheetal Kumar* > Head of Global Engagement and Advocacy | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL > T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| Time zone: GMT+4 | M: +44 (0)7739569514 | > PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 DD7F > E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31| > -- ------------------------ ***Arsène Tungali** *I am a social entrepreneur running both a non profit and a business !* Link up with me on LinkedIn , Twitter and Facebook From joly at punkcast.com Fri Dec 10 03:38:44 2021 From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie) Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 03:38:44 -0500 Subject: [Governance] =?utf-8?q?WEBCAST=3A_IGF2021_Dynamic_Coalition_on_C?= =?utf-8?q?ore_Internet_Values_=E2=80=93_Internet_Regulation_during?= =?utf-8?q?_Crisis_One_Year_Later?= Message-ID: This is the one IGF session I never miss! [image: livestream] On *Friday 10 December 2021* at *8:30-10:00 UTC* the *Dynamic Coalition on Core Internet Values * (DC-CIV) will hold its *IGF 2021 * session '*Internet Regulation during Crisis One Year Later * '. The Global Pandemic has now impacted our daily lives for a longer time than most of us would have imagined a year ago. In 2020, the Coalition's Session was entitled: "*Internet in Crisis Management and Renewal *" - and this Crisis has continued to be the past year's "new normal". The Internet's impact has increased dramatically in all aspects of everyone's lives. Technically, it has coped well with this increased use, but there have also been calls for increased control and regulation. The DC on Core Internet Values will discuss these developments and these calls for regulation --- and explore whether these break Core Internet Values - including a comparison with the *6F Framework *. *SPEAKERS* *Olivier Crépin-Leblond*, ISOC UK England *Olga Makarova*, MTS *Alison Harcourt*, University of Exeter *Bob Frankston* *Jutta Croll, *German Digital Opportunities Foundation. *Desiree Miloshevic*, Global Initiative for Human-centred Digital Governance *MODERATOR* *Alejandro Pisanty*, UNAM *RAPPORTEUR* *Sivasubramanian Muthusamy*, APG *LIVESTREAM http://livestream.com/internetsociety/dc-civ2021 * *AGENDA https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/igf-2021-dc-civ-internet-regulation-during-crisis-one-year-later * *PARTICIPATE VIA ZOOM https://bit.ly/3ye9flT * *REAL TIME TEXT https://www.streamtext.net/player?event=CFI-IGF-CR8 * *TWITTER #IGF2021 #coreinternetvalues #dcciv @Olivier_CL lga Makarova @alieliale Desiree Miloshevic @BobFrankston Jutta Croll* SIMULCAST *https://youtu.be/duYfGeENup4 * (IGF) *https://www.facebook.com/IntGovForum/live* *https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/ * *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive * *https://www.facebook.com/liveisoc * *https://www.facebook.com/CoreInternetValues * *ARCHIVE* *https://archive.org/details/dc-civ2021 * *Permalink* https://isoc.live/14864/ - -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -------------------------------------- - -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From parminder at itforchange.net Sat Dec 11 09:16:18 2021 From: parminder at itforchange.net (parminder) Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 19:46:18 +0530 Subject: [Governance] India In-Reply-To: <362495432.1850784.1638962206260@email.ionos.de> References: <1439079932.1589570.1638878772571@email.ionos.de> <2a31d9eb-5cc1-86ba-e3bb-8c4782dc3c06@itforchange.net> <362495432.1850784.1638962206260@email.ionos.de> Message-ID: <815f9e59-9f61-e671-2b06-f310eedebaa7@itforchange.net> Dear Wolfgang, Thanks for the quotes about the Putin -- Modi meeting. Indeed in most mainstream coverage in India the ICT side hardly got mentioned. They were the less important part of the summit. I am not sure what kind of comments you are looking for from me. India has a non aligned background and it is normal for such a large country like India to hedge its bets and not get caught in one geo-techno-enclosure or the other, in the old cold war like sense, but now with digital tech dependencies which are even deeper, stronger and largely irreversible. It therefore makes complete sense that India is exploring ICT relationships with Russia, to/inter alia/ diversify from the deep embeddedness that India has in the US centric techno-sphere. Do you disapprove of it?  See my article of a few years back India should aim for digital non alignment BTW, one of the key current issues in India-Russia relationship (also highlighted around the summit)  is that India is buying S 400 missiles from Russia, despite strong warnings from the US that this may lead to India being excluded from US military supplies. Perhaps that would put in good perspective Russia-India techno relationships that seem to so rent your mind. >From your quoted text, you seem to have issues or questions about Russia and India deciding to work together on the proposed UN cyber crime treaty... Do you think there should NOT be any such UN treaty? Does that mean countries should rather sign on Europe's Budapest Convention on Cybercrime, or wait for new ones to come from OECD's CDEP (committee on digital economy policy) or from the CoE? You know why India and other countries refuse to sign on the Budapest Convention -- actually they find nothing wrong with its substance, but they refuse to be governed by rules that they were not a part of developing... Makes any democratic sense to you? If not Budapest Convention,  what is the option .. The world stay without a cyber crime framework? Why should not all countries sit together to make a cyber crime convention? Happy to hear your reasons either way. About multistakeholder participation in such a UN cyber crime convention, which seems to be one major concern of yours: I have been arguing long for a horizontal UN digital policy body, with the SAME multistakeholder participation model as OECD's CDEP (and of CoE where the Budapest Convention was made)  ... If we had that UN body , we could have employed its structure for MS participation for developing the proposed UN convention on cyber crime ... But, THE PROBLEM IS, you have consistently opposed it, including as part of the UN WG on enhanced cooperation which had the precise mandate to develop institutional structures for UN based digital policy making. We both were members of that WG and we know what went on there, right. How developing countries proposed the exact same OECD model for UN level digital policy making -- along with all its MS components/ characteristics -- AND YOU ALL TURNED IT DOWN. Am I making any mis-statement here? Happy to be corrected in that case. So, perhaps now it is your turn to answer some questions: 1. Do you think that there should be no UN cyber crime convention, and all non Europeans too should simply sign Europe's Budapest Convention, and further wait for more cyber governance frameworks from OECD's CDEP, or CoE's digital policy mechanisms? 2. Why and how you call OECD's CDEP and CoE's digital policy making processes as multistakeholder, and those are acceptable to you, but the EXACT SAME model at the UN becomes multi-lateral and NOT multistakeholder - -and, apparently for that reason, not acceptable to you ? thanks and look forward to your responses parminder PS: You raise concerns about India-Russia parleys and digital rights issues (internet shutdowns). Last year India signed this with US led five eyes against eend-to-end encryption https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/international-statement-end-end-encryption-and-public-safety   .. Just seeking a better balance of geo-political concerns from you. On 08/12/21 4:46 pm, Wolfgang Kleinwächter wrote: > Wolfgang: > Is the Putin/Modi Summit related to the Indian Internet Shutdowns? > > Parminder: > > I have seen and heard of no connection of that kind. In any case, > nations nowadays need no external assistance to control their > respective Internets. As for foreign alliances, if anything India is > certainly bending much more towards US led alliances, that claim some > western values of democracy, HR, etc ( all of which is of course a lot > of BS, and simply good old-fashioned geopolitics and geo- economics > under new garbs -- one significant manifestation and result of which > kind of geo-politics/ geoeconomics is neo-colonisation) .. > > > Wolfgang: > As I can see, Internet Governance (cybersecurity and digital economny) > was part of the discussions. > > This is from the Putin-Modi Meeting: "The Sides appreciated close > cooperation in the field of security in the use of Information and > Communication Technologies (ICT) through inter-agency cooperation > under bilateral mechanisms and at multilateral platforms. They > highlighted the leading role of the United Nations in the > decision-making process on security in the use of ICTs. The Sides also > recognized the need for further work on rules, norms and principles of > responsible behavior of State aimed at preventing conflicts and > promoting peaceful use of ICTs. The Sides reaffirmed the importance of > international cooperation against criminal use of ICTs and in this > regard they welcome the establishment of an open- ended Ad hoc > intergovernmental committee of experts to elaborate a comprehensive > international convention on countering the use of ICTs for criminal > purposes as stipulated in the UN GA resolutions 74/247 and 75/282." > ... "The Sides intend to focus particularly on increasing the > effectiveness of countering terrorism, extremism, drug trafficking, > cross-border organized crime, and information security threats,"  ... > "The Sides agreed that safeguarding of global commons including our > oceans, outer space and information space should be based on the > principles of transparency, accessibility and upholding international > law." > > And they discussed also digital economy: " The Sides also agreed to > facilitate collaboration between government and private sector > organizations to find ways of joint development of software products, > platforms and services as well as in the area of electronics > manufacturing. The Sides confirmed their interest in further > developing cooperation in the sphere of digital technologies, > including those related to information protection, security of > critical infrastructure and law enforcement." > > Any comment? BTW, no references to civil society or a multistakeholder > approach. > > see: http://en.kremlin.ru/supplement/5745 > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From suresh at hserus.net Sat Dec 11 09:21:06 2021 From: suresh at hserus.net (Suresh Ramasubramanian) Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 14:21:06 +0000 Subject: [Governance] India In-Reply-To: <815f9e59-9f61-e671-2b06-f310eedebaa7@itforchange.net> References: <1439079932.1589570.1638878772571@email.ionos.de> <2a31d9eb-5cc1-86ba-e3bb-8c4782dc3c06@itforchange.net> <362495432.1850784.1638962206260@email.ionos.de> <815f9e59-9f61-e671-2b06-f310eedebaa7@itforchange.net> Message-ID: Parminder, I would encourage you to read, for example, Joseph Menn’s well researched book “Fatal System Error”. https://www.amazon.in/Fatal-System-Error-Bringing-Internet/dp/1586487485/ It might give you some indication of why Wolfgang made the comments he appears to have made. From: Governance on behalf of parminder via Governance Date: Saturday, 11 December 2021 at 7:46 PM To: Wolfgang Kleinwächter , at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org , governance at lists.igcaucus.org Subject: Re: [Governance] India Dear Wolfgang, Thanks for the quotes about the Putin -- Modi meeting. Indeed in most mainstream coverage in India the ICT side hardly got mentioned. They were the less important part of the summit. I am not sure what kind of comments you are looking for from me. India has a non aligned background and it is normal for such a large country like India to hedge its bets and not get caught in one geo-techno-enclosure or the other, in the old cold war like sense, but now with digital tech dependencies which are even deeper, stronger and largely irreversible. It therefore makes complete sense that India is exploring ICT relationships with Russia, to inter alia diversify from the deep embeddedness that India has in the US centric techno-sphere. Do you disapprove of it? See my article of a few years back India should aim for digital non alignment BTW, one of the key current issues in India-Russia relationship (also highlighted around the summit) is that India is buying S 400 missiles from Russia, despite strong warnings from the US that this may lead to India being excluded from US military supplies. Perhaps that would put in good perspective Russia-India techno relationships that seem to so rent your mind. >From your quoted text, you seem to have issues or questions about Russia and India deciding to work together on the proposed UN cyber crime treaty... Do you think there should NOT be any such UN treaty? Does that mean countries should rather sign on Europe's Budapest Convention on Cybercrime, or wait for new ones to come from OECD's CDEP (committee on digital economy policy) or from the CoE? You know why India and other countries refuse to sign on the Budapest Convention -- actually they find nothing wrong with its substance, but they refuse to be governed by rules that they were not a part of developing... Makes any democratic sense to you? If not Budapest Convention, what is the option .. The world stay without a cyber crime framework? Why should not all countries sit together to make a cyber crime convention? Happy to hear your reasons either way. About multistakeholder participation in such a UN cyber crime convention, which seems to be one major concern of yours: I have been arguing long for a horizontal UN digital policy body, with the SAME multistakeholder participation model as OECD's CDEP (and of CoE where the Budapest Convention was made) ... If we had that UN body , we could have employed its structure for MS participation for developing the proposed UN convention on cyber crime ... But, THE PROBLEM IS, you have consistently opposed it, including as part of the UN WG on enhanced cooperation which had the precise mandate to develop institutional structures for UN based digital policy making. We both were members of that WG and we know what went on there, right. How developing countries proposed the exact same OECD model for UN level digital policy making -- along with all its MS components/ characteristics -- AND YOU ALL TURNED IT DOWN. Am I making any mis-statement here? Happy to be corrected in that case. So, perhaps now it is your turn to answer some questions: 1. Do you think that there should be no UN cyber crime convention, and all non Europeans too should simply sign Europe's Budapest Convention, and further wait for more cyber governance frameworks from OECD's CDEP, or CoE's digital policy mechanisms? 2. Why and how you call OECD's CDEP and CoE's digital policy making processes as multistakeholder, and those are acceptable to you, but the EXACT SAME model at the UN becomes multi-lateral and NOT multistakeholder - -and, apparently for that reason, not acceptable to you ? thanks and look forward to your responses parminder PS: You raise concerns about India-Russia parleys and digital rights issues (internet shutdowns). Last year India signed this with US led five eyes against eend-to-end encryption https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/international-statement-end-end-encryption-and-public-safety .. Just seeking a better balance of geo-political concerns from you. On 08/12/21 4:46 pm, Wolfgang Kleinwächter wrote: Wolfgang: Is the Putin/Modi Summit related to the Indian Internet Shutdowns? Parminder: I have seen and heard of no connection of that kind. In any case, nations nowadays need no external assistance to control their respective Internets. As for foreign alliances, if anything India is certainly bending much more towards US led alliances, that claim some western values of democracy, HR, etc ( all of which is of course a lot of BS, and simply good old-fashioned geopolitics and geo- economics under new garbs -- one significant manifestation and result of which kind of geo-politics/ geoeconomics is neo-colonisation) .. Wolfgang: As I can see, Internet Governance (cybersecurity and digital economny) was part of the discussions. This is from the Putin-Modi Meeting: "The Sides appreciated close cooperation in the field of security in the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) through inter-agency cooperation under bilateral mechanisms and at multilateral platforms. They highlighted the leading role of the United Nations in the decision-making process on security in the use of ICTs. The Sides also recognized the need for further work on rules, norms and principles of responsible behavior of State aimed at preventing conflicts and promoting peaceful use of ICTs. The Sides reaffirmed the importance of international cooperation against criminal use of ICTs and in this regard they welcome the establishment of an open- ended Ad hoc intergovernmental committee of experts to elaborate a comprehensive international convention on countering the use of ICTs for criminal purposes as stipulated in the UN GA resolutions 74/247 and 75/282." ... "The Sides intend to focus particularly on increasing the effectiveness of countering terrorism, extremism, drug trafficking, cross-border organized crime, and information security threats," ... "The Sides agreed that safeguarding of global commons including our oceans, outer space and information space should be based on the principles of transparency, accessibility and upholding international law." And they discussed also digital economy: " The Sides also agreed to facilitate collaboration between government and private sector organizations to find ways of joint development of software products, platforms and services as well as in the area of electronics manufacturing. The Sides confirmed their interest in further developing cooperation in the sphere of digital technologies, including those related to information protection, security of critical infrastructure and law enforcement." Any comment? BTW, no references to civil society or a multistakeholder approach. see: http://en.kremlin.ru/supplement/5745 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ca at cafonso.ca Sat Dec 11 11:09:31 2021 From: ca at cafonso.ca (Carlos Afonso) Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 13:09:31 -0300 Subject: [Governance] India In-Reply-To: <815f9e59-9f61-e671-2b06-f310eedebaa7@itforchange.net> References: <1439079932.1589570.1638878772571@email.ionos.de> <2a31d9eb-5cc1-86ba-e3bb-8c4782dc3c06@itforchange.net> <362495432.1850784.1638962206260@email.ionos.de> <815f9e59-9f61-e671-2b06-f310eedebaa7@itforchange.net> Message-ID: <727a6851-e4b5-f861-7e26-7588f8009b8f@cafonso.ca> Compas, unfair... people who are not in the al-large list cannot catch the original Wolf's message. --c.a. On 11/12/2021 11:16, parminder via Governance wrote: > Dear Wolfgang, > > Thanks for the quotes about the Putin -- Modi meeting. Indeed in most > mainstream coverage in India the ICT side hardly got mentioned. They > were the less important part of the summit. > > I am not sure what kind of comments you are looking for from me. > > India has a non aligned background and it is normal for such a large > country like India to hedge its bets and not get caught in one > geo-techno-enclosure or the other, in the old cold war like sense, but > now with digital tech dependencies which are even deeper, stronger and > largely irreversible. It therefore makes complete sense that India is > exploring ICT relationships with Russia, to/inter alia/ diversify from > the deep embeddedness that India has in the US centric techno-sphere. Do > you disapprove of it?  See my article of a few years back India should > aim for digital non alignment > > > BTW, one of the key current issues in India-Russia relationship (also > highlighted around the summit)  is that India is buying S 400 missiles > from Russia, despite strong warnings from the US that this may lead to > India being excluded from US military supplies. > > Perhaps that would put in good perspective Russia-India techno > relationships that seem to so rent your mind. > >>From your quoted text, you seem to have issues or questions about Russia > and India deciding to work together on the proposed UN cyber crime > treaty... > > Do you think there should NOT be any such UN treaty? > > Does that mean countries should rather sign on Europe's Budapest > Convention on Cybercrime, or wait for new ones to come from OECD's CDEP > (committee on digital economy policy) or from the CoE? You know why > India and other countries refuse to sign on the Budapest Convention -- > actually they find nothing wrong with its substance, but they refuse to > be governed by rules that they were not a part of developing... Makes > any democratic sense to you? > > If not Budapest Convention,  what is the option .. The world stay > without a cyber crime framework? Why should not all countries sit > together to make a cyber crime convention? Happy to hear your reasons > either way. > > About multistakeholder participation in such a UN cyber crime > convention, which seems to be one major concern of yours: > > I have been arguing long for a horizontal UN digital policy body, with > the SAME multistakeholder participation model as OECD's CDEP (and of CoE > where the Budapest Convention was made)  ... If we had that UN body , we > could have employed its structure for MS participation for developing > the proposed UN convention on cyber crime ... But, THE PROBLEM IS, you > have consistently opposed it, including as part of the UN WG on enhanced > cooperation which had the precise mandate to develop institutional > structures for UN based digital policy making. We both were members of > that WG and we know what went on there, right. How developing countries > proposed the exact same OECD model for UN level digital policy making -- > along with all its MS components/ characteristics -- AND YOU ALL TURNED > IT DOWN. Am I making any mis-statement here? Happy to be corrected in > that case. > > So, perhaps now it is your turn to answer some questions: > > 1. Do you think that there should be no UN cyber crime convention, and > all non Europeans too should simply sign Europe's Budapest Convention, > and further wait for more cyber governance frameworks from OECD's CDEP, > or CoE's digital policy mechanisms? > > 2. Why and how you call OECD's CDEP and CoE's digital policy making > processes as multistakeholder, and those are acceptable to you, but the > EXACT SAME model at the UN becomes multi-lateral and NOT > multistakeholder - -and, apparently for that reason, not acceptable to > you ? > > thanks and look forward to your responses > > parminder > > PS: You raise concerns about India-Russia parleys and digital rights > issues (internet shutdowns). Last year India signed this with US led > five eyes against eend-to-end encryption > https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/international-statement-end-end-encryption-and-public-safety > .. Just seeking a better balance of geo-political concerns from you. > > > > On 08/12/21 4:46 pm, Wolfgang Kleinwächter wrote: >> Wolfgang: >> Is the Putin/Modi Summit related to the Indian Internet Shutdowns? >> >> Parminder: >> >> I have seen and heard of no connection of that kind. In any case, >> nations nowadays need no external assistance to control their >> respective Internets. As for foreign alliances, if anything India is >> certainly bending much more towards US led alliances, that claim some >> western values of democracy, HR, etc ( all of which is of course a lot >> of BS, and simply good old-fashioned geopolitics and geo- economics >> under new garbs -- one significant manifestation and result of which >> kind of geo-politics/ geoeconomics is neo-colonisation) .. >> >> >> Wolfgang: >> As I can see, Internet Governance (cybersecurity and digital economny) >> was part of the discussions. >> >> This is from the Putin-Modi Meeting: "The Sides appreciated close >> cooperation in the field of security in the use of Information and >> Communication Technologies (ICT) through inter-agency cooperation >> under bilateral mechanisms and at multilateral platforms. They >> highlighted the leading role of the United Nations in the >> decision-making process on security in the use of ICTs. The Sides also >> recognized the need for further work on rules, norms and principles of >> responsible behavior of State aimed at preventing conflicts and >> promoting peaceful use of ICTs. The Sides reaffirmed the importance of >> international cooperation against criminal use of ICTs and in this >> regard they welcome the establishment of an open- ended Ad hoc >> intergovernmental committee of experts to elaborate a comprehensive >> international convention on countering the use of ICTs for criminal >> purposes as stipulated in the UN GA resolutions 74/247 and 75/282." >> ... "The Sides intend to focus particularly on increasing the >> effectiveness of countering terrorism, extremism, drug trafficking, >> cross-border organized crime, and information security threats,"  ... >> "The Sides agreed that safeguarding of global commons including our >> oceans, outer space and information space should be based on the >> principles of transparency, accessibility and upholding international >> law." >> >> And they discussed also digital economy: " The Sides also agreed to >> facilitate collaboration between government and private sector >> organizations to find ways of joint development of software products, >> platforms and services as well as in the area of electronics >> manufacturing. The Sides confirmed their interest in further >> developing cooperation in the sphere of digital technologies, >> including those related to information protection, security of >> critical infrastructure and law enforcement." >> >> Any comment? BTW, no references to civil society or a multistakeholder >> approach. >> >> see: http://en.kremlin.ru/supplement/5745 >> >> > > -- Carlos A. Afonso [emails são pessoais exceto quando explicitamente indicado em contrário] [emails are personal unless explicitly indicated otherwise] Instituto Nupef - https://nupef.org.br From ca at cafonso.ca Sat Dec 11 11:13:20 2021 From: ca at cafonso.ca (Carlos Afonso) Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 13:13:20 -0300 Subject: [Governance] India In-Reply-To: <815f9e59-9f61-e671-2b06-f310eedebaa7@itforchange.net> References: <1439079932.1589570.1638878772571@email.ionos.de> <2a31d9eb-5cc1-86ba-e3bb-8c4782dc3c06@itforchange.net> <362495432.1850784.1638962206260@email.ionos.de> <815f9e59-9f61-e671-2b06-f310eedebaa7@itforchange.net> Message-ID: <30b1485a-32b4-ac10-e354-ab50b299bd52@cafonso.ca> I meant "aT-large"... ---------------------- Compas, unfair... people who are not in the al-large list cannot catch the original Wolf's message. --c.a. On 11/12/2021 11:16, parminder via Governance wrote: > Dear Wolfgang, > > Thanks for the quotes about the Putin -- Modi meeting. Indeed in most > mainstream coverage in India the ICT side hardly got mentioned. They > were the less important part of the summit. > > I am not sure what kind of comments you are looking for from me. > > India has a non aligned background and it is normal for such a large > country like India to hedge its bets and not get caught in one > geo-techno-enclosure or the other, in the old cold war like sense, but > now with digital tech dependencies which are even deeper, stronger and > largely irreversible. It therefore makes complete sense that India is > exploring ICT relationships with Russia, to/inter alia/ diversify from > the deep embeddedness that India has in the US centric techno-sphere. Do > you disapprove of it?  See my article of a few years back India should > aim for digital non alignment > > > BTW, one of the key current issues in India-Russia relationship (also > highlighted around the summit)  is that India is buying S 400 missiles > from Russia, despite strong warnings from the US that this may lead to > India being excluded from US military supplies. > > Perhaps that would put in good perspective Russia-India techno > relationships that seem to so rent your mind. > >>From your quoted text, you seem to have issues or questions about Russia > and India deciding to work together on the proposed UN cyber crime > treaty... > > Do you think there should NOT be any such UN treaty? > > Does that mean countries should rather sign on Europe's Budapest > Convention on Cybercrime, or wait for new ones to come from OECD's CDEP > (committee on digital economy policy) or from the CoE? You know why > India and other countries refuse to sign on the Budapest Convention -- > actually they find nothing wrong with its substance, but they refuse to > be governed by rules that they were not a part of developing... Makes > any democratic sense to you? > > If not Budapest Convention,  what is the option .. The world stay > without a cyber crime framework? Why should not all countries sit > together to make a cyber crime convention? Happy to hear your reasons > either way. > > About multistakeholder participation in such a UN cyber crime > convention, which seems to be one major concern of yours: > > I have been arguing long for a horizontal UN digital policy body, with > the SAME multistakeholder participation model as OECD's CDEP (and of CoE > where the Budapest Convention was made)  ... If we had that UN body , we > could have employed its structure for MS participation for developing > the proposed UN convention on cyber crime ... But, THE PROBLEM IS, you > have consistently opposed it, including as part of the UN WG on enhanced > cooperation which had the precise mandate to develop institutional > structures for UN based digital policy making. We both were members of > that WG and we know what went on there, right. How developing countries > proposed the exact same OECD model for UN level digital policy making -- > along with all its MS components/ characteristics -- AND YOU ALL TURNED > IT DOWN. Am I making any mis-statement here? Happy to be corrected in > that case. > > So, perhaps now it is your turn to answer some questions: > > 1. Do you think that there should be no UN cyber crime convention, and > all non Europeans too should simply sign Europe's Budapest Convention, > and further wait for more cyber governance frameworks from OECD's CDEP, > or CoE's digital policy mechanisms? > > 2. Why and how you call OECD's CDEP and CoE's digital policy making > processes as multistakeholder, and those are acceptable to you, but the > EXACT SAME model at the UN becomes multi-lateral and NOT > multistakeholder - -and, apparently for that reason, not acceptable to > you ? > > thanks and look forward to your responses > > parminder > > PS: You raise concerns about India-Russia parleys and digital rights > issues (internet shutdowns). Last year India signed this with US led > five eyes against eend-to-end encryption > https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/international-statement-end-end-encryption-and-public-safety > .. Just seeking a better balance of geo-political concerns from you. > > > > On 08/12/21 4:46 pm, Wolfgang Kleinwächter wrote: >> Wolfgang: >> Is the Putin/Modi Summit related to the Indian Internet Shutdowns? >> >> Parminder: >> >> I have seen and heard of no connection of that kind. In any case, >> nations nowadays need no external assistance to control their >> respective Internets. As for foreign alliances, if anything India is >> certainly bending much more towards US led alliances, that claim some >> western values of democracy, HR, etc ( all of which is of course a lot >> of BS, and simply good old-fashioned geopolitics and geo- economics >> under new garbs -- one significant manifestation and result of which >> kind of geo-politics/ geoeconomics is neo-colonisation) .. >> >> >> Wolfgang: >> As I can see, Internet Governance (cybersecurity and digital economny) >> was part of the discussions. >> >> This is from the Putin-Modi Meeting: "The Sides appreciated close >> cooperation in the field of security in the use of Information and >> Communication Technologies (ICT) through inter-agency cooperation >> under bilateral mechanisms and at multilateral platforms. They >> highlighted the leading role of the United Nations in the >> decision-making process on security in the use of ICTs. The Sides also >> recognized the need for further work on rules, norms and principles of >> responsible behavior of State aimed at preventing conflicts and >> promoting peaceful use of ICTs. The Sides reaffirmed the importance of >> international cooperation against criminal use of ICTs and in this >> regard they welcome the establishment of an open- ended Ad hoc >> intergovernmental committee of experts to elaborate a comprehensive >> international convention on countering the use of ICTs for criminal >> purposes as stipulated in the UN GA resolutions 74/247 and 75/282." >> ... "The Sides intend to focus particularly on increasing the >> effectiveness of countering terrorism, extremism, drug trafficking, >> cross-border organized crime, and information security threats,"  ... >> "The Sides agreed that safeguarding of global commons including our >> oceans, outer space and information space should be based on the >> principles of transparency, accessibility and upholding international >> law." >> >> And they discussed also digital economy: " The Sides also agreed to >> facilitate collaboration between government and private sector >> organizations to find ways of joint development of software products, >> platforms and services as well as in the area of electronics >> manufacturing. The Sides confirmed their interest in further >> developing cooperation in the sphere of digital technologies, >> including those related to information protection, security of >> critical infrastructure and law enforcement." >> >> Any comment? BTW, no references to civil society or a multistakeholder >> approach. >> >> see: http://en.kremlin.ru/supplement/5745 >> >> > > -- Carlos A. Afonso [emails são pessoais exceto quando explicitamente indicado em contrário] [emails are personal unless explicitly indicated otherwise] Instituto Nupef - https://nupef.org.br -- Governance mailing list Governance at lists.igcaucus.org https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance From parminder at itforchange.net Sun Dec 12 06:44:42 2021 From: parminder at itforchange.net (parminder) Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 17:14:42 +0530 Subject: [Governance] Fwd: India In-Reply-To: <2a31d9eb-5cc1-86ba-e3bb-8c4782dc3c06@itforchange.net> References: <2a31d9eb-5cc1-86ba-e3bb-8c4782dc3c06@itforchange.net> Message-ID: <7960cb34-1413-2b40-999b-0a33ddd358a5@itforchange.net> Dear Carlos, Apropos your comment on not being able to see Wolfgang's meesage, it was below what I posted ... But if you are interested in the first exchange, it is below. I though this was IGC stuff and not so much ALAC and so posted it here ... Happy to hear your views, esp on my second post. Best parminder -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: India Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 19:50:39 +0530 From: parminder To: Wolfgang Kleinwächter , at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org On 07/12/21 5:36 pm, Wolfgang Kleinwächter wrote: > @ Parminder: Sure, Wolfgang, happy to respond to your questions anytime.. > > Is the Putin/Modi Summit related to the Indian Internet Shutdowns? I have seen and heard of no connection of that kind. In any case, nations nowadays need no external assistance to control their respective Internets. As for foreign alliances, if anything India is certainly bending much more towards US led alliances, that claim some western values of democracy, HR, etc ( all of which is of course a lot of BS, and simply good old-fashioned geopolitics and geo- economics under new garbs -- one significant manifestation and result of which kind of geo-politics/ geoeconomics is neo-colonisation) .. > > see; > https://indianexpress.com/article/india/vladimir-putin-india-russia-summit-narendra-modi-7659202/ > Anything in particular you want me to comment on from this .. I found nothing Interenty in this .. >   > https://internetshutdowns.in/ > Yes, I know. We collaborate with this coalition, and this organization SFLC  .. parminder > > Wolfgang -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ca at cafonso.ca Sun Dec 12 12:13:10 2021 From: ca at cafonso.ca (Carlos Afonso) Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:13:10 -0300 Subject: [Governance] Fwd: India In-Reply-To: <7960cb34-1413-2b40-999b-0a33ddd358a5@itforchange.net> References: <2a31d9eb-5cc1-86ba-e3bb-8c4782dc3c06@itforchange.net> <7960cb34-1413-2b40-999b-0a33ddd358a5@itforchange.net> Message-ID: <8703f112-bc33-52c2-ddd7-c916c52c5432@cafonso.ca> Thanks so much, Parm. fraternal regards --c.a. On 12/12/2021 08:44, parminder via Governance wrote: > > Dear Carlos, Apropos your comment on not being able to see Wolfgang's > meesage, it was below what I posted ... But if you are interested in the > first exchange, it is below. I though this was IGC stuff and not so much > ALAC and so posted it here ... > > Happy to hear your views, esp on my second post. > > > Best parminder > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Re: India > Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 19:50:39 +0530 > From: parminder > To: Wolfgang Kleinwächter , > at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > > > On 07/12/21 5:36 pm, Wolfgang Kleinwächter wrote: >> @ Parminder: > > > Sure, Wolfgang, happy to respond to your questions anytime.. > >> >> Is the Putin/Modi Summit related to the Indian Internet Shutdowns? > > I have seen and heard of no connection of that kind. > > In any case, nations nowadays need no external assistance to control > their respective Internets. > > As for foreign alliances, if anything India is certainly bending much > more towards US led alliances, that claim some western values of > democracy, HR, etc ( all of which is of course a lot of BS, and simply > good old-fashioned geopolitics and geo- economics under new garbs -- one > significant manifestation and result of which kind of geo-politics/ > geoeconomics is neo-colonisation) .. > >> >> see; >> https://indianexpress.com/article/india/vladimir-putin-india-russia-summit-narendra-modi-7659202/ >> > Anything in particular you want me to comment on from this .. I found > nothing Interenty in this .. >> >> https://internetshutdowns.in/ >> > > Yes, I know. We collaborate with this coalition, and this organization > SFLC  .. > > parminder > > >> >> Wolfgang > > -- Carlos A. Afonso [emails são pessoais exceto quando explicitamente indicado em contrário] [emails are personal unless explicitly indicated otherwise] Instituto Nupef - https://nupef.org.br From lb at lucabelli.net Mon Dec 13 09:27:48 2021 From: lb at lucabelli.net (lb lucabelli.net) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 14:27:48 +0000 Subject: [Governance] R: Fwd: India In-Reply-To: <8703f112-bc33-52c2-ddd7-c916c52c5432@cafonso.ca> References: <2a31d9eb-5cc1-86ba-e3bb-8c4782dc3c06@itforchange.net> <7960cb34-1413-2b40-999b-0a33ddd358a5@itforchange.net> <8703f112-bc33-52c2-ddd7-c916c52c5432@cafonso.ca> Message-ID: Hello C.A. and Parminder and all, Thanks a lot for sharing the exchange below. Very informative. In case you are interested in reading a slightly broader analysis regarding recent BRICS cybersecurity dynamics (for those who are not familiar, BRICS = Brazil, Russia, India, China, & South Africa), I have just published this article on “Cybersecurity Policymaking in the BRICS Countries: From Addressing National Priorities to Seeking International Cooperation” https://journals.assaf.org.za/index.php/ajic/article/view/12944 The article was included in the latest issue of the African Journal of Information and Communication of the University of the Witwatersrand, which is available (entirely in open access, as all previous issues) on the website of the LINK Centre at Wits https://www.wits.ac.za/linkcentre/ajic/ajic-issue-28-2021/ If you have no time to read the entire 16-page article above, the text is based on a much shorter blog post I published after the BRICS Summit (in September) on the EU CyberDirect blog of the EU Institute for Security Studies, to provide some context on the recent BRICS leaders' pledge to pursue enhanced cooperation on cybersecurity including by “establishing legal frameworks of cooperation among BRICS” and a BRICS intergovernmental agreement on cybersecurity https://directionsblog.eu/cybersecurity-convergence-in-the-brics-countries/ Hope this can be helpful! All the best Luca [http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_direito_rio.jpg] Luca Belli, PhD Professor | FGV Law Schoool Coordinator | Center for Technology & Society [http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_tel.jpg]+55 21 3799 5763 t at 1lucabelli [http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_direito_rio_map.jpg]Praia de Botafogo, 190 13º andar Botafogo - Rio de Janeiro, RJ - CEP: 22250-900 [http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_ass_email.jpg]luca.belli at fgv.br [http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_ass_url.jpg]CTS-FGV direitorio.fgv.br/cts [http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_ass_url.jpg]cyberBRICS www.cyberbrics.info [http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_ass_url.jpg]CPDP LatAm www.cpdp.lat CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message, as well as any attached document, may contain personal data and information that is confidential and privileged and is intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution of this email or attached documents, or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email by mistake. ________________________________ Da: Governance per conto di Carlos Afonso via Governance Inviato: domenica 12 dicembre 2021 14:13 A: parminder ; governance at lists.igcaucus.org Oggetto: Re: [Governance] Fwd: India Thanks so much, Parm. fraternal regards --c.a. On 12/12/2021 08:44, parminder via Governance wrote: > > Dear Carlos, Apropos your comment on not being able to see Wolfgang's > meesage, it was below what I posted ... But if you are interested in the > first exchange, it is below. I though this was IGC stuff and not so much > ALAC and so posted it here ... > > Happy to hear your views, esp on my second post. > > > Best parminder > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Re: India > Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 19:50:39 +0530 > From: parminder > To: Wolfgang Kleinwächter , > at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > > > On 07/12/21 5:36 pm, Wolfgang Kleinwächter wrote: >> @ Parminder: > > > Sure, Wolfgang, happy to respond to your questions anytime.. > >> >> Is the Putin/Modi Summit related to the Indian Internet Shutdowns? > > I have seen and heard of no connection of that kind. > > In any case, nations nowadays need no external assistance to control > their respective Internets. > > As for foreign alliances, if anything India is certainly bending much > more towards US led alliances, that claim some western values of > democracy, HR, etc ( all of which is of course a lot of BS, and simply > good old-fashioned geopolitics and geo- economics under new garbs -- one > significant manifestation and result of which kind of geo-politics/ > geoeconomics is neo-colonisation) .. > >> >> see; >> https://indianexpress.com/article/india/vladimir-putin-india-russia-summit-narendra-modi-7659202/ >> > Anything in particular you want me to comment on from this .. I found > nothing Interenty in this .. >> >> https://internetshutdowns.in/ >> > > Yes, I know. We collaborate with this coalition, and this organization > SFLC .. > > parminder > > >> >> Wolfgang > > -- Carlos A. Afonso [emails são pessoais exceto quando explicitamente indicado em contrário] [emails are personal unless explicitly indicated otherwise] Instituto Nupef - https://nupef.org.br -- Governance mailing list Governance at lists.igcaucus.org https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 14321 bytes Desc: image.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 365 bytes Desc: image.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 566 bytes Desc: image.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 709 bytes Desc: image.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 668 bytes Desc: image.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 668 bytes Desc: image.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 668 bytes Desc: image.png URL: From murali.shanmugavelan at gmail.com Mon Dec 13 11:43:39 2021 From: murali.shanmugavelan at gmail.com (Murali Shanmugavelan) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 16:43:39 +0000 Subject: [Governance] India In-Reply-To: <815f9e59-9f61-e671-2b06-f310eedebaa7@itforchange.net> References: <1439079932.1589570.1638878772571@email.ionos.de> <2a31d9eb-5cc1-86ba-e3bb-8c4782dc3c06@itforchange.net> <362495432.1850784.1638962206260@email.ionos.de> <815f9e59-9f61-e671-2b06-f310eedebaa7@itforchange.net> Message-ID: "India has a non aligned background..."?!?!? On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 at 14:16, parminder via Governance < governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > Dear Wolfgang, > > Thanks for the quotes about the Putin -- Modi meeting. Indeed in most > mainstream coverage in India the ICT side hardly got mentioned. They were > the less important part of the summit. > > I am not sure what kind of comments you are looking for from me. > > India has a non aligned background and it is normal for such a large > country like India to hedge its bets and not get caught in one > geo-techno-enclosure or the other, in the old cold war like sense, but now > with digital tech dependencies which are even deeper, stronger and largely > irreversible. It therefore makes complete sense that India is exploring ICT > relationships with Russia, to* inter alia* diversify from the deep > embeddedness that India has in the US centric techno-sphere. Do you > disapprove of it? See my article of a few years back India should aim > for digital non alignment > > > BTW, one of the key current issues in India-Russia relationship (also > highlighted around the summit) is that India is buying S 400 missiles from > Russia, despite strong warnings from the US that this may lead to India > being excluded from US military supplies. > > Perhaps that would put in good perspective Russia-India techno > relationships that seem to so rent your mind. > > From your quoted text, you seem to have issues or questions about Russia > and India deciding to work together on the proposed UN cyber crime > treaty... > > Do you think there should NOT be any such UN treaty? > > Does that mean countries should rather sign on Europe's Budapest > Convention on Cybercrime, or wait for new ones to come from OECD's CDEP > (committee on digital economy policy) or from the CoE? You know why India > and other countries refuse to sign on the Budapest Convention -- actually > they find nothing wrong with its substance, but they refuse to be governed > by rules that they were not a part of developing... Makes any democratic > sense to you? > > If not Budapest Convention, what is the option .. The world stay without > a cyber crime framework? Why should not all countries sit together to make > a cyber crime convention? Happy to hear your reasons either way. > > About multistakeholder participation in such a UN cyber crime convention, > which seems to be one major concern of yours: > > I have been arguing long for a horizontal UN digital policy body, with the > SAME multistakeholder participation model as OECD's CDEP (and of CoE where > the Budapest Convention was made) ... If we had that UN body , we could > have employed its structure for MS participation for developing the > proposed UN convention on cyber crime ... But, THE PROBLEM IS, you have > consistently opposed it, including as part of the UN WG on enhanced > cooperation which had the precise mandate to develop institutional > structures for UN based digital policy making. We both were members of that > WG and we know what went on there, right. How developing countries proposed > the exact same OECD model for UN level digital policy making -- along with > all its MS components/ characteristics -- AND YOU ALL TURNED IT DOWN. Am > I making any mis-statement here? Happy to be corrected in that case. > > So, perhaps now it is your turn to answer some questions: > > 1. Do you think that there should be no UN cyber crime convention, and all > non Europeans too should simply sign Europe's Budapest Convention, and > further wait for more cyber governance frameworks from OECD's CDEP, or > CoE's digital policy mechanisms? > > 2. Why and how you call OECD's CDEP and CoE's digital policy making > processes as multistakeholder, and those are acceptable to you, but the > EXACT SAME model at the UN becomes multi-lateral and NOT multistakeholder - > -and, apparently for that reason, not acceptable to you ? > > thanks and look forward to your responses > > parminder > > PS: You raise concerns about India-Russia parleys and digital rights > issues (internet shutdowns). Last year India signed this with US led five > eyes against eend-to-end encryption > https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/international-statement-end-end-encryption-and-public-safety > .. Just seeking a better balance of geo-political concerns from you. > > > > On 08/12/21 4:46 pm, Wolfgang Kleinwächter wrote: > > Wolfgang: > Is the Putin/Modi Summit related to the Indian Internet Shutdowns? > > Parminder: > > I have seen and heard of no connection of that kind. In any case, nations > nowadays need no external assistance to control their respective Internets. > As for foreign alliances, if anything India is certainly bending much more > towards US led alliances, that claim some western values of democracy, HR, > etc ( all of which is of course a lot of BS, and simply good old-fashioned > geopolitics and geo- economics under new garbs -- one significant > manifestation and result of which kind of geo-politics/ geoeconomics is > neo-colonisation) .. > > Wolfgang: > As I can see, Internet Governance (cybersecurity and digital economny) was > part of the discussions. > > This is from the Putin-Modi Meeting: "The Sides appreciated close > cooperation in the field of security in the use of Information and > Communication Technologies (ICT) through inter-agency cooperation under > bilateral mechanisms and at multilateral platforms. They highlighted the > leading role of the United Nations in the decision-making process on > security in the use of ICTs. The Sides also recognized the need for further > work on rules, norms and principles of responsible behavior of State aimed > at preventing conflicts and promoting peaceful use of ICTs. The Sides > reaffirmed the importance of international cooperation against criminal use > of ICTs and in this regard they welcome the establishment of an open- ended > Ad hoc intergovernmental committee of experts to elaborate a comprehensive > international convention on countering the use of ICTs for criminal > purposes as stipulated in the UN GA resolutions 74/247 and 75/282." ... > "The Sides intend to focus particularly on increasing the effectiveness of > countering terrorism, extremism, drug trafficking, cross-border organized > crime, and information security threats," ... "The Sides agreed that > safeguarding of global commons including our oceans, outer space and > information space should be based on the principles of transparency, > accessibility and upholding international law." > > And they discussed also digital economy: " The Sides also agreed to > facilitate collaboration between government and private sector > organizations to find ways of joint development of software products, > platforms and services as well as in the area of electronics manufacturing. > The Sides confirmed their interest in further developing cooperation in the > sphere of digital technologies, including those related to information > protection, security of critical infrastructure and law enforcement." > > Any comment? BTW, no references to civil society or a multistakeholder > approach. > > see: http://en.kremlin.ru/supplement/5745 > > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From suresh at hserus.net Mon Dec 13 12:23:31 2021 From: suresh at hserus.net (Suresh Ramasubramanian) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 17:23:31 +0000 Subject: [Governance] India In-Reply-To: References: <1439079932.1589570.1638878772571@email.ionos.de> <2a31d9eb-5cc1-86ba-e3bb-8c4782dc3c06@itforchange.net> <362495432.1850784.1638962206260@email.ionos.de> <815f9e59-9f61-e671-2b06-f310eedebaa7@itforchange.net> Message-ID: Perhaps it did in Nehru’s time several decades back. This is the Modi government and with an entirely different set of tilts. Very long, very glib explanation but .. From: Governance on behalf of Murali Shanmugavelan via Governance Date: Monday, 13 December 2021 at 10:14 PM To: parminder Cc: Wolfgang Kleinwächter , governance at lists.igcaucus.org , at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [Governance] India "India has a non aligned background..."?!?!? On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 at 14:16, parminder via Governance > wrote: Dear Wolfgang, Thanks for the quotes about the Putin -- Modi meeting. Indeed in most mainstream coverage in India the ICT side hardly got mentioned. They were the less important part of the summit. I am not sure what kind of comments you are looking for from me. India has a non aligned background and it is normal for such a large country like India to hedge its bets and not get caught in one geo-techno-enclosure or the other, in the old cold war like sense, but now with digital tech dependencies which are even deeper, stronger and largely irreversible. It therefore makes complete sense that India is exploring ICT relationships with Russia, to inter alia diversify from the deep embeddedness that India has in the US centric techno-sphere. Do you disapprove of it? See my article of a few years back India should aim for digital non alignment BTW, one of the key current issues in India-Russia relationship (also highlighted around the summit) is that India is buying S 400 missiles from Russia, despite strong warnings from the US that this may lead to India being excluded from US military supplies. Perhaps that would put in good perspective Russia-India techno relationships that seem to so rent your mind. >From your quoted text, you seem to have issues or questions about Russia and India deciding to work together on the proposed UN cyber crime treaty... Do you think there should NOT be any such UN treaty? Does that mean countries should rather sign on Europe's Budapest Convention on Cybercrime, or wait for new ones to come from OECD's CDEP (committee on digital economy policy) or from the CoE? You know why India and other countries refuse to sign on the Budapest Convention -- actually they find nothing wrong with its substance, but they refuse to be governed by rules that they were not a part of developing... Makes any democratic sense to you? If not Budapest Convention, what is the option .. The world stay without a cyber crime framework? Why should not all countries sit together to make a cyber crime convention? Happy to hear your reasons either way. About multistakeholder participation in such a UN cyber crime convention, which seems to be one major concern of yours: I have been arguing long for a horizontal UN digital policy body, with the SAME multistakeholder participation model as OECD's CDEP (and of CoE where the Budapest Convention was made) ... If we had that UN body , we could have employed its structure for MS participation for developing the proposed UN convention on cyber crime ... But, THE PROBLEM IS, you have consistently opposed it, including as part of the UN WG on enhanced cooperation which had the precise mandate to develop institutional structures for UN based digital policy making. We both were members of that WG and we know what went on there, right. How developing countries proposed the exact same OECD model for UN level digital policy making -- along with all its MS components/ characteristics -- AND YOU ALL TURNED IT DOWN. Am I making any mis-statement here? Happy to be corrected in that case. So, perhaps now it is your turn to answer some questions: 1. Do you think that there should be no UN cyber crime convention, and all non Europeans too should simply sign Europe's Budapest Convention, and further wait for more cyber governance frameworks from OECD's CDEP, or CoE's digital policy mechanisms? 2. Why and how you call OECD's CDEP and CoE's digital policy making processes as multistakeholder, and those are acceptable to you, but the EXACT SAME model at the UN becomes multi-lateral and NOT multistakeholder - -and, apparently for that reason, not acceptable to you ? thanks and look forward to your responses parminder PS: You raise concerns about India-Russia parleys and digital rights issues (internet shutdowns). Last year India signed this with US led five eyes against eend-to-end encryption https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/international-statement-end-end-encryption-and-public-safety .. Just seeking a better balance of geo-political concerns from you. On 08/12/21 4:46 pm, Wolfgang Kleinwächter wrote: Wolfgang: Is the Putin/Modi Summit related to the Indian Internet Shutdowns? Parminder: I have seen and heard of no connection of that kind. In any case, nations nowadays need no external assistance to control their respective Internets. As for foreign alliances, if anything India is certainly bending much more towards US led alliances, that claim some western values of democracy, HR, etc ( all of which is of course a lot of BS, and simply good old-fashioned geopolitics and geo- economics under new garbs -- one significant manifestation and result of which kind of geo-politics/ geoeconomics is neo-colonisation) .. Wolfgang: As I can see, Internet Governance (cybersecurity and digital economny) was part of the discussions. This is from the Putin-Modi Meeting: "The Sides appreciated close cooperation in the field of security in the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) through inter-agency cooperation under bilateral mechanisms and at multilateral platforms. They highlighted the leading role of the United Nations in the decision-making process on security in the use of ICTs. The Sides also recognized the need for further work on rules, norms and principles of responsible behavior of State aimed at preventing conflicts and promoting peaceful use of ICTs. The Sides reaffirmed the importance of international cooperation against criminal use of ICTs and in this regard they welcome the establishment of an open- ended Ad hoc intergovernmental committee of experts to elaborate a comprehensive international convention on countering the use of ICTs for criminal purposes as stipulated in the UN GA resolutions 74/247 and 75/282." ... "The Sides intend to focus particularly on increasing the effectiveness of countering terrorism, extremism, drug trafficking, cross-border organized crime, and information security threats," ... "The Sides agreed that safeguarding of global commons including our oceans, outer space and information space should be based on the principles of transparency, accessibility and upholding international law." And they discussed also digital economy: " The Sides also agreed to facilitate collaboration between government and private sector organizations to find ways of joint development of software products, platforms and services as well as in the area of electronics manufacturing. The Sides confirmed their interest in further developing cooperation in the sphere of digital technologies, including those related to information protection, security of critical infrastructure and law enforcement." Any comment? BTW, no references to civil society or a multistakeholder approach. see: http://en.kremlin.ru/supplement/5745 -- Governance mailing list Governance at lists.igcaucus.org https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From parminder at itforchange.net Mon Dec 13 21:00:49 2021 From: parminder at itforchange.net (parminder) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 07:30:49 +0530 Subject: [Governance] India In-Reply-To: References: <1439079932.1589570.1638878772571@email.ionos.de> <2a31d9eb-5cc1-86ba-e3bb-8c4782dc3c06@itforchange.net> <362495432.1850784.1638962206260@email.ionos.de> <815f9e59-9f61-e671-2b06-f310eedebaa7@itforchange.net> Message-ID: <7e702b21-1a02-4470-7392-8df761edd3bc@itforchange.net> On 13/12/21 10:13 pm, Murali Shanmugavelan wrote: > "India has a non aligned background..."?!?!? India was a major force in building the nonalignment movement -- that is what 'background' means... As for the current status, my email amply lays is out, See "... the deep embeddedness that India has in the US centric techno-sphere...". Although it still does -- even if just bec it is a big country and needs enough independence,-- try 'some degree' of maintaining independence, or, in other words, a 'diversity of dependences',  like the S 400 missile story tell us... parminder > > On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 at 14:16, parminder via Governance > > > wrote: > > Dear Wolfgang, > > Thanks for the quotes about the Putin -- Modi meeting. Indeed in > most mainstream coverage in India the ICT side hardly got > mentioned. They were the less important part of the summit. > > I am not sure what kind of comments you are looking for from me. > > India has a non aligned background and it is normal for such a > large country like India to hedge its bets and not get caught in > one geo-techno-enclosure or the other, in the old cold war like > sense, but now with digital tech dependencies which are even > deeper, stronger and largely irreversible. It therefore makes > complete sense that India is exploring ICT relationships with > Russia, to/inter alia/ diversify from the deep embeddedness that > India has in the US centric techno-sphere. Do you disapprove of > it?  See my article of a few years back India should aim for > digital non alignment > > > BTW, one of the key current issues in India-Russia relationship > (also highlighted around the summit)  is that India is buying S > 400 missiles from Russia, despite strong warnings from the US that > this may lead to India being excluded from US military supplies. > > Perhaps that would put in good perspective Russia-India techno > relationships that seem to so rent your mind. > > From your quoted text, you seem to have issues or questions about > Russia and India deciding to work together on the proposed UN > cyber crime treaty... > > Do you think there should NOT be any such UN treaty? > > Does that mean countries should rather sign on Europe's Budapest > Convention on Cybercrime, or wait for new ones to come from OECD's > CDEP (committee on digital economy policy) or from the CoE? You > know why India and other countries refuse to sign on the Budapest > Convention -- actually they find nothing wrong with its substance, > but they refuse to be governed by rules that they were not a part > of developing... Makes any democratic sense to you? > > If not Budapest Convention,  what is the option .. The world stay > without a cyber crime framework? Why should not all countries sit > together to make a cyber crime convention? Happy to hear your > reasons either way. > > About multistakeholder participation in such a UN cyber crime > convention, which seems to be one major concern of yours: > > I have been arguing long for a horizontal UN digital policy body, > with the SAME multistakeholder participation model as OECD's CDEP > (and of CoE where the Budapest Convention was made)  ... If we had > that UN body , we could have employed its structure for MS > participation for developing the proposed UN convention on cyber > crime ... But, THE PROBLEM IS, you have consistently opposed it, > including as part of the UN WG on enhanced cooperation which had > the precise mandate to develop institutional structures for UN > based digital policy making. We both were members of that WG and > we know what went on there, right. How developing countries > proposed the exact same OECD model for UN level digital policy > making -- along with all its MS components/ characteristics -- AND > YOU ALL TURNED IT DOWN. Am I making any mis-statement here? Happy > to be corrected in that case. > > So, perhaps now it is your turn to answer some questions: > > 1. Do you think that there should be no UN cyber crime convention, > and all non Europeans too should simply sign Europe's Budapest > Convention, and further wait for more cyber governance frameworks > from OECD's CDEP, or CoE's digital policy mechanisms? > > 2. Why and how you call OECD's CDEP and CoE's digital policy > making processes as multistakeholder, and those are acceptable to > you, but the EXACT SAME model at the UN becomes multi-lateral and > NOT multistakeholder - -and, apparently for that reason, not > acceptable to you ? > > thanks and look forward to your responses > > parminder > > PS: You raise concerns about India-Russia parleys and digital > rights issues (internet shutdowns). Last year India signed this > with US led five eyes against eend-to-end encryption > https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/international-statement-end-end-encryption-and-public-safety >    > .. Just seeking a better balance of geo-political concerns from you. > > > > On 08/12/21 4:46 pm, Wolfgang Kleinwächter wrote: >> Wolfgang: >> Is the Putin/Modi Summit related to the Indian Internet Shutdowns? >> >> Parminder: >> >> I have seen and heard of no connection of that kind. In any case, >> nations nowadays need no external assistance to control their >> respective Internets. As for foreign alliances, if anything India >> is certainly bending much more towards US led alliances, that >> claim some western values of democracy, HR, etc ( all of which is >> of course a lot of BS, and simply good old-fashioned geopolitics >> and geo- economics under new garbs -- one significant >> manifestation and result of which kind of geo-politics/ >> geoeconomics is neo-colonisation) .. >> >> >> Wolfgang: >> As I can see, Internet Governance (cybersecurity and digital >> economny) was part of the discussions. >> >> This is from the Putin-Modi Meeting: "The Sides appreciated close >> cooperation in the field of security in the use of Information >> and Communication Technologies (ICT) through inter-agency >> cooperation under bilateral mechanisms and at multilateral >> platforms. They highlighted the leading role of the United >> Nations in the decision-making process on security in the use of >> ICTs. The Sides also recognized the need for further work on >> rules, norms and principles of responsible behavior of State >> aimed at preventing conflicts and promoting peaceful use of ICTs. >> The Sides reaffirmed the importance of international cooperation >> against criminal use of ICTs and in this regard they welcome the >> establishment of an open- ended Ad hoc intergovernmental >> committee of experts to elaborate a comprehensive international >> convention on countering the use of ICTs for criminal purposes as >> stipulated in the UN GA resolutions 74/247 and 75/282." ... "The >> Sides intend to focus particularly on increasing the >> effectiveness of countering terrorism, extremism, drug >> trafficking, cross-border organized crime, and information >> security threats,"  ... "The Sides agreed that safeguarding of >> global commons including our oceans, outer space and information >> space should be based on the principles of transparency, >> accessibility and upholding international law." >> >> And they discussed also digital economy: " The Sides also agreed >> to facilitate collaboration between government and private sector >> organizations to find ways of joint development of software >> products, platforms and services as well as in the area of >> electronics manufacturing. The Sides confirmed their interest in >> further developing cooperation in the sphere of digital >> technologies, including those related to information protection, >> security of critical infrastructure and law enforcement." >> >> Any comment? BTW, no references to civil society or a >> multistakeholder approach. >> >> see: http://en.kremlin.ru/supplement/5745 >> >> > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lb at lucabelli.net Wed Dec 15 07:58:59 2021 From: lb at lucabelli.net (lb lucabelli.net) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 12:58:59 +0000 Subject: [Governance] 2 New Books Launched at IGF on Platforms and Community Networks Message-ID: Dear colleagues, In case you are looking for reading suggestions for the end of 2021, together with many members of this list we launched two new books at the IGF, last week: the “Glossary of Platform Law and Policy Terms” and “Community Networks: Towards Sustainable Funding Models” They are important works not only for the themes they discuss but also because they have been elaborated through an open and participatory process by two dynamic coalitions of the IGF (on Platform Responsibility and on Community Connectivity), thus providing evidence that the IGF can be much more than a mere talking shop. The “Glossary of Platform Law and Policy Terms” includes analyses of 100 essential terms related to digital platforms, offering to policymakers and researchers the conceptual basis on which legal/semantic interoperability between different systems framing platform governance can be built. It is freely available on the IGF website https://www.intgovforum.org/en/filedepot_download/45/20436 The volume on “Community Networks: Towards Sustainable Funding Models” explores how alternative Internet access strategies such as community networks can be financially sustainable, sharing case studies, success stories and policy analyses. Importantly, more than 70% of book authors are women. This volume is also freely available on the IGF website https://www.intgovforum.org/en/filedepot_download/92/20438 Both works have been the result of incredible team works for which I would like to sincerely thank all co-editors a long list of stellar co-authors (especially for having respected very challenging schedules all along the pandemic), many of which are on this list. Please feel free to share this message through your networks! All the best and season’s greetings Luca  [http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_direito_rio.jpg] Luca Belli, PhD Professor | FGV Law Schoool Coordinator | Center for Technology & Society [http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_tel.jpg]+55 21 3799 5763 t at 1lucabelli [http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_direito_rio_map.jpg]Praia de Botafogo, 190 13º andar Botafogo - Rio de Janeiro, RJ - CEP: 22250-900 [http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_ass_email.jpg]luca.belli at fgv.br [http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_ass_url.jpg]CTS-FGV direitorio.fgv.br/cts [http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_ass_url.jpg]cyberBRICS www.cyberbrics.info [http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_ass_url.jpg]CPDP LatAm www.cpdp.lat CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message, as well as any attached document, may contain personal data and information that is confidential and privileged and is intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution of this email or attached documents, or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email by mistake. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 16538 bytes Desc: image.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 433 bytes Desc: image.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 616 bytes Desc: image.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 733 bytes Desc: image.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 771 bytes Desc: image.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 771 bytes Desc: image.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 771 bytes Desc: image.png URL: From 6.internet at gmail.com Wed Dec 15 08:01:11 2021 From: 6.internet at gmail.com (sivasubramanian muthusamy) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 18:31:11 +0530 Subject: [Governance] 2 New Books Launched at IGF on Platforms and Community Networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Congratulations Luca. Sivasubramanian M On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 6:29 PM lb lucabelli.net via Governance < governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > > Dear colleagues, > > In case you are looking for reading suggestions for the end of 2021, > together with many members of this list we *launched two new books at the > IGF*, last week: the “*Glossary of Platform Law and Policy Terms > *” and “*Community > Networks: Towards Sustainable Funding Models > *” > > They are important works not only for the themes they discuss but also > because they have been elaborated through an open and participatory process > by two dynamic coalitions of the IGF (on Platform Responsibility and on > Community Connectivity), thus providing evidence that the IGF can be much > more than a mere talking shop. > > The *“Glossary of Platform Law and Policy Terms*” includes analyses of > 100 essential terms related to digital platforms, offering to policymakers > and researchers the conceptual basis on which legal/semantic > interoperability between different systems framing platform governance can > be built. It is freely available on the IGF website > https://www.intgovforum.org/en/filedepot_download/45/20436 > > The volume on “*Community Networks: Towards Sustainable Funding Models*” > explores how alternative Internet access strategies such as community > networks can be financially sustainable, sharing case studies, success > stories and policy analyses. Importantly, more than 70% of book authors are > women. This volume is also freely available on the IGF website > https://www.intgovforum.org/en/filedepot_download/92/20438 > > Both works have been the result of incredible team works for which I would > like to sincerely thank all co-editors a long list of stellar co-authors > (especially for having respected very challenging schedules all along the > pandemic), many of which are on this list. > > Please feel free to share this message through your networks! > > All the best and season’s greetings > > Luca > > > > > ** > > [image: > http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_direito_rio.jpg] > > > *Luca Belli, PhD* > > *Professor | FGV Law Schoool* > > *Coordinator | Center for Technology & Society* > > [image: http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_tel.jpg]+55 > 21 3799 *5763* *t*@1lucabelli > > [image: > http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_direito_rio_map.jpg]Praia > de Botafogo, 190 13º andar > > Botafogo - Rio de Janeiro, RJ - CEP: 22250-900 > > [image: > http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_ass_email.jpg] > luca.belli at fgv.br > > [image: > http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_ass_url.jpg]*CTS-FGV direitorio.fgv.br/cts > * > > > *[image: > http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_ass_url.jpg]cyberBRICS www.cyberbrics.info > * > > *[image: > http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_ass_url.jpg]CPDP > LatAm www.cpdp.lat * > *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE* > This message, as well as any attached document, may contain *personal > data* and* information that is confidential and privileged *and is *intended > only for the use of the addressee named above*. If you are not the > intended recipient, you are *hereby notified* that any disclosure, > copying or distribution of this email or attached documents, or taking any > action in reliance on the contents of this message or its attachments is > strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please contact the sender if you > believe you have received this email by mistake. > > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 16538 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 433 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 616 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 733 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 771 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 771 bytes Desc: not available URL: From anita at itforchange.net Thu Dec 16 06:33:45 2021 From: anita at itforchange.net (anita) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 17:03:45 +0530 Subject: [Governance] 2021 versus Big Tech: A Year in Review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear all, I am excited to share that the year-end issue of DataSyn is out! This special issue brings together 21 experts to reflect on the battle against Big Tech in 2021, and suggest trajectories to take the resistance forward in the coming year. Also look out for our list of media and book recommendations for your holidays! Check out the complete issue below. To keep abreast of all things Big Tech in the coming year, *subscribe to DataSyn here *. Happy holidays! Best, anita Dispatches from the People's Tech Frontier December 2021 Dear ,   To cap off the year, we reached out to 21 powerful voices from around the world, across domains of research, activism, and advocacy to capture the pulse of change in the battle against Big Tech. There are many successes worth celebrating this year – from landmark judicial victories that constitute the first step towards restoring the humanity of gig workers to resounding civic actions, campaigns, and new modes of worker organizing that have forced governments and corporations to sit up, take notice, and change course. As you prepare to wind down and welcome in a new year, perhaps with the caution and incertitude that most of the world embodies at this time, this year end issue might provide the necessary hope for the road forward. We also bring you something fun – a radical and edgy smorgasbord of reading and media recommendations on technology , hand-picked by our experts that you can peruse through and savor for weeks.     Wishing you a happy holiday season, The DataSyn Team  *THE MULTITUDE RISES* 21 Takes on Big Tech from 2021 21 experts guide us through the small and big victories in the fight against Big Tech across the world in this series of short interviews. They offer us diverse trajectories of resistance, opportunity and defiance for the year to come in the steady march against Big Tech capture. *POSTCARDS FROM THE GLOBAL SOUTH * Cracks in the Edifice: An Illustrative Essay from the People’s Tech Frontier  *The DataSyn Team* As most of the world concludes a year of precarity, deprivation, and widening inequality, Big Tech is poised to hit double-digit rates of growth, with the top five global corporations looking to make $1.398 trillion in combined revenue in 2021. Yet, this is only part of the picture. 2021 was also a year of subversion, with activists, workers, and even nation-states, throwing down the gauntlet. Read more about these moments of resistance against Big Tech in our illustrative essay.   / In courts across the world, gig workers took Uber to task demanding workplace dignity. / /The Chinese government paved the way for new data imaginaries through its Big Tech crackdown./ /Women platform workers took to the streets in India, protesting against exploitative algorithms and fighting for fair wages and working conditions./ /South Africa introduced critical policy measures, asserting its digital sovereignty. / /2021 saw many legal challenges stopping Amazon in its tracks, culminating in the global Make Amazon Pay campaign in November, with workers, activists, and civil society organizations coming together to disrupt Amazon's supply chains. / /Simmering rage against dominant platforms like Grab and Gojek has sparked off increased public demonstrations by a burgeoning unionized platform workforce in East Asia.  / The Sins and Synergies Lounge What could a Cold War caper teach us about modern anxieties about AI?  Can contemporary Chinese science fiction tell us anything about the imminent future? Experts we contacted for this issue think we have a lot to learn from these reading and media suggestions. Check out our one-of-a-kind recommendation list about all things Big Tech! Post-Script DataSyn is a free monthly newsletter from IT for Change , featuring content hosted by Bot Populi . DataSyn is supported through the Fair, Green and Global Alliance. Have thoughts about what we carried? Want to contribute?  Contact us at *newsletter.datasyn at itforchange.net*   Tw Inst Fb Yt IT for Change #393, 17th Main, Jaynagar 4th T block, Bangalore 560041 India Add us to your address book This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License Add us to your address book . Want to change how you receive these emails? You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list . -- - no title specified Anita Gurumurthy   Executive Director IT for Change In special consultative status with the United Nations ECOSOC www.ITforChange.net Phone: 00-91-80-26536890 | T: 080 2653 6890 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ Forum mailing list Forum at justnetcoalition.org https://lists.justnetcoalition.org/listinfo/forum From lists at digitaldissidents.org Thu Dec 16 06:41:48 2021 From: lists at digitaldissidents.org (Niels ten Oever) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 12:41:48 +0100 Subject: [Governance] January 12 - Workshop on Internet Standard Setting Research Methods Message-ID: <20b68bec-bf83-a0ea-0a60-923ee591e52c@digitaldissidents.org> Dear all, We'd like to invite you to the Giganet "Workshop on Internet Standard Setting Research Methods", taking place online on 12 January 2022 beginning at 6AM EST (12 CET). Through this link you can find the full programme: https://ig-methods.sciencesconf.org/resource/page/id/1 Browsing the menu on your left, you can register to attend (free of charge) and browse papers and presentations. The registration link is the following: https://ig-methods.sciencesconf.org/registration The workshop, which features a keynote speech by professor Jorge Contreras, aims to provide an opportunity for scholars and researchers to: - Explore and perhaps discover qualitative and quantitative methods applicable to standard setting for information networks - Discuss the feasibility of applying specific methods - Improve the understanding of specific methods - Identify new and existing data sources - Share open research questions and work-in-progress on methods - Receive feedback to improve the methods. We will cover the following topics during the workshop: - Mixed Methods - Lessons from studying non-Internet standard-setting bodies - How to acquire data (standards, patents, conversations, outcome documents) - Network analysis - Computational methods - Discourse analysis - Ethnography Looking forward to your participation! Feel free to get back to us should you need further info. Best, The Organizing Committee: Riccardo Nanni, Julien Rossi, Farzaneh Badii, Niels ten Oever and Corinne Cath -- Niels ten Oever, PhD Postdoctoral Researcher - Media Studies Department - University of Amsterdam Affiliated Faculty - Digital Democracy Insitute - Simon Fraser University Research Fellow - Centre for Internet and Human Rights - European University Viadrina Associated Scholar - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - Fundação Getúlio Vargas W: https://nielstenoever.net E: mail at nielstenoever.net T: @nielstenoever P/S/WA: +31629051853 PGP: 2458 0B70 5C4A FD8A 9488 643A 0ED8 3F3A 468A C8B3 Read my latest article on Internet infrastructure governance in Globalizations here: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14747731.2021.1953221 From lb at lucabelli.net Thu Dec 16 12:54:23 2021 From: lb at lucabelli.net (lb lucabelli.net) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 17:54:23 +0000 Subject: [Governance] R: 2 New Books Launched at IGF on Platforms and Community Networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks! Hope they will be useful! All the best ________________________________ Da: sivasubramanian muthusamy <6.internet at gmail.com> Inviato: mercoledì 15 dicembre 2021 10:01 A: lb lucabelli.net Cc: giganet-members at listserv.syr.edu ; governance at lists.igcaucus.org ; forum at justnetcoalition.org Oggetto: Re: [Governance] 2 New Books Launched at IGF on Platforms and Community Networks Congratulations Luca. Sivasubramanian M On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 6:29 PM lb lucabelli.net via Governance > wrote: Dear colleagues, In case you are looking for reading suggestions for the end of 2021, together with many members of this list we launched two new books at the IGF, last week: the “Glossary of Platform Law and Policy Terms” and “Community Networks: Towards Sustainable Funding Models” They are important works not only for the themes they discuss but also because they have been elaborated through an open and participatory process by two dynamic coalitions of the IGF (on Platform Responsibility and on Community Connectivity), thus providing evidence that the IGF can be much more than a mere talking shop. The “Glossary of Platform Law and Policy Terms” includes analyses of 100 essential terms related to digital platforms, offering to policymakers and researchers the conceptual basis on which legal/semantic interoperability between different systems framing platform governance can be built. It is freely available on the IGF website https://www.intgovforum.org/en/filedepot_download/45/20436 The volume on “Community Networks: Towards Sustainable Funding Models” explores how alternative Internet access strategies such as community networks can be financially sustainable, sharing case studies, success stories and policy analyses. Importantly, more than 70% of book authors are women. This volume is also freely available on the IGF website https://www.intgovforum.org/en/filedepot_download/92/20438 Both works have been the result of incredible team works for which I would like to sincerely thank all co-editors a long list of stellar co-authors (especially for having respected very challenging schedules all along the pandemic), many of which are on this list. Please feel free to share this message through your networks! All the best and season’s greetings Luca  [http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_direito_rio.jpg] Luca Belli, PhD Professor | FGV Law Schoool Coordinator | Center for Technology & Society [http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_tel.jpg]+55 21 3799 5763 t at 1lucabelli [http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_direito_rio_map.jpg]Praia de Botafogo, 190 13º andar Botafogo - Rio de Janeiro, RJ - CEP: 22250-900 [http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_ass_email.jpg]luca.belli at fgv.br [http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_ass_url.jpg]CTS-FGV direitorio.fgv.br/cts [http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_ass_url.jpg]cyberBRICS www.cyberbrics.info [http://www.fgv.br/mailing/2018/direito_rio/assinatura/fgv_ass_url.jpg]CPDP LatAm www.cpdp.lat CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message, as well as any attached document, may contain personal data and information that is confidential and privileged and is intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution of this email or attached documents, or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email by mistake. -- Governance mailing list Governance at lists.igcaucus.org https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 16538 bytes Desc: image.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 433 bytes Desc: image.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 616 bytes Desc: image.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 733 bytes Desc: image.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image.png Type: image/png Size: 771 bytes Desc: image.png URL: From joly at punkcast.com Sat Dec 18 22:58:04 2021 From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie) Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2021 22:58:04 -0500 Subject: [Governance] WEBCAST : Dialogue on Inclusion: Does the Internet represent diverse voices? Perspectives from gender, linguistic and marginalized communities Message-ID: This is just starting. Real time text is https://bit.ly/3Ebb5Wf [image: livestream] On *Sunday December 19 2021*, at *09:30-11:00 IST* (04:00-05:30 UTC), the *India Youth IGF *, in conjunction with Internet Society's *India Hyderabad Chapter * and *India Chennai Chapter *, hosts a webinar '*Dialogue on Inclusion: Does the internet represent diverse voices? *' to unpack the idea of inclusive internet in Indian context. "*Internet United*" was the thematic chosen for 16th Internet Governance Forum. Taking the conversation forward, we attempt to explore if the internet is really inclusive through the lenses of various communities like LGBTQ, PwD, marginalized and linguistic communities. *SPEAKERS* *Divyaa Gupta*, independent consultant *Sameer Nair*, Youth4Jobs Foundation *Ritushree*, The Outcast Collective *Savita Muley*, Haqdarshak *Meena Kotwal*, The Mooknayak *Vidushi Kapoor*, Process9 *Shruti Shreya*, The Dialogue *Bhuvana Meenakshi Koteeswaran*, EmergeAbility, *MODERATOR* *Adarsh BU*, ISOC Rural Development SIG *HOSTS* *Dr.Salman Abdul Moiz*, Vice Chair, ISOC Hyderabad *Purnima Tiwari*, IGF Youth Ambassador 21 *Brinda Dash*, Former APrIGF Fellow 2021 *LIVESTREAM http://livestream.com/internetsociety/dialogueoninclusion * *PARTICIPATE VIA ZOOM https://bit.ly/3ejsHEV * *REAL TIME TEXT https://bit.ly/3Ebb5Wf * *TWITTER #DigitalInclusion @youthIGFIndia #Internet4All @isochyderabad @isocchennai* *SIMULCASTS* *https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/ * *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive * *https://www.facebook.com/liveisoc/ *(AI Captions) *ARCHIVE* *https://archive.org/details/dialogueoninclusion * *Permalink* https://isoc.live/14894/ - -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From amritachoudhury8 at gmail.com Tue Dec 21 01:14:51 2021 From: amritachoudhury8 at gmail.com (Amrita Choudhury) Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 11:44:51 +0530 Subject: [Governance] CCAOI Newsletter October to December 2021 Message-ID: Hi, Sharing the CCAOI Newsletter highlighting key digital policy developments from October till date from the Indian perspective. Key updates in this issue are related to #cybersecurity #ransomware attacks #antitrust #globaltaxation #Amazon investigations #metaverse #PDP Bill #Bigtech regulation #child safety online #geopolitics #privacy #dataprotection #InternetOutage #gigworkers #IGF2021 #inSIG2021 #IIGF2021 #YouthIGFIndia2021 and more. Wishing you happy holidays and a prosperous 2022. Regards, Amrita Choudhury CCAOI -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From joly at punkcast.com Tue Dec 21 03:35:40 2021 From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie) Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 03:35:40 -0500 Subject: [Governance] WEBCAST : Dialogue on Inclusion: Does the Internet represent diverse voices? Perspectives from gender, linguistic and marginalized communities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: There is now a transcript of this: https://archive.org/download/dialogueoninclusion/dialogueoniclusion_TRANSCRIPT.pdf > > > [image: livestream] > On *Sunday > December 19 2021*, at *09:30-11:00 IST* (04:00-05:30 UTC), the *India > Youth IGF *, in conjunction with > Internet Society's *India Hyderabad Chapter > * and *India Chennai Chapter > *, hosts a webinar '*Dialogue on Inclusion: > Does the internet represent diverse voices? *' to > unpack the idea of inclusive internet in Indian context. "*Internet > United*" was the thematic chosen for 16th Internet Governance Forum. > Taking the conversation forward, we attempt to explore if the internet is > really inclusive through the lenses of various communities like LGBTQ, PwD, > marginalized and linguistic communities. > > *SPEAKERS* > > *Divyaa Gupta*, independent consultant > *Sameer Nair*, Youth4Jobs Foundation > *Ritushree*, The Outcast Collective > *Savita Muley*, Haqdarshak > *Meena Kotwal*, The Mooknayak > *Vidushi Kapoor*, Process9 > *Shruti Shreya*, The Dialogue > *Bhuvana Meenakshi Koteeswaran*, EmergeAbility, > > *MODERATOR* > *Adarsh BU*, ISOC Rural Development SIG > > *HOSTS* > *Dr.Salman Abdul Moiz*, Vice Chair, ISOC Hyderabad > *Purnima Tiwari*, IGF Youth Ambassador 21 > *Brinda Dash*, Former APrIGF Fellow 2021 > > *LIVESTREAM http://livestream.com/internetsociety/dialogueoninclusion > * > > *PARTICIPATE VIA ZOOM https://bit.ly/3ejsHEV * > > *REAL TIME TEXT https://bit.ly/3Ebb5Wf * > > *TWITTER #DigitalInclusion @youthIGFIndia > #Internet4All @isochyderabad @isocchennai* > > *SIMULCASTS* > *https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/ * > *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive * > *https://www.facebook.com/liveisoc/ *(AI > Captions) > > *ARCHIVE* > *https://archive.org/details/dialogueoninclusion > * > > > > *Permalink* > https://isoc.live/14894/ > > > - > > > -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From joly at punkcast.com Sun Dec 26 19:35:35 2021 From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie) Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2021 19:35:35 -0500 Subject: [Governance] 12 Streams 2021 #1 - Jane Coffin @ IEEE Connecting the Unconnected Nov 4 2021 Message-ID: That time of year again. As well as highlights, this year's selection will include a few things we missed streaming. Like these two highlights from the IEEE CTU. It should be noted that the entire IEEE CTU video is still available on line, but only for the rest of the year. Register to view at https://bit.ly/IEEECTU2021 [image: livestream] Today, *Sunday December 26 2021*, at *7:30pm EST* (00:30 UTC) in the first installment of the ISOC LIVE‘s ‘*12 Days of Streams *‘ annual highlights, we feature *Jane Coffin *, former Senior Vice President, Internet Growth, Internet Society appearing on a panel '*Community Enablement: Local Content, Skills & Inclusion*' at the *IEEE Connecting the Unconnected Conference * on November 4 2021. Jane has two responses: 1) *The Internet Society and Digital Inclusion* 2) *Digital Inclusion - A Lesson Learned*. *VIEW ON LIVESTREAM: https://livestream.com/internetsociety/12streams2021-1 (Open captions)* *TWITTER #12STREAMS @Jane_Coffin @IEEEFutureNtwks #communitynetworks #IEEECTU* *SIMULCASTS* *https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/ * *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive * *https://www.facebook.com/liveisoc/ * *ARCHIVE* *https://archive.org/details/12streams2021-1 * *Permalink* https://isoc.live/14915/ - -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -------------------------------------- - -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From arsenebaguma at gmail.com Mon Dec 27 03:11:10 2021 From: arsenebaguma at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Ars=C3=A8ne_Tungali?=) Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 10:11:10 +0200 Subject: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: So sorry to hear of the passing of Ian Peter. We never met in person but I worked with him closely a couple of years ago as part of the IG Civil Society Coordination Group that he co chaired a while ago. I led two CSCG NomComs selecting CS nominees for the IGF MAG and he was a great support for those processes. May he rest in peace! On Mon, Dec 27, 2021, 8:53 AM Avis Momeni wrote: > So sad to hear this Dear Andrew, at this end of year. Lot of glory to the > hard work he done as a mentor within APC family. > May his soul rest in peace. > Avis. > > Le lun. 27 déc. 2021 à 7:36 AM, Andrew Garton a > écrit : > >> My dear friends and colleagues - our friend, collaborator and mentor Ian >> Peter passed away peacefully last night. His wife, Sue, was with him as she >> had been these past few weeks. Ian reached out to Paul Wilson and me three >> weeks ago, telling us that he has but a few weeks left in him. Paul got to >> speak to him Friday week ago and Ian and I via emails and messages Sue >> shared with him. She described Ian as a man who was led by love, and the >> past few weeks he did just that. But he did ask at that time that we not >> share his condition widely. Today, however, Sue asked that I share this sad >> news with you. Ian Peter was my friend. >> >> >> Ian Peter in the centre, Southeast Forest Rally, Canberra, 1989 (?) and I >> with a cap on sat just behind him. The words "email", "electronic >> networks", "earthnet" I'd heard in passing. I knew that moment that this >> was Ian Peter who some weeks ago I'd sent my first email to. Some months >> later Pegasus Networks was launched. A year later I moved to Byron Bay to >> work with Ian... and here we are. >> >> Love, >> Andrew >> >> *Andrew Garton *| Lecturer & Adjunct Industry Fellow >> School of Social Sciences, Media, Film and Education, Swinburne University >> agarton at swin.edu.au | +61409948280 | andrewgarton.com >> Register for APC member convening: >> https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 >> _______________________________________________ >> You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to APC.members >> mailing list >> Additional information and options can be found at >> https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members >> If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to >> apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org >> If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, please >> refer to our privacy policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy) or >> write to privacy at apc.org. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members *must* be >> introduced. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, >> individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. Some other >> staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> All conversations that take place on this list are considered >> confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect >> this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the >> APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission >> from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. >> ------------------------------ >> > Register for APC member convening: > https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 > _______________________________________________ > You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to APC.members > mailing list > Additional information and options can be found at > https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members > If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to > apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org > If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, please > refer to our privacy policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy) or > write to privacy at apc.org. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members *must* be > introduced. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, > individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. Some other > staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > All conversations that take place on this list are considered > confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect > this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the > APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission > from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. > ------------------------------ > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nadira.araj at gmail.com Mon Dec 27 04:14:20 2021 From: nadira.araj at gmail.com (Nadira Alaraj) Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 14:44:20 +0530 Subject: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: My condolences to the big loss of one of the pillars to the CSCG and other spaces. Same as what Arsène has written, that I never met Ian in person but I worked with him on the CSCG NomComs and one of Diplo Foundation online courses. He is an eye opener and great mentor. Rest In Peace Ian, Nadira On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 1:41 PM Arsène Tungali via Governance < governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > So sorry to hear of the passing of Ian Peter. > > We never met in person but I worked with him closely a couple of years ago > as part of the IG Civil Society Coordination Group that he co chaired a > while ago. > > I led two CSCG NomComs selecting CS nominees for the IGF MAG and he was a > great support for those processes. > > May he rest in peace! > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021, 8:53 AM Avis Momeni > wrote: > >> So sad to hear this Dear Andrew, at this end of year. Lot of glory to the >> hard work he done as a mentor within APC family. >> May his soul rest in peace. >> Avis. >> >> Le lun. 27 déc. 2021 à 7:36 AM, Andrew Garton a >> écrit : >> >>> My dear friends and colleagues - our friend, collaborator and mentor Ian >>> Peter passed away peacefully last night. His wife, Sue, was with him as she >>> had been these past few weeks. Ian reached out to Paul Wilson and me three >>> weeks ago, telling us that he has but a few weeks left in him. Paul got to >>> speak to him Friday week ago and Ian and I via emails and messages Sue >>> shared with him. She described Ian as a man who was led by love, and the >>> past few weeks he did just that. But he did ask at that time that we not >>> share his condition widely. Today, however, Sue asked that I share this sad >>> news with you. Ian Peter was my friend. >>> >>> >>> Ian Peter in the centre, Southeast Forest Rally, Canberra, 1989 (?) and >>> I with a cap on sat just behind him. The words "email", "electronic >>> networks", "earthnet" I'd heard in passing. I knew that moment that this >>> was Ian Peter who some weeks ago I'd sent my first email to. Some months >>> later Pegasus Networks was launched. A year later I moved to Byron Bay to >>> work with Ian... and here we are. >>> >>> Love, >>> Andrew >>> >>> *Andrew Garton *| Lecturer & Adjunct Industry Fellow >>> School of Social Sciences, Media, Film and Education, Swinburne >>> University >>> agarton at swin.edu.au | +61409948280 | andrewgarton.com >>> Register for APC member convening: >>> https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to APC.members >>> mailing list >>> Additional information and options can be found at >>> https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members >>> If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to >>> apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org >>> If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, please >>> refer to our privacy policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy) or >>> write to privacy at apc.org. >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members *must* be >>> introduced. >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, >>> individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. Some other >>> staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> All conversations that take place on this list are considered >>> confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect >>> this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the >>> APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission >>> from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. >>> ------------------------------ >>> >> Register for APC member convening: >> https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 >> _______________________________________________ >> You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to APC.members >> mailing list >> Additional information and options can be found at >> https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members >> If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to >> apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org >> If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, please >> refer to our privacy policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy) or >> write to privacy at apc.org. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members *must* be >> introduced. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, >> individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. Some other >> staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> All conversations that take place on this list are considered >> confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect >> this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the >> APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission >> from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. >> ------------------------------ > > >> -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > -- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From suresh at hserus.net Mon Dec 27 04:17:33 2021 From: suresh at hserus.net (Suresh Ramasubramanian) Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 09:17:33 +0000 Subject: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I’ve interacted with Ian on the old governance list (and I think earlier as well) and met him occasionally at an igf He struck me as one of the very few people in IG who regained his faith and commitment to the cause and built bridges across stakeholder groups. Very sad loss. Rest in peace. --srs ________________________________ From: Governance on behalf of Nadira Alaraj via Governance Sent: Monday, December 27, 2021 2:44:20 PM To: Arsène Tungali Cc: Internet Governance ; APC Members Subject: Re: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter My condolences to the big loss of one of the pillars to the CSCG and other spaces. Same as what Arsène has written, that I never met Ian in person but I worked with him on the CSCG NomComs and one of Diplo Foundation online courses. He is an eye opener and great mentor. Rest In Peace Ian, Nadira On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 1:41 PM Arsène Tungali via Governance > wrote: So sorry to hear of the passing of Ian Peter. We never met in person but I worked with him closely a couple of years ago as part of the IG Civil Society Coordination Group that he co chaired a while ago. I led two CSCG NomComs selecting CS nominees for the IGF MAG and he was a great support for those processes. May he rest in peace! On Mon, Dec 27, 2021, 8:53 AM Avis Momeni > wrote: So sad to hear this Dear Andrew, at this end of year. Lot of glory to the hard work he done as a mentor within APC family. May his soul rest in peace. Avis. Le lun. 27 déc. 2021 à 7:36 AM, Andrew Garton > a écrit : My dear friends and colleagues - our friend, collaborator and mentor Ian Peter passed away peacefully last night. His wife, Sue, was with him as she had been these past few weeks. Ian reached out to Paul Wilson and me three weeks ago, telling us that he has but a few weeks left in him. Paul got to speak to him Friday week ago and Ian and I via emails and messages Sue shared with him. She described Ian as a man who was led by love, and the past few weeks he did just that. But he did ask at that time that we not share his condition widely. Today, however, Sue asked that I share this sad news with you. Ian Peter was my friend. [X] Ian Peter in the centre, Southeast Forest Rally, Canberra, 1989 (?) and I with a cap on sat just behind him. The words "email", "electronic networks", "earthnet" I'd heard in passing. I knew that moment that this was Ian Peter who some weeks ago I'd sent my first email to. Some months later Pegasus Networks was launched. A year later I moved to Byron Bay to work with Ian... and here we are. Love, Andrew Andrew Garton | Lecturer & Adjunct Industry Fellow School of Social Sciences, Media, Film and Education, Swinburne University agarton at swin.edu.au | +61409948280 | andrewgarton.com Register for APC member convening: https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 _______________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to APC.members mailing list Additional information and options can be found at https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, please refer to our privacy policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy) or write to privacy at apc.org. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members *must* be introduced. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. Some other staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. ---------------------------------------------------------------- All conversations that take place on this list are considered confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. ------------------------------ Register for APC member convening: https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 _______________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to APC.members mailing list Additional information and options can be found at https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, please refer to our privacy policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy) or write to privacy at apc.org. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members *must* be introduced. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. Some other staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. ---------------------------------------------------------------- All conversations that take place on this list are considered confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. ------------------------------ -- Governance mailing list Governance at lists.igcaucus.org https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance -- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com Mon Dec 27 04:25:08 2021 From: salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com (Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro) Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 09:25:08 +0000 Subject: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Tribute to Ian Peter I know you won't be able to read this Ian as you would have passed on. We acknowledge the contributions you made whilst you were a co-cordinator for the Internet Governance Caucus (IGC) and you were instrumental in the establishment of various quasi committees with the view of enhancing collaboration. You had clear and strong views and whilst we may not have agreed on certain things, you were a giant in your contributions and your no-nonsense approach to leadership, consensus building. I know that the Internet Community in Australia, Oceania and the Globe will miss you. Goodbye Ian! Rest easy! Loloma, Sala On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 9:17 AM Suresh Ramasubramanian via Governance < governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > I’ve interacted with Ian on the old governance list (and I think earlier > as well) and met him occasionally at an igf > > He struck me as one of the very few people in IG who regained his faith > and commitment to the cause and built bridges across stakeholder groups. > > Very sad loss. Rest in peace. > > > --srs > ------------------------------ > *From:* Governance on behalf of > Nadira Alaraj via Governance > *Sent:* Monday, December 27, 2021 2:44:20 PM > *To:* Arsène Tungali > *Cc:* Internet Governance ; APC Members < > apc.members at lists.apc.org> > *Subject:* Re: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter > > My condolences to the big loss of one of the pillars to the CSCG and other > spaces. > > Same as what Arsène has written, that I never met Ian in person but I > worked with him on the CSCG NomComs and one of Diplo Foundation online > courses. He is an eye opener and great mentor. > > Rest In Peace Ian, > > Nadira > > > On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 1:41 PM Arsène Tungali via Governance < > governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > > So sorry to hear of the passing of Ian Peter. > > We never met in person but I worked with him closely a couple of years ago > as part of the IG Civil Society Coordination Group that he co chaired a > while ago. > > I led two CSCG NomComs selecting CS nominees for the IGF MAG and he was a > great support for those processes. > > May he rest in peace! > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021, 8:53 AM Avis Momeni > wrote: > > So sad to hear this Dear Andrew, at this end of year. Lot of glory to the > hard work he done as a mentor within APC family. > May his soul rest in peace. > Avis. > > Le lun. 27 déc. 2021 à 7:36 AM, Andrew Garton a > écrit : > > My dear friends and colleagues - our friend, collaborator and mentor Ian > Peter passed away peacefully last night. His wife, Sue, was with him as she > had been these past few weeks. Ian reached out to Paul Wilson and me three > weeks ago, telling us that he has but a few weeks left in him. Paul got to > speak to him Friday week ago and Ian and I via emails and messages Sue > shared with him. She described Ian as a man who was led by love, and the > past few weeks he did just that. But he did ask at that time that we not > share his condition widely. Today, however, Sue asked that I share this sad > news with you. Ian Peter was my friend. > > > Ian Peter in the centre, Southeast Forest Rally, Canberra, 1989 (?) and I > with a cap on sat just behind him. The words "email", "electronic > networks", "earthnet" I'd heard in passing. I knew that moment that this > was Ian Peter who some weeks ago I'd sent my first email to. Some months > later Pegasus Networks was launched. A year later I moved to Byron Bay to > work with Ian... and here we are. > > Love, > Andrew > > *Andrew Garton *| Lecturer & Adjunct Industry Fellow > School of Social Sciences, Media, Film and Education, Swinburne University > agarton at swin.edu.au | +61409948280 | andrewgarton.com > Register for APC member convening: > https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 > _______________________________________________ > You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to APC.members > mailing list > Additional information and options can be found at > https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members > If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to > apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org > If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, please > refer to our privacy policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy) or > write to privacy at apc.org. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members *must* be > introduced. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, > individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. Some other > staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > All conversations that take place on this list are considered > confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect > this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the > APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission > from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. > ------------------------------ > > Register for APC member convening: > https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 > _______________________________________________ > You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to APC.members > mailing list > Additional information and options can be found at > https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members > If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to > apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org > If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, please > refer to our privacy policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy) or > write to privacy at apc.org. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members *must* be > introduced. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, > individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. Some other > staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > All conversations that take place on this list are considered > confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect > this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the > APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission > from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. > ------------------------------ > > > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > > -- > > > > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > -- *Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala T* *P. O. Box 17862* *Suva* *Republic of Fiji* *Cell: +679 7656770; * *Home: +679 3362003* *Twitter: @SalanietaT* *"You will never do anything in this world without courage. It is the greatest quality of the mind next to honour." Aristotle* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From george.sadowsky at gmail.com Mon Dec 27 08:36:39 2021 From: george.sadowsky at gmail.com (George Sadowsky) Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 08:36:39 -0500 Subject: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Ian Peter was a clear and rational voice for the spread of the Internet and good social policy to guide it since the 1990s when I worked while with him. I am sorry that he is not with us to continue to be that voice and to offer his badly needed perspectives.. George Sadowsky > On Dec 27, 2021, at 4:25 AM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro via Governance wrote: > > Tribute to Ian Peter > > I know you won't be able to read this Ian as you would have passed on. We acknowledge the contributions you made whilst you were a co-cordinator for the Internet Governance Caucus (IGC) and you were instrumental in the establishment of various quasi committees with the view of enhancing collaboration. You had clear and strong views and whilst we may not have agreed on certain things, you were a giant in your contributions and your no-nonsense approach to leadership, consensus building. > > I know that the Internet Community in Australia, Oceania and the Globe will miss you. Goodbye Ian! Rest easy! > > Loloma, > Sala > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 9:17 AM Suresh Ramasubramanian via Governance > wrote: > I’ve interacted with Ian on the old governance list (and I think earlier as well) and met him occasionally at an igf > > He struck me as one of the very few people in IG who regained his faith and commitment to the cause and built bridges across stakeholder groups. > > Very sad loss. Rest in peace. > > > --srs > From: Governance > on behalf of Nadira Alaraj via Governance > > Sent: Monday, December 27, 2021 2:44:20 PM > To: Arsène Tungali > > Cc: Internet Governance >; APC Members > > Subject: Re: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter > > My condolences to the big loss of one of the pillars to the CSCG and other spaces. > > Same as what Arsène has written, that I never met Ian in person but I worked with him on the CSCG NomComs and one of Diplo Foundation online courses. He is an eye opener and great mentor. > > Rest In Peace Ian, > > Nadira > > > On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 1:41 PM Arsène Tungali via Governance > wrote: > So sorry to hear of the passing of Ian Peter. > > We never met in person but I worked with him closely a couple of years ago as part of the IG Civil Society Coordination Group that he co chaired a while ago. > > I led two CSCG NomComs selecting CS nominees for the IGF MAG and he was a great support for those processes. > > May he rest in peace! > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021, 8:53 AM Avis Momeni > wrote: > So sad to hear this Dear Andrew, at this end of year. Lot of glory to the hard work he done as a mentor within APC family. > May his soul rest in peace. > Avis. > > Le lun. 27 déc. 2021 à 7:36 AM, Andrew Garton > a écrit : > My dear friends and colleagues - our friend, collaborator and mentor Ian Peter passed away peacefully last night. His wife, Sue, was with him as she had been these past few weeks. Ian reached out to Paul Wilson and me three weeks ago, telling us that he has but a few weeks left in him. Paul got to speak to him Friday week ago and Ian and I via emails and messages Sue shared with him. She described Ian as a man who was led by love, and the past few weeks he did just that. But he did ask at that time that we not share his condition widely. Today, however, Sue asked that I share this sad news with you. Ian Peter was my friend. > > > Ian Peter in the centre, Southeast Forest Rally, Canberra, 1989 (?) and I with a cap on sat just behind him. The words "email", "electronic networks", "earthnet" I'd heard in passing. I knew that moment that this was Ian Peter who some weeks ago I'd sent my first email to. Some months later Pegasus Networks was launched. A year later I moved to Byron Bay to work with Ian... and here we are. > > Love, > Andrew > > Andrew Garton | Lecturer & Adjunct Industry Fellow > School of Social Sciences, Media, Film and Education, Swinburne University > agarton at swin.edu.au | +61409948280 | andrewgarton.com Register for APC member convening: https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 > _______________________________________________ > You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to APC.members mailing list > Additional information and options can be found athttps://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members > If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org > If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, please refer to our privacy policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy ) or write to privacy at apc.org . > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members *must* be introduced. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. Some other staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > All conversations that take place on this list are considered confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. > ------------------------------ > Register for APC member convening: https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 > _______________________________________________ > You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to APC.members mailing list > Additional information and options can be found athttps://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members > If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org > If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, please refer to our privacy policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy ) or write to privacy at apc.org . > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members *must* be introduced. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. Some other staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > All conversations that take place on this list are considered confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. > ------------------------------ > > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > -- > > > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > > > -- > Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala T > P. O. Box 17862 > Suva > Republic of Fiji > > Cell: +679 7656770; > Home: +679 3362003 > Twitter: @SalanietaT > > > "You will never do anything in this world without courage. It is the greatest quality of the mind next to honour." > > Aristotle > > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ George Sadowsky Residence tel: +1.301.968.4325 8300 Burdette Road, Apt B-472 Mobile: +1.202.415.1933 Bethesda MD 20817-2831 USA Skype: sadowsky george.sadowsky at gmail.com http://www.georgesadowsky.org/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From seun.ojedeji at gmail.com Mon Dec 27 08:41:39 2021 From: seun.ojedeji at gmail.com (Seun Ojedeji) Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 14:41:39 +0100 Subject: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: My condolences to Ian family and the entire IG community Regards Sent from my mobile Kindly excuse brevity and typos Every word has consequences. Every silence does too! On Mon, 27 Dec 2021, 09:11 Arsène Tungali via Governance, < governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > So sorry to hear of the passing of Ian Peter. > > We never met in person but I worked with him closely a couple of years ago > as part of the IG Civil Society Coordination Group that he co chaired a > while ago. > > I led two CSCG NomComs selecting CS nominees for the IGF MAG and he was a > great support for those processes. > > May he rest in peace! > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021, 8:53 AM Avis Momeni > wrote: > >> So sad to hear this Dear Andrew, at this end of year. Lot of glory to the >> hard work he done as a mentor within APC family. >> May his soul rest in peace. >> Avis. >> >> Le lun. 27 déc. 2021 à 7:36 AM, Andrew Garton a >> écrit : >> >>> My dear friends and colleagues - our friend, collaborator and mentor Ian >>> Peter passed away peacefully last night. His wife, Sue, was with him as she >>> had been these past few weeks. Ian reached out to Paul Wilson and me three >>> weeks ago, telling us that he has but a few weeks left in him. Paul got to >>> speak to him Friday week ago and Ian and I via emails and messages Sue >>> shared with him. She described Ian as a man who was led by love, and the >>> past few weeks he did just that. But he did ask at that time that we not >>> share his condition widely. Today, however, Sue asked that I share this sad >>> news with you. Ian Peter was my friend. >>> >>> >>> Ian Peter in the centre, Southeast Forest Rally, Canberra, 1989 (?) and >>> I with a cap on sat just behind him. The words "email", "electronic >>> networks", "earthnet" I'd heard in passing. I knew that moment that this >>> was Ian Peter who some weeks ago I'd sent my first email to. Some months >>> later Pegasus Networks was launched. A year later I moved to Byron Bay to >>> work with Ian... and here we are. >>> >>> Love, >>> Andrew >>> >>> *Andrew Garton *| Lecturer & Adjunct Industry Fellow >>> School of Social Sciences, Media, Film and Education, Swinburne >>> University >>> agarton at swin.edu.au | +61409948280 | andrewgarton.com >>> Register for APC member convening: >>> https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to APC.members >>> mailing list >>> Additional information and options can be found at >>> https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members >>> If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to >>> apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org >>> If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, please >>> refer to our privacy policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy) or >>> write to privacy at apc.org. >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members *must* be >>> introduced. >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, >>> individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. Some other >>> staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> All conversations that take place on this list are considered >>> confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect >>> this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the >>> APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission >>> from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. >>> ------------------------------ >>> >> Register for APC member convening: >> https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 >> _______________________________________________ >> You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to APC.members >> mailing list >> Additional information and options can be found at >> https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members >> If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to >> apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org >> If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, please >> refer to our privacy policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy) or >> write to privacy at apc.org. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members *must* be >> introduced. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, >> individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. Some other >> staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> All conversations that take place on this list are considered >> confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect >> this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the >> APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission >> from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. >> ------------------------------ >> > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From judith at jhellerstein.com Mon Dec 27 08:48:59 2021 From: judith at jhellerstein.com (Judith Hellerstein) Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 08:48:59 -0500 Subject: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi All So sorry to hear about Ian Peter’s passing. As Arsène said Ian was able to rise above the fray when the IGC was almost falling apart and bring everyone together. That was no small feat!! He was a really great person and was able to bring people and the IGC to a better place and one where it could continue to grow. Indeed a giant in his time. May his memory be for a blessing. Judith Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 27, 2021, at 4:25 AM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro via Governance wrote: > >  > Tribute to Ian Peter > > I know you won't be able to read this Ian as you would have passed on. We acknowledge the contributions you made whilst you were a co-cordinator for the Internet Governance Caucus (IGC) and you were instrumental in the establishment of various quasi committees with the view of enhancing collaboration. You had clear and strong views and whilst we may not have agreed on certain things, you were a giant in your contributions and your no-nonsense approach to leadership, consensus building. > > I know that the Internet Community in Australia, Oceania and the Globe will miss you. Goodbye Ian! Rest easy! > > Loloma, > Sala > >> On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 9:17 AM Suresh Ramasubramanian via Governance wrote: >> I’ve interacted with Ian on the old governance list (and I think earlier as well) and met him occasionally at an igf >> >> He struck me as one of the very few people in IG who regained his faith and commitment to the cause and built bridges across stakeholder groups. >> >> Very sad loss. Rest in peace. >> >> >> --srs >> From: Governance on behalf of Nadira Alaraj via Governance >> Sent: Monday, December 27, 2021 2:44:20 PM >> To: Arsène Tungali >> Cc: Internet Governance ; APC Members >> Subject: Re: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter >> >> My condolences to the big loss of one of the pillars to the CSCG and other spaces. >> >> Same as what Arsène has written, that I never met Ian in person but I worked with him on the CSCG NomComs and one of Diplo Foundation online courses. He is an eye opener and great mentor. >> >> Rest In Peace Ian, >> >> Nadira >> >> >> On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 1:41 PM Arsène Tungali via Governance wrote: >> So sorry to hear of the passing of Ian Peter. >> >> We never met in person but I worked with him closely a couple of years ago as part of the IG Civil Society Coordination Group that he co chaired a while ago. >> >> I led two CSCG NomComs selecting CS nominees for the IGF MAG and he was a great support for those processes. >> >> May he rest in peace! >> >> On Mon, Dec 27, 2021, 8:53 AM Avis Momeni wrote: >> So sad to hear this Dear Andrew, at this end of year. Lot of glory to the hard work he done as a mentor within APC family. >> May his soul rest in peace. >> Avis. >> >> Le lun. 27 déc. 2021 à 7:36 AM, Andrew Garton a écrit : >> My dear friends and colleagues - our friend, collaborator and mentor Ian Peter passed away peacefully last night. His wife, Sue, was with him as she had been these past few weeks. Ian reached out to Paul Wilson and me three weeks ago, telling us that he has but a few weeks left in him. Paul got to speak to him Friday week ago and Ian and I via emails and messages Sue shared with him. She described Ian as a man who was led by love, and the past few weeks he did just that. But he did ask at that time that we not share his condition widely. Today, however, Sue asked that I share this sad news with you. Ian Peter was my friend. >> >> >> Ian Peter in the centre, Southeast Forest Rally, Canberra, 1989 (?) and I with a cap on sat just behind him. The words "email", "electronic networks", "earthnet" I'd heard in passing. I knew that moment that this was Ian Peter who some weeks ago I'd sent my first email to. Some months later Pegasus Networks was launched. A year later I moved to Byron Bay to work with Ian... and here we are. >> >> Love, >> Andrew >> >> Andrew Garton | Lecturer & Adjunct Industry Fellow >> School of Social Sciences, Media, Film and Education, Swinburne University >> agarton at swin.edu.au | +61409948280 | andrewgarton.com >> Register for APC member convening: https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 >> _______________________________________________ >> You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to APC.members mailing list >> Additional information and options can be found at https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members >> If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org >> If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, please refer to our privacy policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy) or write to privacy at apc.org. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members *must* be introduced. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. Some other staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> All conversations that take place on this list are considered confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. >> ------------------------------ >> Register for APC member convening: https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 >> _______________________________________________ >> You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to APC.members mailing list >> Additional information and options can be found at https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members >> If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org >> If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, please refer to our privacy policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy) or write to privacy at apc.org. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members *must* be introduced. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. Some other staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> All conversations that take place on this list are considered confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. >> ------------------------------ >> >> -- >> Governance mailing list >> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >> -- >> >> >> -- >> Governance mailing list >> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > > > -- > Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala T > P. O. Box 17862 > Suva > Republic of Fiji > > Cell: +679 7656770; > Home: +679 3362003 > Twitter: @SalanietaT > > > "You will never do anything in this world without courage. It is the greatest quality of the mind next to honour." > > Aristotle > > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From williams.deirdre at gmail.com Mon Dec 27 08:53:35 2021 From: williams.deirdre at gmail.com (Deirdre Williams) Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 09:53:35 -0400 Subject: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Ian was very special. He had strong opinions, but he always listened as well. Any time I had a question or a problem I knew that by about 4pm here I would have an answer. Condolences to his family De On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 09:36, George Sadowsky via Governance < governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > Ian Peter was a clear and rational voice for the spread of the Internet > and good social policy to guide it since the 1990s when I worked while with > him. I am sorry that he is not with us to continue to be that voice and to > offer his badly needed perspectives.. > > George Sadowsky > > On Dec 27, 2021, at 4:25 AM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro via Governance < > governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > > Tribute to Ian Peter > > I know you won't be able to read this Ian as you would have passed on. We > acknowledge the contributions you made whilst you were a co-cordinator for > the Internet Governance Caucus (IGC) and you were instrumental in the > establishment of various quasi committees with the view of enhancing > collaboration. You had clear and strong views and whilst we may not have > agreed on certain things, you were a giant in your contributions and your > no-nonsense approach to leadership, consensus building. > > I know that the Internet Community in Australia, Oceania and the Globe > will miss you. Goodbye Ian! Rest easy! > > Loloma, > Sala > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 9:17 AM Suresh Ramasubramanian via Governance < > governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > >> I’ve interacted with Ian on the old governance list (and I think earlier >> as well) and met him occasionally at an igf >> >> He struck me as one of the very few people in IG who regained his faith >> and commitment to the cause and built bridges across stakeholder groups. >> >> Very sad loss. Rest in peace. >> >> >> --srs >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Governance on behalf of >> Nadira Alaraj via Governance >> *Sent:* Monday, December 27, 2021 2:44:20 PM >> *To:* Arsène Tungali >> *Cc:* Internet Governance ; APC Members < >> apc.members at lists.apc.org> >> *Subject:* Re: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter >> >> My condolences to the big loss of one of the pillars to the CSCG and >> other spaces. >> >> Same as what Arsène has written, that I never met Ian in person but I >> worked with him on the CSCG NomComs and one of Diplo Foundation online >> courses. He is an eye opener and great mentor. >> >> Rest In Peace Ian, >> >> Nadira >> >> >> On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 1:41 PM Arsène Tungali via Governance < >> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >> >> So sorry to hear of the passing of Ian Peter. >> >> We never met in person but I worked with him closely a couple of years >> ago as part of the IG Civil Society Coordination Group that he co chaired a >> while ago. >> >> I led two CSCG NomComs selecting CS nominees for the IGF MAG and he was a >> great support for those processes. >> >> May he rest in peace! >> >> On Mon, Dec 27, 2021, 8:53 AM Avis Momeni >> wrote: >> >> So sad to hear this Dear Andrew, at this end of year. Lot of glory to the >> hard work he done as a mentor within APC family. >> May his soul rest in peace. >> Avis. >> >> Le lun. 27 déc. 2021 à 7:36 AM, Andrew Garton a >> écrit : >> >> My dear friends and colleagues - our friend, collaborator and mentor Ian >> Peter passed away peacefully last night. His wife, Sue, was with him as she >> had been these past few weeks. Ian reached out to Paul Wilson and me three >> weeks ago, telling us that he has but a few weeks left in him. Paul got to >> speak to him Friday week ago and Ian and I via emails and messages Sue >> shared with him. She described Ian as a man who was led by love, and the >> past few weeks he did just that. But he did ask at that time that we not >> share his condition widely. Today, however, Sue asked that I share this sad >> news with you. Ian Peter was my friend. >> >> >> Ian Peter in the centre, Southeast Forest Rally, Canberra, 1989 (?) and I >> with a cap on sat just behind him. The words "email", "electronic >> networks", "earthnet" I'd heard in passing. I knew that moment that this >> was Ian Peter who some weeks ago I'd sent my first email to. Some months >> later Pegasus Networks was launched. A year later I moved to Byron Bay to >> work with Ian... and here we are. >> >> Love, >> Andrew >> >> *Andrew Garton *| Lecturer & Adjunct Industry Fellow >> School of Social Sciences, Media, Film and Education, Swinburne University >> agarton at swin.edu.au | +61409948280 | andrewgarton.com >> Register for APC member convening: >> https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 >> _______________________________________________ >> You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to APC.members >> mailing list >> Additional information and options can be found at >> https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members >> If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to >> apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org >> If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, please >> refer to our privacy policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy) or >> write to privacy at apc.org. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members *must* be >> introduced. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, >> individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. Some other >> staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> All conversations that take place on this list are considered >> confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect >> this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the >> APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission >> from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. >> ------------------------------ >> >> Register for APC member convening: >> https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 >> _______________________________________________ >> You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to APC.members >> mailing list >> Additional information and options can be found at >> https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members >> If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to >> apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org >> If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, please >> refer to our privacy policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy) or >> write to privacy at apc.org. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members *must* be >> introduced. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, >> individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. Some other >> staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> All conversations that take place on this list are considered >> confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect >> this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the >> APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission >> from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. >> ------------------------------ >> >> >> -- >> Governance mailing list >> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >> >> -- >> >> >> -- >> Governance mailing list >> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >> > > > -- > > *Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala T* > > *P. O. Box 17862* > > *Suva* > > > *Republic of Fiji* > > *Cell: +679 7656770; * > > *Home: +679 3362003* > *Twitter: @SalanietaT* > > > > > *"You will never do anything in this world without courage. It is the > greatest quality of the mind next to honour." Aristotle* > > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > George Sadowsky Residence tel: > +1.301.968.4325 > 8300 Burdette Road, Apt B-472 Mobile: > +1.202.415.1933 > Bethesda MD 20817-2831 USA Skype: > sadowsky > george.sadowsky at gmail.com http://www.georgesadowsky.org/ > > > > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > -- “The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge" Sir William Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ocl at gih.com Mon Dec 27 08:59:16 2021 From: ocl at gih.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Olivier_MJ_Cr=c3=a9pin-Leblond?=) Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 14:59:16 +0100 Subject: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: What sad news! Ian was one of the pioneers that actually *did something* to spread the Internet worldwide back in the day, when others were just talking about it. His continued work on Internet Governance was key to promote civil society at the table of the multistakeholder model. He held strong views and there were times when we absolutely disagreed but his passing is a great loss to our community and his wisdom and gravitas will be missed. Olivier On 27/12/2021 09:11, Arsène Tungali via Governance wrote: > So sorry to hear of the passing of Ian Peter. > > We never met in person but I worked with him closely a couple of years > ago as part of the IG Civil Society Coordination Group that he co > chaired a while ago. > > I led two CSCG NomComs selecting CS nominees for the IGF MAG and he > was a great support for those processes. > > May he rest in peace! > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021, 8:53 AM Avis Momeni > wrote: > > So sad to hear this Dear Andrew, at this end of year. Lot of glory > to the hard work he done as a mentor within APC family. > May his soul rest in peace. > Avis. > > Le lun. 27 déc. 2021 à 7:36 AM, Andrew Garton > a écrit : > > My dear friends and colleagues - our friend, collaborator and > mentor Ian Peter passed away peacefully last night. His wife, > Sue, was with him as she had been these past few weeks. Ian > reached out to Paul Wilson and me three weeks ago, telling us > that he has but a few weeks left in him. Paul got to speak to > him Friday week ago and Ian and I via emails and messages Sue > shared with him. She described Ian as a man who was led by > love, and the past few weeks he did just that. But he did ask > at that time that we not share his condition widely. Today, > however, Sue asked that I share this sad news with you. Ian > Peter was my friend. > > > Ian Peter in the centre, Southeast Forest Rally, Canberra, > 1989 (?) and I with a cap on sat just behind him. The words > "email", "electronic networks", "earthnet" I'd heard in > passing. I knew that moment that this was Ian Peter who some > weeks ago I'd sent my first email to. Some months later > Pegasus Networks was launched. A year later I moved to Byron > Bay to work with Ian... and here we are. > > Love, > Andrew > > *Andrew Garton *| Lecturer & Adjunct Industry Fellow > School of Social Sciences, Media, Film and Education, > Swinburne University > agarton at swin.edu.au | +61409948280 | andrewgarton.com > > Register for APC member convening: > https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 > _______________________________________________ > You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to > APC.members mailing list > Additional information and options can be found at > https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members > If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to > apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org > If you want more information about how we protect your > privacy, please refer to our privacy > policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy) or write to > privacy at apc.org. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members > *must* be introduced. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC > Council, individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to > this list. Some other staff of APC member organisations is > subscribed. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > All conversations that take place on this list are considered > confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected > to respect this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or > quote a post from the APC.members list in any other space or > forum, you MUST receive permission from the person who made > the quote first on the APC.members listserv. > ------------------------------ > > Register for APC member convening: > https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 > _______________________________________________ > You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to > APC.members mailing list > Additional information and options can be found at > https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members > If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to > apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org > If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, > please refer to our privacy > policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy) or write to > privacy at apc.org. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members > *must* be introduced. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, > individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. > Some other staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > All conversations that take place on this list are considered > confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to > respect this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a > post from the APC.members list in any other space or forum, you > MUST receive permission from the person who made the quote first > on the APC.members listserv. > ------------------------------ > > -- Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From 6.internet at gmail.com Mon Dec 27 10:09:19 2021 From: 6.internet at gmail.com (sivasubramanian muthusamy) Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 20:39:19 +0530 Subject: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Sad to hear the news about the passing away of Ian Peter who I remember as one of the leading participants of the Internet Governance Caucus. I have known him for a long time, we will miss him. Heartfelt condolences to his family. Sivasubramanian M On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 7:29 PM Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond via Governance < governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > What sad news! > > Ian was one of the pioneers that actually *did something* to spread the > Internet worldwide back in the day, when others were just talking about it. > His continued work on Internet Governance was key to promote civil society > at the table of the multistakeholder model. He held strong views and there > were times when we absolutely disagreed but his passing is a great loss to > our community and his wisdom and gravitas will be missed. > > Olivier > > On 27/12/2021 09:11, Arsène Tungali via Governance wrote: > > So sorry to hear of the passing of Ian Peter. > > We never met in person but I worked with him closely a couple of years ago > as part of the IG Civil Society Coordination Group that he co chaired a > while ago. > > I led two CSCG NomComs selecting CS nominees for the IGF MAG and he was a > great support for those processes. > > May he rest in peace! > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021, 8:53 AM Avis Momeni > wrote: > >> So sad to hear this Dear Andrew, at this end of year. Lot of glory to the >> hard work he done as a mentor within APC family. >> May his soul rest in peace. >> Avis. >> >> Le lun. 27 déc. 2021 à 7:36 AM, Andrew Garton a >> écrit : >> >>> My dear friends and colleagues - our friend, collaborator and mentor Ian >>> Peter passed away peacefully last night. His wife, Sue, was with him as she >>> had been these past few weeks. Ian reached out to Paul Wilson and me three >>> weeks ago, telling us that he has but a few weeks left in him. Paul got to >>> speak to him Friday week ago and Ian and I via emails and messages Sue >>> shared with him. She described Ian as a man who was led by love, and the >>> past few weeks he did just that. But he did ask at that time that we not >>> share his condition widely. Today, however, Sue asked that I share this sad >>> news with you. Ian Peter was my friend. >>> >>> >>> Ian Peter in the centre, Southeast Forest Rally, Canberra, 1989 (?) and >>> I with a cap on sat just behind him. The words "email", "electronic >>> networks", "earthnet" I'd heard in passing. I knew that moment that this >>> was Ian Peter who some weeks ago I'd sent my first email to. Some months >>> later Pegasus Networks was launched. A year later I moved to Byron Bay to >>> work with Ian... and here we are. >>> >>> Love, >>> Andrew >>> >>> *Andrew Garton *| Lecturer & Adjunct Industry Fellow >>> School of Social Sciences, Media, Film and Education, Swinburne >>> University >>> agarton at swin.edu.au | +61409948280 | andrewgarton.com >>> Register for APC member convening: >>> https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to APC.members >>> mailing list >>> Additional information and options can be found at >>> https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members >>> If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to >>> apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org >>> If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, please >>> refer to our privacy policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy) or >>> write to privacy at apc.org. >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members *must* be >>> introduced. >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, >>> individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. Some other >>> staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> All conversations that take place on this list are considered >>> confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect >>> this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the >>> APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission >>> from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. >>> ------------------------------ >>> >> Register for APC member convening: >> https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 >> _______________________________________________ >> You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to APC.members >> mailing list >> Additional information and options can be found at >> https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members >> If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to >> apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org >> If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, please >> refer to our privacy policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy) or >> write to privacy at apc.org. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members *must* be >> introduced. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, >> individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. Some other >> staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> All conversations that take place on this list are considered >> confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect >> this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the >> APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission >> from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. >> ------------------------------ >> > > > -- > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhDhttp://www.gih.com/ocl.html > > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From avri at acm.org Mon Dec 27 10:26:07 2021 From: avri at acm.org (avri doria) Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 10:26:07 -0500 Subject: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: So sorry to read of Ian's death. He was a good person and will be missed. avri From angelacdaly at gmail.com Mon Dec 27 10:29:59 2021 From: angelacdaly at gmail.com (Angela Daly) Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 15:29:59 +0000 Subject: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I'm also sad to hear this. Condolences to Ian's family. I remember some nice in-person chats with him at Australian IGF events in the 2010s. Angela On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 15:26, avri doria via Governance < governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > So sorry to read of Ian's death. > > He was a good person and will be missed. > > avri > > > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From olgacavalli at gmail.com Mon Dec 27 10:51:51 2021 From: olgacavalli at gmail.com (Olga Cavalli) Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 12:51:51 -0300 Subject: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Very sad news indeed. Our condolences for his family. Olga El lun, 27 dic 2021 a las 12:30, Angela Daly via Governance (< governance at lists.igcaucus.org>) escribió: > I'm also sad to hear this. Condolences to Ian's family. I remember some > nice in-person chats with him at Australian IGF events in the 2010s. > > Angela > > On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 15:26, avri doria via Governance < > governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > >> So sorry to read of Ian's death. >> >> He was a good person and will be missed. >> >> avri >> >> >> -- >> Governance mailing list >> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >> > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From wolfgang.benedek at uni-graz.at Mon Dec 27 10:53:46 2021 From: wolfgang.benedek at uni-graz.at (Benedek, Wolfgang (wolfgang.benedek@uni-graz.at)) Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 15:53:46 +0000 Subject: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter In-Reply-To: References: , Message-ID: <77DC8BBD-4FF2-444F-B0C0-DBD0AD0B0981@uni-graz.at> Very sorry to learn about this news. I remember Jan as a very integrative and committed Person, who Will be missed. Wolfgang Benedek Am 27.12.2021 um 16:30 schrieb Angela Daly via Governance :  I'm also sad to hear this. Condolences to Ian's family. I remember some nice in-person chats with him at Australian IGF events in the 2010s. Angela On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 15:26, avri doria via Governance > wrote: So sorry to read of Ian's death. He was a good person and will be missed. avri -- Governance mailing list Governance at lists.igcaucus.org https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance -- Governance mailing list Governance at lists.igcaucus.org https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From andersj at elon.edu Mon Dec 27 11:55:00 2021 From: andersj at elon.edu (Janna Anderson) Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 16:55:00 +0000 Subject: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter In-Reply-To: <77DC8BBD-4FF2-444F-B0C0-DBD0AD0B0981@uni-graz.at> References: <77DC8BBD-4FF2-444F-B0C0-DBD0AD0B0981@uni-graz.at> Message-ID: Ian Peter was one of the earliest Internet historians, getting his start as a lecturer in the late 1990s. Ian posted a link to this 1989 video that features Ian (along with Mike Jensen) at the launch of Pegasus Networks in Australia. (APC published an interview with Ian about it in 2017.) The Imagining the Internet Center at Elon University has several short recordings that feature Ian speaking on panels at the Internet Governance Forum over the years, including this 11-minute 2008 clip from Hyderabad in which he talks about “the last billion” people likely to be connected to the Internet in future. Ian has been an outstanding leader in the evolution of the Internet from the 1980s to today. Those who never had the opportunity to meet him missed the chance to fully appreciate his kindness, dedication and sharp intellect. This wonderfully charming and bright Aussie was a key figure in the Internet’s early development and diffusion in the Asia-Pacific area. He was one of the original founding directors of the Association for Progressive Communications, the outstanding international network of organizations that has been and continues to do work that is crucial to the advancement of the Internet as a tool for the advancement of human rights via human communication. We will always remember Ian for his passionate pursuit of the best possible future of global communication. Janna Anderson From: Governance on behalf of "Benedek, Wolfgang (wolfgang.benedek--- via Governance" Reply-To: "Benedek, Wolfgang (wolfgang.benedek at uni-graz.at)" Date: Monday, December 27, 2021 at 7:53 AM To: "angelacdaly at gmail.com" Cc: "governance at lists.igcaucus.org" , APC Members Subject: Re: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter Very sorry to learn about this news. I remember Jan as a very integrative and committed Person, who Will be missed. Wolfgang Benedek Am 27.12.2021 um 16:30 schrieb Angela Daly via Governance : I'm also sad to hear this. Condolences to Ian's family. I remember some nice in-person chats with him at Australian IGF events in the 2010s. Angela On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 15:26, avri doria via Governance > wrote: So sorry to read of Ian's death. He was a good person and will be missed. avri -- Governance mailing list Governance at lists.igcaucus.org https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance -- Governance mailing list Governance at lists.igcaucus.org https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From farzaneh.badii at gmail.com Mon Dec 27 18:18:36 2021 From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com (farzaneh badii) Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 18:18:36 -0500 Subject: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: When we wanted to revive IGC in 2019, Ian with such great determination helped us bring IGC back and restore its website and figure out complex things .. and he was so persistent. I learned a great deal from him. Following his legacy, we should work together to make IGC stronger in 2022, work on bringing the mailing list archives back live ( I think we can piece them together since IGC inception, other cocos have offered to help too) I suggest we get together in January (virtually) to celebrate Ian's life, and send a letter on behalf of IGC to Ian's family. Best Farzaneh On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 3:11 AM Arsène Tungali via Governance < governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > So sorry to hear of the passing of Ian Peter. > > We never met in person but I worked with him closely a couple of years ago > as part of the IG Civil Society Coordination Group that he co chaired a > while ago. > > I led two CSCG NomComs selecting CS nominees for the IGF MAG and he was a > great support for those processes. > > May he rest in peace! > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021, 8:53 AM Avis Momeni > wrote: > >> So sad to hear this Dear Andrew, at this end of year. Lot of glory to the >> hard work he done as a mentor within APC family. >> May his soul rest in peace. >> Avis. >> >> Le lun. 27 déc. 2021 à 7:36 AM, Andrew Garton a >> écrit : >> >>> My dear friends and colleagues - our friend, collaborator and mentor Ian >>> Peter passed away peacefully last night. His wife, Sue, was with him as she >>> had been these past few weeks. Ian reached out to Paul Wilson and me three >>> weeks ago, telling us that he has but a few weeks left in him. Paul got to >>> speak to him Friday week ago and Ian and I via emails and messages Sue >>> shared with him. She described Ian as a man who was led by love, and the >>> past few weeks he did just that. But he did ask at that time that we not >>> share his condition widely. Today, however, Sue asked that I share this sad >>> news with you. Ian Peter was my friend. >>> >>> >>> Ian Peter in the centre, Southeast Forest Rally, Canberra, 1989 (?) and >>> I with a cap on sat just behind him. The words "email", "electronic >>> networks", "earthnet" I'd heard in passing. I knew that moment that this >>> was Ian Peter who some weeks ago I'd sent my first email to. Some months >>> later Pegasus Networks was launched. A year later I moved to Byron Bay to >>> work with Ian... and here we are. >>> >>> Love, >>> Andrew >>> >>> *Andrew Garton *| Lecturer & Adjunct Industry Fellow >>> School of Social Sciences, Media, Film and Education, Swinburne >>> University >>> agarton at swin.edu.au | +61409948280 | andrewgarton.com >>> Register for APC member convening: >>> https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to APC.members >>> mailing list >>> Additional information and options can be found at >>> https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members >>> If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to >>> apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org >>> If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, please >>> refer to our privacy policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy) or >>> write to privacy at apc.org. >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members *must* be >>> introduced. >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, >>> individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. Some other >>> staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> All conversations that take place on this list are considered >>> confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect >>> this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the >>> APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission >>> from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. >>> ------------------------------ >>> >> Register for APC member convening: >> https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 >> _______________________________________________ >> You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to APC.members >> mailing list >> Additional information and options can be found at >> https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members >> If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to >> apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org >> If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, please >> refer to our privacy policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy) or >> write to privacy at apc.org. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members *must* be >> introduced. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, >> individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. Some other >> staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> All conversations that take place on this list are considered >> confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect >> this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the >> APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission >> from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. >> ------------------------------ >> > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From g.astbrink at gsa.com.au Mon Dec 27 20:04:47 2021 From: g.astbrink at gsa.com.au (Gunela Astbrink) Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 12:04:47 +1100 Subject: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <85d09007-79f0-5c2f-fd9e-9e42fc0a3038@gsa.com.au> Ian Peter certainly was an Internet pioneer. We live in the same area and met for coffee now and then. Among many other things, we discussed his activism in protecting local rainforest and those early networks to share information with the wider community. Ian was a kind, compassionate person with a towering intellect and a strong belief in social justice. He will be sorely missed. His hard work in Internet governance and for 'the last billion' is to be celebrated. Vale Ian Peter. Gunela Astbrink farzaneh badii via Governance wrote on 28/12/2021 10:18 : > When we wanted to revive IGC in 2019, Ian with such great determination > helped us bring IGC back and restore its website and figure out complex > things .. and he was so persistent. I learned a great deal from him. > > Following his legacy, we should work together to make IGC stronger in > 2022, work on bringing the mailing list archives back live ( I think we > can piece them together since IGC inception, other cocos have offered to > help too) > > I suggest we get together in January (virtually) to celebrate Ian's > life, and send a letter on behalf of IGC to Ian's family. > > Best > > > Farzaneh > > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 3:11 AM Arsène Tungali via Governance > > > wrote: > > So sorry to hear of the passing of Ian Peter. > > We never met in person but I worked with him closely a couple of > years ago as part of the IG Civil Society Coordination Group that he > co chaired a while ago. > > I led two CSCG NomComs selecting CS nominees for the IGF MAG and he > was a great support for those processes. > > May he rest in peace! > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021, 8:53 AM Avis Momeni > wrote: > > So sad to hear this Dear Andrew, at this end of year. Lot of > glory to the hard work he done as a mentor  within APC family. > May his soul rest in peace. > Avis. > > Le lun. 27 déc. 2021 à 7:36 AM, Andrew Garton > > a écrit : > > My dear friends and colleagues - our friend, collaborator > and mentor Ian Peter passed away peacefully last night. His > wife, Sue, was with him as she had been these past few > weeks. Ian reached out to Paul Wilson and me three weeks > ago, telling us that he has but a few weeks left in him. > Paul got to speak to him Friday week ago and Ian and I via > emails and messages Sue shared with him. She described Ian > as a man who was led by love, and the past few weeks he did > just that. But he did ask at that time that we not share his > condition widely. Today, however, Sue asked that I share > this sad news with you. Ian Peter was my friend. > > > Ian Peter in the centre, Southeast Forest Rally, Canberra, > 1989 (?) and I with a cap on sat just behind him. The words > "email", "electronic networks", "earthnet" I'd heard in > passing. I knew that moment that this was Ian Peter who some > weeks ago I'd sent my first email to.  Some months later > Pegasus Networks was launched. A year later I moved to Byron > Bay to work with Ian... and here we are. > > Love, > Andrew > > ** > > *Andrew Garton *| Lecturer & Adjunct Industry Fellow > School of Social Sciences, Media, Film and Education, > Swinburne University > agarton at swin.edu.au | > +61409948280 | andrewgarton.com > Register for APC member convening: > https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 > > _______________________________________________ > You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to > APC.members mailing list > Additional information and options can be found at > https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members > > If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to > apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org > > If you want more information about how we protect your > privacy, please refer to our privacy > policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy > ) or write to > privacy at apc.org . > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members > *must* be introduced. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC > Council, individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to > this list. Some other staff of APC member organisations is > subscribed. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > All conversations that take place on this list are > considered confidential. As a member of the APC network, you > are expected to respect this confidentiality. If you wish to > circulate or quote a post from the APC.members list in any > other space or forum, you MUST receive permission from the > person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. > ------------------------------ > > Register for APC member convening: > https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 > > _______________________________________________ > You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to > APC.members mailing list > Additional information and options can be found at > https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members > > If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to > apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org > > If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, > please refer to our privacy > policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy > ) or write to > privacy at apc.org . > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members > *must* be introduced. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC > Council, individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to > this list. Some other staff of APC member organisations is > subscribed. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > All conversations that take place on this list are considered > confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected > to respect this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or > quote a post from the APC.members list in any other space or > forum, you MUST receive permission from the person who made the > quote first on the APC.members listserv. > ------------------------------ > > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > > > From bruna.mrtns at gmail.com Tue Dec 28 07:53:25 2021 From: bruna.mrtns at gmail.com (Bruna Martins dos Santos) Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 13:53:25 +0100 Subject: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter In-Reply-To: <85d09007-79f0-5c2f-fd9e-9e42fc0a3038@gsa.com.au> References: <85d09007-79f0-5c2f-fd9e-9e42fc0a3038@gsa.com.au> Message-ID: This is indeed a very sad loss for IGC and the second one in our tech Team these past times. We shall work on keeping Ian and many others legacies alive in such hard times. RIP Ian! Best, Bruna On Tue 28. Dec 2021 at 02:05, Gunela Astbrink via Governance < governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > Ian Peter certainly was an Internet pioneer. > > We live in the same area and met for coffee now and then. Among many > other things, we discussed his activism in protecting local rainforest > and those early networks to share information with the wider community. > > Ian was a kind, compassionate person with a towering intellect and a > strong belief in social justice. He will be sorely missed. > > His hard work in Internet governance and for 'the last billion' is to be > celebrated. > > Vale Ian Peter. > > Gunela Astbrink > > > farzaneh badii via Governance wrote on 28/12/2021 10:18 : > > When we wanted to revive IGC in 2019, Ian with such great determination > > helped us bring IGC back and restore its website and figure out complex > > things .. and he was so persistent. I learned a great deal from him. > > > > Following his legacy, we should work together to make IGC stronger in > > 2022, work on bringing the mailing list archives back live ( I think we > > can piece them together since IGC inception, other cocos have offered to > > help too) > > > > I suggest we get together in January (virtually) to celebrate Ian's > > life, and send a letter on behalf of IGC to Ian's family. > > > > Best > > > > > > Farzaneh > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 3:11 AM Arsène Tungali via Governance > > > > > wrote: > > > > So sorry to hear of the passing of Ian Peter. > > > > We never met in person but I worked with him closely a couple of > > years ago as part of the IG Civil Society Coordination Group that he > > co chaired a while ago. > > > > I led two CSCG NomComs selecting CS nominees for the IGF MAG and he > > was a great support for those processes. > > > > May he rest in peace! > > > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021, 8:53 AM Avis Momeni > > wrote: > > > > So sad to hear this Dear Andrew, at this end of year. Lot of > > glory to the hard work he done as a mentor within APC family. > > May his soul rest in peace. > > Avis. > > > > Le lun. 27 déc. 2021 à 7:36 AM, Andrew Garton > > > a écrit : > > > > My dear friends and colleagues - our friend, collaborator > > and mentor Ian Peter passed away peacefully last night. His > > wife, Sue, was with him as she had been these past few > > weeks. Ian reached out to Paul Wilson and me three weeks > > ago, telling us that he has but a few weeks left in him. > > Paul got to speak to him Friday week ago and Ian and I via > > emails and messages Sue shared with him. She described Ian > > as a man who was led by love, and the past few weeks he did > > just that. But he did ask at that time that we not share his > > condition widely. Today, however, Sue asked that I share > > this sad news with you. Ian Peter was my friend. > > > > > > Ian Peter in the centre, Southeast Forest Rally, Canberra, > > 1989 (?) and I with a cap on sat just behind him. The words > > "email", "electronic networks", "earthnet" I'd heard in > > passing. I knew that moment that this was Ian Peter who some > > weeks ago I'd sent my first email to. Some months later > > Pegasus Networks was launched. A year later I moved to Byron > > Bay to work with Ian... and here we are. > > > > Love, > > Andrew > > > > ** > > > > *Andrew Garton *| Lecturer & Adjunct Industry Fellow > > School of Social Sciences, Media, Film and Education, > > Swinburne University > > agarton at swin.edu.au | > > +61409948280 | andrewgarton.com > > Register for APC member convening: > > https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to > > APC.members mailing list > > Additional information and options can be found at > > https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members > > > > If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to > > apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org > > > > If you want more information about how we protect your > > privacy, please refer to our privacy > > policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy > > ) or write to > > privacy at apc.org . > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members > > *must* be introduced. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC > > Council, individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to > > this list. Some other staff of APC member organisations is > > subscribed. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > All conversations that take place on this list are > > considered confidential. As a member of the APC network, you > > are expected to respect this confidentiality. If you wish to > > circulate or quote a post from the APC.members list in any > > other space or forum, you MUST receive permission from the > > person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. > > ------------------------------ > > > > Register for APC member convening: > > https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to > > APC.members mailing list > > Additional information and options can be found at > > https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members > > > > If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to > > apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org > > > > If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, > > please refer to our privacy > > policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy > > ) or write to > > privacy at apc.org . > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members > > *must* be introduced. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC > > Council, individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to > > this list. Some other staff of APC member organisations is > > subscribed. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > All conversations that take place on this list are considered > > confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected > > to respect this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or > > quote a post from the APC.members list in any other space or > > forum, you MUST receive permission from the person who made the > > quote first on the APC.members listserv. > > ------------------------------ > > > > -- > > Governance mailing list > > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > > > > > > > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > -- *Bruna Martins dos Santos * German Chancellor Fellow 21' (Bundeskanzler-Stipendiatin) | Alexander von Humboldt Foundation Visiting Researcher (Gastwissenschaftlerin) | Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB) Member | Coalizão Direitos na Rede Chair | Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group at ICANN Co-Coordinator | Internet Governance Caucus Twitter: @boomartins // Skype: bruna.martinsantos *bruna.martinsdossantos at wzb.eu * and bruna.mrtns at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From caribe at caribe.pro.br Tue Dec 28 08:12:36 2021 From: caribe at caribe.pro.br (=?utf-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_Carlos_Carib=C3=A9?=) Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 10:12:36 -0300 Subject: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <694B0F67-D5C1-43AF-8EB6-B7F2B34D207E@caribe.pro.br> That a sad news, Ian Peter was my colleague on NetMundial Initiative and he was a great person on the I.G. at all. My condolence to the relatives and close friends. -- João Carlos Rebello Caribé Mestre em Ciência da Informação Consultor de Marketing e Estratégia Professor MBA https://caribe.pro.br +55(21)9 8761 1967 > Em 27 de dez. de 2021, à(s) 05:11, Arsène Tungali via Governance escreveu: > >  > So sorry to hear of the passing of Ian Peter. > > We never met in person but I worked with him closely a couple of years ago as part of the IG Civil Society Coordination Group that he co chaired a while ago. > > I led two CSCG NomComs selecting CS nominees for the IGF MAG and he was a great support for those processes. > > May he rest in peace! > >> On Mon, Dec 27, 2021, 8:53 AM Avis Momeni wrote: >> So sad to hear this Dear Andrew, at this end of year. Lot of glory to the hard work he done as a mentor within APC family. >> May his soul rest in peace. >> Avis. >> >>> Le lun. 27 déc. 2021 à 7:36 AM, Andrew Garton a écrit : >>> My dear friends and colleagues - our friend, collaborator and mentor Ian Peter passed away peacefully last night. His wife, Sue, was with him as she had been these past few weeks. Ian reached out to Paul Wilson and me three weeks ago, telling us that he has but a few weeks left in him. Paul got to speak to him Friday week ago and Ian and I via emails and messages Sue shared with him. She described Ian as a man who was led by love, and the past few weeks he did just that. But he did ask at that time that we not share his condition widely. Today, however, Sue asked that I share this sad news with you. Ian Peter was my friend. >>> >>> >>> Ian Peter in the centre, Southeast Forest Rally, Canberra, 1989 (?) and I with a cap on sat just behind him. The words "email", "electronic networks", "earthnet" I'd heard in passing. I knew that moment that this was Ian Peter who some weeks ago I'd sent my first email to. Some months later Pegasus Networks was launched. A year later I moved to Byron Bay to work with Ian... and here we are. >>> >>> Love, >>> Andrew >>> >>> Andrew Garton | Lecturer & Adjunct Industry Fellow >>> School of Social Sciences, Media, Film and Education, Swinburne University >>> agarton at swin.edu.au | +61409948280 | andrewgarton.com >>> Register for APC member convening: https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to APC.members mailing list >>> Additional information and options can be found at https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members >>> If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org >>> If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, please refer to our privacy policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy) or write to privacy at apc.org. >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members *must* be introduced. >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. Some other staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> All conversations that take place on this list are considered confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. >>> ------------------------------ >> Register for APC member convening: https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 >> _______________________________________________ >> You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to APC.members mailing list >> Additional information and options can be found at https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members >> If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org >> If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, please refer to our privacy policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy) or write to privacy at apc.org. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members *must* be introduced. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. Some other staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> All conversations that take place on this list are considered confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. >> ------------------------------ > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From williams.deirdre at gmail.com Tue Dec 28 09:03:25 2021 From: williams.deirdre at gmail.com (Deirdre Williams) Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 10:03:25 -0400 Subject: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: This is such a good suggestion. My current domestic situation makes it difficult for me to offer reliable support, but to the extent that I can, I will. The news of Ian's death is attracting unqualified sympathy from right across the "opinion spectrum". Can we transform that energy to recreate a safe place, not to disagree but to share differences? De On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 19:19, farzaneh badii via Governance < governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > When we wanted to revive IGC in 2019, Ian with such great determination > helped us bring IGC back and restore its website and figure out complex > things .. and he was so persistent. I learned a great deal from him. > > Following his legacy, we should work together to make IGC stronger in > 2022, work on bringing the mailing list archives back live ( I think we can > piece them together since IGC inception, other cocos have offered to help > too) > > I suggest we get together in January (virtually) to celebrate Ian's life, > and send a letter on behalf of IGC to Ian's family. > > Best > > > > Farzaneh > > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 3:11 AM Arsène Tungali via Governance < > governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > >> So sorry to hear of the passing of Ian Peter. >> >> We never met in person but I worked with him closely a couple of years >> ago as part of the IG Civil Society Coordination Group that he co chaired a >> while ago. >> >> I led two CSCG NomComs selecting CS nominees for the IGF MAG and he was a >> great support for those processes. >> >> May he rest in peace! >> >> On Mon, Dec 27, 2021, 8:53 AM Avis Momeni >> wrote: >> >>> So sad to hear this Dear Andrew, at this end of year. Lot of glory to >>> the hard work he done as a mentor within APC family. >>> May his soul rest in peace. >>> Avis. >>> >>> Le lun. 27 déc. 2021 à 7:36 AM, Andrew Garton a >>> écrit : >>> >>>> My dear friends and colleagues - our friend, collaborator and mentor >>>> Ian Peter passed away peacefully last night. His wife, Sue, was with him as >>>> she had been these past few weeks. Ian reached out to Paul Wilson and me >>>> three weeks ago, telling us that he has but a few weeks left in him. Paul >>>> got to speak to him Friday week ago and Ian and I via emails and messages >>>> Sue shared with him. She described Ian as a man who was led by love, and >>>> the past few weeks he did just that. But he did ask at that time that we >>>> not share his condition widely. Today, however, Sue asked that I share this >>>> sad news with you. Ian Peter was my friend. >>>> >>>> >>>> Ian Peter in the centre, Southeast Forest Rally, Canberra, 1989 (?) and >>>> I with a cap on sat just behind him. The words "email", "electronic >>>> networks", "earthnet" I'd heard in passing. I knew that moment that this >>>> was Ian Peter who some weeks ago I'd sent my first email to. Some months >>>> later Pegasus Networks was launched. A year later I moved to Byron Bay to >>>> work with Ian... and here we are. >>>> >>>> Love, >>>> Andrew >>>> >>>> *Andrew Garton *| Lecturer & Adjunct Industry Fellow >>>> School of Social Sciences, Media, Film and Education, Swinburne >>>> University >>>> agarton at swin.edu.au | +61409948280 | andrewgarton.com >>>> Register for APC member convening: >>>> https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to APC.members >>>> mailing list >>>> Additional information and options can be found at >>>> https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members >>>> If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to >>>> apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org >>>> If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, please >>>> refer to our privacy policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy) or >>>> write to privacy at apc.org. >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members *must* be >>>> introduced. >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, >>>> individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. Some other >>>> staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> All conversations that take place on this list are considered >>>> confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect >>>> this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the >>>> APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission >>>> from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>> Register for APC member convening: >>> https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to APC.members >>> mailing list >>> Additional information and options can be found at >>> https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members >>> If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to >>> apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org >>> If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, please >>> refer to our privacy policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy) or >>> write to privacy at apc.org. >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members *must* be >>> introduced. >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, >>> individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. Some other >>> staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> All conversations that take place on this list are considered >>> confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect >>> this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the >>> APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission >>> from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. >>> ------------------------------ >>> >> -- >> Governance mailing list >> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >> > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > -- “The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge" Sir William Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From iza at anr.org Tue Dec 28 09:09:26 2021 From: iza at anr.org (Izumi AIZU) Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 23:09:26 +0900 Subject: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: The first time I met Ian was November 1991 in Seoul, when we hosted the Asia-Pacific Networking Forum, he was representing Australia, for the PC networking community, not the Internet as we know it today. Then we started to meet a lot in the Internet policy arena, mostly at IGF and its related fora. He has been such a wonderful, thoughtful, and warm leader. We miss him a lot. RIP. izumi 2021年12月28日(火) 23:04 Deirdre Williams via Governance < governance at lists.igcaucus.org>: > This is such a good suggestion. > My current domestic situation makes it difficult for me to offer reliable > support, but to the extent that I can, I will. > The news of Ian's death is attracting unqualified sympathy from right > across the "opinion spectrum". > Can we transform that energy to recreate a safe place, not to disagree but > to share differences? > De > > On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 19:19, farzaneh badii via Governance < > governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > >> When we wanted to revive IGC in 2019, Ian with such great determination >> helped us bring IGC back and restore its website and figure out complex >> things .. and he was so persistent. I learned a great deal from him. >> >> Following his legacy, we should work together to make IGC stronger in >> 2022, work on bringing the mailing list archives back live ( I think we can >> piece them together since IGC inception, other cocos have offered to help >> too) >> >> I suggest we get together in January (virtually) to celebrate Ian's life, >> and send a letter on behalf of IGC to Ian's family. >> >> Best >> >> >> >> Farzaneh >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 3:11 AM Arsène Tungali via Governance < >> governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: >> >>> So sorry to hear of the passing of Ian Peter. >>> >>> We never met in person but I worked with him closely a couple of years >>> ago as part of the IG Civil Society Coordination Group that he co chaired a >>> while ago. >>> >>> I led two CSCG NomComs selecting CS nominees for the IGF MAG and he was >>> a great support for those processes. >>> >>> May he rest in peace! >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 27, 2021, 8:53 AM Avis Momeni >>> wrote: >>> >>>> So sad to hear this Dear Andrew, at this end of year. Lot of glory to >>>> the hard work he done as a mentor within APC family. >>>> May his soul rest in peace. >>>> Avis. >>>> >>>> Le lun. 27 déc. 2021 à 7:36 AM, Andrew Garton a >>>> écrit : >>>> >>>>> My dear friends and colleagues - our friend, collaborator and mentor >>>>> Ian Peter passed away peacefully last night. His wife, Sue, was with him as >>>>> she had been these past few weeks. Ian reached out to Paul Wilson and me >>>>> three weeks ago, telling us that he has but a few weeks left in him. Paul >>>>> got to speak to him Friday week ago and Ian and I via emails and messages >>>>> Sue shared with him. She described Ian as a man who was led by love, and >>>>> the past few weeks he did just that. But he did ask at that time that we >>>>> not share his condition widely. Today, however, Sue asked that I share this >>>>> sad news with you. Ian Peter was my friend. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ian Peter in the centre, Southeast Forest Rally, Canberra, 1989 (?) >>>>> and I with a cap on sat just behind him. The words "email", "electronic >>>>> networks", "earthnet" I'd heard in passing. I knew that moment that this >>>>> was Ian Peter who some weeks ago I'd sent my first email to. Some months >>>>> later Pegasus Networks was launched. A year later I moved to Byron Bay to >>>>> work with Ian... and here we are. >>>>> >>>>> Love, >>>>> Andrew >>>>> >>>>> *Andrew Garton *| Lecturer & Adjunct Industry Fellow >>>>> School of Social Sciences, Media, Film and Education, Swinburne >>>>> University >>>>> agarton at swin.edu.au | +61409948280 | andrewgarton.com >>>>> Register for APC member convening: >>>>> https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to APC.members >>>>> mailing list >>>>> Additional information and options can be found at >>>>> https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members >>>>> If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to >>>>> apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org >>>>> If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, please >>>>> refer to our privacy policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy) or >>>>> write to privacy at apc.org. >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members *must* be >>>>> introduced. >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, >>>>> individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. Some other >>>>> staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> All conversations that take place on this list are considered >>>>> confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect >>>>> this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the >>>>> APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission >>>>> from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>> Register for APC member convening: >>>> https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to APC.members >>>> mailing list >>>> Additional information and options can be found at >>>> https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members >>>> If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to >>>> apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org >>>> If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, please >>>> refer to our privacy policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy) or >>>> write to privacy at apc.org. >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members *must* be >>>> introduced. >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, >>>> individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. Some other >>>> staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> All conversations that take place on this list are considered >>>> confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect >>>> this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the >>>> APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission >>>> from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>> -- >>> Governance mailing list >>> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >>> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >>> >> -- >> Governance mailing list >> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >> > > > -- > “The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge" Sir William > Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979 > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > -- >> Izumi Aizu << Institute for InfoSocionomics, Tama University, Tokyo Institute for HyperNetwork Society, Oita, Japan www.anr.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From joly at punkcast.com Tue Dec 28 19:59:12 2021 From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie) Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 19:59:12 -0500 Subject: [Governance] =?utf-8?q?12_Streams_2021_=232_=E2=80=93_Celebratin?= =?utf-8?q?g_Ian_Peter?= Message-ID: This is a late notice as this stream went out earlier. However this does mean that it is already archived including transcripts https://archive.org/download/12streams2021-2/01_Pegasus_launch_1989_TRANSCRIPT.pdf https://archive.org/download/12streams2021-2/02_The_Last_Billion_-_Ian_Peter_TRANSCRIPT.pdf Everyone who knew Ian Peter is saddened by his loss, however it is cheering to recall his enthusiastic spirit, well evident in the two clips here. [image: livestream] Today, *Monday December 27 2021*, at* 9:00pm EST* (02:00 UTC Dec 28) in the second installment of the Internet Society Livestreaming‘s ‘*12 Days of Streams *‘ annual highlights, we celebrate *Ian Peter* , environmental activist and Australian Internet pioneer, who died on December 26. Ian Pete*r *was also an Internet historian and leaves us *nethistory.info *, a comprehensive general reference. *Janna Anderson * Of Elon University writes: Ian has been an outstanding leader in the evolution of the Internet from the 1980s to today. Those who never had the opportunity to meet him missed the chance to fully appreciate his kindness, dedication and sharp intellect. This wonderfully charming and bright Aussie was a key figure in the Internet’s early development and diffusion in the Asia-Pacific area. He was one of the original founding directors of the Association for Progressive Communications, the outstanding international network of organizations that has been and continues to do work that is crucial to the advancement of the Internet as a tool for the advancement of human rights via human communication. We will always remember Ian for his passionate pursuit of the best possible future of global communication. Today’s stream has two clips, via Janna, 1) a 1989 *ABC TV report * as Ian and colleague Mike Jensen launch *Pegasus Networks * in *Terania Creek * NSW 2) an *Imagining the Internet Center * at Elon University clip of Ian speaking at *IGF 2008 Hyderabad * in which he talks about “*The Last Billion *” people likely to be connected to the Internet 20 years into the future. *VIEW ON LIVESTREAM: https://livestream.com/internetsociety/12streams2021- 2*(Open captions) *TWITTER #12STREAMS @IanWPeter @APC_News @ImagineInternet* *SIMULCASTS* *https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/ * *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive * *https://www.facebook.com/liveisoc/ * *ARCHIVE* *https://archive.org/details/12streams2021-2 * *Permalink* https://isoc.live/14921/ - -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -------------------------------------- - -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From williams.deirdre at gmail.com Tue Dec 28 21:09:40 2021 From: williams.deirdre at gmail.com (Deirdre Williams) Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 22:09:40 -0400 Subject: [Governance] =?utf-8?q?12_Streams_2021_=232_=E2=80=93_Celebratin?= =?utf-8?q?g_Ian_Peter?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thank you Joly. De On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 at 20:59, Joly MacFie via Governance < governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > This is a late notice as this stream went out earlier. However this does > mean that it is already archived including transcripts > > https://archive.org/download/12streams2021-2/01_Pegasus_launch_1989_TRANSCRIPT.pdf > > https://archive.org/download/12streams2021-2/02_The_Last_Billion_-_Ian_Peter_TRANSCRIPT.pdf > > Everyone who knew Ian Peter is saddened by his loss, however it is > cheering to recall his enthusiastic spirit, well evident in the two clips > here. > > [image: livestream] > Today, *Monday > December 27 2021*, at* 9:00pm EST* (02:00 UTC Dec 28) in the second > installment of the Internet Society Livestreaming‘s ‘*12 Days of Streams > *‘ annual highlights, we celebrate *Ian > Peter* , environmental > activist and Australian Internet pioneer, who died on December 26. Ian > Pete*r *was also an Internet historian and leaves us *nethistory.info > *, a comprehensive general reference. > > *Janna Anderson * Of Elon > University writes: > > Ian has been an outstanding leader in the evolution of the Internet from > the 1980s to today. Those who never had the opportunity to meet him missed > the chance to fully appreciate his kindness, dedication and sharp > intellect. This wonderfully charming and bright Aussie was a key figure in > the Internet’s early development and diffusion in the Asia-Pacific area. He > was one of the original founding directors of the Association for > Progressive Communications, the outstanding international network of > organizations that has been and continues to do work that is crucial to the > advancement of the Internet as a tool for the advancement of human rights > via human communication. > > We will always remember Ian for his passionate pursuit of the best > possible future of global communication. > > Today’s stream has two clips, via Janna, 1) a 1989 *ABC TV report > * as Ian and colleague Mike Jensen launch *Pegasus > Networks > * > in *Terania Creek * NSW > 2) an *Imagining the Internet Center * at > Elon University clip of Ian speaking at *IGF 2008 Hyderabad > * in > which he talks about “*The Last Billion *” > people likely to be connected to the Internet 20 years into the future. > > *VIEW ON LIVESTREAM: https://livestream.com/internetsociety/12streams2021- > 2*(Open captions) > > *TWITTER #12STREAMS @IanWPeter @APC_News > @ImagineInternet* > > *SIMULCASTS* > *https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/ * > *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive * > *https://www.facebook.com/liveisoc/ * > > *ARCHIVE* > *https://archive.org/details/12streams2021-2 > * > > > > *Permalink* > https://isoc.live/14921/ > > > > - > > > -- > -------------------------------------- > Joly MacFie +12185659365 > -------------------------------------- > - > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > -- “The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge" Sir William Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From joly at punkcast.com Wed Dec 29 00:28:18 2021 From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie) Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 00:28:18 -0500 Subject: [Governance] 12 Streams 2021 #3 - Beyond the Net webinar on Greening the Internet Message-ID: Just got this in past the post by a few minutes on 12 streams day 3! It's something that I missed streaming a couple of weeks back, that I've reconstructed from the zoom. Two great presentations, fantastic projects. What's notable is that a) the ISOC Foundation is showing broader scope than the Internet Society itself, and encouraging Chapters to do the same, b) in the case of Zimbabwe, a combined Beyond the Net and a research project has enough clout to sway the country's policy on e-waste, c) in the case of Serbia, a DIY open hardware project shows promise of scaling widely, while providing hard data for activists, and also giving the chapter a high profile. ISOC Live posted: "Today, Tuesday December 28 2021, at 11:55pm EST (04:55 UTC Dec29) in the third installment of the Internet Society Livestreaming‘s ‘12 Days of Streams‘ annual highlights, we feature the Internet Society Foundation webinar ‘Greening the Internet‘ from 16 D" [image: livestream] Today, *Tuesday December 28 2021*, at *11:55pm EST* (04:55 UTC Dec29) in the third installment of the Internet Society Livestreaming‘s ‘*12 Days of Streams *‘ annual highlights, we feature the *Internet Society Foundation * webinar ‘*Greening the Internet*‘ from 16 December 2021. The *Internet Society Zimbabwe Chapter * presented their project ‘*Greening from the Margins: the Geopolitics of extractive, operational and post-consumer e-waste management*’ and the *Internet Society Serbia Belgrade Chapter * presented their project ‘*Air to the people 2.0*’. *HOST* *Tasnim Broud*, Grants Specialist, Beyond the Net, Internet Foundation *PRESENTERS* *Jasper Mangwana*, ISOC Zimbabwe *Desiree Evans Miloševic & Nevena Nikolic*, ISOC Serbia Belgrade *MODERATOR* *Guilherme Rocca*, Grants Specialist, Beyond the Net, Internet Foundation *VIEW ON LIVESTREAM: https://livestream.com/internetsociety/12streams2021-3 * (Open captions) *TWITTER #12Streams #BeyondTheNet #greeningtheinternet @ISOC_Foundation @ISOCZIM @isoc_belgrade* *SIMULCASTS* *https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/ * *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive * *https://www.facebook.com/liveisoc/ * *https://www.facebook.com/ISOCAfrica/ * *ARCHIVE* *https://archive.org/details/12streams2021-3 * *Permalink* https://isoc.live/14931/ - -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -------------------------------------- - -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com Wed Dec 29 00:45:23 2021 From: salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com (Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro) Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 05:45:23 +0000 Subject: [Governance] =?utf-8?q?12_Streams_2021_=232_=E2=80=93_Celebratin?= =?utf-8?q?g_Ian_Peter?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear Colleagues, >From Ian's own writings- his journey as described by his blog: https://ianpeter.wordpress.com/2012/10/26/the-pegasus-story-from-2004/ Sala On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 2:10 AM Deirdre Williams via Governance < governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > Thank you Joly. > De > > On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 at 20:59, Joly MacFie via Governance < > governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > >> This is a late notice as this stream went out earlier. However this does >> mean that it is already archived including transcripts >> >> https://archive.org/download/12streams2021-2/01_Pegasus_launch_1989_TRANSCRIPT.pdf >> >> https://archive.org/download/12streams2021-2/02_The_Last_Billion_-_Ian_Peter_TRANSCRIPT.pdf >> >> Everyone who knew Ian Peter is saddened by his loss, however it is >> cheering to recall his enthusiastic spirit, well evident in the two clips >> here. >> >> [image: livestream] >> Today, *Monday >> December 27 2021*, at* 9:00pm EST* (02:00 UTC Dec 28) in the second >> installment of the Internet Society Livestreaming‘s ‘*12 Days of Streams >> *‘ annual highlights, we celebrate *Ian >> Peter* , environmental >> activist and Australian Internet pioneer, who died on December 26. Ian >> Pete*r *was also an Internet historian and leaves us *nethistory.info >> *, a comprehensive general reference. >> >> *Janna Anderson * Of Elon >> University writes: >> >> Ian has been an outstanding leader in the evolution of the Internet from >> the 1980s to today. Those who never had the opportunity to meet him missed >> the chance to fully appreciate his kindness, dedication and sharp >> intellect. This wonderfully charming and bright Aussie was a key figure in >> the Internet’s early development and diffusion in the Asia-Pacific area. He >> was one of the original founding directors of the Association for >> Progressive Communications, the outstanding international network of >> organizations that has been and continues to do work that is crucial to the >> advancement of the Internet as a tool for the advancement of human rights >> via human communication. >> >> We will always remember Ian for his passionate pursuit of the best >> possible future of global communication. >> >> Today’s stream has two clips, via Janna, 1) a 1989 *ABC TV report >> * as Ian and colleague Mike Jensen launch *Pegasus >> Networks >> * >> in *Terania Creek * NSW >> 2) an *Imagining the Internet Center * at >> Elon University clip of Ian speaking at *IGF 2008 Hyderabad >> * in >> which he talks about “*The Last Billion *” >> people likely to be connected to the Internet 20 years into the future. >> >> *VIEW ON >> LIVESTREAM: https://livestream.com/internetsociety/12streams2021- >> 2*(Open captions) >> >> *TWITTER #12STREAMS @IanWPeter @APC_News >> @ImagineInternet* >> >> *SIMULCASTS* >> *https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/ * >> *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive * >> *https://www.facebook.com/liveisoc/ * >> >> *ARCHIVE* >> *https://archive.org/details/12streams2021-2 >> * >> >> >> >> *Permalink* >> https://isoc.live/14921/ >> >> >> >> - >> >> >> -- >> -------------------------------------- >> Joly MacFie +12185659365 >> -------------------------------------- >> - >> -- >> Governance mailing list >> Governance at lists.igcaucus.org >> https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance >> > > > -- > “The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge" Sir William > Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979 > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > -- *Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala T* *P. O. Box 17862* *Suva* *Republic of Fiji* *Cell: +679 7656770; * *Home: +679 3362003* *Twitter: @SalanietaT* *"You will never do anything in this world without courage. It is the greatest quality of the mind next to honour." Aristotle* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tapani.tarvainen at effi.org Wed Dec 29 03:09:19 2021 From: tapani.tarvainen at effi.org (Tapani Tarvainen) Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 09:09:19 +0100 Subject: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20211229080919.GA7424@jay.tarvainen.info> On Dec 27 10:26, avri doria via Governance (governance at lists.igcaucus.org) wrote: > > So sorry to read of Ian's death. As am I. :-( > He was a good person and will be missed. Indeed. I have only good memories of him. Most recently when we worked as IG Caucus elections tech team. I can't think of an easier person to work with. And looking at all he did and achieved, even though I must only know a small part of it, it was clearly a life well-lived, even though it was cut too short. -- Tapani Tarvainen From ca at cafonso.ca Wed Dec 29 07:02:49 2021 From: ca at cafonso.ca (Carlos Afonso) Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 09:02:49 -0300 Subject: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter In-Reply-To: <20211229080919.GA7424@jay.tarvainen.info> References: <20211229080919.GA7424@jay.tarvainen.info> Message-ID: This video of 1989 gives an idea of the pioneering role played by my dear friend Ian -- working on a wireless project in Terania Creek, New South Wales, Australia: https://nuvem.social/s/nbTqM7qKEcpEpYX fraternal regards --c.a. On 29/12/2021 05:09, Tapani Tarvainen via Governance wrote: > On Dec 27 10:26, avri doria via Governance (governance at lists.igcaucus.org) wrote: >> >> So sorry to read of Ian's death. > > As am I. :-( > >> He was a good person and will be missed. > > Indeed. > > I have only good memories of him. Most recently when we worked as IG > Caucus elections tech team. I can't think of an easier person to work > with. > > And looking at all he did and achieved, even though I must only know a > small part of it, it was clearly a life well-lived, even though it was > cut too short. > -- Carlos A. Afonso [emails são pessoais exceto quando explicitamente indicado em contrário] [emails are personal unless explicitly indicated otherwise] Instituto Nupef - https://nupef.org.br From kstouray at gmail.com Wed Dec 29 08:38:41 2021 From: kstouray at gmail.com (Katim S. Touray) Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 13:38:41 +0000 Subject: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Dear all, This is very sad news! I join you all in mourning Ian, and extend my sincere condolences to his family and loved ones. May his soul rest in perfect and eternal peace! Amen!! Katim On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 8:11 AM Arsène Tungali via Governance < governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > So sorry to hear of the passing of Ian Peter. > > We never met in person but I worked with him closely a couple of years ago > as part of the IG Civil Society Coordination Group that he co chaired a > while ago. > > I led two CSCG NomComs selecting CS nominees for the IGF MAG and he was a > great support for those processes. > > May he rest in peace! > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021, 8:53 AM Avis Momeni > wrote: > >> So sad to hear this Dear Andrew, at this end of year. Lot of glory to the >> hard work he done as a mentor within APC family. >> May his soul rest in peace. >> Avis. >> >> Le lun. 27 déc. 2021 à 7:36 AM, Andrew Garton a >> écrit : >> >>> My dear friends and colleagues - our friend, collaborator and mentor Ian >>> Peter passed away peacefully last night. His wife, Sue, was with him as she >>> had been these past few weeks. Ian reached out to Paul Wilson and me three >>> weeks ago, telling us that he has but a few weeks left in him. Paul got to >>> speak to him Friday week ago and Ian and I via emails and messages Sue >>> shared with him. She described Ian as a man who was led by love, and the >>> past few weeks he did just that. But he did ask at that time that we not >>> share his condition widely. Today, however, Sue asked that I share this sad >>> news with you. Ian Peter was my friend. >>> >>> >>> Ian Peter in the centre, Southeast Forest Rally, Canberra, 1989 (?) and >>> I with a cap on sat just behind him. The words "email", "electronic >>> networks", "earthnet" I'd heard in passing. I knew that moment that this >>> was Ian Peter who some weeks ago I'd sent my first email to. Some months >>> later Pegasus Networks was launched. A year later I moved to Byron Bay to >>> work with Ian... and here we are. >>> >>> Love, >>> Andrew >>> >>> *Andrew Garton *| Lecturer & Adjunct Industry Fellow >>> School of Social Sciences, Media, Film and Education, Swinburne >>> University >>> agarton at swin.edu.au | +61409948280 | andrewgarton.com >>> Register for APC member convening: >>> https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to APC.members >>> mailing list >>> Additional information and options can be found at >>> https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members >>> If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to >>> apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org >>> If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, please >>> refer to our privacy policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy) or >>> write to privacy at apc.org. >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members *must* be >>> introduced. >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, >>> individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. Some other >>> staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> All conversations that take place on this list are considered >>> confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect >>> this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the >>> APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission >>> from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. >>> ------------------------------ >>> >> Register for APC member convening: >> https://crm.apc.org/webforms/convening-2021 >> _______________________________________________ >> You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to APC.members >> mailing list >> Additional information and options can be found at >> https://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members >> If you want to unsubscribe, send an email to >> apc.members-unsubscribe at lists.apc.org >> If you want more information about how we protect your privacy, please >> refer to our privacy policy(https://www.apc.org/en/privacy-policy) or >> write to privacy at apc.org. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Policy guiding membership in this list: All new list members *must* be >> introduced. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> Membership on the list: All member representatives to APC Council, >> individual members, and APC staff are subscribed to this list. Some other >> staff of APC member organisations is subscribed. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> All conversations that take place on this list are considered >> confidential. As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect >> this confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the >> APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission >> from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv. >> ------------------------------ >> > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From trieste at gmail.com Wed Dec 29 09:38:27 2021 From: trieste at gmail.com (trieste at gmail.com) Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 11:38:27 -0300 Subject: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter In-Reply-To: References: <20211229080919.GA7424@jay.tarvainen.info> Message-ID: To add to C.A remembrances, an Interview from the same year: https://www.apc.org/en/news/constellations-internet-history-conversation-ian-peter-founder-pegasus-networks demi On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 9:03 AM Carlos Afonso via Governance < governance at lists.igcaucus.org> wrote: > This video of 1989 gives an idea of the pioneering role played by my dear > friend Ian -- working on a wireless project in Terania Creek, New South > Wales, Australia: > > https://nuvem.social/s/nbTqM7qKEcpEpYX > > fraternal regards > > --c.a. > > On 29/12/2021 05:09, Tapani Tarvainen via Governance wrote: > > On Dec 27 10:26, avri doria via Governance ( > governance at lists.igcaucus.org) wrote: > >> > >> So sorry to read of Ian's death. > > > > As am I. :-( > > > >> He was a good person and will be missed. > > > > Indeed. > > > > I have only good memories of him. Most recently when we worked as IG > > Caucus elections tech team. I can't think of an easier person to work > > with. > > > > And looking at all he did and achieved, even though I must only know a > > small part of it, it was clearly a life well-lived, even though it was > > cut too short. > > > > -- > > Carlos A. Afonso > [emails são pessoais exceto quando explicitamente indicado em contrário] > [emails are personal unless explicitly indicated otherwise] > > Instituto Nupef - https://nupef.org.br > > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From joly at punkcast.com Thu Dec 30 00:33:03 2021 From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie) Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 00:33:03 -0500 Subject: [Governance] =?utf-8?q?12Streams_2021_=234_=E2=80=93_Open_Standa?= =?utf-8?q?rds_Everywhere_=E2=80=93_Dan_York?= Message-ID: The ISOC Fundamentals series was a marathon event, taking place over a couple of weeks in April 2021, where each of 6 topics, Encryption, Community Networks, Infracom, Open Standards for Webservers, MANRS, Internet Way of Networking, was explored in 4 separate sessions, in 3 different languages, aimed at ISOC chapters and members in different regions, The entire thing is archived here ISOC Live posted: "Today, Wednesday December 28 2021, at 11:55pm EST (04:55 UTC Dec29) in the fourth instalment of the Internet Society Livestreaming‘s ‘12 Days of Streams‘ annual highlights, we feature a session the Internet Society's Fundamentals Series in April 2021. Dan" [image: livestream] Today, *Wednesday December 28 2021*, at *11:55pm EST* (04:55 UTC Dec29) in the fourth instalment of the Internet Society Livestreaming‘s ‘*12 Days of Streams *‘ annual highlights, we feature a session the *Internet Society's Fundamentals Series * in April 2021. *Dan York *, Director of Online Content, gives Chapters a primer on the '*Open Standards Everywhere *' (OSE) project which aims to promote best practices to secure web servers. *VIEW ON LIVESTREAM:* https://livestream.com/internetsociety/12streams2021-4 (Open captions) *TWITTER #12Streams #OSE @danyork @InternetSociety @ISOC_Community #ISOCFundamentals #StrongInternet* *SIMULCASTS* *https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/ * *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive * *https://www.facebook.com/liveisoc/ * *GITHUB* *https://github.com/InternetSociety/ose-documentation * *ARCHIVE* *https://archive.org/details/12streams2021-4 * *Permalink* https://isoc.live/14935/ - -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -------------------------------------- - -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From parminder at itforchange.net Thu Dec 30 05:11:25 2021 From: parminder at itforchange.net (parminder) Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 15:41:25 +0530 Subject: [Governance] [apc.members] Ian Peter In-Reply-To: References: <20211229080919.GA7424@jay.tarvainen.info> Message-ID: It is very sad to hear Ian leave us.... As others have said, he was a good person. A very good person - pure and simple at heart. Cared greatly for the 'Internet', had strong and clear views and ideas, but always listened. It was so easy to talk with him, even when disagreeing. However strongly he was for something, he never turned away from reasoning for or against it. The world is a better place because of people like Ian. He will be fondly remembered. I had the good fortune of working with him as a co-coordinator of IGC. He wholehearted, selfless dedication was pure inspiration. On matters of trivia, to beat the condition imposed by the IGF for some time for having a co- organizer from at least three stakeholder groups, he gladly lent us Ian Peter and Associates (https://www.ianpeter.com/bio.html) as our private sector partner for many workshops :) Always a man ready to help. Be well wherever you are, Ian! With fond love and memories, parminder On 29/12/21 8:08 pm, trieste--- via Governance wrote: > To add to C.A remembrances, an Interview from the same year: > https://www.apc.org/en/news/constellations-internet-history-conversation-ian-peter-founder-pegasus-networks > > demi > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 9:03 AM Carlos Afonso via Governance > > > wrote: > > This video of 1989 gives an idea of the pioneering role played by > my dear friend Ian -- working on a wireless project in Terania > Creek, New South Wales, Australia: > > https://nuvem.social/s/nbTqM7qKEcpEpYX > > > fraternal regards > > --c.a. > > On 29/12/2021 05:09, Tapani Tarvainen via Governance wrote: > > On Dec 27 10:26, avri doria via Governance > (governance at lists.igcaucus.org > ) wrote: > >> > >> So sorry to read of Ian's death. > > > > As am I. :-( > > > >> He was a good person and will be missed. > > > > Indeed. > > > > I have only good memories of him. Most recently when we worked as IG > > Caucus elections tech team. I can't think of an easier person to > work > > with. > > > > And looking at all he did and achieved, even though I must only > know a > > small part of it, it was clearly a life well-lived, even though > it was > > cut too short. > > > > -- > > Carlos A. Afonso > [emails são pessoais exceto quando explicitamente indicado em > contrário] > [emails are personal unless explicitly indicated otherwise] > > Instituto Nupef - https://nupef.org.br > > -- > Governance mailing list > Governance at lists.igcaucus.org > https://lists.igcaucus.org/mailman/listinfo/governance > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From joly at punkcast.com Fri Dec 31 03:43:34 2021 From: joly at punkcast.com (Joly MacFie) Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2021 03:43:34 -0500 Subject: [Governance] =?utf-8?q?12Streams_2021_=235_=E2=80=93_Inaugural_L?= =?utf-8?q?ord_Renwick_Memorial_Lecture_w/_Vint_Cerf?= Message-ID: One of the boons of the pandemic is that remote working has enabled Vint Cerf to participate in way more events than previously possible. My guess is his calendar had 100+ in 2021. This is one of the most prestigious, honoring the recently deceased UK Internet pioneer Lord Harry Renwick. [image: livestream] On* Thursday December 30 2021*, in the fifth instalment of the Internet Society Livestreaming‘s ‘*12 Days of Streams *‘ annual highlights, we feature the inaugural *Lord Renwick Memorial Lecture * on September 9 2021. Guest Speaker *Vint Cerf* addressed the topic “*Wrestling with Alligators: Delivering on the Digital Promise*“. *VIEW ON LIVESTREAM: https://livestream.com/internetsociety/12streams2021-5 *(Open captions) *TWITTER #12Streams #renwick2021 @DPAlliance @VGCerf* *SIMULCASTS* *https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/ * *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive * *https://www.facebook.com/liveisoc/ * *ARCHIVE* *https://archive.org/details/12streams2021-5 * *Permalink* https://isoc.live/14940/ - -- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -------------------------------------- - -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: