[governance] [bestbits] Brief update on MAG meeting on IGF retreat

Renata Aquino Ribeiro raquino at gmail.com
Thu Jun 2 07:21:22 EDT 2016


Hi Parminder

Up to now, the meeting has been presented at the MAG as an UNDESA
organized event.

Best,

Renata

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:32 AM, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:
> Thanks Jac
>
> Do we know if it is strictly a UNDESA owned, funded and run event, or is it
> co-funded? Are there any other principals here than UNDESA? Or is it really
> a fully UN event, like UN agencies do hold once in a while? The fact that
> they are not using UN facilities in NY but are meeting outside does partly
> fuel my stated curiosity. thanks, parminder
>
>
> On Thursday 02 June 2016 01:21 PM, Jac sm Kee wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Sharing a brief update from the MAG meeting discussing the retreat last
> night.
>
> The concerns around short timeline, problematics around representation
> and participation, interest in knowing about content as well as outputs
> of the process, broad participation were raised also in the meeting.
>
> Some suggestions were put forth to address some of this, in summary:
>
> * That the retreat not be seen as something that makes decisions, but
> rather the start of articulating the process for a strategic plan. So
> part of the "journey" of IGF improvements that has begun many years ago,
> with the opportunity of a 10 year mandate
> * That an open process be provided for inputs to shape the agenda
> (including e.g. CSTD recommednaitons, WSIS + 10 doc)
> * Remote participation in some way is important to promote transparency
> and participation, and the need to balance this against smaller space
> for brainstorming work as forwarded by some (live tweeting, remote
> participation at some point every day)
> * That outputs be open for comments and inputs by everyone
> * That there be clarity around what happens next with these outputs -
> roles and responsibilities
> * And that recommendations and suggestions on how to make the retreat
> work is open for consultation and inputs
>
> I think that's it. May have missed out on some, but hope this gives a
> gist of the conversation. Also happy to bring any further thoughts or
> recommendations to the MAG space.
>
> j
>
> ---------------------------------
> Jac sm Kee
> Manager, Women's Rights Programme
> Association for Progressive Communications
> www.apc.org | www.takebackthetech.net | erotics.apc.org
> Jitsi: jacsmk | Skype: jacsmk | Twitter: @jhybe
>
> On 01/06/2016 18:23, Nicolás Echániz wrote:
>
> On 06/01/2016 07:03 AM, Chat Garcia Ramilo wrote:
>
> Therefore, I'd like to encourage you all to send us your nominees. If
> you have other issues to raise please share them as well.
>
> One issue, that maybe is a bit late to raise by now is that doing this
> meeting in the USA is a poor choice. The visa process is difficult, time
> consuming and expensive to people in many countries.
>
> This in combination with the short notice and lack of preliminary
> discussion... is a bad combination.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> APC.members mailing list
> Info and options: http://lists.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/apc.members
> --------------------------------------
> Temporary access to APC Member Meeting page:
> http://meeting.apc.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=APCcm2014-December
> user: apc-member
> pswd: apc2014!
> --------------------------------------
> All conversations that take place on this list are considered confidential.
> As a member of the APC network, you are expected to respect this
> confidentiality. If you wish to circulate or quote a post from the
> APC.members list in any other space or forum, you MUST receive permission
> from the person who made the quote first on the APC.members listserv.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list