[governance] [bestbits] Follow-on from survey on the future of Bestbits: next steps

Mon Apr 1 08:25:50 EDT 2019

Dear Sivasubramanian,
(Apologies for cross-posting)
Although various people have pointed to the need for a common voice for
civil society in this arena it really seems that there is no longer an
appetite for the individual effort needed for a successful collaboration of
this type. I would be very happy to have this opinion drowned by a chorus
of voices proving me wrong, but I am not expecting to hear them.
So I wonder if we should be looking for a new means to and a new process
for collaboration?
Should this be included in the agenda under 2 - Concrete ways forward?
I don't have any real suggestions. I think that, more now than before, the
process depends on individuals being willing to make a commitment of time
energy and effort, and that this is happening in a context where the
general ethos has lost its encouragement of sharing and communal energy.
It needs to become possible again to perceive a common good. Should this
happen by painstakingly linking very small local initiatives, where the
"common good" is easy to see, rather than attempting things on a global
scale (which in fact is "top down")?
Hopefully the discussion on 9th will take us nearer to a solution.
Best wishes
Deirdre

On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 at 16:41, Sivasubramanian M <6.Internet at gmail.com>
wrote:

> With apologies for cross-posting, I see a limited response, only about 8
> respondents.
>
> Is there a corresponding message on the IGC list?  Possibly the poll
> announcement hasn't reached those who are subscribed only to the IGC list.
> (or because the title of the message says "future of Bestbits" rather than
> say "future of IG Civil Society".
>
> Sivasubramanian M
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 11:41 PM Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> It's been really great to see the level of engagement in these
>> conversations about strengthening civil society coordination, and I know
>> there's a lot of interest in not losing motivation. The conversations have
>> been premised on a general interest in changing the current situation
>> (namely Bestbits being inactive as a coordination network), and
>> collectively finding ways to strengthen global civil society coordination
>> on the issues we work on.
>>
>> Hopefully the conversations so far, and the survey which gathered a
>> broader array of views, have been helpful. I attached a summary report of
>> the survey in my last email. At the last IGF in Paris there was discussion
>> of holding a meeting at RightsCon this year. Before we do that however, it
>> would be good to discuss the responses to the survey and agree a way
>> forward.
>>
>> I'm including a doodle below, with a suggested agenda. It would be great
>> if you could fill it out by 29 March so I can confirm the date and set up a
>> room.
>>
>> https://doodle.com/poll/vyfn2zdxzt8wqzis
>>
>> *Suggested agenda*
>> 1) Responses to the survey: a discussion
>> 2) Suggestion of concrete ways forward
>> 3) Meeting at RightsCon?
>>
>> Looking forward to building on your energy and contributions so far!
>>
>> Best
>> Sheetal.
>>
>> On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 13:43, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> Thank you very much to those who completed the survey. I have attached
>>> the anonymised results as a text document, with a summary included at the
>>> top in case useful.
>>>
>>> As a next step I would suggest a split call, with the first half spent
>>> discussing the results and suggesting a way forward (45 minutes-1 hour) and
>>> the second half, if deemed necessary, with IGC founders and other key
>>> members of IGC. We could arrange that as a separate call too.
>>>
>>> The aim of the calls so far and the survey have been to find a way to
>>> promote *more* civil society coordination, and thus to change the
>>> current state of affairs. I hope that they help in finding a way forward
>>> which does this and in so doing, responds to the widest possible range of
>>> opinion. Should you have any other suggestions on how to proceed, please do
>>> chime in! Otherwise, I'll send around a doodle for a follow up call.
>>>
>>> Thanks again.
>>>
>>> Best
>>> Sheetal.
>>>
>>> On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 15:02, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> We've received a useful number of responses but it would be great to
>>>> hear from more people about the future of Bestbits. If you could fill out
>>>> the survey by COB this Friday that would be much appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> http://bestbits.net/
>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>> limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/
>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>> index&sid=528319
>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>> I'll then likely send out a doodle for another call to decide next
>>>> steps next week.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you!
>>>>
>>>> Best
>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 11:58, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>
>>>>> We've got some great responses to the survey so thank you to those who
>>>>> have responded already.
>>>>>
>>>>> The survey is still open so please do lend your views if you can, by
>>>>> using the link below. The survey responses will feed into the next set of
>>>>> discussions on the future of Bestbits.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://bestbits.net/
>>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>>> limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/
>>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>>> index&sid=528319
>>>>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>>>>> Best
>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 at 09:37, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Following a call and discussion on this thread, please see a survey
>>>>>> below to gather your views on the future of Bestbits. Following a call on
>>>>>> February 11 with members of Bestbits, as well as members of IGC, it was
>>>>>> agreed that a survey would be circulated to gather views of all members.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The survey is preceded by a background information note which
>>>>>> includes a summary of the discussions so far, and links to the summaries of
>>>>>> calls.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319&lang=en
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As a member of the Bestbits mailing list, you are invited to complete
>>>>>> the survey. To inform future discussions in a timely way, please complete
>>>>>> the survey *by 08 March*. Should you have any questions at all,
>>>>>> don't hesitate to get in touch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looking forward to hearing your views!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 20:08, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you to those who participated in the call yesterday. For those
>>>>>>> who couldn't attend the call, you'll find the list of participants and
>>>>>>> notes here:  https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/Bestbitscallfuture
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We had a rich discussion about the possible ways forward for
>>>>>>> Bestbits, building on the previous conversation in December and the
>>>>>>> discussion on this thread since.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In essence, there was general agreement that both Bestbits and IGC
>>>>>>> have been facing challenges in fulfilling their objectives, particularly
>>>>>>> when it comes to coordination and we agreed to circulate a survey to both
>>>>>>> lists to gather perspectives on four suggested ways forward which were
>>>>>>> discussed on the call. It was suggested that this survey with the broader
>>>>>>> communities feed into a decision on the future of the platforms. The survey
>>>>>>> will be circulated shortly to both lists shortly,  and your participation
>>>>>>> would be greatly appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 16:47, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is just a gentle reminder that the call on next steps is this
>>>>>>>> coming Monday, 11 February from* 4- 6 PM UTC*. The full details
>>>>>>>> are included in my previous email and I've updated the etherpad
>>>>>>>> <https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/Bestbitscallfuture> with those
>>>>>>>> planning to attend.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Looking forward to speaking to you then!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 10:07, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank you for filling out the doodle! It seems the best time for
>>>>>>>>> the call is* 4-6 PM UTC on February 11*. The full details of the
>>>>>>>>> call, including how to join, are below.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks to Farzaneh for setting up the room. Looking forward to
>>>>>>>>> speaking to as many of you as possible on the 11th!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Bestbits call: Future pathways *
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Date and time: *
>>>>>>>>> 11 February, 4:00-6:00 PM UTC <http://worldtimebuddy.com/>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Online Meeting room: *
>>>>>>>>> To join the Meeting:
>>>>>>>>> https://bluejeans.com/819760256
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To join via Room System:
>>>>>>>>> Video Conferencing System: bjn.vc -or-199.48.152.152
>>>>>>>>> Meeting ID : 819760256
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To join via phone :
>>>>>>>>> 1)  Dial:
>>>>>>>>> +1.408.740.7256 (US (San Jose))
>>>>>>>>> +1.888.240.2560 (US Toll Free)
>>>>>>>>> +1.408.317.9253 (US (Primary, San Jose))
>>>>>>>>> (see all numbers - http://bluejeans.com/numbers)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2)  Enter Conference ID : 819760256
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please note that if you call in, your phone number will appear on
>>>>>>>>> the Bluejeans room page. We would like to record and share the link with
>>>>>>>>> the BestBits network on the mailing list. Please let us know if you do not
>>>>>>>>> want the recording to be shared on an open mailing list if you call in.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Proposed agenda: *
>>>>>>>>> *Aim: *to discuss the future of the Bestbits and IGC lists,
>>>>>>>>> including the possibility of a merger + other options
>>>>>>>>> 1) Identification/agreement of challenges and issues faced in each
>>>>>>>>> network
>>>>>>>>> 2) Discussion of options, e.g merger of lists/establishment of
>>>>>>>>> new/maintenance of status quo - using lists as information sharing devices:
>>>>>>>>> pros and cons of each
>>>>>>>>> 3) Discussion of next steps/agreement on process for decision
>>>>>>>>> making regarding future of the lists
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *RSVP on etherpad*
>>>>>>>>> I've put the agenda in this pad
>>>>>>>>> <https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/Bestbitscallfuture>and I've
>>>>>>>>> also added the names of those who indicated they were available for the
>>>>>>>>> call at this time. Of course, as a Bestbits member you can join the call
>>>>>>>>> without indicating that in the pad, this is just to have a vague idea of
>>>>>>>>> numbers.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 14:13, Sheetal Kumar <
>>>>>>>>> sheetal at gp-digital.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dear all
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's been great to see the engagement on this topic, and thanks
>>>>>>>>>> to those who have shared their perspectives and the relevant documents too.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In December when we had the call we agreed to touch base again in
>>>>>>>>>> the middle of January to agree a way forward. The discussions here provide
>>>>>>>>>> rich ground for the discussion, and Farzaneh has kindly offered to set up a
>>>>>>>>>> conference call space for us.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I am circulating below a doodle for our second call to decide
>>>>>>>>>> next steps. This is a suggested agenda:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1) Identification/agreement of challenges and issues faced in
>>>>>>>>>> each network
>>>>>>>>>> 2) Discussion of options, e.g merger of lists/establishment of
>>>>>>>>>> new/maintenance of status quo, e.g using lists as information sharing
>>>>>>>>>> devices: pros and cons of each approach
>>>>>>>>>> 3) Discussion of next steps/agreement on process for decision
>>>>>>>>>> making regarding future of Bestbits
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Having spoken to those who arranged the last call, we suggest
>>>>>>>>>> only Bestbits members are invited but that we also reach out to some IGC
>>>>>>>>>> folks to help provide some background and inform the discussion only.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://doodle.com/poll/yzmbvibwp6n4s976
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If everyone could fill out the doodle by the end of next week
>>>>>>>>>> (Friday, 25 Jan) we can set a time and send the conference room link too.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 13:10, Deirdre Williams <
>>>>>>>>>> williams.deirdre at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please excuse the cross-posting.
>>>>>>>>>>> I've been following this discussion with care, and have a couple
>>>>>>>>>>> of questions which seem to fall in line with what Nnenna and Jeremy are
>>>>>>>>>>> saying.
>>>>>>>>>>> 1. If we had more or less stopped sharing information/discussing
>>>>>>>>>>> things/ working together within IGC and Bestbits separately, would merging
>>>>>>>>>>> the two groups again really improve participation?
>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Is there a way for us to look at what needs to be done, what
>>>>>>>>>>> we want to do, how we want to do it?
>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Who are "we"? Are we the same as the people who started IGC
>>>>>>>>>>> and Bestbits - same objectives, same perceptions and perspectives, same
>>>>>>>>>>> priorities?
>>>>>>>>>>> Without answers to these questions it seems unlikely that we
>>>>>>>>>>> would make much progress.
>>>>>>>>>>> Purely as an illustration please consider IRPC (which many of us
>>>>>>>>>>> also belong to) which is currently having some difficulty with identifying
>>>>>>>>>>> volunteers to carry out management tasks for the group.
>>>>>>>>>>> Civil society still needs a means to discuss issues and find a
>>>>>>>>>>> common voice, but is this the right way to do that now or do we need to
>>>>>>>>>>> devise something different?
>>>>>>>>>>> Best wishes for 2019
>>>>>>>>>>> Deirdre
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 at 14:09, Jeremy Malcolm <
>>>>>>>>>>> jeremy at malcolm.id.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/19 2:01 AM, Sheetal Kumar wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> > For those who were part of the first Steering Committee of
>>>>>>>>>>>> Bestbits -
>>>>>>>>>>>> > could you share more information about how it was constituted
>>>>>>>>>>>> and why?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It was because IGC discourse had become toxic and
>>>>>>>>>>>> dysfunctional, and
>>>>>>>>>>>> people were dropping out. It had been a while since it had been
>>>>>>>>>>>> able to
>>>>>>>>>>>> agree on a joint statement. At the same time, the 2012 ITU WCIT
>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>> coming up, and being able to collaborate on joint action was
>>>>>>>>>>>> important,
>>>>>>>>>>>> so a few conversations between people both inside and outside
>>>>>>>>>>>> of IGC
>>>>>>>>>>>> resulted in them becoming the first volunteer steering
>>>>>>>>>>>> committee.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But then the same civil society politics that had driven the
>>>>>>>>>>>> IGC into
>>>>>>>>>>>> the ground started to disrupt Best Bits too. There were
>>>>>>>>>>>> (misplaced but
>>>>>>>>>>>> damaging) allegations about various participants having hidden
>>>>>>>>>>>> agendas
>>>>>>>>>>>> or not being transparent enough about their own funding. So
>>>>>>>>>>>> whereas the
>>>>>>>>>>>> original committee had been fairly lightweight and informal,
>>>>>>>>>>>> pressure to
>>>>>>>>>>>> adopt more formal mechanisms of accountability resulted in us
>>>>>>>>>>>> investing
>>>>>>>>>>>> a lot of time in creating a more elaborate set of rules and
>>>>>>>>>>>> processes.
>>>>>>>>>>>> As it turned out, this was too heavy and people weren't
>>>>>>>>>>>> motivated to
>>>>>>>>>>>> engage in these new processes, indicating that the more
>>>>>>>>>>>> lightweight
>>>>>>>>>>>> structure had probably been better.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If there was a group of willing people who could resuscitate
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Bits,
>>>>>>>>>>>> even without formal elections, I'd be all for that. But I don't
>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>> there is. I personally have given as much time to it as I'd
>>>>>>>>>>>> like to
>>>>>>>>>>>> give, because I'm focusing my energy on my new nonprofit
>>>>>>>>>>>> Prostasia
>>>>>>>>>>>> Foundation now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jeremy Malcolm PhD LLB (Hons) B Com
>>>>>>>>>>>> Internet lawyer, ICT policy advocate, geek
>>>>>>>>>>>> echo "9EEAi^^;6C6]>J^=^>6"|tr '\!-~' 'P-~\!-O'|wget -q -i - -O -
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>>>>>>>>>>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>>>>>>>>>>>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> “The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge"
>>>>>>>>>>> Sir William Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>>>>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>>>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603
>>>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603
>>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603
>>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603
>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>
>
>
> --
> Sivasubramanian M
> Please send all replies to 6.Internet at gmail.com
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits

-- 
“The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge" Sir William
Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20190401/9f11b1ac/attachment.htm>