[governance] Retreat on Advancing the 10-Year Mandate of the Internet Governance Forum

Tue May 24 16:45:12 EDT 2016

 blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px #715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white !important; }  Thanks Sandra,
Your comment brings in new insights about the role coordinators of NRI play as in regards to the stakeholder representation. Not only for this particular IGF Retreat but even for future calls of this sort (MAG selection, etc)
I think this question needs to be discussed and i would encourage our members to step in and discuss.
Regards,A
---------------------Arsene Tungali,IGC Co-coordinator at arsenebaguma+243 993810967 (DRCongo)Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone (excuse typos and brievity)

On Tuesday, May 24, 2016, 10:47 PM, sandra hoferichter <sandra.hoferichter at freenet.de> wrote:

<!-- _filtered {font-family:"Cambria Math";panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;} _filtered {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} _filtered {font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;} _filtered {font-family:Verdana;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;} p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";}a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}p {margin-right:0cm;margin-left:0cm;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman", "serif";}p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate {margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma", "sans-serif";}span.E-MailFormatvorlage17 {font-family:"Calibri", "sans-serif";color:windowtext;}span.SprechblasentextZchn {font-family:"Tahoma", "sans-serif";}.MsoChpDefault {} _filtered {margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 2.0cm 70.85pt;}div.WordSection1 {}-->
I found this announcement today: 

[cut/paste from http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/igf-retreat ] 

“…a two-day working retreat is proposed by UN Secretariat as part of the process of continual improvement of the IGF. A strategic dialogue will be held among experts, policymakers and practitioners in enriching IGF as the global forum for facilitating multistakeholder policy discussion and exchange on public policy issues related to key elements of Internet governance, in order to foster the sustainability, robustness, security, stability and development of the Internet (in line with its mandate as established by the Tunis Agenda para 72).  As part of the discussion, we will welcome inputs on how the IGF discussions can contribute to the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development[2].

Expected outcomes of the retreat include (but are not limited to): (i) ways to improve the overall preparatory process of the IGF, the structure and nomination process for the Multistakeholder Advisory Group (MAG), and ways to strengthen the IGF Secretariat; (ii) measures to engage those stakeholders who are currently unengaged, with a view to expand and diversify physical and virtual participation; (iii) finding ways to better capture the outputs of the IGF and increasing their visibility and impact; (iv) ideas to support the work of national and regional IGF initiatives, and leverage the synergies between them as well as synergies with the IGF; and (v) modalities to ensure sustained funding to support the IGF and the IGF Secretariat….”

I am convinced it is the right moment to think about a long term strategy and development of the IGF, now that there is planning security for 10 years and very much welcome this initiative. I just wonder why the call is limited to “…5 participants from each of the 4 IGF Stakeholder communities.”  Are national / regional coordinators not expected to participate, although we can expect a great source of expertise here? 

SPEAKING FOR MYSELF: As the coordinator of the EuroDIG I would not assign myself to any of these groups for the simple reason of neutrality towards all these groups, when offering a platform for discussion and balancing all interests equally. So although I would like to contribute to this important process I would have no chance to get nominated. Am I the only one in this situation?

SPEAKING IN GENERAL: I know that the composition of coordinating teams is different in each county / region. Often there is indeed a committee composed of representatives drawn from these 4 stakeholder groups, but often these groups are not so balanced for various reasons (for instance because one stakeholder group is in the lead and has the ability, while others in the region don’t). I believe being in the role of a coordinator desires a certain degree of neutrality towards all stakeholder groups, which puts IG(F) coordinators naturally in a special position, even if they belong to one of the 4 groups. This would IMO desire an additional category for such a call.

I would be interested in other views.

Best Sandra 

Point of order: Although I am very much interested in this process, I would hardly be in the position to attend in NY, because the EuroSSIG is starting on 16 July. So I am not posting this to get a seat in this retreat.  

_______________________________________________________________

S a n d r a   H o f e r i c h t e r 

Secretary General

European Dialogue on Internet Governance (EuroDIG)

sandra at eurodig.org
www.eurodig.org 

Fon: +49.341.301 28 27

Mobile: +49.163.380 87 85

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intendet recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender  immediately and destroy this mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
    governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
    http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
    http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
    http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20160524/bcb88be9/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 6587 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20160524/bcb88be9/attachment.jpe>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t