[governance] FW: Letter from Senators+ on .ORG Sale

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

              	    	Plain statements of fact don’t constitute ad hominem I’m afraid.    	
    	--srs      



On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 9:02 PM +0530, <david_allen_ab63 at post.harvard.edu> wrote:










Ad hominem attacks are grounds for removal from the list.
Co-co’s take notice.
David

On Jan 26, 2020, at 11:37 PM, Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu> wrote:
This is a joke. You did nothing to help create jurisdictional immunity. Here is a link to the record of public comment on the final report on the jurisdiction subgroup.NCSG is there. You are not. End of story. https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/responses-comments-recommendations-on-icann-jurisdiction-20mar18-en.pdf

>I was there in most jurisdiction issue related WG meetings, including calls, and email discussions . I initiative many of the key elements of the jurisdiction issue and argued extensively about most of them. In the end there were two dissenting notes to the final jurisdiction related report which did not agree that enough was done to remove/ reduce US jurisdiction over ICANN, Brazil government's and mine.  . Can we now get back to what NCUC was doing about removing/ reducing US jurisdiction over ICANN?

parminder 

 

     Julf 

---To unsubscribe: <mailto:igc-unsubscribe at lists.riseup.net>List help: <https://riseup.net/lists>---
To unsubscribe: <mailto:igc-unsubscribe at lists.riseup.net>
List help: <https://riseup.net/lists>






-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20200127/976ed8b7/attachment.htm>