[governance] Should the IGF be reformed?

[Baudouin SCHOMBE (via governance Mailing List)]

Thanks Arsene about this question. In my view and following my modest experience, I think IGF must be improve at  national level and to reinforce multistakeholder approach.
So training's IGF at this stage is very relevant. 
We still meet many difficulties to stand up strongly this plate forms at this level. Surely we don't have same problems, same  context but the main items come from countries. Like I say up, the context isn't comparable in different continents, in different countries.

-----Message d'origine-----
De : "Arsène Tungali" <governance at lists.riseup.net>
Envoyé : ‎19/‎03/‎2018 20:40
À : "governance at lists.riseup.net" <governance at lists.riseup.net>
Objet : [governance] Should the IGF be reformed?

https://www.internetsociety.org/blog/2018/03/lets-reform-igf-ensure-healthy-future/


A blog from Raul (ISOC) about the need to reform the IGF. I know this is what so many other people believe we should do. Let’s talk about it!


Can we discuss what are the changes that we would like to see happen to make the IGF as strong and powerful as it used to be? As of now, no one know where the IGF 2018 will take place and we are in March! All i know and heard from Chengetai is that they have 3 countries in mind but are yet to decide!


Now that the new MAG was announced, what are our expectations of its members? What do you think of new and past members? What can we expect from our CS representatives there?


Thanks,
Arsene
-----------------
Arsène Tungali,
about.me/ArseneTungali
+243 993810967
GPG: 523644A0
Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo


Sent from my iPhone (excuse typos)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20180329/5713bc8a/attachment.htm>